News

A Smoking Gun on Athabasca River: Deformed Fish

Top water ecologist cites evidence of extreme pollution near oil sands.

By Andrew Nikiforuk, 17 Sep 2010, TheTyee.ca

Deformed Athabasca fish

Whitefish TOP: from the Athabasca Delta, collected by Robert Grandjambe Jr., May 2010; BOTTOM: from Lake Athabasca, collected by Ray Ladouceur, Dec. 2009. Photo credit: John Ulan, EPIC Photography.

Related

Armed with photos and ice-filled tubs of deformed fish from Lake Athabasca, a broad coalition of aboriginal communities, scientists, fishermen and local politicians asked the Canadian government yesterday to fund a comprehensive fish monitoring program on rivers and lakes downstream of the controversial oil/tar sands.

At the University of Alberta in a room packed with nearly 100 reporters and onlookers, David Schindler, one of the world's most celebrated water ecologists, explained that he had never seen so many deformed fish from one region in his long career as a freshwater scientist except on polluted rivers feeding the Great Lakes nearly 30 years ago.

In addition to photographs of deformed fish with large back tumors, reporters could also examine several ice-filled tubs displaying suckers with stomach abnormalities, burbot with snubbed faces and white fish with shortened tails and odd-looking lesions. All had been pulled from fishing nets on Lake Athabasca and the delta over the last two years

Given the regularity with which fisherman now catch deformed fish, Schindler suggested that a federally funded fish health study on the Athabasca River "should be a much higher priority [for Ottawa] than funding hockey rinks and new fighter jets." Aboriginal communities and leaders downstream of the oil sands have been calling for such studies for nearly a decade.

Of 27 whitefish, burbot and northern pike recently collected by Robert Grandjambe, a resident of Fort Chip, seven had deformities, lesions, curved spines and bulging eyes. No reliable data exists on the actual percentage of deformed fish being caught downstream from the oil sands. But it may range from two to 20 per cent, says Schindler.

'Public anxiety won't go away'

David Donald, a senior aquatic biologist with the federal government who has monitored fish health in the region for nearly 30 years, said in an email that a fish health assessment is now needed. "I think you need to do this kind of assessment, because there is sufficient public anxiety over this issue and it won't go away."

In fact two fishermen at the press conference, Robert Grandjambe and Raymond Ladouceur, said government authorities had ignored concerns about deformed fish for nearly 15 years.

In 2008 Grandjambe sent a frozen fish to an industry consultant group, the Vancouver-based Hatfield Group, only to be told 13 months later that it couldn't be analyzed. Several years ago, Ladouceur delivered 200 pounds of deformed pickerel to Fort McMurray, but Alberta officials failed to pick them up before the entire cargo rotted.

"It's time for a proper study," said Grandjambe, who catches fish for his dog-sled team. "There is so much distrust with government."

Ladouceur, who has been fishing commercially for 53 years on the lake and has lost eight family members to cancer, said, "I never saw deformed fish in my younger days. We've been trying to get some help to figure this out."

"We are human beings. Alberta Premier Ed Stelmach treats his dogs better. Sorry to say, but we need help."

Toxic brew identified by scientists

Many industrial sources now pollute the Athabasca River, including pulp mills, agricultural run-off, abandoned uranium mines and municipal waste. But two studies published in the prestigious Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) have also shown that industrial air pollution and watershed destruction directly caused by the oil/tar sands has contaminated the river with heavy metals and petroleum compounds called polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs).

However, both Ottawa and the Alberta government, which are dependent on oil sand taxes and royalties, claim that all the pollution in the river is naturally occurring based on proprietary data collected by an industry-funded group.

Yet a 2009 study by David Schindler and Erin Kelly found that oil sands air pollution now blackens the snow with thousands of tonnes of bitumen particulates and PAHS during the winter within a 50 kilometre radius of the industry upgraders, resulting in an annual 5,000 barrel oil spill on the river during spring run-off.

Last month another study by Erin Kelly and David Schindler showed that air pollution and watershed destruction by the oil sands industry directly adds a rich brew of heavy metals including arsenic, thallium and mercury into the Athabasca river and at levels up to 30 times greater than permitted by pollution guidelines. Many heavy metals can increase the toxicity of PAHs.

Furthermore several studies have also found high levels of PAHs in six billion barrels of oil sands mining waste (enough to stretch to the moon and back 12 times) now stored in huge dams covering an area larger than the city of Vancouver.

PAH poisoning persists

Since the 1970s, scientists have taken a keen interest in PAHs, a vast body of often cancer-causing petroleum byproducts, while investigating the impact of oil spills on aquatic life. In the process, scientists have identified coking and smelting facilities as large emitters of PAHs and heavy metals.

Deformed Athabasca fish

Caption: Burbot from the Athabasca Delta, collected by Robert Grandjambe Jr., May 2010. Photo credit: John Ulan, EPIC Photography.

Fish can absorb PAHS from water and sediment via their gills, skin and stomach. Different PAHs can cause totally different diseases and deformities in different fish species, including cataracts, tumors of the skin and liver, weakened immune systems, deformities, bile duct cancers and heart troubles.

PAHs can persist and behave in unexpected ways. A 2003 high profile study in the journal Science found that weathered oil from 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill, including PAHs, continued to poison and affect the lifespan of fish and sea otters at sublethal levels more than a decade later. Long term PAH exposure not only stunted the growth of young pink salmon embryos, for example, but decreased their lifespan by 50 per cent.

Deformed Athabasca fish

Caption: Burbot from the Athabasca Delta, collected by Robert Grandjambe Jr., May 2010. Photo credit: John Ulan, EPIC Photography.

Several studies have confirmed that PAHs created by both natural and industrial oil sands activity can impact fish. Several experiments performed by Maria Colavecchia at Queen's University found that minnows and other fish exposed to oil sands mining waste sediment suffered from deformities, bleeding and skin diseases as well as reproductive difficulties.

Kitimat study zeroed in on PAHs

A model for stringent PAH monitoring can now be found in northern British Columbia. Several years ago the Haisla Nation in Kitimat, B.C., asked the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and Alcan Primary Metal aluminum smelter to monitor PAH levels in Kitimat harbour, due to rising concerns about their food supply: salmon and shell fish. (At the time Environment Canada, once a leader in freshwater science, didn't have the expertise to do it, says Schindler.)

A comprehensive 2009 NOAA report found that elevated levels of PAHs in the sediment had indeed lowered disease resistance in salmon and increased DNA damage as well as liver lesions in flat fish. Alcan responded to the monitoring by developing a multi-million program to reduce PAH emissions released by its smelting process. The company has also begun to clean up hot spots of PAH contamination. As a result, liver and DNA damage in flatfish has steadily decreased in recent years.

Several U.S. studies also show dramatic declines in liver and bile duct cancer in cat fish after industry closed highly polluting coking facilities on Ohio rivers in the last two decades.

In 2007 Kevin Timoney, an independent Edmonton-based scientist, did a study for the Nunee Health Board that found elevated levels of PAHs, arsenic and mercury in sediment near the community of Fort Chip. The study reported that elevated reports of fish deformities "may be higher than expected, may be increasing, and may be related to declines in water quality." Timoney called for an environmental monitoring program "independent of control by vested interests."

To date, the Alberta government, which depends on oil sand revenue to run its daily business, has maintained that all pollution and PAHs in the river come from natural bitumen outcrops on the river and not from a $200-billion mining and coking project. It claims that the Regional Aquatic Monitoring Program, an industry-funded and industry-administered group, has never found any instance of pollution.

Deformed Athabasca fish

Whitefish from Lake Athabasca, collected by Ray Ladouceur, Dec. 2009. Photo credit: Kelly/Radmanovich.

Although Alberta Environment agrees that PAHSs exist downstream from the oil sands, it's spokespeople say it is solely due "to the magnitude of the oily sand along the river banks through which the river has eroded naturally. PAH levels found in samples on other rivers in the area with absolutely no industrial oil sands activity have been found to be higher than samples taken downstream from oil sands developments. The sources in the area are natural."

Scientists send letter to PM

A 2004 technical review of RAMP by federal scientists concluded that industry's fish monitoring program "lacks a clear focus and a clear hypotheses regarding what it is trying to do... the project has suffered inconsistencies in study design, study area, sampling methods and quality control practices." It also made no reference to traditional knowledge on fish health in the river.

In addition to community groups, many scientists and individuals signed a letter to Prime Minister Stephen Harper asking for a long term fish monitoring program with an independent oversight committee for the lower Athabasca river, delta and Lake Athabasca. They included Jim Boucher, Chief of Fort McKay Nation, Dr. John O'Connor, health director of Fort McKay and Guy Boutiller, MLA for Fort McMurray-Wood Buffalo.  [Tyee]

34  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • clear.the.air

    2 years ago

    Springfield , Alberta, Canada

    Calling Montgomery Burns! Seems Canada may have a Springfield of its own:

    "Bart and Lisa go fishing downstream of the Springfield Nuclear Power Plant and Springfield Shopper reporter Dave Shutton pulls up just as Bart catches a three-eyed fish, which the media nicknames Blinky. The fish makes headlines and a Washington regulatory committee sends a team to investigate nuclear waste coming from the plant that could have caused the fish to mutate. After the inspection, the plant's owner, Mr. Burns, is presented with a list of 342 violations, which would cost US$56 million to rectify. Distraught, Burns talks to plant employee Homer, who half-heartedly suggests Burns run for governor so that he could change the standards and prevent the plant from being shut down. Burns pounces on the idea, knowing that he will not have to pay to bring the plant up to code anymore.

    Burns's political advisers break the news to Burns that he is greatly despised by many people and force Burns to try being friendly and even smile. Burns makes a television commercial discussing Blinky with an actor portraying Charles Darwin, who claims Blinky is an evolutionary step and not a mutated fish. Combined with a promise to lower taxes and a smear campaign against current governor Mary Bailey, Burns ties with her in the polls. On the night before the election, Burns's advisers suggest that Burns have dinner at the home of a middle class family as an opportunity to put Burns in the lead. Burns scans his employees for the most average man he can find, and Homer is chosen.

    The impending dinner with Burns divides the Simpson household. Homer supports Burns, while Marge and Lisa oppose him. Before the dinner arrives, Burns's advisers prepare the family for the event, even giving them pre-written questions to ask in lieu of conversation. Lisa becomes disillusioned by it all, but Marge tells her not to worry. To everyone's surprise, Marge serves Blinky for dinner. Burns tries to act as if it does not bother him, but is not able to keep from spitting it out. The cameras flash as the bite flies through the air, and by the time the chunk hits the floor the press is gone and his gubernatorial campaign dissolves. Bailey wins the election and, despite Burns saying that Homer's dreams will be unfulfilled for as long as he is alive, the Simpson family happily gets together again."

    (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_Cars_in_Every_Garage_and_Three_Eyes_on_Every_Fish)

  • snert

    2 years ago

    Another black eye

    for the province with no sales tax.

  • G West

    2 years ago

    'Now' where is that guy from the Alberta Government?

    It will be interesting to see what he says about this.

  • Jerry Munro

    2 years ago

    A Gangster System...

    "It will be interesting to see what he says about this." GWest.

    Being without conscience, these government and corporate PR guys and gals are capable of apologizing for, and explaining away, any corporate crime. Just don't forget to report that $50 you made on the side, before claiming your UI or welfare cheque.

    On the other hand, if and when it does come down to cleaning up this mess, it will be public tax dollars as direct corporate welfare or doing the research groundwork for themm that will fund or help fund it.

    We've seen so much of this over recent years, it becomes a tad numbing to the mass sensibility. But is part of the growing mass "withdrawl" from participation in the system, particularly the political system, save as is needed from a wage slave perspective in the economy, to keep food on the tablen and clothes on one's back.

    It's a gangster socio-economic system... totally absent of conscience.

    Anyone else remember when it was only the Russians and the Chinese who ripped, raped and ran through their environment in this way... and stood in long ques at the supermarket and the bank?

    Look around you.

  • warbler

    2 years ago

    Frankenfish: The Movie!

    I can see it..

    A Tar Sands Production Presents

    Creature from the Athabasca River!

    Once nothing but a normal, happy little fish...

    But after years of toxic contamination, a new kind of fish is spawned!

    Now an angry creature, emerging from the soupy toxic goo to seek revenge

    (to be continued)

  • freebear

    2 years ago

    Another example of the

    Alberta Advantage!

    F the environment for the sake of the oil addicts and profits!

  • carpediem

    2 years ago

    Two sided coin

    Yes, the Tar Sands industry has no morality when it comes to hiding the awful pollution results...yet all of us who drive cars, use plastic are accomplices. Sustainable communities, low carbon footprint is the response along with making pollution on such large scale a crime against humanity. Suncor and co. should be trial at La Haye...

  • CanadianLatitude

    2 years ago

    Filthy disgusting dirty Tar

    Filthy disgusting dirty Tar sands should be nuked and all the oil companies nationalised.

  • morechatter

    2 years ago

    The Smoking Gun

    I couldn't help by think of the gun registary with that title. The pollution in the waters is devasting and I am not surprised as so many others are. Like those senators from the good old USA coming down to take a gander at the goose that laid the golden egg.
    That is right as to market to market they did go but just imagine a market where you could get a couple more billion for the sell as it would be safe to say good bye good old USA as fortune 500 company makes an extra couple billion on the sale to China who is more than willing to pay the price.
    Makes it all kinda strange don't you think as Sincrude sells it pollutioin to the highest bidder good old China who had just the right amount of cash for the sale, and then some more.
    It just seems strange when you see fortune 500 hundred companies saying don't use tar sands its bad for the environment is like a snake eating its own tail as comes against another fortune 500 company says the more to this sell as China takes over oil sands operations.

  • morechatter

    2 years ago

    two more cents

    It is not Canada who is benefiting from the sale or using the tar sands as company makes a controversal killing on the sale. Or is it Canada who is using the resources as most of what Canadians use is imported and pricey as hell while the stuff to China is going to have the HST attacthed to along with Canadians subsidies makes you wonder what is really going on? http://www.canadians.org/energy/issues/energy_strategy/Canadian_oil.html

  • morechatter

    2 years ago

    Correction

    HST is the for the lumber that is already so heavily subsidized. One of the guys involved in the sale of BC Rail company soon after purchased prime real estate in bc for logs to send to China by former bc rail.

  • jwstewart

    2 years ago

    That Guy from Alberta

    said on CBC news that the cause of the deformities could be biological or chemical but that it was not directly attributable to the tar sands.

    I suppose if he's unclear of the cause, maybe he would want to find out?

    But how come everyone wants the government to do the testing? Do people still beleive government is honest & trustworthy?

    Would a DFO scientist want to state a fact like "Tar Sands is poisoning the Athabasca"? That would be like a statistician saying the long form census provides better data. True, but career limiting.

    I would rather listen to a university labs results.

  • morechatter

    2 years ago

    jwsteward I'm with you on that

    Being misinformed by government is the name of the politicial game along with the CBC another agency that government has no place in as Harper redecorated the Media so it wouldn't come back in his face.

  • morechatter

    2 years ago

    for example

    CBC has hired Kory Teneycke, the former director of communications to the Prime Minister, who is now being paid with taxpayer dollars to tout the Tory line and do Mr. Harper’s bidding.
    http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/world/news/e3i188fd3103facd85e33995465ae9a04ce

  • plebe

    2 years ago

    teneycke

    quit the cbc not long after he joined:

    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/ottawa-notebook/conservative-pundit-kory-teneycke-quits-cbc/article1596635/

    the important fact here is that there is no comprehensive fish monitoring program for rivers and streams affected by tar sands pollution. how did these industrial nightmares pass environmental assesments in the first place?

    wouldn't your money (i.e. oil and gas subsidies) be better spent on developing renewable energy resources?

  • morechatter

    2 years ago

    He quit and then he quit again

    As the controversay was to much to take but the fact that he was hired speaks volumes of the intent of the Conservatives as the former communications director of a prime minister has no place in the cbc network and a Fox newroom well I'm certain he would feel right at home.
    And that there is no fish monitoring well that is old news, there is no monitoring all all is the message repeately heard as industry is left to it own devices with little getting in its way.

  • morechatter

    2 years ago

    CBC latest news

    CBC News brings on Stephen Harper's former spokesperson, Kory Teneycke, to provide political commentary
    .News will feature Prime Minister Stephen Harper's former director of communications as a political commentator across all of its platforms. According to a CBC news release, Kory Teneycke will appear on The National, Power & Politics, and The House,

  • livanhardy

    2 years ago

    Tailings

    As a tip to Dr. Schindler and Mr. Nikiforuk...

    Check out the plans to use polyacrylamide to flocculate the tailings to allow water recovery.

    PAM breaks down to acrylamide.

  • RockyRacoon

    2 years ago

    Alberta brings in more from gambling and alcohol sales than oil

    revenues. Thank Ralf Klien for scrapping the Heritage fund. How do you like me now?
    Cheers,
    RR

  • carfreecity

    2 years ago

    cancer/tumours

    sci american now showing results for alzheimers and breathing in auto fumes.
    funding for studies not done for decades on all these toxins and health problems.
    wakeup and smell the exhaust people.

  • Jerry Munro

    2 years ago

    Alcohol and Gambling...

    "Alberta brings in more from gambling and alcohol sales than oil..." rockyracoon.

    Actually, I would not be surprised if this were true... alcohol and gambling are the "mafia-capitalism" staples for sure..., after or along with prostitution. Pay them for helping bring in the oil, then take it from them with alcohol/drugs, gambling and a piece of back alley ass. (The latter probably just augmenting her starvation welfare cheques, in order to raise her kids sans support from the deadbeat "youknowho", working in the oil fields.)

    Ain't life in modern capitalism just grand. I mean, where the frig else would you want to be?

  • time 2 wakeup

    2 years ago

    Will our government ever care?

    This is what worries me most -- our federal government and the province of Alberta just don't care. There is money to be made from the Tar Sands, and it appears to me that they will not stop - nor slow down - nor listen. They will continue to rape the land and the feds will continue to look the other way.
    Unbelievable photos...

  • RickW

    2 years ago

    But, but, but........

    ...that Senator from South Carolina said Oilsands 'acceptably clean':
    http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2010/09/17/senators-oilsands-tour.html?ref=rss

  • RickW

    2 years ago

    Someone in a not-too-far-past post mentioned providing

    ....Athabasca River drinking water to the Alberta legislature - or the House of Commons - or the Oil company CEOs. While we're at it, maybe send some to South Carolina.

  • Marushka

    2 years ago

    too many people = too much polution

    For some reason most people just don't get the real problem, which is that there are too many people on the planet. They want/seemingly need oil.
    How about encouraging people to not breed.
    Less people to service, less polution.
    Amen.

  • Umslopogaas

    2 years ago

    Fishy tales

    The Alberta government members should each have to eat fish like this for one meal a day as part of the environmental study. Maybe some slice on the side for garnish.

    BTW I wonder how many of the farmed salmon look like this? How would we ever know? I will bet that the fish farms produce some amazingly similar fish. But then they would hardly show them off would they?

  • Sask Resident

    2 years ago

    Funding

    Shindler is very careful on what he says and he also knows that Environment Canada no longer have the scientists capable of doing the work. So his comment "Schindler suggested that a federally funded fish health study on the Athabasca River" is illustrative. He wants more federal funding to be directed to his research and grad students.

    Yes the oil sands are polluting the Athabasca River, but probably much less than Hamilton and Toronto are polluting Lake Ontario, of Vancouver and Victoria are polluting the shorelines. However, the oil sands are, over time, reducing the natural pollution from the oil sands as oil is removed and runoff is more controlled.

    If you are worried about the oil sands, stop driving and buying running shoes. The oil sands plants are less polluting than almost any oil producing area in Russia, Iran or Nigeria.

  • macsasquatch

    2 years ago

    Supper tonight...

    ...how about fish sticks? Would you kids like fish sticks for supper tonight?

    I still think of a few years ago when evidence of the same happening to humans was officially ignored, and that doctor working in the area was disciplined for trying to bring attention to what the people were suffering.

  • mopled

    2 years ago

    Remember how mercury pollution was handled in Ontario 40yrs ago?

    Both the provincial and federal agencies supposed to protect us stonewalled their own researchers for years while people went mad on the reserve from eating fish. Three whistle blowing research pharmacologists finally published in a scientific journal and never worked again. The people at the Grassy Narrows Reserve had to subsist on frozen fish from elsewhere supplied to them for years. The situation today is worse than it was in the 1970s.

    " there are next to no federal regulations in Canada to environmentally protect any reserve lands, including Grassy Narrows."
    http://intercontinentalcry.org/mercury-poisoning-in-grassy-narrows-worse-than-ever/
    An interesting complication!

    This dodgy pattern of official behavior has been going on for a long time, and industry prefers to spend its money on PR rather than clean things up.

    When those people demonstrating or protesting against the tar sands emphasize the CO2 produced instead of the PAHs, they obfuscate the REAL issue.

  • Jerry Munro

    2 years ago

    Sask.Resident

    "The oil sands plants are less polluting than almost any oil producing area in Russia, Iran or Nigeria." Sask.Resident

    And your evidence for this claim is?

  • Jerry Munro

    2 years ago

    Sask.Resident II

    Allowing that you have consistently been an apologist for the oil industry, every time we see your moniker here.

  • Driftwood

    2 years ago

    There are just two words which come to mind...

    Lawsuit. Wait a minute, that's only one word. Environmental lawsuit? Yep, them's the words.
    http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/09/18-5
    I was reading the article in the above link and started thinking, 'That's how lots of people worldwide are thinking of Canada.'
    Maybe the world needs tar sand oil, but when we know it's killing the natives downstream we should either put it right or get out.

    All just laws condemn cruelty.
    - Pedro Calderon de la Barca

  • G West

    2 years ago

    Au contraire -

    The TAR SANDS are, according to any measure, the most polluting and carbon intensive way of producing oil in the world.

    The technology extracts the bitumen from the forest floor in two different ways. 20% of the bitumen rich soils are close enough to grade that they can be mined from the surface using 400 ton trucks and electric shovels that cost about $15 million each. For each barrel of oil eventually produced hundreds of trees are knocked down and hectared of soil is bulldozed. For each barrel of oil yield it is necessary to process 4 tons of earth which will yield 2 tons of bituminous sand which must then be washed and processed with steam...

    All in all the process costs about $100,000, per flowing barrel of oil...likely the most expensive fual in the world.

    The other 80% must be processed underground using 'Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage' (SAGD).

    On average it takes one barrel of oil (or an equivalent energy source) to pump from 20 to 60 bbls of cheap fluid oil...With Tar Sands oil the equation is between about 3 and 5 bbls.

    Why do you think Tar Sands oil sells for from 20 to 50% of the price of West Texas sweet crude?

  • Camero409

    2 years ago

    Hey Stromach

    or is it Stomach who's the Premier. Doesn't matter. Anyway, Stomach, guess what's for dinner tonight? Beautiful fresh fish from the Athabask river and lake. Ummmmm Yummmy! Oh, just so you know, keep some pepto bismal close by. Yuk! Yuk! He'll need a strong stomach to digest those.

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.