Gov't Kept Kids in Unsafe Homes Says Watchdog
Children left to live with known abusers; probe planned.
BC Representative for Children and Youth Mary Ellen Turpel-Lafond.
The Campbell administration left vulnerable children in homes it judged unsafe, according to British Columbia's independent child protection watchdog, Mary Ellen Turpel-Lafond.
The newspaper 24 Hours Vancouver exclusively learned about the controversy in records obtained via a freedom of information request.
Turpel-Lafond says she's launched an unprecedented audit that will investigative this and related matters. But the Ministry of Children and Family Development says it's already responding to her concerns.
At issue: the government's Child in Home of a Relative program, which will service an estimated 4,767 kids in 2008.
Under that program -- which was transferred from the Ministry of Housing and Social Development to the Ministry of Children and Family Development last month -- parents who can't care for their children can place them in the home of a relative. And that relative will receive financial aide from the government if there's "no evidence of a level of risk to the child."
But Turpel-Lafond, whose job title is B.C. Representative for Children and Youth, advised the government on July 10, 2008 she's identified "serious child and youth safety concerns" related to the screening process introduced seven months before to assess that risk level.
Loaded shotgun, abusive residents
In a three-page letter sent to Lesley du Toit and Cairine MacDonald -- the top bureaucrats at the Ministry of Children and Family Development and the Ministry of Housing and Social Development -- Turpel-Lafond cited four cases where homes have been denied assistance because there was evidence of risk. But the government hadn't taken action to remove the children from those homes.
Among the cases:
- A grandmother was denied assistance because her son -- who was "found to have physically abused" the child and had a history of "sexually interfering with another child" -- lived in the same home. The grandmother's spouse had also been arrested for driving drunk while a child was in his car. But a social worker found those risks had been "mitigated" and that funding could be "supported." Turpel-Lafond states "it is not clear what the outcome of this application is" or whether the risk to the child "has been addressed." The representative also notes the grandmother was "apparently in receipt of CIHR assistance" for another grandchild "who is also in the home."
- A grandmother was denied assistance because she lived in the same building as the child's stepfather -- "who is being investigated for sexually abusing the child." Turpel-Lafond states the Ministry of Children and Family Development's local office "attempted to have that decision overturned, but was not successful in doing so." Since then "some efforts" have been made to support the grandmother. But "it does not appear that the issue of risk to the child is being addressed."
- A grandmother -- who had an extensive criminal history -- was denied assistance. Her son, who lived in the same home, also had a record. And the home had been the site of a number of violent crimes -- including a domestic assault case where an "unregistered and unsecured shotgun was apparently seized from the child's bedroom." Turpel-Lafond states the child's social worker unsuccessfully appealed the denial. And, at "last report," the child remains in the home -- despite the risk being "extreme."
- An aunt was denied assistance because her spouse had "several past charges for assault, including sexual assault, sexual interference with a person under 14, and he had been convicted of sexually molesting his daughter." The aunt had also been contacted by the government "with respect to instances of physical abuse." But the child "apparently remains in this home." And it doesn't appear she's being assisted by the Ministry of Children and Family Development. Nor does it appear the risks posed to her are being addressed.
As a result, Turpel-Lafond stressed the need for government to develop a policy that "addresses the risk faced by children left in homes that have been judged unsafe for them." And it is "difficult to understand" why social workers attempted to "over-ride the results of a process intended to reduce risks to vulnerable children."
No 'adequate resolution' yet: Turpel-Lafond
The government's three-paragraph response to the representative came six days later. The letter stated "a review and evaluation of our experience to date" with the Child in Home of a Relative program is "planned for the end of August."
The government also promised the four cases Turpel-Lafond identified "will appropriately be reviewed and considered under the Child Family and Community Service Act and the results of those assessments and investigations will be shared with you."
But when asked yesterday about the present status of those cases, Turpel-Lafond told 24 Hours that she didn't have "adequate resolution."
The youth representative also said she hasn't heard anything further from the ministry regarding her concerns about children who have been left in unsafe homes.
But the representative says she has written to regional child welfare directors expressing her concern about funding being given to such homes.
"The social worker on the line was saying, 'Okay, we know there's a failed criminal record check. But we're satisfied it's safe. So let's place a child there under CIHR. So a criminal record check doesn't lead to an ineligibility. It's overridden and the child is placed."
Kids 'found to be safe': ministry
Asked for comment about the representative's concerns, Children and Family Development communications director Kelly Gleeson said in a written statement the four cases referenced by Turpel-Lafond have been investigated. And "in all of these cases the children or youth involved have been found to be safe."
Gleeson also stressed, "If over the course of the screening processes the ministry becomes aware of any protection concerns related to a family, the ministry will assess those child protection concerns, where necessary conduct an investigation and provide supports as necessary."
Gleeson added the ministry's review of those processes will be "conducted this fall" and examine "how staff have responded and the extent to which the screening checks have identified child welfare concerns in the homes of relatives applying for CIHR funding."
Previous concerns
This isn't the first time concerns have been raised about the Child in Home of a Relative program.
In May 2008, the Victoria Times-Colonist's Lindsay Kines reported on the case of a four-year-old aboriginal girl who had been beaten by her grandmother, who was receiving funding from the program.
The grandmother, who "drank too much, suffered from panic attacks and worked the night shift," received three years probation after pleading guilty to assault causing bodily harm.
Then, in April, Turpel-Lafond issued a report stating there was an "inadequate assessment of the relative's ability to care" for the four-year-old, "incomplete child protection investigations" and "no reassessment of risk completed while the family was receiving ongoing protective services."
The representative says her office is now undertaking an audit of the Child in Home of a Relative program -- the first she's launched since taking office. That audit has been under design since June.
Related Tyee stories:
- Cody's Death: How Deep an Investigation?
The Fontaine toddler died in a troubled home after social worker cutbacks. But the Liberals killed the Children's Commission -- and its power to investigate government fault. - NDP Corners Coroner's Defenders
James accuses Campbell, Les of 'misleading' the public. - B.C.'s Least Safe Teens
The roots of gay bashing need more focus, says head of B.C.'s new Institute for Safe Schools.




65
Login or register to post comments
G West
3 years ago
Child poverty
So, not only do we have the highest rates of child poverty in the country, the government is so disaffected that it can't even manage to respond to problems with the welfare of children in care.
Now what was it that the CEO said about doing the 'right' thing.
Oh right, that only extends to the phony Campbell Tax.
Carole Taylor was smart to get out when she did - no moral person can have any part in this continuing disaster of a BC Liberal road show.
Frank
3 years ago
Unreal
I guess the liberals want to get the child abuser vote.
garden bay
3 years ago
Need a laugh and a cry
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D59ZeMm2E00
If my link doesn`t work google up
Bully-the movie-anti-campbell animation parody
sanamark
3 years ago
Secrets.....
There is a deep, dark secret buried between the lines in this story. Anyone care to state it publicly?
Frank
3 years ago
sanamark
That the NDP is to blame?
sanamark
3 years ago
Nope
No, Frank, but I doubt that the NDP will touch this with an 11 foot pole. They may hold power soon and will have similar issues to contend with.
alive
3 years ago
The SECRET
The secret is that once BC is plundered completely, then Gordo will move to Hawaii and laugh his head off at us stupid voters!
Luke Skywalker
3 years ago
Hmmmmmm....
So is it the "government's" fault or is it some inept or rogue "social worker's" fault???????
"The social worker on the line was saying, 'Okay, we know there's a failed criminal record check. But we're satisfied it's safe. So let's place a child there under CIHR. So a criminal record check doesn't lead to an ineligibility. It's overridden and the child is placed."
Just had to ask based upon a lead story in the Vancouver Sun today regarding inept and rogue BC Nurses:
http://www.canada.com/victoriatimescolonist/news/story.html?id=38c9d213-d083-4392-a1e5-c7eb1866dd24
sanamark
3 years ago
Perhpas
Perhaps, alive, you can contribute something to this thread.
Such problems are hardly unique to the present government; the NDP had the Matthew Vaudrille case. When dealing with such awful issues, there are bound to problems. Tragedies happen on every governments watch.
G West
3 years ago
Nope
It's this government's fault. Period. Full Stop.
I take it you haven't read the Hughes' Report.
No longer any excuses for that, here it is:
http://www.childyouthreview.ca/down/BC_Children_and_Youth_Review_Report_FINAL_April_4.pdf
(please note the date - April 7 2006)
On 26 November Madame Justice Turpel-Lafond released a progress report.
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/british-columbia/story/2007/11/27/bc-turpelreport.html
We'd now almost a year further along and little or nothing substantive has been done.
Whose fault do you think that is?
G West
3 years ago
errata
penultimate sentence should read:
We're now almost a year further along and little or nothing substantive has been done.
Okay?
In the end, that's what openness, accountability, ethics and responsible government requires.
Unfortunately, we have a CEO premier who'd really rather just hide from the truth, the press and questions in the Legislature.
And that's truly sad.
The only thing sadder and more pathetic than that was Stephane Dion making the ludicrous comparison between Gordon Campbell and Tommy Douglas.
Maybe the CEO premier can get Tim Lewis and Western Pro Show Rentals to work it out for him.
SharingIsGood
3 years ago
government's fault
Luke askes:
"So is it the "government's" fault or is it some inept or rogue "social worker's" fault???????"
Until the government trains and hires all of the qualified people it should have, they will be at fault.
There are currently a large number of jobs waiting to be filled in child protection and the like throughout the province. I can't help but wonder if some child will die or be beaten tonight or tomorrow night because caseloads are too high or not even filled.
The Gove Inquirey recommendations were turned into an awful joke about two months after the Liberals first took office in 2001. The downsizing and turmoil that the Campbell government instituted has now become a long-standing legacy. Mathew hasn't stopped turning over in his grave.
Note that the government's own web-site lists that somewhere in the neighbourhood of 45% of its managers for various ministries will be retired by 2015. (those ministries include: Min for Children and Family Dev't, Social Services and Housing, Health, Mental Health, & Attorney General).
Some of the waiting jobs can be found here:
http://employment.gov.bc.ca/index.php?rLoad=1
Further, this government's record shows huge increases in gambling, alcohol sales, drug addiction/sales, homelessness and extreme poverty in BC. Common sense tells one that increases in these areas lead to increased family violence. This ain't rocket science.
All of this has happened during our convicted drunken premier's watch. Obviously, our premier cares more about throwing a 7 billion dollar party of olympic proportions than he does about children and families.
Frank
3 years ago
Mathew Vaudrille
And Trevor Lautens of the V.Sun demanded that the NDP resign en masse. And continued to do so in his columns from then on.
I haven't heard anyone at the Sun say that about this gov't in spite of the fact they've had a number of "Mathew" cases.
SharingIsGood
3 years ago
excellent point, Frank
What a horrible double standard the big business MSM monopoly employs when it reports the welfare of BC's children. Personally, I don't know how people can stand to work for the MSM or as an MLA in the Campbell government. How do they live with themselves or even call themselves Canadians?
It all starts at the top, trickle down economic theory means that the premier puts on a good drunk then he and all of his corporate buddies, being full in bladder and drunk with power, piss on all of the little people. They are merely following the GW Bush - Wall Street model. Trickle down economics stink.
ME2
3 years ago
SIG
Well, SIG, what else can you expect from a gov't in love with the US style of business?
Just for example, do you think even one of those corrupt US CEOs who've brought the present mess down on us is going to lose his home and savings?
Campbell and his buddies are no different.
marta
3 years ago
The big dark secret I'll bet
The big dark secret I'll bet sanamark is referring to, is that it's likely that most of these cases involve aboriginal families. It is also very possible that the social workers in question work for first nations' agencies. The government is too frightened to intervene in aboriginal control over children's aid issues.
Am I right, sanamark?
dorothy
3 years ago
Here it is...
The deep dark secret is, that our elected and non-elected people here, these men and women with thir not-a-hair-out-of-of-its-way coiffures, their perfect suits with nary a spot or wrinkle, who can stand in fron of a mike and smile and sound oh,so reasonable and caring and upbeat, have in their closet, BEHIND all the skeletons, this bottomless void of total hypocrisy and mind-numbing indifference. It looks like stupidity, but if so,it is stupidity to the point of touching evil.
Take the support away, because the caregivers don't 'qualify', as they are abusive/drunk/criminals/generally wasted, but leave the child there, helpless against them, now without even money to support it. One wants to run screaming out of the room, but no such option, as this can only be Hel.
THIS is the kind of thing we need to keep in mind, however much it hurts to do so, on election day...
Grumpy
3 years ago
Let me get this straight..........
.....we have children at risk, in dangerous homes and the provincial government denies funding for the 'child at risk' because he is in a dangerous home?
Why is the child/children allowed there in the first place?
Is the government putting the safety of children doubly at risk by 1) keeping them in a dangerous homes and 2) denying them money for being in the dangerous home?
Good god, Kafka couldn't have done better!
Can someone forward this to the IOC!
sanamark
3 years ago
you are right, marta
Marta, you are correct. This is the reason you will not hear Carole James or any other NDP person comment on this issue.
Because they are First Nations and must be 1) if at all possible, placed with family members and 2) in First Nations families.
Finally, the actual placement agencies were all First Nations.
This report will die very quickly. The NDP won't comment on it because the same thing can very easily happen to them.
DPL
3 years ago
So the odds are, since a
So the odds are, since a great percentage of children in care are Indian kids, that some of the kids involved are from that background. But the Judge is writing about kids being placed in unsafe places.Why single out aboriginal kids
Sean Holman of 24 hours wrote a large article today about the twists and turns in the ministry. They are not follwoing the Hughes Report even though at the time the Campbell government swore they would. Go find it and see who is blowing smoke. It sure as heck isn't the childrens rep.
sanamark
3 years ago
OK, DPL
DPL, I haven't been able to find any official reaction from Carole James and the NDP. Not even her present main spokesperson, Mike Farnsworth. He did, however, make a statement that a certain car thief should spend more time in jail.
Perhaps you can supply me with a link?
Frank
3 years ago
sanamark
So your cryptic deep dark secret turned out to be about the NDP after all, how amazing. What's next? A conspiracy theory about why the NDP never discusses why the Canucks always lose?
sanamark
3 years ago
Frank
Frank, this seems like a very important social issue. I find the NDP's inattention the matter rather strange, especially when issues such as illegal farm workers figure prominently on their website.
Or perhaps they realise that since they may well form the next government, the same thing could happen to them.
Or are all NDP governments inherently perfect?
garden bay
3 years ago
Makes little sense,except it clears case load and saves money
The part that makes it reek is if--The kids could or should stay there then they must be funded,to me it appears it is business as usual for Campbell, every chance not to pay out money,what else is new.
Just like the insulin pumps for kids with diabetes,Campbell REALLY despises spending any money on social or "life saving" measures.
Chritisian is really a sorry exscuse for a human being,talking to him is like talking to a toaster! Who`s worse him or IAN BLACK!
I picture in my mind those two clowns locked up in jail WHINING FOR THEIR MOMMIES AND THEIR BLANKEES OR FOR CAMPBELLS BOOT POLISH !!!
Frank
3 years ago
sanamark
Sure, by all means blame the NDP. I know you'd never say a word against the Liberals who happen to be in power right now and failed to do what they themselves promised to do in regards to the Hughes Report. If it feels better to instead blame the opposition, go for it.
SharingIsGood
3 years ago
sanamark's remarks
Because they are First Nations and must be 1) if at all possible, placed with family members and 2) in First Nations families.
Finally, the actual placement agencies were all First Nations.
This report will die very quickly. The NDP won't comment on it because the same thing can very easily happen to them.
This is an assumption made by you, Sanamark. Let's have facts please.
Regarding facts: The Gove Inquiry Into Child Protection reported on the findings that resulted from the death of Matthew John Vaudreuil. Joy MacPhail, Min. of Social Services reported upon the abuse and neglect that resulted in Matthews death. Two days later, the Cabinet apointed retired judge Gove to launch an inquiry and make recommendations. Judge Gove listended to testimony for weeks resulting in more than 6000 pages of transcript. He was thorough. After making recommendations the NDP worked dilligently to implement those changes through restructuring, integrating service delivery, and making changes to the way children were monitored. There were huge improvements!
The Liberals got into power, cut funding and changed the way services were delivered as a matter of fiscal policy. The cuts they imposed caused many of their best workers in in the Ministries of the AG, SSH, and MCFD to be layed off or just plain quit through burnout/frustration of not having adequate support nor time for the caseloads/expectations placed upon them. Not only did they have to downsize their own staff, the Ministries had no options but to make cuts to many non-profit agencies that had been providing excellent services to children and families. Very little of this information hit the mainstream media. Even letters to the editor about such events were not published.
It is the Campbell Legacy to have dismantled Mathew's Legacy. Perhaps the NDP are not commenting upon it because they have just now learned of the facts from the report. Perhaps the Ndp are being stretched to the limit just trying to keep up with mismanagement and corruption in nearly every branch of the Campbell government. Give the NDP some time. Note, much of First Nations' funding for social needs is federal. Harper hasn't been any better than Campbell.
garth_harris
3 years ago
pure evil
i forgot that quote,what is it ?
"for evil to prevail,good men need do nothing"
children of any race or religion that need our help should get our help.
after all,isn't that why we are in AFGHANISTAN?
so little girls can grow to be TEACHERS?
what lies these evil doers spread with their big smiles and empty rhetoric.
what evil do these highly paid sultans of business invoke at the cost of childrens lives.
what evil will make you stand and say ENOUGH!
I said that ENOUGH back when MATTHEW VAUDRILLE DIED!
apparently, no one heard...
ME2
3 years ago
Re inconvenient facts
Sanamark, there's none so blind as those who will not see, and that is perfectly obvious with some bleeding-heart Lefties on this site.
They are as quick to let ideological preference over-ride reason and inconvenient fact as are the Right wingers.
The sad thing about this is while the neocons have concerns other than for the individual, so to do the Lefties, in the guise of such things as "preserving the culture".
They're going to have to figure it out for themselves, and that will require taking off the blinders, which they are not yet prepared to do.
garth_harris
3 years ago
matters not
it does not matter the politics of who is in charge.
it only matters that INNOCENTS DIE because some one does not care enough.SOCIETY DOES NOT CARE ENOUGH.
PERIOD
never mind left , right , mind the children .
alive
3 years ago
sanamark: I did contribute
sanamark:
I did contribute something to this discussion!
Not my fault that you do not see what is coming.
again here it is:
"The secret is that once BC is plundered completely, then Gordo will move to Hawaii and laugh his head off at us stupid voters!"
Perhaps you need a lengthy explanation as to how this government has screwed up? I doubt you would grasp it!
What is clear is that Gordo has a hardon for Hawaii, and have no feelings for BC.
My prediction is that he will quietly retire as soon as he gets defeated, leaving us (and his wife) to pick up the pieces of the wreckage!
Is that clear enough?
lynn
3 years ago
May 5, 2008: The BC Legislature
Big Media doesn't bother reporting this.... too busy trailing car chases:
C. James: Mr. Speaker, today British Columbians were once again shocked and saddened to learn about another child whom this government failed. She was four years old when the government took her out of a foster home and placed her with her grandmother. This little girl was then beaten and neglected. She never should have been placed in that home, but the government moved ahead without a home study.
My question is to the Minister of Employment and Income Assistance. Can he confirm that this Prince George child was placed under his ministry's Child in the Home of a Relative program? And can he further confirm that once placed under this program, children receive no protection services or monitoring?.........
Mr. Speaker: Leader of the Opposition has a supplemental.
C. James: It's critical that lessons be learned from every one of these tragic cases. It's critical that we take a look at all government programs, whether it's the Ministry of Income Assistance or the Ministry of Children and Families, to look at where there are gaps. There are gaps in the Child in the Home of a Relative program, whether with this specific case or other cases in British Columbia.
This is a case that is being done to save money. Kith-and-kin programs, Child in the Home of a Relative and other out-of-care options are being done because they're cheaper. Under this government, the number of vulnerable children who've been placed into these kinds of out-of-care options has increased 14 percent. That's hundreds of children, not just this specific case but hundreds of children.
My question is to the Minister of Children and Family Development. Can he please explain to us why more children are going into programs without child protection services, without monitoring, without accountability and without home studies? How does that protect the vulnerable children that the minister said he wants to protect?.....
lynn
3 years ago
May 5, 2008: The BC Legislature
Mr. Speaker: Leader of the Opposition has a further supplemental.
C. James: Looking after children means making sure that checks and balances are in place. Looking after children — whether they're placed with a relative or in a foster home, but they're placed by government — means making sure that those home studies are in place. It means making sure that those children are being checked on. That's not happening right now. There aren't enough checks and balances.
If we take a look at this specific case, in fact, the government made the decision to put this child into her grandmother's home. The government made the decision to cut the Ministry of Children and Families budget, and the consequences in this province have been tragic. This government looked at cutting costs rather than looking at protecting the most vulnerable.
So my question is to the minister. Will he stand up in this House today and take a look at out-of-care options, whether it's Child in the Home of a Relative or kith and kin, and insist that those programs put in place the supports that the most vulnerable children need in this province?
lynn
3 years ago
May 5, 2008: The BC Legislature
More questions asked by NDP MLA Nicholas Simons that Big Media ignores...too busy promoting Whistler and 2010:
N Simons: This government has had seven years to learn from its own mistakes. They've had opportunity after opportunity to close the gaps. The opposition has been demanding it, the people of the province have been demanding it, the media is getting on the case of the minister, and he still refuses to act. In the case of the Child in the Home of a Relative or out-of-care options, we know that it's cheaper and it's faster, and it makes the workload lighter. But we know of the damages and the dangers involved.
When will this minister do what he said he would do and allow the Representative for Children and Youth to have oversight over this program for the 4,000 or so children who are placed under this program?......
Mr. Speaker: Member has a supplemental.
N. Simons: That doesn't really answer the question. British Columbians want to know if the system is getting better or getting worse, and all evidence suggests that things are in chaos in the Ministry of Children and Family Development. The social workers are telling us that, and it's clear from the evidence we have before us.
Never before have social workers been asked to put children under Child in the Home of a Relative. This is a new policy direction change, and it's one that requires some oversight. This ministry's refusal to provide that is a shame on this province.
Will the minister acknowledge that all out-of-care placements, options for children, options for social workers and options for families are safe and secure and have the proper oversight to ensure that our most vulnerable children are safe?.....
garden bay
3 years ago
MAY 5 2008 in the legislature
Chritisian---" Back in the gloom and doom of the nineties when the NDP built useless fast ferries there were similar cases before the minister of children and family services but as for this paticular case I cannot comment because it is currently before the courts!"
SharingIsGood
3 years ago
thanks, lynn
Thanks for correcting sanamark's glaring error, lynn.
Obviously, the NDP did not need more time to comment upon this sort of thing. They have already raised the issue. Too bad the Libs pared question period down to next to nothing and too bad they refuse to answer so many questions. I guess without holding the fall sitting of the Legislature, the NDP won't even be permitted a few questions. After all, the MSM will probably not follow up on this.
The Campbell government and the MSM continues to be immoral and unethical.
lynn
3 years ago
May 5, 2008: The BC Legislature
Big Media too busy reporting on real estate trends to report this:
M. Karagianis: What a complete and abject failure of this government on this file.
The Child in the Home of a Relative program. A child is placed without a review, without a home study, and MCFD simply closes the file. The Minister of Income Assistance opens the file but does nothing in the way of child protection. It is simply a financial arrangement, as the minister has just admitted. This government is placing more and more children into this program, and it is an absolute failure.
Here we have the latest tragedy, which is a child who went from a foster home into the home of a relative, and subsequently a tragedy occurred. I know that when he was questioned about this in estimates by the current critic, he said here that the Child in the Home of a Relative program is actually an income assistance program. It's not a child protection program — washed his hands of it completely.
The Minister of Children and Families has a responsibility. I would like to ask him today: when will this program be transferred into the appropriate hands? To the Minister of Children and Family Development: do the right thing today and transfer this program into your own department, where these children can be protected......
Mr. Speaker: Member has a supplemental.
M. Karagianis: Well, clearly the protections are not in place, and that is the problem here. Protections are not in place. Once these children get moved into the home of a relative, there are no protections and oversight in place.
The Children and Youth Representative, Mary Ellen Turpel-Lafond, asked the government back in April of 2007 — over a year ago — for jurisdiction over these children. There are some 4,000 children — perhaps as high as 4,700 — in the home of a relative, and they are not under her jurisdiction.
We have canvassed this repeatedly. I canvassed this with the minister in estimates last year. The question now is whether or not this jurisdiction is going to be extended.
Will the Minister of Children and Families stop dragging his feet on this file, this part of the file, and extend the jurisdiction of the Children and Youth Representative to cover children in the home of a relative?....
lynn
3 years ago
May 5, 2008: The BC Legislature
Just another day in the legislature that Big Media failed to report on...all just a Big Yawn to them....they've got better things to do like....what's happening on the the Sea-to-Sky Hwy...Big Important Stuff like that.
A. Dix: Well, the Minister of Employment and Income Assistance is responsible in this House for Child in the Home of a Relative. He's responsible in this House. The number of children in the homes of relatives has increased by a very significant margin — more, actually, than the total number of children who are involved in the kith-and-kin program. There are 600 more children in that program today than there were five years ago.
My question to the minister is this. Why is it that more children are being placed in this program? The number of children in foster care is going down. The number of children in this program is going dramatically up. What are the results of the review? This case happened in 2006. Since then the government has been stonewalling — from the Attorney General to the Minister of Income Assistance to the Minister of Children and Families — from allowing the child representative to take over responsibility.
If it's the case that we've had an increase of 600 children, why is that the case? Is the minister assuring this House today that every single one of those 600 incremental cases has received the proper review?.....
.
Mr. Speaker: The member has a supplemental.
A. Dix: It's very simple. The Minister of Employment and Income Assistance right now is responsible for these children. He is responsible. There's been a dramatic increase in the number of children in this program. If what the minister says is true, that shouldn't be happening — 600 new children incremental, an increase in this program.
My question is very simple to the Minister of Employment and Income Assistance. What is the reason? If they aren't diverting — to save money — children into this program, what is the reason for the dramatic increase in Child in the Home of a Relative in his ministry?....
ME2
3 years ago
Lynn
Lynn says:
"Big Media doesn't bother reporting this.... too busy trailing car chases:"
And :[b]
"Just another day in the legislature that Big Media failed to report on...all just a Big Yawn to them....they've got better things to do like....what's happening on the the Sea-to-Sky Hwy...Big Important Stuff like that."
Lynn, Big Media journalism could make plenty of hay with this one, esp the Province with its tabloid style, but even they won't touch it with a ten-foot pole.
Guess why.
lynn
3 years ago
the real secret
And no, I'm not a member of the NDP....
Just one question: The party in power in BC presently is the BC Liberals, isn't it?
So if that is the case, how it's 'posed to work, logically: is that, they, the BCLiberals are both responsible and accountable in this case.
Accordingly, they should not be (as some would like to have it) beyond public scrutiny, despite Big Media's finest efforts to protect them from just that.
No, this is the Campbell government's policy - and this is both their action (and their inaction ) in regard to this tragedy.
This happened on their watch.
No one else's.
And if the tragedy of this situation is to be addressed it is they who must do just that. For they are the only ones with the power to do so. So quit deflecting blame. ....and yes, all political parties should be held accountable for the results of their policies.
I think Maurine Karagianis's quote below, reveals the real secret embedded in this tragedy... the one motive that governs all BC Liberal "so-called" social policy:
lynn
3 years ago
It's very late
Sorry, ME2, I didn't see your post before I posted my last comment above. I was just making a general comment to who(m)ever was still out there.;-)
As I say above, this government's motive was not guided by any genuine concern for the welfare of aboriginal or non-aboriginal children.... it centered around "financial arrangements"....their usual prime quest of how not to have to fund the social safety net.
That's the faulty and coy flimsiness this structure was based on. Nothing of real strength or accountability built in...so it's too easy to blame those caught in this whole charade of a process.
The blame belongs with the government.
G West
3 years ago
Oh, and sanamark
If you needed any further refutation of your claim(s) yesterday after Lynn more or less completely routed them, you can refer to this article on the Hook:
http://thetyee.ca/Blogs/TheHook/BC-Politics/2008/09/19/UnsafeHomesJames/
SharingIsGood
3 years ago
G West
G West has added the exclamation point to a series of posts by several Tyee regulars. sanamark and his ilk have been provided with examples that date back to 1994 to today's Carole James statement. The postings prove the NDP to be consistent in doing their best to provide for the welfare of children - doubly so for children whose lives are at risk.
Whether in government or in the opposition, the NDP has always been on the side of children. The Campbell government has again proven to be inept.
I notice that the Liberal media monitors, here, at the Tyee, seemed to have backed away from this issue. I think they want the awfulness of their actions/inactions to quietly go away. I thank sanamark for his uninformed and biased remarks. They have allowed this comparison of the NDP and the Liberals.
In regard to Christiansen, no matter what portfolio he gets, nothing seems to happen - but he generally looks good in the photo ops. Like his leader, all package, little substance.
SharingIsGood
3 years ago
erratum
that date back to 1994 to today's Carole James statement
that date back from 1994 to today's Carole James statement
garth_harris
3 years ago
psychopaths have no conscience
and they are what the politicians are made up of in our governments.
they talk of the sacrifices of THE FEW , so that THE PEOPLE may ENDURE.
same crap i heard when I was in the military
you give your pathetic little life , so I may eat like a pig and live like a king.
it is in our way of life and none of you are going to change it.
you live by those sickening guidelines every day of your lives,
you bleat all day long , til you get to the slaughterhouse and then ,it is your turn to sacrifice your life for the good of the others.
you got a job ? you got a house ? you got a car ? what have you got ?
what have you got that has not come at the expense of another human being ?
we are all COMPLICIT in the deaths of these children.
and what is even more sickening is the fact that the FINGER POINTING NEVER STOPS.
the word REVOLUTION and incendiary language on pages like this have been banned , by people more interested in making money and staying alive.so no one can really do anything .
so bleat and point fingers , you time is coming.
soon , you will be the sacrifice.
and who will bleat 4 U ?
POC04746160
3 years ago
ULTIMATUM TO CANADIAN PUBLIC SERVANTS
End the coverup of crimes committed against my child and family! Horrendous lies and their cover up systematically ruined our child’s health and life. Liars with their protectors have been spending enormous efforts, resources, time and money to coverup very serious crimes, but only our Family Doctor and our children’s teachers have ever tried to reduce the unspeakable injustice, abuse and inhuman cruelty superimposed upon our family. Canadians and the rest of the world are craftily deceived that Canada is governed by the rule of law, that everyone is equal before and under the law, that Canadian officials must obey the law, or receive correctional services like everyone else. Grossly illegal and cruel treatment of our family, perpetrators' absolute impunity and ongoing coverup represent undeniable evidence of the opposite. Rather than admit any wrongdoing, officials condemned us (“he will try to take someone with him”) to violent deaths, as predicted in the “Threat Assessment”. All informed accept all possible variables of that “someone“ - tens to hundreds of dead and injured people, nobody accepted any peaceful solution we sought. It is in the public interest to know the factual, utterly corrupt and disastrous state of Canadian public service and justice and radically improve them. Until then, countless lives of other powerless children and families will be ruined or terminated courtesy of their government. Perpetrators are confident that you all will indefinitely coverup their crimes and calmly, day after day, wait for the predicted loss of many lives, instead of trying to save them. Any reasonable person capable of discriminating between right and wrong would not hesitate for a second before making the right choice. What about YOU? Let justice be done though the heavens fall! Or, the predicted massacre and murders must happen. HONOR YOUR OATH. Or RESIGN.
more at http://fcase.blogharbor.com/blog
tired in BC
3 years ago
it's clear to me....
that there are people here who KNOW what it is like to work inside of the child protection system....and those who clearly do not. Sanamark is 100% correct in citing the policy. And there are more First Nations children in government care in BC than children who are not First Nations. Why? THAT is a history lesson that everyone in Canada should be well aware of, (but many are not). Social workers do the best they can with 50+ investigations on their caseloads. Does anyone really and truly comprehend the level of responsibility on the shoulders of a protection worker? We don't do the job for fame, (as is clearly demonstrated by Skywalker) and we don't do the job for the $$ (there isn't much!) We do it because we care about children and do the best we can with government cuts, little funding and a mandate to keep children with family members rather than foster care. Don't even get me started on the lack of foster homes! Until SOCIETY starts valuing our most vulnerable children, appropriate funding is not going to be given to the front-line workers who are struggling to manage incredible risk to those children. It's a much bigger picture than just blaming the front-line workers, people!!!
SharingIsGood
3 years ago
tired in bc - I'm confused?
Hi tired...,
I admire the work you do. I am not in child protection, but I do work closely with many people from various ministries. I have had to make calls to "colleagues" in MCFD to have abused children removed for their own protection. I have worked in a professional capacity with women and children who have been abused; and I have also done some extremely difficult and seemingly successful work with abusers of every stripe. I'm confused by one of your comments. Will you please tell me what is the policy that you believe sanamark to be 100% correct in citing? I have reread his posts; and I fail to see any government policy that he is 100% correct in citing. As far as I can tell, he bashes the NDP at every opportunity, but never correctly. Sanamark (as Frank and Lynn have pointed out) even tries to turn this Liberal crisis in child protection into an NDP issue.
garden bay
3 years ago
I don`t hear anyone blaming front line workers
Tired in BC
Only morons would blame front line workers!
Every(intelligent)poster on this site blame Campbell and his cronies.
The part you mention about first nations is true and you ask why?
I will probably get lambasted for this comment but here goes.
The reserve system doesn`t work,for decades now the money sent to Indian affairs works out to about 100.000 per native Indian per year.
The cheifs have learned well from whitey goverment,most money doesn`t get past the cheifs as illistrated earlier this year when the squamish band held a sit in demanding money from the head honchos.
It serves the cheifs well to keep their people poor!
Squeaky wheels get grease,there was a cheif from north eastern Canada who was interviewed last year about alcoholism and suicide rates in their band,the cheif went on to say that the biggest problem his band had was money,the fact that everyone gets a cheque each month no one will work,he went on to say that until the free flow of money stops it will never improve!
Yes sins were committed against first nations for far to long but until first nations intigrate into modern society nothing will change.
Seems to me other groups have integrated quite well--Japanese,Chinese,the Irish,the Polish(my background)the hindu,Pakastani,Dutch,and others,sure they were here first but minority groups have lands, money,woman and just about everything else stolen from them over the years and life goes on.
My grandfather,a polish immagrant was treated like shit in Winnipeg,he did all the work for the company he worked for and never got credit or promoted and when he got to old and tired to work he was fired with no pention no nothing,fortunately he saved almost every penny he made and he got by, with NO GOVERMENT PENSION OR HANDOUTS!
There are many wealthy Indian bands on the sunshine coast and the lower mainland.
I have seen the cheifs up here many times on the ferries and usually they are heading to the casinos in richmond with pockets stuffed full of cash!
I worked(in construction) with a native man that told me he could not stand to be on the reserve anymore,too many drugs alcohol,too much soap opera,too much lazy entitlement.
Sadly todays politicians use native affairs as a political football and none of them can speak the truth out of political correctness.
So until we face facts that reality will persist.
In no means does that give Campbell a pass,by far Gordon Campbell is the worst premier in BC history and his crimes will be written in the history books!
bcliberals_suck
3 years ago
The Truth about MCFD
It must be publically stated there is MUCH the public and even the child welfare community do not know about what happens inside of MCFD, how bad, risky decisions are made and why social workers are ALWAYS the ones scapegoated and thrown on the pyre. The wholesale destruction of an occupational group, that is largely female is a fact that is being covered up and denied.
Sean Holman released these numbers, which are no coincidence:
In 2001/02 MCFD employees took sick leaves at 10.97 days per employee. The numbers for the 2007/08 fiscal year, MCFD employees took $7.3 million in sick leave, which is equal to 47,313 sick days, or an average of 12.39 days per employee - significantly more than the 8.55 day average across government.
What is also very important to highlight is that all Ministries under the Campbell government are failing children and youth in BC. Go to the BC Coroners Service website. You will find that the BCCS & the Child Death Review Unit have not made public the numbers of children & youth who have died (and the causes) since 2004. As mentioned on our blog below, the current director of the Child Death Review Unit is a former Director of Child Protection from the Northern region, where you may recall, the Representative recently released a report admonishing MCFD yet again for failing to improve practice and conditions that her office concluded were implicated in the deaths of four children.
Amanda, Savannah, Rowen and Serena: From loss to learning (2.3 Mb)
http://www.rcybc.ca/Content/Publications/Reports.asp
It is crucial to recognize that Aboriginal children and youth are dramatically over-represented in these CIHR cases, in child & youth deaths and in foster care when considering their total population in BC. The work Lesley Du Toit is here to do for Campbell and his minions (and overlords) is to dismantle the child welfare system and devolve everything from direct government to communities and regions. As many have vigorously noted, Community Living BC is the best example of that work and failure and the impacts and consequences devolution has on children, youth and adults and their families. As a society we all MUST do better for our vulnerable children & youth. Read more here:
Human Rights, Justice & Dignity for BC's Children NOW!
It is time for some serious discussions to take place about the administration, competence and accountability of the leadership of the Ministry of Children & Family Development.
http://bcliberalssuck.blogspot.com/
And here is a promise. When the NDP get in as a majority government in BC, if they have an interest in that, be very clear that your government will also become the target of the wrath of the people if you do not act with integrity, ethics and in the public interest for the children, youth and families of BC. It is one the commitments you are making to the people of BC if they should decide to place you in power in the People's House.
ME2
3 years ago
What is the real issue here?
Having known a number of social workers over my lifetime, and having discussed with them the many dilemmas they encounter daily in the practice of their jobs, every time the topic is discussed I recall Nancy Wilson (?) singing "And so another social worker burns out".
They too see undeserving people play the system while deserving people who are trying are denied. They too see rules that defy common sense, and bureaucracies which see people only as statistics, and so seek to turn social workers into rule-following automatons.
So you can see why I utterly despise those neocone who slag social workers, esp since doing so is simply a pro forma regurgitation of their unreasoning attacks upon ALL government workers.These are truly despicable people, IMO.
I have little more respect for those Lefties on this site who, in deliberately avoiding the specifics of this discussion, seek to turn it into a political football with which they can play their propagandistic games.
Their crocodile tears contribute absolutely nothing towards solving the problems at hand. In fact they serve only to muddy the waters by intoducing Provincial politics, since it appears FN politics are playing the major role here.
So for whom do you hold your concern folks, your dislike of the Campbell gov't - which I share - or the kids being victimized by adult games?
garth_harris
3 years ago
point 2 me2
another questioning the issue here...
good on you me2
what are CONCERNED CITEZENS TO DO FOR THE CHILDREN ?
what can we REALLY do?
do we shake our head and hide in nihilism ?
blame others for our inactions ?
we seem to give raises to these front line workers every time they bitch and kvetch ,like a bribe to shut them up , yet some don't , some are the governments worst enemies , some ,the govts best friends.
gee , we could debate who ,what ,when ,where , why , all effin debate long and still ,where are the children ?
what disgusting, filthy,circumstances have to be shoved in your face before any action takes place.
and god forbid if it is a child dear to you,what you gonna do then ?
lord help me,if it is my blood,there will be no place to hide for anyone .
so what is to be done so circumstances do not get TOTALLY OUT OF CONTROL ?
or is it too late ?
ME2
3 years ago
Garth_Harris
Garth, I have no idea where you're coming from or what you're talking about, and what's more, I don't think I care.
garth_harris
3 years ago
"So for whom do you hold
"So for whom do you hold your concern folks, your dislike of the Campbell gov't - which I share - or the kids being victimized by adult games?"
this is either caring or confusion .
after reading your postings,i don't think you are a confused person.
but this is saturday morning and still early .so maybe last nights BUZZ hasn't worn off yet !
regardless,i am still going to mark you down as a DEFENDER of the INNOCENTS.
that is ,until you prove me wrong .
anyways,hope the fog clears me2
G West
3 years ago
dude
How's your brother doing? I've missed him...and you.
SharingIsGood
3 years ago
false dichotomy
"So for whom do you hold your concern folks, your dislike of the Campbell gov't - which I share - or the kids being victimized by adult games?"
One is not exclusive of the other. It is not an either/or situation.
I don't believe that enlightened BC citizens can truly care about kids being victimized without having disdain for the games that Campbell government plays.
SIG
lynn
3 years ago
in the guise of....
I agree, Sharing.
ME2,
One of the reasons the abuse of children, both aboriginal and non-aboriginal, is not being addressed is the way this whole mess was basically an arrow haphazardly shot into the air by the Campbell government..... it, (the government), not caring how or where it landed.
Just as long as they could check names off their funding list.
No one is defending abuse taking place within First Nations or without. The thing is this could have been a program that proceeded in a series of steps, a transitional monitored process that would support First Nations social workers and with built in safeguards.
It wasn't - because one of the main aims of this government has been to remove funding previously targeted to address social problems....and do it as quickly and as surreptitiously as possible. Funding they can then re-direct to more important projects eg. to their corporate buddies in the form of subsidization of those P3's...where the public pays and the privateers rake in the profits using our tax dollars.
We as people with all our messy social and human problems are in the way of this inhuman government. All of us.
Children. Seniors. First Nations. The Disabled. The Homeless.
So they create programs that make it look like they care...when really it's just another guise to cut funding (funding we provided from our tax dollars)... so they can slam the door on the people of this province.... in order to fund and open all the doors for their special friends.
That's pretty well what happened here.
ME2
3 years ago
My guesses
Lynn, take off the blinders. Both the Fed and Prov gov'ts have turned over the bulk of their services to the Bands to administer. They pay for the services and pay FNs to provide them. Since they must still oversee the programs, I suspect this is costing them more not less, to do so.
The biggest squawk the Bands have had was regarding placement of foster children off-reserve, with militants charging our gov'ts with "cultural genocide" for doing so. So the Prov gov't now funds the Bands to find on-reserve placements, which they've claimed could be easily done.
My guess is that the Bands are faced with the same problem as faced "white" social workers, in that the responsible grandparents who have traditionally cared for these children, already have their hands more than full.
This puts the militants in a bind, doesn't it? So my further guess is that they have been less than careful in their placements than they should be.
IMO, since Campbell had a situation impossible to solve as long as he owned this hot potato, he did a smart thing by letting the Bands juggle it for a while.
Please take note that I titled this as "My guess", which is all it is. If anyone has the facts and figures, it's high time we stopped beating around the bush.
SharingIsGood
3 years ago
Smart Thing?
When you know that a system is broken and you have hired an expert to help you come up with sollutions, is it a "smart thing" to let the Bands "handle it" while innocent children continue being abused and killed? Though I understand the conundrum, to my way of thinking, this is when the greatest leadership is needed - not buck-passing. It was, after all, Campbell's down-sizing and buck-passing without due oversight that made the situation far worse than when the Liberals assumed power. And let's not forget that both, Campbell and the Feds, are at fault here.
On a similar note, outside of the CBC, I haven't been seeing MSM coverage for victims of The Highway of Tears. The MSM and the Campbell government just don't seem to care.
lynn
3 years ago
Slapdash and reckless
This is Campbell's argument on everything that money for programs has increased. But the question is who is getting the money? Management?...because if costs have increased then they obviously are not using it towards providing any kind of effective oversight or planning.
Who is this money going to? My guess is that is not going to fund front line workers...or effective resources.
I can think of a few alternatives that would still allow First Nations children to stay in their own community that would not involve putting them at risk.
Provide the real oversight. Provide the necessary funding. Use some imagination.
I don't see it as smart....I see it as irresponsible - especially the way it has been haphazardly addressed. Read the Auditor's report. It reveals an extremely flawed process - a disconnect between management and social workers. It also confirms that the Ministry does not report on how well aboriginal children or child protection sertvices are being delivered.
According to the report there was a lack of resources, lack of funding, and lack of planning.
It also revealed there was little consultation with First Nations, little consultation on needs, and little measurement for outcomes.
Bottom line: No one in government cared enough...or they cared more about another agenda.
I still say the carelessness and undirected approach evident in this program was a convenient and slapdash "opportunity" for the Campbell government to remove "human costs" from a social safety net they simply do not want to fund.
ME2
3 years ago
Lynn
You state :
"I can think of a few alternatives that would still allow First Nations children to stay in their own community that would not involve putting them at risk."
If that is the case, then you should by all means share those ideas with the Bands, since I'm sure they'd welcome almost any solution for this "conundrum" (as SIG aptly called it).
And if you think social programs on the reserves are being underfunded, esp if in the same manner as are services to non-aboriginals, then you are grossly mistaken. You need to do some unbiased research.
Well, this line of discussion is going nowhere, so I think I've said enough.
SharingIsGood
3 years ago
ethical change
Whenever politicians make changes to the way social programs are implemented, they should expect higher costs. After all, one must keep the original system functioning while the new system is being built up and able to run on its own. Oversight is always needed, even without change; doubly so, with change.
When working with people, one cannot replace educated and seasoned veterans with new people without expecting poorer results. New staff, be they FN or not, need time to be trained and they need a strong support structure. Campbell did not allow for this nor did he provide oversight to make sure the new folks have been being successful.
garth_harris
3 years ago
QUOTE "Whenever politicians
QUOTE "Whenever politicians make changes to the way social programs are implemented, they should expect higher costs. After all, one must keep the original system functioning while the new system is being built up and able to run on its own. Oversight is always needed, even without change; doubly so, with change.
When working with people, one cannot replace educated and seasoned veterans with new people without expecting poorer results. New staff, be they FN or not, need time to be trained and they need a strong support structure. Campbell did not allow for this nor did he provide oversight to make sure the new folks have been being successful." END QUOTE
hey ! these people are " THE BEST OF THE BEST"
thats why all those burecrats got those HUMUNGOUS RAISES and laughed in our faces while they skipped to their banks ,going nah,na,na,nah,na,na ,your a stupid taxpayer ,na,nah,na,nah,na,nah
when you got the best you can get ,you got to pay them to keep them ,na.nah.na,nah,na,nah ,your a stupid taxpayer and you don't know nuthin,you stupid ,you
ME2
3 years ago
Lynn
Do we call this guy "Ronnie Retread" ?
lynn
3 years ago
ME2
I don't think it's the return of Ronnie, ME2.
I think he's being sarcastic....trying to tell us how those bureaucrats who purport to be "the best of the best" are really just robbing us blind....and "skipping to their banks".
That's the tone I pick up....'course I've been wrong before. :-)
garden bay
3 years ago
Massive pay raises
Baldrey on global news today stated that the pay raises are smaller than they were originally stated to be and Baldrey stated and I quote "Jessicca Mcdonald will be receiving no wage increase" later on Cknw who put the story on their news cast stated the same thing except they added one item to the news story and I quote "Jessicca Mcdonald who received the largest pay hike will not take the money at this time"
What a joke--Also bobble head Abbott stated on the global news at noon today that his goverment has made it to their committment of 5000 new bed for seniors!
What a joke,everyone knows they committed to 5000 long term care beds--Abbott has lumped thousands of peoples own beds into that mix, what they call assisted living beds,I gather that to mean that perhaps a worker comes by once a week to see if their still breathing!