News

Casino Workers Buck Odds

Win right to join union in lean times for organizers.

By Tom Sandborn, 14 Jul 2008, TheTyee.ca

Gateway Burnaby Casino

Gateway casino in Burnaby.

Under the Campbell government in British Columbia, the deck is heavily stacked against workers trying to organize unions, say a pair of veteran labour lawyers who've run the numbers.

But the latest to beat those odds are employees of a casino -- members of one of B.C.'s fastest growing industries.

On July 2, the 72 dealer and slot machine supervisors at Burnaby's Gateway Casino won a B.C. Labour Relations Board-supervised vote count allowing them, after a delay of two years, to join the union of their choice, the B.C. Government and Service Employees.

Their win was made possible by a board decision to finally open a box full of completed ballots that had been sealed at management request for a year. But still left hanging is the fate of a related organizing drive amongst 225 Gateway dealers and slot machine attendants.

"This is very much a David and Goliath story where against-all-odds workers have persevered against a powerful company and unbalanced labour laws and won in the end," said BCGEU president Darryl Walker.

"Finally, these workers get a voice," BCGEU organizer and former gaming industry worker Muriel Labine told The Tyee. "I am very happy about this decision. It's what the Gateway workers have wanted and worked for."

Another 225 workers in limbo

While the recent vote settles, at least for now, the issue of union certification for the 72 supervisors at Gateway, ballots cast last fall by 225 dealers and slot machine attendants at the Burnaby casino still remain uncounted. Originally, the union had made a single application to represent both groups, but objections from Gateway and subsequent rulings by the Labour Relations Board required the two groups to make separate applications. The casino filed actions at the labour board and in B.C. courts that kept both ballot boxes sealed until July 2.

Even after the recent vote, the question of union representation for the remaining 225 workers remains unresolved. And if Gateway is successful in its most recent application to the board, the ballots already counted may not represent a final decision on the supervisors' certification either.

According to Stephen Howard, a BCGEU spokesman, Gateway lawyers have recently filed a new motion with the board, asking that it reconsider the decision that allowed the ballot boxes to be opened, alleging that the decision was "patently unfair."

No one from Gateway Casino made themselves available for comment, despite numerous calls from The Tyee.

$2 billion BC industry

Gaming (which includes bingo, lotteries and casinos) is a hugely lucrative industry in B.C., generating more than $2 billion of gross revenue for the B.C. Lottery Corporation in 2006/2007.

(That same year, the casino sector alone generated $1.1 billion in gross revenue for the corporation.) According to the corporation's annual report for 2006/2007, Gateway Casino in Burnaby generated $165 million in revenue that year, and $152 million the previous year. Gateway's Burnaby casino sent nearly $10 million in revenue to the municipality in 06/07.

According to its corporate website, Gateway Casinos & Entertainment is one of the largest casino and entertainment companies in Western Canada and has grown from just two facilities with 150 employees to nine facilities with over 3,000 employees. Its properties include Burnaby Villa Casino, Royal City Star Riverboat Casino, Cascades Casino, Lake City Casinos (Vernon, Kamloops, Kelowna and Penticton) and Baccarat and Palace Casinos in Edmonton.

Gateway Casinos were recently acquired by New World Gaming, a partnership between Macquarie Bank and Crown Limited. Macquarie is headquartered in Australia and is a leading provider of full range investment banking, financial markets and retail financial services. Macquarie is also one of Australia's top 15 companies with over 11,000 employees in 24 countries. Crown is one of Australia's largest diversified media and entertainment groups and its market capitalization of more than $11 billion places it among the top 25 companies listed on the Australian Stock Exchange.

Lean times for organizers

In the summer of 2006, workers at Gateway approached the BCGEU for help in joining the union. According to a union source, workers start at Gateway at $8.75 an hour with wages running up to a maximum of $16.00 per hour for experienced supervisors. The BCGEU already represents about 400 workers at Gateway-owned casinos in the Interior.

By the fall of 2006, the BCGEU and Gateway management were locked into a complex struggle that included legal actions in B.C. courts and at the provincial labour board, and an aggressive communication campaign against the union conducted by Gateway management inside the casino. Union-side critics say the workers' experience at Gateway illustrates the way that changes in B.C. labour legislation brought in by the Campbell government have made a union certification much harder to obtain. Patrick Dickie, a senior lawyer at Vancouver's Hastings Labour Law Offices, wrote in 2005 that changes in the province's labour laws had created "a crisis in union organizing under the current Liberal government in British Columbia." He said then:

"Indeed, the number of unorganized employees certified in any of the past three years is considerably lower than in any previous year -- including during the depths of economic recession in the early 1980s under the Socred mandatory vote regime."

According to David Tarasoff, also of Hastings Labour Law Offices, writing in 2006, the time required by the B.C. Labour Relations Board to consider an application for union certification has doubled in recent years.

Dickie says the organizing picture has improved a bit since he wrote his paper, but not nearly as much as it would appear on first reviewing Labour Relations Board figures for new certifications in the ensuing years.

"Much of the improvement in the certification numbers you would see in the reporting for 2006-2008 is likely due to several anomalous situations, not to any dramatic increase in the organization of unorganized workers," he said. "Much of what looks like an increase in new certifications represents re-organization of workers who were de-unionized by contracting out in the health sector. Also, BCGEU had a huge certification not so long ago at a call centre, and that too might tend to distort the picture."

Labour code 'lost its balance'

"The Code had lost its balance and the LRB its objectivity," says an internal BCGEU document obtained by The Tyee. "An employer can now campaign vigorously against a union in the worksite at any time, but the Code restricts any pro-union work at all. An employer, who is noted by the Supreme Court to have enormous weight, can say or (now) do what it wants without sanction... This is the so-called freedom Gordon Campbell championed."

The Tyee asked Lisa Southern, the Labour Relations Board's registrar, what she made of charges that the board had tilted in a pro-management direction under the Campbell Liberals. She declined to comment.

The Tyee has obtained a document allegedly signed by Mr. Trevor West, vice president of human resources at Gateway Casino, and dated Aug. 17, 2007. The document was reportedly posted in the staff break room at the Casino. It says, in part, referring to BCGEU organizers,

"Their primary function is to create an atmosphere of fear through rumours and misconceptions. Many of the rumors stated in their propaganda are started by their internal organizers to give the Union the opportunity to fear monger."

The Tyee left messages over several days for Mr. West and for Mr. Jag Nijjar, another Gateway vice president, to ask for confirmation whether the document was authentic and to ask for comment on the successful certification vote, the two-year delay in dealing with the certification application by the majority of Gateway workers and the firm's most recent application to the board to nullify the July 2 vote. No one from Gateway made him or herself available for comment before this story was filed.

Related Tyee stories:

 [Tyee]

7  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • Luke Skywalker

    3 years ago

    "Labour code 'lost its balance'" ?????

    Quote:
    Labour code 'lost its balance'

    I simply have a problem with that concept and find it to be somewhat far-fetched.

    Heck, only BC and Quebec have "anti-scab" labour legislation on their books and even the SK and MB New Democrats refused to include such anti-scab legislation within their respective labour codes.

    Yes, during the Vander Zalm era of the late 1980's, Bill 19, the Industrial Relations Act, was a severely unbalanced labour law that led to a boycott of the Industrial Relations Council (the renamed Labour Relations Board) by the BC Federation of Labour.

    Fortunately, under Harcourt, Bill 19 was repealed and the labour code again became more balanced.

    And frankly, I have not heard one single material argument that BC's existing labour code is "unbalanced" by either the BC Fed or the NDP since 2001. Otherwise, they would scream about same.

    Quote:
    Gateway Casinos & Entertainment is one of the largest casino and entertainment companies in Western Canada... Its properties include ...Lake City Casinos (Vernon, Kamloops, Kelowna and Penticton)

    Interestingly enough, BCGEU certified employees at Lake City Casinos reached a tentative agreement on May 14, 2008. Good for them!

    http://www.nupge.ca/news_2008/n14my08b.htm

  • munroe

    3 years ago

    Luke, I do believe you may

    Luke, I do believe you may not be conversant with what has happened in labour relations under Campbell. The Article begins, but perhaps even understates, the negative impact on workers by this government. I do agree that too little focus has been provided on this by the institutions associated with progressive forces here.

    I'll limit my comments to the deleterious changes to the Code which has clearly and deliberately created a major imbalance as a full analysis requires a book. Labour Law is both a complex and intricate balancing act. The 1993 Code, on the basis of expert opinion, was a reasoned document. It took two over-riding principles - access to collective bargaining and industrial stability and designed a system to meet these principles. There were many trade-offs, not one for one one but collectively, and the final product was reasonable access and reasonable restrictions on union action that might affect stability.

    The Tyee article is focused on the first principle, access to bargaining. The Campbell government made a deliberate choice of restricting access (and destroying the balance) through two moves. First, it required to choose to unionise twice - once by joining and second by voting. Second, Campbell alter a law on restricted Employer "free speech" that had been found to be consistet with both the Charter and Supreme Court decisions.

    The practical result (as interpreted by the current Board) is that an employer can say anything in any form during an organising campaign if it is not intimidating or coercive. The standard for this prohibition is very high and does not include inaccuracies or comments intended to unduly influence decisions. In fact, employer's have gone to far to make personal attcks on organisers.

    Further, the Employer is unencumbered in its access to employees while asserting its messages. Any union or pro-union worker cannot "organise" on company time in company premises. Employers consistently work to limit the ability of empoyees to even hear the benefits through such common law restrictions as trespass.

    It is like there is a debate. One party, the Employer takes the stage in front of the auditorium (sometimes filled by employees on work time and required to attend). The second participant is the union, but his or her speech is made in a locked closet down an unoccupied hall. At the end of the debate, the audience votes on which side won.

    If workers cannot access collective bargaining, anti-scab laws are irrelavant. Worker participation in unions drops as does union density.

    The law is a violent instrument to deny workers the right to be a part of a union. Add to this the undermining of the rights of any employee under the Employment Standards Act and you have "imbalance".

    Truly an understatement.

  • sdgreen

    3 years ago

    Archaic Unionism is the Predominent problem

    It seems to me that the predominent issue here is the rigid attitude of the Unions. The so called cry for a 'living wage', refusal to deal with concessions and such do nothing to promote industry nor the worker.

    Why is it that the forest industry has closed down so many mills, why is it that BC Ferries went to Germany to build new ships, why is it that costs of goods are so expensive? Unions and the Left blame the large Corporations, but who blames the investor for telling their boards that labour hostility causes lost investment.

    Problem is the current Employment Standards Act, and the Labour Relations Act continue the charade of adversarial relationships between organized labour and business. Not withstanding all that, Buzz found out the hard way with a result of thousands of jobs because of his bull headed attitude.

    I am of the opinion that we need a complete rethink of our current labour and employment standards statutes and regulations -- somehow we have to get out of the contant war of words, extravangant awards on both sides, bureaucratic interventions.

  • munroe

    3 years ago

    sdgreen is SO correct. What

    sdgreen is SO correct. What we need is to abolish the minimum wage and all those pesky laws that allow workers to organise.

    Should have thought of that earlier, after all Alabama and Columbia are truly progressisve states and real pardises.

  • Luke Skywalker

    3 years ago

    Munroe...

    You have a good, reasoned analysis, yet I still stand by my initial supposition that I don't believe that the BC Labour Code is imbalanced as is represented in the article.

    For example:

    Quote:
    "Indeed, the number of unorganized employees certified in any of the past three years is considerably lower than in any previous year -- including during the depths of economic recession in the early 1980s under the Socred mandatory vote regime."

    And your own statement:

    Quote:
    If workers cannot access collective bargaining, anti-scab laws are irrelavant. Worker participation in unions drops as does union density.

    Yet Statistics Canada's August, 2007 report on Canadian unionization density paints an entirely different picture.

    In fact, BC's unionization rate (density) increased from 32% in 2006 to 32.9% in 2007 during their respective initial semi-annual periods.

    That represents the second highest density increase in Canada!

    http://www.statcan.ca/english/freepub/75-001-XIE/comm/fact-2.pdf

  • Frank

    3 years ago

    sdgreen

    Quote:
    Why is it that the forest industry has closed down so many mills,

    I assume phrases such as "gov't policies" or "bad corporate management" aren't in your lexicon but "workers are to blame for everything" is?

    Quote:
    why is it that BC Ferries went to Germany to build new ships,

    Because everyone knows investment in other countries is what makes us rich? Right? Or maybe it was a political decision?

    Quote:
    why is it that costs of goods are so expensive?

    Workers don't set the price, companies do and as we see with the price of so many things from cereal to oil, the mantra is "charge what the market will bear".

    Quote:
    Unions and the Left blame the large Corporations, but who blames the investor for telling their boards that labour hostility causes lost investment.

    And why is labour hostile? Perhaps because most of them work for peanuts in dead end jobs and don't reap the benefits of what they make or sell.

    Quote:
    Problem is the current Employment Standards Act, and the Labour Relations Act continue the charade of adversarial relationships between organized labour and business.

    And you'd prefer the one side to get on its knees and submit so that we no longer have an adversarial relationship?

    Quote:
    Not withstanding all that, Buzz found out the hard way with a result of thousands of jobs because of his bull headed attitude.

    Oh man, I realize you'll pull one of your usual disappearing acts but I'd love to hear how Buzz Hargrove is the reason for all those lost jobs. Is there any way I can PayPal you some money for the entertainment value of what I hope you'll deliver on this subject?

  • munroe

    3 years ago

    Luke, I needed to briefly

    Luke, I needed to briefly respond. I admit I was a bit surprised by the single year over year increase in union density. I don't think it means a great dal as it is only a single year and represents at best a "levelling off" in the decline. There has been a big hit since the Campbell Liberals after a reasonable maintenance during the NDP years. If you go to Dickie's paper, some of the stats are included.

    Futher, a single indicator can be explained by certain individual events. Again, from Dickie, the reorganisation of health care workers that continued in the year in question and the addition of 1400 members through a single call centre certification skews the numbers.

    Union density alone does not speak to the current imbalance in the Code. The specific changes to unfair labour practice provisions and what is called "free speech" has had dramatic effects. I could provide a great deal of anecdotal information to prove this claim.

    Finally, the journey to choosing collective bargaining is supposed to be an expedited and administrative process, not a two year struggle pockmarked by litigation excesses and delays. This is a second perspective on how Campbell has altered labour relations, but it has to o with funding the Tribunal and the Board's drift from balance in its decision-making.

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.