- Ms Kaye is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Mary Carlisle is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Prem Gill is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Nancy Flight is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Justin Everett is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- John Westover is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Nora Etches is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Edward Henderson is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Bharadwaj Chandramouli is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Dean Chatterson is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Marius Scurtescu is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Robert Parkes is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- James Murton is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Susan Doyle is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Vincent Strgar is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Helen Spiegelman is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Subir Guin is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Kimball Finigan is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Joanne Manley is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- David Leach is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
Government Push for More Slot Gambling
Slot machines in bingo halls are Liberals' latest plan to boost gambling revenues, reversing election promises.
[This article was updated on Oct. 8. See Editor's note inserted in text below.]
A quiet plan to introduce slot machines to more than 30 bingo halls throughout British Columbia could soon see pretty much every community in the province flooded with the machines.
The plan, which would see bingo halls re-branded as "community gaming centres," dates back to the start of this year, says Brian Butters, a B.C. Lottery Corporation spokesperson who explains the plan was adopted at the urging of the companies that run the bingo halls.
"The game of bingo has been on a downward spiral," he says. Revenues have been dropping, not just in B.C. but across North America. To give revenues a boost, it's necessary to pull in people who don't ordinarily go to bingo halls. "The idea is to attract a younger consumer to the type of facilities formerly known as bingo halls," he says.
A look at BCLC annual reports, however, shows that bingo revenues have been in anything but a "downward spiral."
Numbers contradict claims
In 1996/97 the the BCLC made $4.1 million from bingo, in 1997/98 they made $18.1 million and in 1998/99 it was up to $42.7 million. By 2003/04, this year's report shows, bingo revenues had rocketed to almost $194 million, up $542,000 from the year before.
According to Butters, revenue from all the bingo played in the province didn't start flowing through the BCLC until part way through 2002, making it difficult to make comparisons for any but the last two years. Asked if he could back up the "downward spiral" claim by providing older financial information from the industry, he said he'd send figures by e-mail. Two weeks later, that message still hasn't arrived. Butters explained the contradiction in the available figures by saying, "The number of player visits have been on a decline . . . but the average spent per visit has gone up." New bingo halls in Kelowna and Kamloops have also boosted the province's total bingo revenues, he says.
[Editor's note: After this article was published, Butters provided figures stating that bingo revenue in B.C. dropped from $205.9 million in 1999 to $195.7 million in 2004. Butters provided profit figures for 2004 only: $20.4 million.]
Gambling revenues up $500 million
It wasn't supposed to be this way.
A New Era for British Columbia, the platform booklet on which the B.C. Liberals fought the 2001 election, promises, "A BC Liberal government will stop the expansion of gambling that has increased gambling addiction and put new strains on families."
Since 2001, total gambling revenues coming into the BCLC from all its operations--casinos, lotteries and bingo halls--have jumped by about $500 million. They hit an all-time high of $1.9 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004.
Solicitor general Rich Coleman, who is responsible for the BCLC, was unavailable to comment on the plan to put slots in bingo halls, the rapid expansion of gambling in the province or the Liberals' broken promise to stop the industry's growth.
Before a bingo hall is allowed to add slot machines it has to get the approval of its local municipal council. The Gaming Control Act requires the council to get "community input" and consult with any neighbouring municipal governments. According to Butters, municipal governments are offered 10 percent of the revenue from the new slots. Minutes from a Courtenay city council meeting in May show that Butters estimated revenues to that city would be about $110,000 a year for 25 machines, and $440,000 for 100.
So far, he says, Williams Lake, Kelowna, Dawson Creek, Fort Nelson and Campbell River have all given the okay to slots in bingo halls, and the machines could be operating in some places as soon as September. Courtenay, Powell River and Vernon are all close to giving their approval, and considerations are also underway in Coquitlam, Kamloops, Mission, and Prince George.
'Opportunity to convert all of them'
Butters says the BCLC has had discussions with "several municipalities" in the capital region and a number of others in the Lower Mainland, but nothing has moved forward yet. The goal is to have at least eight approved by March, he says.
Playtime Bingo in Saanich and Langford Drop-in Bingo are both owned by Playtime Community Gaming Centres Inc., the same company that owns the halls moving forward with slots in Campbell River and Courtenay. Based in Vancouver, the company owns a total of eight bingo halls in B.C., and until October, 2003, it was called Pacific Fundraising Limited.
"We have the opportunity, with municipalities' support, to put an application forward and convert all of them," says Tom Nellis, the president, CEO and largest single shareholder of Playtime. "We're not certain that out of eight, eight cities will be approved," he says, but within the next year they'll make the pitch to all of them.
City councils and the public need to hear the arguments for converting the halls, he says, in order to make an informed choice.
Community groups get nine percent
Of the $1.9-billion the BCLC brings in from all its operations it puts $170 million back into some 6,000 community associations and organizations. Says Butters, "We think it's important to protect the bingo industry because of its importance in funding charity organizations throughout the province."
People wanting to gamble can already do it illegally through the internet, Butters says, and for most people in the province there's already a casino or a new community gaming centre nearby. "You can't stop it by a municipal boundary. They just drive into the next community that does offer it . . . It's not an activity that can be curtailed or stopped by council. It's just whether they want to have it in their community." And having it in their community, he adds, means creating some jobs and getting a share of the money.
Slots social harm debated
Creating more opportunities to gamble doesn't mean more people will get hooked on an addictive activity, Butters says, the same way opening bars doesn't create more alcoholics. "The number of problem gamblers in our province is pretty much the same as it is everywhere in North America. It's a small percentage. More gaming in more of these facilities doesn't create a larger problem. It's a constant."
A Statistics Canada report called Fighting the Odds said in December, 2003, that there are 120,000 problem gamblers in Canada, and another million are at risk of problems. Over 170,000 of those people are in B.C.. One of the factors that put people at increased risk of developing a problem, the report says, is access to more addictive forms of gambling, such as video lottery terminals.
"Slot machines are the most addictive form of gambling, period," says Garry Johns, a 50-year-old Burnaby man who has been sentenced to 16 years in jail for crimes he says he committed to feed a gambling addiction. If you compare gambling to drug use, he says, "Keno and slots are the crack cocaine. Once you do it you're hooked. God forbid you win. Once you win you're hooked deeper." A representative of the Victoria branch of Gamblers Anonymous says about eight to 10 people come to the organization's weekly meetings at the Royal Jubilee hospital. Most have run into trouble playing casino games like blackjack and slots, while some have been "hardcore" high-stakes poker players. Individuals with a problem will always find somewhere to gamble, he adds, but creating more opportunities "isn't a good thing."
'Addicted to revenues'
"I think that would be a very unfortunate step to take," says Maurine Karagianis, an Esquimalt councillor who is seeking the NDP nomination to represent Esquimalt-Metchosin in the next provincial election. "I'm very unhappy about expanded gambling in any way."
If we're going to expand gambling in the province, she says, we need to have a broader public discussion about it, instead of the way it's happening now. "It's by stealth. I don't agree with that either."
A Saanich councillor, David Cubberley, says, "I think the community in the broad sense doesn't want it, and we don't want the government in Saanich to become addicted to gaming revenues, because it's a slippery slope."
He says he isn't "a prude" who's opposed to gambling for moral reasons, and he can also see why municipal governments would be compelled by the argument to expand gaming. "Let's face it, we are cash-strapped as a level of government," he says. But when you add in the associated social costs, which he says are well documented, the short-term boost to revenue may be outweighed by long-term problems. "I think it's the wrong path. . . . It's a problem to become reliant on gambling to finance public goods."
'Don't see big picture'
Cubberly calls bingo a relatively "innocuous" way to gamble and says, "Some forms are more addictive than others, and probably the slots are one of those forms." Adding them to a bingo hall would really change the social and community feel of the place, he says.
"The government's so far behind they don't even see it," says Garry Johns, talking about the social costs of gambling. "They see free money. It's much the same as the gambler who's chasing free money. They don't see the big picture."
Johns figures he has "created at least 2,000 victims" through lying, cheating and skipping debts. He says about 80 percent of the people he meets through Gamblers Anonymous say they have committed a crime -- bank fraud, writing phony cheques, stealing from a spouse, embezzling from an employer -- to support a gambling habit.
He describes leaving an 80-year-old family friend in a "pool of blood" after he robbed him. "That's where the addiction takes you."
Andrew MacLeod, a staff writer for Monday Magazine in Victoria, wrote The Tyee's four-part series about how the new welfare rules are affecting the poor in B.C. ![]()



11
Login or register to post comments
allan (not verified)
7 years ago
Good article Andrew and the first I am aware of that actually deals with the plans for extended gambling in an honest way. There is a new ''bingo'' hall in Kamloops, which was billed as just a replacement for the old existing facilites and that, no, there was no plan to add slots. Zoom forward six months and all of a sudden the owners are now proposing introducing 100 slot machines to the ''bingo'' hall. The sad thing is that this new hall is in a mixed residential area that previously didn't have much of a walk-in clientelle. Today you seldom notice as the gamblers arrive, but pay attention for a few minutes and you begin to notice individuals leaving the hall in obvious financial difficulty. They don't drive away, hail cabs or wait for the bus. Instead you notice them strolling along streets where they look completely out of place as they start the walk home across this far-flung city.*** Now, it's known this issue will come before Kamloops city council for debate soon, but the concensus on the street is that our gang of local politicians will welcome the gambling plan as a boost to economic development. Yes, you see Kamloops politicians aren't shy about supporting anything that may suggest another tax dollar. It may cost two or three dollars down the road, but hey, they call this progess. In the past two years the same section of Kamloops that now has a new bingo hall, has about a half dozen new private cold beer and wine and liquour stores. Bar owners are beginning to feel the pinch as boozers now have virtually a liquour store on every corner to detract them from stopping at a bar or pub. The same area of Kamloops has had a couple of fast food joints open in the past year or so, but other than that booze and gambling appear to be the only growth areas. In fact both merely pull existing revenues from other businesses and there-by create a net-loss as far as the city's financial situation is concerned. But, like the shell game economic development targets usually are, city council members will no doubt do there duty once again and praise the benefits of unimpeded capitalism, all the while, ignoring the slow, cancerous growth of problems that will have to be dealt with by local residents and other levels of government. Another example of the race-to-the-bottom being painted as growth. How sad, how pathetic, how provincial Liberal!
Stuart (not verified)
7 years ago
Good article, provincial and municipal governments are always addicted to gambling and praise Its benefits as good for the local economy. Putting aside the moral and societal cost of such A habit it is actually bad for business. You see most bars , restaurants, retail stores etc will not support a local casino, gambling is just a raw exchange of money, no new goods or services Were produced. You have a provincial gov with a bottomless pit of money competing with businesses In the area. There is only so much disposable income to go around, once you spend it its gone, someone who lost money gambling does not spend it somewhere else. Gambling usually hits the poor the most who are desperate etc. Provincial governments love the revenue flow it provides and will ignore all other factors, It may work for Gordo, why not have hookers legal to, Gordo would Make a good pimp.
Kaybertoss (not verified)
7 years ago
It may work for Gordo, why not have hookers legal to, Gordo would Make a good pimp. LOL!!!!
This is the exact same thing Gordo’s idol Ralph Klein did in Alberta years ago. Alberta now relies more on gambling revenue than most anything else. Just another tax grab. Again, another example of one of the many lies of Gordon Campbell!
The Odd time I’ve ventured into a casino in my hometown and lost my limit of twenty bucks, I found the majority of the patrons were lonely, bored seniors.Peter Dimitrov (not verified)
7 years ago
To be fair the BC Liberals are not the only ones who have sought the expansion of gambling...many municipalities/cities also approve of it...witness Vancouver --- COPE council's approval of slots at Hasting Park. The reasons why municipalities/cities want such an expansion...is pure and simple...cash! Ditto for the BC Liberals. The symptom: is that municipalities/cities are fairly cash poor....although some have large land banks! Wonder why that is? - what is the root cause of the cities/municipalities being cash poor? Is it because they have little taxing power under the present "system" , is it because there is no financial equity in the system? Is that why the PST, other taxes, levies, resouce rents, traffic fines, etc. etc...ALL flow nicely to Victoria...to be re-allocated according to the Premier's office...and rubber-stamped by Cabinet/ Legislature. Is it not because the relationship between cities/municipalities/regions and the Provincial Crown is essentially colonial and unequal in character...where the Crown extracts rents, capital, etc. and then off-loads costs & responsibilities, etc. ---you know the argument. Few have critically written about Campbell's 100 million dollar repatriation of traffic fines back to the municipalities/cities ---does anyone, other than myself, think it a sick use of Executive power, a political ploy to gain votes? Does anyone else, besides myself, not ask---just what business does Victoria have, or ought to have, ...collecting traffic fines? Is it just that Victoria collect virtually all revenues, leaving the municipalities only room to levy property tax? Does anyone, aside from myself, not think that more financial equity needs to be introduced to the BC political system? Does anyone else think that perhaps an 'internal constitution' within BC, that allocated jurisdictional rights, as well as powers to levy and collect direct & indirect taxes in a more equitable fashion between Victoria, the cities/municipalities & regions is an idea worthy of discussion/contemplation/ perhaps doing at some point in our history. If not, one can only infer that the 'broad consensus" within both the "neo-liberal right" and the NDP ...is that the provincial governance structures are just fine...that we ought to continue to allow only the Provincial Crown centralized in Victoria, as "landlord" to own almost everything (water, trees, minerals, oil & gas, etc), to set taxation levels and just collect it all...and then...ala the Premier's office..with the rubber-stamping of the Legislature & Cabinet of whatever party is in power, to establish, in a very undemocratic manner...a budget. Yes, I'm talking about the powers of the Crown, about property rights, about the need for an equitable division of power between the Provincial Crown...and the cities/municipalities & regions of this province. ..but am I the only person pondering these larger questions? Does anyone else, aside from myself, even ponder, that more democratic budgeting processes need to occur in BC? Does anyone, aside from myself, not concur that Victoria and the Premier's office have, visa vis the other branches of government way too much power, and also that the idea of a centralized Crown located in Victoria, paternalistically setting policy and budget...has to be substantially modified. Is there anyone else ought there that sees...that regardless of which party is elected...the present 'rules of the game' and the 'institutions of governance' have centralized power, with mininal checks and balances, with minimal equity. Are there others out there in internet -land who clearly see that what we have in BC/Canada is not a democracy...but governance by elites for elites...in essence an oligarchy. For those who seek to further this discussion, intellectual as it is, please contribute here and if you wish also at bcpolitics.ca. For those who are left on the Left in BC...should we not come together, online and in -person to discuss these and other matters. Those who have within this Tyee forum, expressed a wish to contact me personally can write me at PO Box 102, 2496 East Hastings St. Vancouver, BC V5K 1Z1. Please leave an email, or phone number and I'll try my best to get in touch.
billy pilgrim (not verified)
7 years ago
the government ought to be obligated to put warning labels on slot machines and lottery tickets similar to the warnings on cigarette packages. something like - "you are pissing your money away" or "slots cause financial ruin" - and have a big smirking photo of gordon under the warning.
claudia (not verified)
7 years ago
These Liberals will go to any length to rape the common taxpayer. Anyone else feeling abused?
Kent (not verified)
7 years ago
I am one of those rare individuals who have never bought a lottery ticket, or entered a B.C casino. I have been to Reno and Vegas, but not primarily to gamble. Gambling is a voluntary tax which I choose not to pay. If we needed more proof of the Liberal lies (and we didn't)this is it. But note how they skillfully bring Municipal elected officials onside by their pre-election promises and by moves like this.
allan (not verified)
7 years ago
Kent, you touch on an interesting aspect of politics in B.C. in your final point. These neo-Libs, just like when they were Socreds, have always maintained a strong power-base within the municipal system. They always pander to that sector as the clock winds down and if you will follow the trend, you will see they usually offer gifts to municipalities that will benefit the business classes in most municipalities. The NDP, for all its claims of fighting for the ordinary people, seldom get around to looking good when dealing with mayors and councillors. The Socreds or Liberals don't deliver any more, but, thanks to support by corporate controlled media, get full credit while the NDP is accused of handicapping business if it offers a crumb to the poor. The latest anti-panhandling laws plan, announced by the Liberals this week is a perfect example of that. Homeless people and squeegie kids are a sign of social crisis, yet they are being villified at the beckoning of businesses who want them moved but are simply too miserly to pay the real price of dealing with the larger picture. Perhaps they think their customers should pay the freight.
karl (not verified)
7 years ago
and how did the liberals realy balance the provincial budget?through more slots why of course
BC Mary (not verified)
7 years ago
Compare the shrinking of the police budgets with the expansion of gaming!
Margo (not verified)
7 years ago
Guess you get the picture.