- Ms Kaye is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Mary Carlisle is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Prem Gill is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Nancy Flight is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Justin Everett is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- John Westover is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Nora Etches is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Edward Henderson is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Bharadwaj Chandramouli is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Dean Chatterson is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Marius Scurtescu is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Robert Parkes is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- James Murton is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Susan Doyle is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Vincent Strgar is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Helen Spiegelman is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Subir Guin is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Kimball Finigan is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Joanne Manley is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- David Leach is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
Send in the Shoe Police!
Women in a Crown Counsel office are having their footwear monitored. Does it really matter what public servants wear?
Six middle-aged women sit amongst half-eaten fruit plates, seven-layer dip and Nanaimo bars, sipping white wine and chatting about work. A normal gal's night, until you reach their feet--garish shoes home-decorated in sequins, silver spray paint and buttons don their otherwise ordinarily dressed selves.
The occasion is a mock rebellion in solidarity with their colleagues in a neighboring government office who are feeling the pinch of a new shoe dress code.
Over the summer, the staff at the Vancouver-Main Street Crown Counsel offices were sent an e-mail declaring that certain shoes were not acceptable to wear in the office. Regional Crown Michael Hicks said the e-mail was sent by office manager Anne Boyle to clarify questions the staff had about appropriate warm weather attire.
Shoe 'uncertainty' addressed
"There was uncertainty in the office about the type of shoes that should be worn during the summer, the office manager clarified it with an e-mail," explains Hicks, adding, "There is an overall expectation that staff in the Crown Counsel offices, who, like many other members of the civil service deal regularly with the public, will be neatly dressed consistent with the standards of a professional office environment."
In the e-mail, Boyle attempted to simplify the confusion by attaching pictures of shoes arranged in columns titled "Shoes That are OK" and "Shoes That are Not," with an explanatory note. She writes:
"You will see that I have put one type of shoe in the "not ok" column that I had previously said ok to. Unfortunately, this shoe (the first one) has caused too many questions as there are varying types, and I have since decided that they are not ok. Although very nice shoes, I do not think they should be worn within the type of office that we are."
What about the men?
Looking at the pictures provided, the obvious conclusion would be: no open-toe shoes. However, Boyle goes on explain that "open toe shoes are fine, as long as you have a sling back or full back with them and are not 'sandal' in nature."
This "clarifying" e-mail was sent on June 29 with the "PS" addition, "this will be effective tomorrow, June 30th."
To the women at the "shoe rebellion" party, this small slice of office wear politics is both disturbing and humorous. None are willing to go on the record with their opinions. But they grumble about managers spending time compiling pictures of acceptable shoes, and ask why only women's shoes are depicted in the illustrations. According to the government employee directory, at least two men work in the office.
In fact, the "shoe" e-mail garnered quite a bit of attention from colleagues throughout the lower mainland. Boyle's "Shoes That are OK" and "Shoes That are Not" was circulated by e-mail among several offices with comments attached such as, "Just in case everyone was wondering what life was like for Admin Staff at Main Street, you just have to check out this latest e-mail with attached pictures of 'o.k. shoes' and 'not o.k. shoes'…seriously (happy face icon)," and subsequent parody e-mails of Boyle's original made their rounds as well.
A spokesperson for the Ministry of Attorney General, which oversees the Crown Counsel, said she had no knowledge of a shoe dress code.
Professional look ascendant
Although Hicks maintains there were no formal complaints about issuing the "shoe code," confirmed by the staff's regional BCGEU representative, he seemed hesitant to talk about the rationale of such explicit fashion instruction of his employees, repeating the office was simply complying with standard expectations of business attire exhibited countless other professional offices.
The "professional look" is popping up in government and business rhetoric everywhere. One of the first actions President Bush made after taking over the Oval Office was to reinstate the White House suit-and-tie dress code and Premier Gordon Campbell's "We're open for Business" slogan heralded hallways fulls of power suits, perfect hair and designer ties.
Victoria Times-Colonist legislative columnist Les Leyne recalls this switch during the 2002 Bike to Work Week by revealing that, since the changing of the guard, previously filled bike racks laid nearly empty, something he chalks up to fashion:
"Word of the business dress code surfaced soon after. Suits and ties, business attire all around, no casual Fridays. The thought occurred that maybe pedaling along in full geek mode--pedal clips, helmet and Armani business suit--was putting them off," writes Leyne.
Damned if you do or don't
During the Conservative leadership campaign earlier this year, candidate Belinda Stronach was scrutinized by the media more for her designer suits and perfect hair than her platform points. Similarly, provincial NDP leader Carole James has been criticized for supposedly not showing enough fashion savvy. And when provincial NDP opposition leader Joy MacPhail announced she was stepping out of politics last year, the Vancouver Sun responded with an elegy article to her hairstyles during her years as a high-profile politician.
Although office dress codes seem to defy what our society prides itself on as individualism and choice, according to business image consultant, Karen Mallett, dress codes are the way of the future.
"People don't like dress codes. They don't like to be told what to wear. But in the business world they are very important if you want to be taken seriously," said Mallett.
Power fashion advisor
Mallett is co-founder of a business consulting firm called In Good Company and, with Lewena Mayer, is half of the author/columnist power duo, known as the "Etiquette Ladies." She said dress codes allow an office staff to work together as a team and project the image they want. Mallett insists proper clothes and grooming project confidence to both employees and clients.
Number three on Mallet's "Top Ten Unquestionably Rude Office Behaviors", is "inappropriate attire" which she defines as "too short, too tight, too revealing, too often slept in."
"It is disrespectful to others and to yourself when productivity and the quality of work is demeaned by distractions resulting from someone's attire. A good rule of thumb is to follow the dress code exhibited by your immediate supervisor," writes Mallett in her column, putting bad attire next to only gossip and "the silent treatment" in ultimate office rudeness.
However, Mallet insists that dress codes should never come from the top-down or without proper consultation.
Bye, Bye Birkenstocks
"Dress codes should always be a group decision, not something one person dictates," she said.
"Everyone affected should discuss and decide as group what their dress code will be. Dress codes should be about group empowerment, not control."
So while the administration staff at Main Street Crown Counsel are letting their Birkenstocks and strapless pumps collect dust, the trend for office apparel seems clear: a more professional (and in most cases, more expensive) look is becoming the standard.
Sara Petrescu is a reporter who recently moved from the Sunshine Coast to Toronto.
![]()



34
Login or register to post comments
Shirin (not verified)
7 years ago
Are you kidding me? Talk about much ado about nothing. Although I like the subtle parallel between gordo and the bush wacked styles of ruling - the thought that people are more occupied with what someone is wearing than what is in their job description to do is disturbing if not lunatic. I guess it makes sense to try to polish up the cover of a book lacking substance if you are ever going to get someone to buy its nonsense. As for the ladies in eticquette and their opinion on the matter of the dress code becoming the new vogue - they are hoping people would buy that concept so that they can stay employed in voicing their opinions.
larry (not verified)
7 years ago
Ah yes, dress codes. One thing about the Bush-shite Cambull Gang is their consistency. Here we are marching back to the 1950's. The neoconazi utopia is abuilding! Now only if women and non-whites would learn their place and everyone would work for a dollar an hour, wouldn't it be wonderful.
Sherry (not verified)
7 years ago
It also seems that the unacceptable footwear are shoes that are healthier for your feet. So, tip over on those stilleto heels and break your ankle. Maybe we'll see directives on what kind of cast is acceptable in the office.
Christine (not verified)
7 years ago
This all seems to go back to the Professional Beauty Quotient that Naomi Wolf outlined in The Beauty Myth. Can't go too sexy, can't go too casual, can't go too creative with a woman's business attire. In a world filled with low-rider pants and flimsy see-through shirts, it is nearly impossible to find something to wear to work that is affordable, attractive and comfortable. Helpful emails like this one only add to the feeling that no matter what a girl does, she has "nothing to wear". Notice too, how the shoes deemed acceptable are not only granny-styled, but more sedate in colour too? Oh, and look how pointy everything is. ooh, comfy. I suppose women should all just do that office lady thing of keeping the proper footwear under the desk and commute in their nice padded sneakers. Ughly. Interesting that this was sent out by the manager of a Crown Cousel office. By all accounts of the caseload those folks are dealing with, you'd think they'd be concerned with something other than what kind of shoes the women are wearing. My dream in life is to have a job where I can wear comfortable shoes to work, because half the time it feels like I'm (hobbling around on heels) wearing a disguise.
Trusha Desai (not verified)
7 years ago
How much of tax payers' money was spent by Boyle? Could we transfer her to the payroll of a private school where she can ad nauseum advise on the length of skirts and the the number of buttons in cardigans? We don't have money for single moms on welfare, but we sure know how are crown counsel staff should be shod.
Trusha Desai (not verified)
7 years ago
Sorry for the typo. Please replace "are" by "our" in the last line. Too much haste in clicking send, since my iration increases.
Jeff (not verified)
7 years ago
Why not let these governament lawyers wear comfortable shoes as they don't do much anyway. Start monitoring thier out put.
Ron (not verified)
7 years ago
Obviously, men don't have to have this code because we only have two pairs of shoes, c'mon.
billk (not verified)
7 years ago
after a (cough) close inspection of the shoes that are "ok" and "not ok" i think i found the difference. it seems that the "not ok" shoes are far more revealing than the "ok" shoes. hmmmm..... i guess that Boyle is worried that EXPOSING to much toe might cause some office offence. we don`t want our office girls running around with thier toes hanging out for all to see now do we? how are the "boys" going to get any work done? Boyle should get out of her workmates closets and concentrate on doing her job...what ever that is.
jakking (not verified)
7 years ago
This is part and parcel of the Talebanization we see across neocon societies. Is anyone else old enough to remember Organization Man. Back to the '50s indeed!
Fi (not verified)
7 years ago
Well it's not like they don't still have choice, give me a break. Ron's right too, men have about three styles to choose from so that is irrelevant. And one CAN commute by bike and change at work (it's usually raining anyway, you have to); I do and have for three years. Big deal!
Footloose (not verified)
7 years ago
Hhmmm! I take it the jury's still out on track shoes, cowboy boots and bunny slippers? How about a nice classic pump in hot pink with five-inch stilleto heels? Would that still be OK, or is colour also a factor? Gosh, I sure don't envy Ms. Boyle the tough task she's taken upon herself! This is a real Pandora's Box.
Shoe Rebuff (not verified)
7 years ago
How much of the tax payers money was spent by Boyle - none. Setting and communicating best practices and expectations is within a manager's job description. What about the women at the "shoe rebellion" party who were in contact with the media (probably on the tax payer's time) and all the other government employees throughout the lower mainland who joined in to circulate this e-mail? If they don't understand this is an inappropriate use of the government's e-mail system, time and resources or that circulating material outside of the government is a breach of confidentiality, it's no wonder they have to be told how to dress.
Ragamuffing ... (not verified)
7 years ago
Here's my proposal for appropriate government office wear:
To accentuate that permanent sleep-state this government has entered: Fuzzy slippers, preferably canary yellow for pie-eyed optimism, with infantile cookie-monster googly eyes. And a pink polyester 'satin' quilted bathrobe. Old-fashioned hair-curlers.
For that low man on the totem pole look: A tasteful metal-spiked black corinthian leather dog collar with chain leash and muzzle. Chastity belt for anyone who isn't biblically approved.
For the voter snow-job look: hydrogen peroxide squeegees implanted into the gums to give teeth that dazzling used-car salesman gleam. Botox injections for the conscience.
wellherewegoagain (not verified)
7 years ago
How stupid can they get? Would be much more appropriated that Crown Council office get involved with the monumental job of drug (cocaine, heroine, alcohol) related accidents/incidents in the work place and deal with other very serious problems. I could care less if the workers walked bare feet or if they were dressed at all. Talking about too much time in their hands!
ummm... (not verified)
7 years ago
"heroine related incidents" -- Can I have one of those?
Cypher (not verified)
7 years ago
Note to the Tyee Editor!!!!!! Your website is so unreliable, why are you still running on IIS? Why have you not found someone else to host the site? Why did they not backup the metabase and the content when they did the upgrade? Disaster recovery plans are useless if you don't test the backup, I hope you have these people on a short leash. Seek a second and third opinion, do us all a favour.
Cypher (not verified)
7 years ago
Scratch that, your website is sooooooo unreliable.
allan (not verified)
7 years ago
Shoe Rebuff -Do you really think it is a breach of ''confidentiality'' to slag a large-headed boss who has obviously stepped unsteadily back out onto a fashion limb on which she has already had to change her position in a less than flattering way? A manager so engrossed in an obvious and escalating foot phobia, that she would spend her high-end time scanning foot zines and writing multiple e-mail edicts, clarifications and ''I changed my mind''s. Perhaps I missed it and the entire goverment human resources services have closed and all the staff have been ''severed'', but I thought an HR person could probably draw up a more appropiate foot cover code and get it right the first time more smoothly and effectively than someone who should be focused on the administration of a very busy public system. As for your mean-spirited whine about civil servants wasting government time and money e-mailing the that ''keeper'' around, you should be encouraged that civil servants can find something to smile about working under this government of liars who ripped up legally binding contracts for many of those workers. Finally, did the shoe rebelion scare you? All those middle-aged ladies with their toes sticking right out there for the whole world to get confused over. Did they have tea?
Justice Demands Respect (not verified)
7 years ago
I see nothing wrong with rules of decorum in a forum in which the rights of citizens are adjudicated. Shouldn't we all be on an equal footing (no pun intended) before the law?
Kit (not verified)
7 years ago
And who, your nibs, shall adjudicate that?
Trusha Desai (not verified)
7 years ago
I noticed this morning, in current Premier Gordon Campbell's riding that there were shoes of all descriptions dangling from power lines. After the current Premier Gordon Campbell retires from politics and seeks another career, perhaps he may join with Boyle. We'll loan some ladders, they could perhaps redistribute those shoes to the homeless on the east end. And maybe current Mayor Larry Campbell could also consider this choice instead of pondering about legalizing marijuana. I have an old soccer shoe. Size 11 (kids). Does anyone want to look for the matching pair? Thank God we don't do glass slippers any more. Otherwise, we'd have a landfill full of pesky pumpkins.
The REAL barking mad fox channel ... (not verified)
7 years ago
First off, the pumps gotta go. Indecent! Not the shoe, the name 'pumps' -- it's going to give all those whacky foot fetish people some nasty ideas. Next thing, we'll have all these people lining up at the government office wickets to rub themselves like a bunch of untrained doggies against the feet of civil servants. First the feet, then the apocalypse!
ragamuffing ... (not verified)
7 years ago
barking, you're a bit of an untrained doggie yourself. Stay away from my heels!
SIEGLINDE (not verified)
7 years ago
So what would happen if someone came in with a doctor's note saying that they HAD TO WEAR BIRKENSTOCK?! Comfortable shoes save money because they prevent unnecessary back pain. What an infringement! What's next? What underwear to wear?
Ron Y (not verified)
7 years ago
Au contraire, I don't think these regulations are restrictive enough. They don't include deep sea diving gear, pimp hats, bling bling, use of the phrase bling bling, Old Spice, Axe Body Spray, semen stains, pulling your penis out of your pants and your pockets inside out and asking people "wanna see an elephant?", stilts, face paint, wigs, extra heads, or white pants after Labour Day. There ought to be a law!!!!
Tha Geek (not verified)
7 years ago
As usual Ron cracks me up, been a big fan of your movie reviews as well.
Anonymous
7 years ago
beyond hope (not verified)
7 years ago
Is anyone surprised?! this is just another example of the new era management tactics from Victoria, once again it only affect women
Ron Yamauchi (not verified)
7 years ago
Ya but there are only two guys in the office, and how many guys are into shoes? What was that figure...one in ten
donena (not verified)
7 years ago
well i think gordon cambell should pick up all the shoes people are not suppose to wear have a garage sale take the money and buy all the children in b.c.a couple pairof good winter boots for the winterand maybe a coupon for a free meal before they are sent off to school hungry how does that sound you have extra money to spend on finding out what shoes people wear to the office blows my mind i do not think there is a dress code for garage sales yet so just wear whatever you can afford cambell
Jim (not verified)
7 years ago
I've seen some of the feet of the people that work at the Main Street office and they're not too pretty. Boyle's main concern is about showing off disgustingly ugly toes.
massive ego trip now (not verified)
7 years ago
thanks Geek
Colin (not verified)
7 years ago
My wife is going to be doing a stint at the Crown’s Counsel office, she will get a chuckle out of this. During her interview they warned her that it might be difficult as they deal with “bad peopleâ€. She replied that in Malaysia she had to defend murderers against the death penalty. They started squirming when she mentioned that Malaysia had the death penalty and caning. My sister was at the Labour Board and was told by an Socred appointee that he wanted women to wear skirts and not pants.