Mediacheck

Competition Bureau Ready to Take on Media Convergence?

Bell Media, one of four media giants dominating Canada, has huge designs on Quebec.

By Michael Geist, 7 Aug 2012, TheTyee.ca

Man being crushed underfoot

Now or never for Competition Bureau to deal with unprecedented concentration of Canadian media firms? Photo: Shutterstock.

Related

Canadian broadcasters and broadcast distributors have pursued a convergence strategy for the past decade that has created one of the world's most concentrated media markets. Four powerhouses -- Bell Media, Rogers, Shaw, and Videotron -- have been left standing with those companies now dominating broadcast television, radio, and broadcast distribution from coast to coast.

While it may already be too late, the proposed $3 billion Bell Media-Astral merger may represent the final opportunity to address mounting concerns over the competitive impact of a converged market. The new Bell Media-Astral entity will control approximately 45 per cent of the commercial radio market in Canada along with a dizzying array of television stations, specialty television channels, as well as wireless, satellite, and Internet services.

The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission and the Competition Bureau share responsibility for approving media mergers. The CRTC is charged with assessing the cultural perspective and the Competition Bureau is tasked with assessing the economic impact.

The CRTC's public review will capture the lion share of attention as it examines the proposed merger in the fall. As is often the case, much of the discussion will centre on the "benefits package" that accompanies each media merger. Cultural groups will argue over the hundreds of millions that is up for grabs (Bell is seeking to divert a sizable chunk of money toward infrastructure development in the Canadian north), while the public comments have thus far focused primarily on a controversial programming shift at a Montreal sports talk radio station.

Should those issues dominate the CRTC debate, the competitive concerns may be given a pass, leaving it to the Competition Bureau to assert itself.

Now or never

The Bureau has a long history of examining media mergers with most receiving regulatory approval with no conditions. The exception to the rule has been media mergers with a significant Quebec component. For example, a proposed merger of Quebecor and Benjamin Media, a leading magazine distributor, was scuttled in 1989 after the Bureau raised competition concerns.

In 2000, the Bureau challenged Quebecor's proposed purchase of Videotron, noting that it would give the company control of the first and third largest television networks in the province. As a result, the Bureau ordered Quebecor to sell one of the networks in order to complete the deal.

A year later, the Bureau challenged Astral's proposed purchase of Telemedia, which would have given the company a near-monopoly in four French language radio markets and a dominant position in two others. The case settled when the parties agreed to sell several of the radio stations at issue.

The Bell Media-Astral merger raises many of the same concerns, though supporters have characterized the transaction as an effort to inject greater competition into the Quebec market. The Bureau may need further convincing since it has signaled a growing discomfort with Canadian media convergence and the potential for Bell Media to act in an anti-competitive manner.

Its 2010 approval of the Bell-CTVglobemedia merger included comments about the "growing trend toward vertical integration in the broadcasting industry" and the Bell Media-Rogers Communications joint purchase of Maple Leafs Sports and Entertainment earlier this year featured a statement that the Bureau was actively reviewing concerns about "incremental increasing concentration and vertical integration in the broadcasting industry."

Most recently, it launched an inquiry into whether Bell Media is imposing, or seeking to impose, unlawful restrictions on broadcast distributors that carry Bell-owned specialty channels. In a filing last month with the Federal Court, the Bureau sought "information detailing the precise nature of the restrictions being proposed and/or imposed by Bell on competing distributors."

The outcome of that inquiry is to be determined, but with the Bell Media-Astral deal waiting in the wings, it may be now or never for the Competition Bureau to wade into the competitive impact of the unprecedented concentration of Canadian media companies.  [Tyee]

2  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • frank2

    40 weeks ago

    This issue is a real can of

    This issue is a real can of worms. Changing technology -- not well understood (certainly by me) - very large $ involved -- and media which help form public opinion.

    Wouldn't it be nice to say that no company could have more than 10% of any local market, and those larger than that can't acquire or accrete anything without larger divestiture to reach the target.

    Of course, any government taking that line would be accused of communism -- even if the idea is really to get to "free market competition" rather than accelerating trends to monopoly control.

    ah well.

  • Talon

    40 weeks ago

    What's not to love about monopolies?

    Everything!

    Monopolies have always been the surest way to get really, really rich next to winning the loto. I am old enough to remember when monopolies were illegal. But put the "right" people in government and all those fine rules against monopolies will surely come tumbling down. The problem is worsening and the only way to defeat it is to not use the services of monopolies because it seems we cannot trust Ottawa to do the right thing. Welcome to Harperland right next door to Idiotsland.

    • No best comments selected by an editor for this story yet. To see all comments, click the All Comments tab, above.