Canada's Path to Digital Competitiveness
Hint: Deregulation isn't the silver bullet.
Industry Minister Jim Prentice
Jim Prentice, Canada's new industry minister, has been on the job for less than a week, yet his appointment has already sent a buzz through the business community. With a member of Prime Minister Stephen Harper's inner circle now at the helm, promoting Canada's global economic competitiveness promises to become a core priority on the government's fall agenda.
While some political commentators maintain that the issue rarely translates into voter support, the good news for Prentice is that reforms focusing on digital issues represent both good policy and smart politics. By prioritizing three issues -- communication, copyright, and consumer confidence -- he has the opportunity to establish a forward-looking framework that can serve as a model for other countries and provide a payoff at the ballot box.
Maxime Bernier, the former industry minister, rightly identified communications as a foundational issue for Canadian digital competitiveness. Over the past 18 months, Bernier tabbed telecommunications as his chief concern, ordering the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) to deregulate local phone markets and to emphasize a hands-off approach.
Catching up on Net connectivity
Analysts are divided on whether the deregulation will result in reduced prices for consumers; however, there is near-universal agreement that deregulation alone is not enough. Plans for a new consumer complaints commissioner and the do-not-call registry should be placed on the fast track, while the minister should heed recent advice from Corus Entertainment, one of Canada's leading media companies, by establishing a task force to examine network neutrality. Moreover, the spectrum auction, which can open the door to greater competition and lower prices, provided that Ottawa reserves space for new entrants, should proceed as planned.
Looking further ahead, there will be another spectrum auction once Canada's broadcasters complete the transition from analog to digital, freeing up the analog spectrum for alternate uses. While Canada has lagged behind most of the industrial world in the wireless sector, Prentice can propel it ahead by mandating that some of that spectrum feature "open access" requirements that would spur innovation and empower consumers.
Moreover, with recent news that the Australian government plans to implement a national broadband network that will provide coverage to 99 per cent of its population by the end of 2008, Canada is facing the prospect of playing catch-up on the Internet connectivity front. A long overdue Canadian broadband strategy to ensure that all Canadian communities have access to affordable high-speed Internet connectivity would prove popular with voters and strengthen Canada's position in the digital economy.
Copyright reform
After years of missed deadlines, the stars may have finally aligned for Canadian copyright reform. With a strong new industry minister, a former industry minister (David Emerson) chairing the powerful cabinet economic committee, a fresh face at Canadian Heritage in new minister Josée Verner, and a government that only two months ago met U.S. demands for movie piracy legislation, Canada is now poised to introduce reforms that meet domestic needs and generate popular support.
In the short term, that means blocking the application of the private copying levy to iPods and SD cards, which can be implemented without the need for new legislation and would bring cheer to Canadian retailers and consumers.
Longer term, a new legislative package could contain a series of measures focused on restoring balance to Canadian copyright law, emboldening a new generation of Canadian creators and capturing the public's attention. These include provisions that formally legalize recording television shows (time shifting), permit personal backup copies of CDs and DVDs (format shifting), expand fair dealing to allow for innovative new business models, eliminate the private copying levy and establish a close link between legal protection for copy-control technologies and actual copyright infringement.
Making a safety net
Bernier puzzlingly ignored promoting consumer confidence in the digital economy. With mounting concern over spam, spyware and identity theft, Canada's failure to act places us in a distinct minority of countries and threatens consumer acceptance of electronic services such as e-banking and e-commerce. The obvious solution -- supported in 2005 by Emerson -- is a legislative package targeting Internet harms that would likely receive all-party support as few politicians would stand in the way of anti-spam legislation.
Addressing consumer confidence also means giving Canadians the tools to protect themselves against identity theft and misuse of their personal information. Last spring, a House of Commons committee recommended creating a mandatory security breach notification system that would require organizations to report security breaches to the privacy commissioner. The government has been silent on its planned response, but Prentice should seize the opportunity by implementing the recommendation.
The government sent an important signal last week that industrial policy will garner greater attention in the months ahead. Digital economic issues should form a key part of that initiative as aligning smart policies and politics may be both easily said and done.
Related Tyee stories:
- Canada Sleeps Through War to 'Save the Internet'
Digital democracy at risk if telecoms get their way say opponents. - CanCon Adapts to a Wild New Media World
Satellite radio, TiVo, iPods change the game. - A Net Abuzz with Activism
But why does Canada lag so far behind the U.S. when it comes to mobilizing "smart mobs" online?



5
Login or register to post comments
gaulois
4 years ago
The "task force" isn't the silver bullet either
Paying attention to the advice from Corus Entertainment of "establishing a task force to examine network neutrality" sounds to me like promoting more foot dragging amongst the regulator ranks, hence making the case for more deregulation.
But if deregulation is not the silver bullet as the author suggests, perhaps we should ensure that the regulator operates at the pace of the Internet age away from the powerful special interest groups that seems to always get the attention. A regulator that oerates at the pace of the horse&buggies is just as good as no regulator IMO.
I wonder who in Ottawa would have been interested in joining the proposed horse&buggies task force...
gaulois
4 years ago
A made-in BC view of the regulator
Food for thoughts for the Tyee editor. Or that is what the comment sections is for?
Fiat lux
4 years ago
The more we compete. the
The more we compete. the poorer we get.
This applies to any and every field, because the increased energy demands will cause reactions that will automatically increase costs, the real physical costs that ultimately must jack up artificially low monetary costs.
I'm just sorting out some old magazines from the '60s and 70s, with .50-.60 cents to $1.50 price tags. The same now cost $6 to $8. so, where are the savings by competition?
I bought a brand new Dodge Tradesman 200 van with all kinds of extras for $5600. in 1975. The same van now would cost, like our grocery prices, about 1000% more.
So much for economic competition, still sold by crooks and bought by the suckers, while killing themselves to pay the daily increases.
Ed Deak.
Cycling Commuter
4 years ago
Competition = Choice.
The more we compete. the poorer we get.
Depends what you mean by "we."
If "we" refers to lazy and/or incompetent people, yes they may get poorer in a competitive system, assuming they can't be bothered to start doing their fair share of the work to be done.
If "we" means people with average or above average intelligence and work ethics, then "we" come out ahead with properly-regulated competition.
Not that lazy and/or stupid people should be written off entirely. It's just that letting a lazy and/or stupid minority dictate terms to the smart and hard-working majority amounts to the tail wagging the dog.
Properly-regulated competition = well-informed choice. It's true that some people are intellectually incapable of evaluating the facts and making intelligent choices. There are lots of adults with minds of three-year-olds. These people need to be protected from themselves and we need to be protected from them by making them wards of the state to some degree.
Unfortunately, NDP types like to impose nanny-statism on people who are perfectly capable of making their own decisions, while giving far too long a leash to drunk drivers, home invaders and other violent criminals who have repeatedly proven themselves to be incapable of making rational decisions.
Cycling Commuter
4 years ago
The cost of reading is plunging, not rising.
old magazines from the '60s and 70s, with .50-.60 cents to $1.50 price tags. The same now cost $6 to $8. so, where are the savings by competition?
I haven't bought a magazine for years. I tend to do most of my reading online these days. The cost of an internet connection is much less than what I used to pay for magazine subscriptions. When I want an old book or magazine, I generally buy it through http://www.ebay.ca or http://www.bookfinder.com at a fraction of the price it would cost in a store or library. It costs taxpayers over $25 per visit to my local library, plus patrons' cost of transportation to get there and back - even though the selection of material is outright pitiful compared to the selection of material available online.
I'm about to sell some of my old factory auto repair manuals by auction on eBay.ca with a minimum bid of C $0.99. Some of these manuals sold for up to $180.00 new, but they're out of print now. Even though the minimum bid will be $0.99, the manuals will likely sell for $5 to $10 because of competitive bids. Online auctions are the ultimate competition.
Another eBay.ca seller has set a fixed price of US $69.95 + US $20 shipping and "handling" for exactly the same service manual I'm putting up at a minimum bid of C $0.99 plus actual postage costs. Do you think buyers should be forced to pay $69.95 plus a bogus, inflated "handling fee" for the manual even though I'd be quite happy to sell mine for $0.99 instead of throwing it out now that I no longer need it? What if the seller has an income of $100,000 per year and the buyer has an income of $20,000 per year? Should the buyer still be forced to pay a lot more for the manual than its fair market value as determined by an online auction?
If you don't like online auctions and other forms of competition, how do you think the price of the manual should be determined? Do you want a kommunist kommittee of kommissars deciding what every trivial item is worth? What if your kommittee of kommissars decides the manual is worth $69.95 but nobody can afford to pay that much? What if I want to get rid of the manual because I need to free-up the space it's taking and I'd be quite happy to get $10, $5 or even $0.99? Would you prefer that I just discard the manual instead of selling it to someone who wants it, can afford to pay $5 for it, but can't afford to pay $69.95 plus "handling"?
Even if you continue to use only dead trees as reading material (which obviously you don't since you're reading thetyee.ca right now), the cost of new magazines hasn't increased anywhere near as fast as the average income. Each dead tree type magazine consumes a much smaller percentage of the average income today than it did 40 years ago.
How much are you paying to read thetyee.ca? How does this compare to the cost of a subscription to a CanWest type dead tree newspaper today and 40 years ago?