Porn 2.0, and Its Victims
'Private' sex tapes flood user-fed sites like YouPorn.
New tech, new audience.
She's naked and posing suggestively, but otherwise she doesn't resemble the average Playboy model. Yet this "ex-girlfriend" has been viewed by 138,629 people on YouPorn, the new, German-based Internet aggregator of amateur-generated porn.
She's not the only one to have a former lover post her most intimate moments for the world to google. There are over 250 ex-girlfriends currently featured among the tens of thousands of sex videos on YouPorn.
About 15 per cent of women have knowingly made sex videos, according to a recent poll in Cosmopolitan magazine. If true, that's how many are at risk of having an ex post x-rated files of them on a porn-sharing site.
Unlike Paris Hilton, the average YouPorn star probably won't become famous, except unwittingly to his or her next potential boss or partner. And it's likely he or she will suffer a loss of privacy that could hurt her reputation, relationship and career.
As sites like YouPorn and PornoTube that mesh community aspects of social networking with completely free-of-charge pornography rise in popularity, so too do the associated copyright and privacy infringements.
Right now, the law is lagging behind in redressing the harm done to victims of "porn 2.0."
And with the rapid expansion of this new technology, concerns over the impending social, economic and legal implications are probably the only thing uniting conservative lawmakers and traditional pornographers.
The problem with free
Every day, there are 266 new porn sites on the Net. Every second, 28,258 users are viewing porn.
New aggregators like YouPorn and PornoTube make it easier for a new audience to find free Internet porn, previously often only accessible to "techies" who knew how to use often illegal file sharing methods like Bit Torrent.
"I never get free porn. I'm not good with all that Internet stuff, the passwords, the searching. I just buy it," said one 43 year-old Vancouver man who spoke to the Tyee. But he said he would go to YouPorn instead if it was just all in one spot and free, and says that due to this technology, he will almost certainly view more porn than before.
'X-rated' Facebook
He's not attracted to the social networking side of YouPorn, but many people are. One of the best things about these YouTube-like services, says an avid fan, is they allow you to both chat with other posters online and read their profiles. "It's like Facebook with an x-rated edge."
Porn 2.0 sites mesh tagged content, discussion groups and user comments and ratings to form a community where users can easily explore and share different fetishes and fantasies.
Without that community aspect, the allure of YouPorn diminishes, says Fredrick Lane, author of Obscene Profits, a study of the success of online pornography. "It's easier for voyeurs to indulge in fantasy and exhibitionists to expose themselves without violating the law. It's like an electronic peeping Tom."
Off-line Thrills
Royal Vancouver Porn Society
Robyn Volk likes vintage porn. It's not just about sex, like today's "ugly, unimaginative porn."
Along with 15 others, she watched Cream Rinse (a 1976 flick starring Ginger Peachy, Linda Licks and Peter Pecker) at the June meeting of the Royal Vancouver Pornographic Society.
Old school porn "keeps my interest more because there is at least an attempt at plot development, costume designs and believable characters."
Volk founded the society three years ago as an excuse for a social gathering that happens to centre on a collection of 200 vintage porno flicks. "It's more like a comedy hour," Volk said.
They holler when the 16 mm reel periodically jams. Volk, identifiable by her presidential sash, squeals with delight when the mundane dialogue somehow suddenly sparks a group sex party.
But before the film, they take care of business. Volk authoritatively calls the meeting to order and runs through the agenda items, which range from members' porn names, to the rules of the RVSP porn library. And one member brought a show-and-tell: a sexually explicit statue made completely out of dried pasta.
The group, made of equal numbers of men and women, whose day jobs range from financial magazine editing to adult film editing, say they relish the monthly opportunity to meet in the East Van "manor," sit down to tea and home baked lemon cookies, watch porn with cinematic shots, and listen to soft jazz afterwards as they discuss the film.
--Sunny Freeman
There are even several Facebook groups for fans of online porn. Members of the PornoTube Appreciation Society, for example, post messages like "Work is going down the tube! The PornoTube!"
Porn goes democratic
Free porn on the web is nothing new. But aggregating it into one searchable database a la YouTube is. That free porn revolution highlights the democratization of sexuality, says Lane.
When porn first emerged in mainstream society, he says, a few magazines like Hustler and Playboy determined social norms of sexual attractiveness: "5'10" and blonde." Now, fans have access to a wide variety of sexual preferences and experiences.
But not everyone in the porn world is turned on by recent developments. In fact, the ease of posting porn online is causing a panic among some adult film producers, who spend big budgets on big stars, only to have those posted and viewed for free, or only to see viewers turn to free, amateur porn instead.
Initially, the Internet increased pornography sales, by providing users with easy and anonymous access. U.S. revenue reached a record $2.84 billion in 2006.
But after years of fairly steady increases, sales and rentals of porn videos dipped from $4.28 billion in 2005 to $3.62 billion last year, according to estimates by AVN, an industry trade publication.
Paid advantages
Despite the slide, traditional porn companies say they still have some advantages. Although the rawness of amateur porn is part of its appeal for some, professional adult filmmakers are banking on the appeal of higher quality production and well-known stars. Some offer extra services.
"Fans of sites like my own appreciate having access to material that is focused on a particular person, and they want to see and learn all they can about that person," says Seska Lane, who hosts and stars in three Canadian pay-for-porn sites. "Live webcam interaction cannot be found on free porn websites."
Along with others, she's upset that material from paid porn sites is increasingly showing up illegally on free porn 2.0 sites -- users sometimes even pay to download the video then post it for free somewhere else. Lane says adult companies like hers are moving to protect their work from copyright infringement by contacting offenders.
Both YouPorn and PornoTube already offer ways to complain about copyrighted material on their sites. But a search for the infamous Jenna Jameson turned up 29 results on YouPorn, despite her efforts, and the efforts of the site, to protect copyright.
When private is public
The amateur porn phenomenon also brings a legal quandary involving privacy for non-professionals.
For those 250 YouPorn "ex-girlfriends" who made private sex videos for strictly personal use, only to find them released online, their rights to privacy will likely go unprotected.
People post sexually explicit images without consent all the time, says Janine Benedet a professor in the UBC faculty of law. "It is a devastating attack. There is no legal mechanism for victims to get their pictures back once they're out there, despite the fact that there is lingering harm."
Any Canadian who posts online content is subject to obscenity laws laid out in the Criminal Code of Canada. Even if the server that hosts the content is outside Canada, if there is a connection to Canada, the offender can be charged.
But Benedet, who specializes in pornography law, says there are very few cases where Internet posts have been deemed illegal by the courts. In one Ontario case, a man was charged with distributing child porn. In another Ontario case, a man was charged with extortion for threatening that he would post nude pictures of a woman on the Internet if she didn't continue to sleep with him.
The charge of video voyeurism might be applied if an image is posted without consent, but this is rare.
"I would be amazed if all the videos on these sites had full consent of the people involved," Benedet says. But if a person is legally in possession of sexually explicit adult content, criminal harassment might be the only applicable charge.
Porn aggregators' liability is not entirely clear under existing legislation. "So far I don't think we've seen any prosecution of that kind," Benedet says.
Real world problems
Privacy disclaimers on YouPorn and PornoTube are extensive. Waivers state users must have the consent of all individuals involved, and claim liability protection against a third party lawsuit.
The companies seem to scrutinize their content at least for illicit content. Searches for "illegal" and "child" turned up no search results on either site.
But the worldwide nature of the web makes it difficult to trace and prosecute violators and even more difficult to police privacy rights. There is no universal set of laws that apply to the distribution, purchase, or possession of Internet porn.
Still, that's not to say what happens on the net can't be regulated, says Benedet. "The idea that the Internet is a borderless lawless universe is quite false," she adds.
Experts like Lane say porn 2.0 is here to stay, given how easy it is to post and view material online. Now lawmakers need to catch up with tech-savvy Internet users, and deal with the potential emotional and psychological damage lurking for "ex-girlfriends" around the world.
Related Tyee stories:
- Digital Child Porn Watchdog: Too Big a Bite?
'Cleanfeed' a threat to free speech say critics. - Child Porn 101 at Cap College
Charges against instructor spark free speech debate. - Porn People UNTIE!
'East Van Porn Collective' isn't about what but who you do.



9
Login or register to post comments
nightbloom
4 years ago
Great article. But this
Great article. But this phenomenon works both ways. On-line gay porn is bursting with candid shots and camera vids of straight boys which were obviously recorded and release by (ex)girlfriends. It’s funny that they’re trying to work this into the feminist Oppression Narrative. This kind of sordid revenge is hardly a gendered phenomenon, so beware of double standards. Anyone remember the Dutch rugby star whose reputation, career and family life were destroyed when his vengeful ex-girlfriend deliberately released a home vid which showed her riding him full-throttle with a strap-on dildo? No one saw him as a victim - just a fool. Or (closer to home) [a UBC sports team] EDITED who had a candid and intimately revealing team party-photo enlarged and printed in the Ubyssey (student newspaper) despite prior complaints regarding invasion of privacy? Again, these men were seen as fools who did it to themselves, not as victims.
Anyone (man or woman) who betrays someone's trust this way is a mean-spirited cad. But there's a misplaced chivalry inherent in trying to pretend that this phenomenon boils down to the tired dynamic of "Bad Man vs. Victim Woman".
Stump
4 years ago
15%?
Clearly I've been dating too many 'nice' women and not enuff wannabe porn stars.
Seriously though, A Cosmo survey? Probably skewed statistic if ever there were one. I highly doubt that stat would bear up under scrutiny. Maybe I'm just feeling left out.
flyingfish
4 years ago
That number doesn't surprise me
And sex video is probably a grand name for the final product of most people. But when everyone has a camera phone, a digital camera and digital video with them at all times and is used to spending half their time during any given activity taking pictures of each other, taping sex wouldn't seem like a big leap.
You just need to hang out with younger women, perhaps!
Visible Justice
4 years ago
Yawn!
Nothing about the Ian Bush case? Local blogs massacred the competition in coverage. Tyee should be trying to embarass cop-doormat publications like the Times-Colonist, Province and Sun.
http://www.opinion250.com/news/1/home
kent
4 years ago
porn sites
It is not my opinion that The Tyee should have published this article. Does the scarcity of comment mean that most readers are now checking out new porn sites? It is some time since I entered a porn site and it will be just as long before I do again.
dave49
4 years ago
Tonya Harding’s Wedding Night
The “Tonya Harding’s Wedding Night” porn video is a pre-Internet version of this development. However, few people see it for what it is: an astonishing act of revenge. Tonya Harding is reviled for her role in ‘Skategate’, where she and her husband, Joe, and one of his friends plotted to attack and injure US skater Nancy Kerrigan to prevent her from competing at the Lillehammer Winter Olympics. Harding competed and won no medals, while Kerrigan recovered, competed and won silver. Tonya, Joe and friend got charged with conspiracy, assault, etc. Tonya ‘co-operated’ with the prosecution and I don’t think she served any jail time. Joe, (ex husband by then?) got two and a half years in jail and the friend got two.
It seems Tonya and Joe wanted to record their wedding night so they set up a videocamera on a tripod to record their ‘activities'. I guess Joe had possession of the tape and as soon as he got out of jail he went knocking at the door of Bob Guccione of Penthouse magazine. At the time, I saw a steady trickle of small news stories about this. Whatever legal actions Tonya took, she stopped nothing. Penthouse published stills in the magazine, and then began selling copies of the tape under the title “Tonya Harding’s Wedding Night”. Few people see it as an act of revenge. Some said she deserved it. Recall that with Skategate, most of the people who had an opinion about the scandal HATED Tonya Harding. I remember thinking it must be tough to go through the day knowing that about half the world’s population thinks you are a bitch.
One Vancouver sports columnist recently suggested the Harding video was a bid for celebrity. It is amazing the way attitudes have changed. Thirty years ago a friend in Winnipeg sent me a news clipping about the visit of a Playmate of the Year to Winnipeg on a publicity tour. The gist of the interviewer's conclusion was this woman was a disgrace to the human race and civilization because she had posed nude for a photographer and been paid for that.
Now we have the phenomenon of Paris Hilton, a 'poor’ little rich girl, who becomes a huge celebrity after a videotape of her and one of her lovers gets out into the public domain. As one musician noted recently in an indirect reference to PH, “why would you want to be famous for being a slut?”
dave49
4 years ago
Once it's on the Internet...
I recall a few interesting letters to Dan Savage's "Savage Love" column a few years back. He was very clear in his reply. You must realize that once it's out on the Internet, you have to assume that its out there FOREVER. It can be copied, downloaded, uploaded, etc.
It's not like the days of film (before video) when then-famous Farrah Fawcett, embarrassed by a brief semi-nude appearance in the movie Myra Breckenridge, bought and burned every print of the film she could find.
Lefty
4 years ago
Nothing to see here folks move along now
Why advertise these sources? I checked them them both out. Nothing for free, some titilating still shots and a bunch of links to pay as you go porno pages.
What a load of nonsense, I had never heard of these websites until reading this stupid article.
Business must be slow
Frank
4 years ago
The lack of comments...
Its because porn is boring.
Its why the Japanese are putting money into sex-robots, even they know you can sell movies of 2 girls jello-wrestling for only so long and then the gravy train stops coming.
Willcocks-ian footnote : I find it hilarious that the pay-porn industry will eventually be killed by the internet and homemade video.