Life

Agri-Business Exposed

Podcast: 'Deconstructing Dinner' on agri-giant Cargill, Inc.

By Jon Steinman, 7 Jun 2008, TheTyee.ca

Deconstructing Dinner

Listen to this:

Following in the foodsteps of the Packaged Foods Exposed series, the Agri-Business Exposed series explores the major agricultural companies whose names are rarely heard by the eating public.

The ingredients entering into the staples of our diet rarely, if ever, originate from the company that produced the final product. Behind the Krafts, Nestlés, Coca-Colas and Pizza Huts of the world are the large corporations that deal with the most important person in the process: the farmer.

The Cargill exposé

It is fitting to launch this series by exploring the most influential and powerful agri-business in the world: Cargill. As one of the largest private companies in the world, Cargill's $75.2 billion in sales employs 149,000 people in 63 countries. But the Minnesota-based company utilizes a strategy that situates much of their presence behind the scenes, and upon addressing the scope of this company's influence, their operations and products make their sales figures and employment statistics close to meaningless. Cargill sets the stage for agriculture and food around the world, and a better understanding of this company is a better understanding of our dinners.

On this part two of the Cargill exposé, we tackle topics of child slave labour in the West African cocoa industry; we raise questions over how Cargill's high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) has played a role in the global obesity and diabetes epidemics; and we discover how the company was able to arrive in Canada in 1989, and now assume 50 per cent control of Canada's beef.

Guests for part two of the two-part Cargill exposé

Cam Ostercamp, president, Beef Initiative Group Canada (BIG) (Blackie, Alta.) -- The organization was formed in 2004 to be a voice for primary producers of beef in Canada. As Cargill is the most influential company in the Canadian beef industry, Cam's experience as both a farmer and president of BIG provides him with a comprehensive background on the influence exercised by the company.

Brian Campbell, staff attorney, International Labor Rights Fund (ILRF) (Washington, D.C.) -- The ILRF is an advocacy organization dedicated to achieving just and humane treatment for workers worldwide. The organization is currently targeting the child labour practices in the West African cocoa industry that companies like Cargill are said to support. Brian Campbell began working with the ILRF as a law clerk in 2001 and was hired as a full-time attorney upon graduation from law school in 2004.

Brewster Kneen, author/publisher, The Ram's Horn (Ottawa, Ont.) -- Brewster was born in Ohio and studied economics and theology in the U.S. and the U.K. before moving to Toronto in 1965. There he produced public affairs programs for CBC Radio, and worked as a consultant to the churches on issues of social and economic justice. In 1971, with his wife Cathleen and their children Jamie and Rebecca, he moved to Nova Scotia, where they farmed until 1986, starting with a cow-calf operation and then developing a large commercial sheep farm. When Brewster stopped farming, he developed a devoted interest in learning more about Cargill than perhaps anyone has ever attempted. The second edition of his book Invisible Giant (2002), provides the most current and comprehensive source for any eater interested in learning more about the origins of our food.

This podcast first aired February 15, 2007.

Related Tyee stories:

 [Tyee]

13  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • zalm

    3 years ago

    Canadian beef

    Well, I can hardly wait to hear from Ed Deak on this.

  • Fiat lux

    3 years ago

    I can only repeat what I've

    I can only repeat what I've been saying for years, as I watched the food industry being collectivized and kholkhozified to an extent Stalin and Mao could never have imagined.

    The corporate mafia, now in control of all foods and all markets, are nothing less than the communists politbureus who may ultimately uproote, forcibly urbanize and kill more farmers than the communists.

    Farmers and ranchers are being forced out of business through their control of the markets, while they're raising prices in the stores, stealing incredible profits from the pockets of both sides.

    The tragic part is that our brainwashed priesthood of economists, the politicians and governments owned and controlled by this criminal mafia, are jumping for joy because of the "increased competitiveness" and "growth of the GDP", while rural communities are destroyed and people are being fed with a diet of shit, loaded with chemicals and then nuked, destroying all food values.

    While our hospitals are bursting at the seams with sick people and little, bald headed kids, full of cancers.

    But the stock and money markets are happy, politicians are collecting directorships, so all is well with the world. After all, what else could be more important in a so called "market economy" built on imaginary money and imaginary theories?

    Otherwise known as the biggest crime wave in human history.

    Ed Deak.

  • Fiat lux

    3 years ago

    Multinationals make billions

    Multinationals make billions in profit out of growing global food crisis

    May 4, 2008

    Giant agribusinesses are enjoying soaring earnings and profits out of the world food crisis which is driving millions of people towards starvation.

    http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/green-living/multinationals-make-billions-in-profit-out-of-growing-global-food-crisis-820855.html

  • Canis Latrans

    3 years ago

    The New World Order...

    Agree with Fait's analogy of the Global Corps control of the food supply as politburo control over all facets of life in what "passed for" communism, indeed still does in Capitalist China. At least the "communists" were somewhat more honest as to their intentions, though both maintained their own versions of a "formalized" democratic control almost entirely devoid of reality, certainly in both their applications to "the economy".

    The Global Corps are pursuing the same end as that of The State under "so-called" communism, being this same total bureaucratic control over all aspects of personal and social life-, especially, though not exclusively, through control of the means of sustenance. The "formal" mask of this bullshit "democracy" is ever more falling away however, and the raw corporate power nature of the New Capitalist World Order becomes more and more obvious, as is likewise its destruction of the quality of life of the lower orders of society. Obvious to all but the most intellectually blind amongst us that is.

    "The Economy" at least as much as, perhaps even more than, "The State" needs to be brought under a more full and "popular" system of democratic controls, checks and balances-, before these so-called "free market", which ain't, ideologues destroy the planet and any meaningful and humane content to social life.

  • SharingIsGood

    3 years ago

    Canis and Fiat

    Both are correct, and the vehicle for the loss of true democracy is the condensing of the ownership of print, radio, TV and even the internet. Daily, the free exchange of truth is being gobbled up big media.

  • ME2

    3 years ago

    re podcasts

    Tyee, please leave the podcasts for discussion of the latest hits, etc, by the young folks, and the serious stuff, such as the topic above, for wider examination in print.

  • ME2

    3 years ago

    podcasts again

    The above comment was prompted by a glitch of some kind which hid from display the comments above til now, so I withdraw the request.

  • ME2

    3 years ago

    podcasts again

    The above comment was prompted by a glitch of some kind which hid from display the comments above til now, so I withdraw the request.

  • Van Isle

    3 years ago

    Maybe with the high fuel

    Maybe with the high fuel prices that globalization as we know it, will morph into something else. I'm sure that the multi-nationals have thought about the ramifications of higher transportation costs. Or, are the high fuel costs just a hic-cup and only temporary and the fuel prices will come tumbling down. The only reason that globalization works is because of low transportation costs.

  • NicS

    3 years ago

    Globalization Dying!

    So suggests the partially quoted CIBC report from Jeffery Rubin and company. He doesn't mention food transport directly, but I think one can easily see that a 100 mile diet may be closer than we like to think.

    How this will help the farmer, let alone the small farmers I don't know. Life on this planet of ours appears to be entering the peak change stage.

    This report on page 4

    CIBC World Markets InC. StrategEcon - May 27, 2008

    Will Soaring Transport Costs Reverse Globalization?

    Jeff Rubin and Benjamin Tal

    Globalization is reversible. Higher energy prices are
    impacting transport costs at an unprecedented rate. So
    much so, that the cost of moving goods, not the cost
    of tariffs, is the largest barrier to global trade today. In
    fact, in tariff-equivalent terms, the explosion in global
    transport costs has effectively offset all the trade
    liberalization efforts of the last three decades. Not only
    does this suggest a major slowdown in the growth of
    world trade, but also a fundamental realignment in trade
    patterns.

    [snip]

    Higher energy costs translate directly into higher shipping
    costs. At today’s oil prices, every 10% increase in trip
    distance translates into a 4.5% increase in transport
    costs. The duration of a typical sea voyage from China
    to North America is four weeks. Including inland costs,
    shipping a standard 40-foot container from Shanghai
    to the US eastern seaboard now costs $8,000. In 2000,
    when oil prices were $20 per barrel, it cost only $3,000
    to ship the same container. But at $200 per barrel, it will
    soon cost $15,000 in transport costs to ship from China
    to the US eastern seaboard.

    [snip]

    Unless that container is chock full of diamonds,
    shipping costs have suddenly inflated the
    cost of whatever is inside. And those inflated
    costs get passed onto the Consumer Price
    Index when you buy that good at your local
    retailer. As oil prices keep rising, pretty soon
    those transport costs start cancelling out the
    East Asian wage advantage. They already
    have in steel. Soaring transport costs, first on
    importing iron to China and then exporting
    finished steel overseas, have already more
    than eroded the wage advantage and
    suddenly rendered Chinese-made steel
    uncompetitive in the US market.

  • ME2

    3 years ago

    organic farming

    After reading this article I was prompted to do a bit of research on organic farming. I learned that consumer demand is making many organic farming ventures profitable, and that the demand is verifiably growing and is not just a fad.

    Present reluctance by many farmers to make the shift is due to both indoctrination by the chemical industry, and the fact that it requires a minimum of two years to become certified as organic, making the switchover somewhat risky.

    However, increased demand is driving up prices to the producer, and is certain to entice more farmers to enter into organic production.

    My guess is that if the trend continues, agribusiness will try to drive organics out of the market with a price war, and it will depend upon consumer loyalty to make sure organic products compete.

    Since agribusiness is dependent upon oil, while organic minimises its use, perhaps in these times of rising oil prices organics will maintain an edge. At any rate, those of us who are looking for ways to combat the oilcos, the agribusiness multinationals, and our oil-based "system", this is a golden opportunity for us to do so.

    In those cases where organics are perhaps more expensive, we could look at such purchases as being a self-imposed "tax" in which this time we are sure it's benefits are going to the right place.

    The site below offers a realistic hope that it is not all just a pipe dream, even though it concludes with an equally realistic look at just how deadly the opposition to it will be :

    http://www.twnside.org.sg/title/twr118h.htm

  • Fiat lux

    3 years ago

    I've been an organic farmer

    I've been an organic farmer for 29 years and can say that many organic products can be grown for much less than the agribiz crap.

    When it comes to beef, the cost is far less.

    Organic beef could be sold at around half the price of the feedlot garbage meat. I should know it, because I'm doing it.

    The problem is the control of the markets by a handful of the corporate mafia, who steal from both the producers and the customers.

    It is the biggest racket and crime wave in history. Yet, governments are supporting it and are doing their best to kill off the family farm, on the advice of their brainwashed and braindead economists.

    Ed Deak. Big Lake.

  • jwstewart

    3 years ago

    I dunno about that CIBC analysis...

    Maybe steel is too costly to ship from Asia because of the cost per tonne, but other products that have lower weight could probably absorb the shipping cost increases even at $200 per barrel.

    Container capacity and extra cost when price goes frm $8000 to $15000...

    100 Fridges - extra $70 each
    200 dishwashers - extra $35 each
    350 bicycles - extra $20 each
    640 vacumm cleaners - extra$11 each
    5000 pairs jeans - extra $1.40 each
    gadjillion ipods - no effect

    I don't see those factories coming back here anytime soon.

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.