Life

Ghetto Feminism

An insider's view of protecting sex workers.

By Amber Dawn, 25 Jul 2007, TheTyee.ca

Fishnet stocking clad leg.

'I was the "bad" sister'

Coco and I peek through the yellowed blinds at the Rec Centre meeting room, assessing if we want to go in or not. It looks to be an amicable mix of community advocates, low-level politicians, and a few Downtown Eastside residents, all drinking coffee from Styrofoam cups and eating cheap pastries, so we push through the heavy glass door and find places at the round table.

As we sit, I see a woman who once strangled me because I wouldn't give her a cigarette. We have since made peace, or at least made peace the way that street prostitutes do -- we pretend it didn't happen. This was long ago, when I worked low track. I assume she doesn't recognize me since now I am twenty pounds heavier, my clothes aren't from a church donation box, and I don't keep my head perpetually bowed. When she greets me, I almost say, "Hey bitch, you strangle anyone lately?" but I stop myself, for it is my understanding that community advocates and low-level politicians are uncomfortable with this sort of banter.

The meeting is to discuss changing the criminal code regarding prostitution, and how to push for this issue in the upcoming election. I quickly learn that most people present, or those doing the talking, are pro-decriminalizing both prostitution and solicitation.

First things first

There was a time when I still believed that laws and policies actually promote social change and during that stage of optimism I too would have been for decriminalization. It's a bit unsettling to think that I've grown into an age of fence-sitting, but I really do doubt that a law, alone, will improve working conditions for sex workers. I believe that more social programs, public awareness and support for sex workers need to be in place first. I've come to this meeting with more question than opinions.

My head unconsciously begins to shake in disagreement as the advocates speak. I blurt out "well actually ... " a couple of times, trying to insert myself into the conversation when someone has a mouth full of croissant, only to be interrupted by the next person.

When I do get a turn, I explain that while some relatively affluent prostitutes could benefit from legally being able to solicit clients and work from their homes, most women will remain on the street or with their pimps because that is what they know. Changing the laws doesn't mean working girls will be able to change their lives accordingly.

Get out the vote

"Won't the right to solicit work both ways?" I continue, still shaking my head even though I now have everyone's attention. "Will clients suddenly be allowed to approach any woman they believe to be a prostitute and offer to buy sex from her? Vancouver's not likely to set up a red light district any time soon. So could this possibly turn into a legalized form of sexual harassment?"

"And I like our discrete, coded lingo like 'half-and-half' and 'all-inclusive.' That is our language." I stress the words "our language," hoping I'll gain credit if my position echoes cultural conservation. I receive only blank stares from around the table. "I wouldn't want some guy to ask how much to penetrate my ass," I offer -- perhaps too colourful of an illustration. One of the men, the representative of an NDP candidate, clears his throat a few times.

"And trafficking might rise," Coco says, tapping her acrylic nails on the tablet top. I notice everyone leans forward as she speaks. Coco is considered an "unheard voice": an Asian immigrant sex worker who is willing and able to articulate (in English) her experiences. "Vancouver is already one of the top cities for trafficked women in North America."

"Just because something's not criminal does not mean it will be equitable," I add. "It doesn't guarantee safety."

"Fuck the police," my old strangler friend shouts out. "They don't fucking protect us no matter what. If you want to do something, make the police protect us from getting raped and beaten."

These points receive nods and "hmms" from the advocates and politicians. I am certain we've been clear and convincing (and maybe a tad offensive). However, after a brief pause to reflect, the meeting loops back to the same agenda: how to make de-criminalization an electoral issue. By the end of the meeting the entire group, except for Coco and me, dub themselves the "Change the Code" committee.

Different feminisms

This is not the first time I've involved myself with politics, nor is it the first time my opinions have clashed with other politically-minded people. Calling myself a feminist has posed problems since I joined an anti-violence, feminist collective in 1994. As a member, I learned the power of identity -- the idea that even an uneducated woman, like myself, who hadn't read Mary Wollstonecraft or bell hooks could be an expert on feminism simply because of her identity as a woman. Phrases like "as a women of colour" or "as a lesbian mother" qualified every opinion.

While being valued "as a young, poor woman" seemed miraculous to me, the miracle was hampered by my awareness of how different I was from my sister collective members; I was the 'bad' sister. I wore a mini skirt and had scraped knees in a room full of sensible pants and make-up-free faces. The collective also taught me that sex workers, from prostitutes to phone-sex operators, are "servants of the patriarchy." I learned immediately that the phrase "as a sex worker" was not met with the same gravity as other women's qualifiers. Debate arose when I suggested we, as an anti-violence collective, stop vilifying sex workers and start offering them much-needed support. Some members listened, some agreed we should assist sex workers if they were trying to quit, and some acted as though I had spoiled their fortress of womanly empowerment. We took a vote: should we or should we not help sex workers out of violent situations. I remember crumpling into the purple bean bag chair in the meeting room as I watched the show of hands in favor of "no." I left the collective with the bitter realization that "prostitute-ism" or "whore-phobia" were not words in the feminist lexicon.

City geography

However, I've witnessed a great deal of change over the last decade. I've seen an alarming number of street prostitutes from the Downtown Eastside go missing; their photos currently haunt newspapers as the Pickton trial begins. The north end of Commercial Drive -- the very street where I worked for years -- was exposed by the media as Vancouver's kiddie stroll. Dozens of massage parlours with oriental-sounding names, like The Lotus and Shangri-La, have sprung up throughout the Lower Mainland. In response to this, it seems every community and feminist organization has slowly, yet steadily, added assistance to sex workers as part of their mandates.

I underwent my own evolution too: I left the streets and started working high-end fetish jobs and escorted for midway celebrities employed by our "Hollywood North." I stopped spending my money on cocaine and men who didn't love me and put myself through university instead. I grieved for the women I knew who had died or disappeared, and grieved for myself for having lived the life I did. But I never stopped wanting to help other pros. In fact, coming out the other side, mostly unscathed, I wanted to help more than ever.

Coco and I met at an HIV prevention project that hired us to do safer sex outreach to prostitutes. Like me, Coco had lasted a couple of rounds with feminist organizations and was not willing to go back for more. We both started volunteering at health-related organizations during the syphilis comeback and hepatitis surge in Vancouver. We bonded over this and because, unlike most of the long retired prostitutes-turned-advocates, Coco and I were still hustling a client here and there to pay the bills.

Infiltrators

Our job was to reach out to immigrant and Asian massage parlour workers -- a difficult demographic to connect with. At first, the parlour owners wouldn't let us through the door. Coco and I would stand outside parlour doorways joking, in our best spy voices, "We've got to infiltrate the building." Next we pretended to be applying for jobs; this got us as far as the softly-lit lobbies. Then, we were invited in because we came with big fruit baskets and sweets from a Chinese bakery. Finally, after months of this dance, we were welcomed in to hand out free condoms for the girls, teach safer sex, and set women up with doctors who wouldn't discriminate. I was doing something that had a direct impact, and it felt damn great to be doing it.

The project suffered from lack of funding, and within a year was scooped up by a UBC doctoral student who forged a quick partnership with the board of directors. We were told the project could continue for several more months if we helped the doctoral student collect data, including blood samples, for her thesis: basically a study of how HIV is spread within massage parlours. Accustomed to duking it out in the name of sex workers' rights, Coco and I threw some good punches about how this was stigmatizing and blaming the women, and how it would ruin the relationship we had with them, and that blood was a thing most Asian women, for cultural reasons, would not simply hand over. Never mind the fact that prostitutes are one of the most researched peoples in Canada, and as far as I can see, these studies aren't helping anything except the researchers' CVs. In the end, Coco and I walked out.

The kiddie stroll

Having already tried feminism and health services, I suggested we give legal issues a go. This is how Coco and I find ourselves rolling our eyes as the advocates and politicians draft a plan of action to Change the Code.

At the end of the meeting we slink away, angry. "How sad is it when the workers themselves don't even get a say in the laws and policies that affect them," I complain. This is when Coco tells me she hasn't made any money in two weeks. She is broke, not eating-at-a-soup-kitchen broke, but broke enough to be scared.

"None of my regulars are calling." Coco asks me to hit the kiddie stroll with her. "I just need a hundred bucks or so," she says.

I take her to my old corner beside the fish factory. We scan the beat-up trucks that circle the block to check us out before going home after their workday. "Factory workers are okay," I tell her. "But only on a Friday when they get paid."

Soon a police cruiser is circling us too. "We're just out looking for a girlfriend of ours. We haven't seen her for a couple of days," I say to the officer and he drives off without further questions.

When a good client does come around, I recite the numbers and letters of his license plate as Coco gets in his car. I sit on the stoop of the fish factory and wait for her to return as the setting sun lights up the shards of broken glass embedded in the pavement. I've stood watch, like this, many times for other girls; come running when I've heard a women scream; stuck around to listen to the story of why she was screaming. I realize this is the place where I have discovered a kind of ghetto feminism, a street social justice. No debates, no mandates, only survival.

[This story originally appeared in Fugue, an annual anthology of non-fiction produced by students in UBC's Creative Writing department]

Related Tyee stories:

 [Tyee]

14  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • Chris H

    4 years ago

    Thank you

    Thank you for bringing this story to us Ms. Dawn. I hope you continue to put yourself at the table with those who do not understand. Please keep telling your stories. It is time that those who look at this issue take steps that actually help sex workers. While you have met many that are on the pro-decriminalization side, I have met many that think just the opposite. It is a complex issue, but it will only get better for the women who find themselves working in the sex industry when we all stop and listen. Really listen. Keep writing. Your words are powerfull.

  • nightbloom

    4 years ago

    What an excellent piece.

    What an excellent piece.

    This narrative really gets at the nuance involved without sacrificing readability - nuance in terms of the politics and ideologies in play, as well as the organizational tensions and opportunism revolving around this issue [I got the reference to the UBC doctoral student]. This article very effectively describes how good intentions are not enough - that the women themselves have to be acknowledged as both full persons and the primary stakeholders in any policy impacting the sex-trade. The cop driving away without any questions about the missing friend summed it all up succinctly without even mentioning pig farms and murder trials.

    Great work. It's refreshing to see The Tyee depart from the syllabus and infuse a little grit into its content.

  • Jeffrey J.

    4 years ago

    Journalism at its Best

    Powerful journalsim! Kudos to Ms. Dawn for tackling this complex component of society. Like many 'prohibited' activities that people engage in, there are social solutions. The hard part, as the author point out, is how to implement them. Invariably, social progress is blocked by society's politcal & corporate elite, a very narrow minded group with no interest in human suffering or public good. Yet using financial influence and media monopolies, the elite obstruct social change at every turn. Having said that, we must remember that in Canada, we still have significant freedoms to puruse social change and it is very, very important that we continue to exercise them. Great article!!

  • off-the-radar

    4 years ago

    thoughtful article, thank you

    Thank you, Amber Dawn, for writing this well-written and interesing article, it is really making me think.

    I laughed at the references to the feminist collectives. Sometimes (and so delightfully ironic) a lot of patriachal hierachy going on and one-upmanship. My sister had a very similar experience.

    As Nightbloom noted above, good to see Tyee offering different perspectives. I read independent media for stories that take me outside my personal box.

  • avandoc

    4 years ago

    This would never appear in the Sun...

    Which is why we need The Tyee and other independent outlets. But it's a shame that this story will not have a wider audience. Of course, as Jeffrey pointed out, the elite have nothing to gain from allowing someone like Amber Dawn to take up copy space, unless her story has enough prurient interest to sell some papers. Mention of HIV is too much of a downer for that purpose.

    Perhaps women like Amber and Coco can take a lesson from VANDU in how to shape the debate so that politicians have to respond meaningfully. Good luck.

  • mgeoghegan

    4 years ago

    the state has no business regulating women's sexuality

    I have always found it extrmely offensive and more than a tad hypocritical (given that politicians and judges are frequent users of prostitutes) that we continue to have laws in Canada that make soliciting illegal.

    A woman and not the state should control access to her own vagina. No pun intended but the state should simply screw off.

  • HawkEyes

    4 years ago

    The heart has a voice.

    Evelyn Lau take note.
    What is the difference between decriminalizing prostitution and soliciting?
    You would think, with the start of the Picton trial, some concern would be felt. You would think trafficking of women in Vancouver would raise some eyebrows. You would think...
    I hate the classification "uneducated". All too often it is used to disqualify and silence a voice, usually the wiser one...
    I have looked at the UBC Creative Writing course because of this article and I thank you and the Tyee for that! Best of wishes to you.

  • Josephine

    4 years ago

    A woman and not the state should control access to her own vagin

    I'm not in any way suggesting that most women who end up making a living as prostitutes aren't forced to do so by tragic circumstances and social neglect; however, mgeoghegan's argument suggests individual rights trump community rights.

    The counterpoint is that the community is greatly affected by women's decisions (when we have freedom and support to make them!) regarding who has access to our vaginas for better or worse.

    How can it be good for a community if women (or anyone) makes a living as a prostitute? Can we really say there's no negative impact on the prostitute? Can we really say there's no negative impact on the community?

    Freedom has its limits. While I'm not unsympathetic to the author's experience of insensitivity from others, I'm with the feminists the author pillories.

  • harry

    4 years ago

    get real josephine

    you are not properly equipped to make decisions for others. nobody is. it is a paternalistic/elitist/arrogant/do-i-really-need-another-word? assumption that one possesses the qualifications to decide for another. imposing one's will upon another is the foundation of abuse.

    freedom, by definition, does not have limits. an honestly community minded person would ask of themselves: what sort of community creates prostitution? the answer would be almost all sorts.

    communities exist because the benefits are great. who benefits in what sort of community is a question we need to ask.

  • Josephine

    4 years ago

    freedom, by definition, does not have limits

    By what definition?

    The very fact that I am strongly encouraged in my community to refrain from certain bodily functions other than in a bathroom/toilet situation is an infringement on freedom.

    Whether or not an individual or a community considers prostitution to be a viable, socially approved form of employment has huge implications. I don't know how I, as a feminist, could view prostitition as anything other than a form of exploitation.

    How do we balance the tensions between what is socially useful and apparently compassionate (harm reduction) and what is socially valued (the inherent dignity of a person).

  • Bronwyn

    4 years ago

    Great article! Ms. Dawn's

    Great article! Ms. Dawn's story powerfully illustrates the complex issues surrounding prostitution. As the world's oldest profession, one might well ask why it continues to flourish in cultures throughout the world. Patriarchy has had an impact: for thousands of years single women, denied jobs and the right to vote, have had no other way to make a living. But that's the tip of the iceberg.

    One recent brain study shows that men's brains are much more occupied with sex than women's. No surprise there. How many times have I heard some guy friend say, I need to get laid! I'm going crazy! Is it any wonder, then, that some men seek to vent and release sexual tension with perfect strangers? Why should they or the women who perform this service be punished?

    For what it's worth, as a woman who has been raped and mauled by numerous horny men, I'm grateful to the prostitutes who can happily alleviate their angst. If prostitutes were unavailable, I fear many more women would get raped.

    Not all men are uncontrollable beasts, of course. And I do not mean to imply that men are not responsible for their actions because their brains are sex-obsessed. However, guys at the shallow end of the gene pool do seem less able to cope with a woman saying, No! As for the others, I've purchased the services of prostitutes for several men friends who, for various reasons, were having trouble getting laid, and as a result became severely depressed. These men did not look down on the prostitute; they were grateful in the extreme. As one of them told me afterwards, "Sure beats a month on prosac."

  • Josephine

    4 years ago

    freedom, by definition, does not have limits

    How can this be? For example, limits to my freedom are imposed by a society that expects me to use a bathroom/toilet/outhouse for bodily functions rather than going where I stand/sit/lie.

    There's an agonizing tension between the competing goods of harm reduction (safety, respect and codified compassion for prostitutes recognizing that there are many personal and social reasons why people engage in prostitution) and protection of the inherent dignity of persons and their right to be free of such a personal kind of exploitation.

    Recognizing that prostitution, like child abuse, has always and will always be present to some degree, I support the implementation of beefy social programs to assist people in a compassionate, dignity-enhancing and effective way to stop engaging in the exploitive practice of prostitution because I believe it hurts them and hurts the community as a whole.

  • Josephine

    4 years ago

    freedom, by definition, does not have limits

    Freedom always has limits. For example, my freedom to defecate wherever I stand is limited by my community's stigma against such a practice.

    Recognizing that prositution has been and always will be around (like child abuse or rape), I strongly support comprehensive, respectful and compassionate social programs delivered in a humble, respectful way to prostitutes to help them stop the practice.

  • harry

    4 years ago

    i had number four in mind

    definition source: http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/freedom?view=uk

    "freedom

    • noun 1 the power or right to act, speak, or think freely. 2 the state of being free. 3 (freedom from) exemption or immunity from. 4 unrestricted use of something: the dog had the freedom of the house. 5 a special privilege or right of access, especially that of full citizenship of a particular city given to a public figure as an honour."

    to take the concept literally, one is "free" to use their body to commit murder rape or foul body functions when/wherever. similarly, the community, through actions of individual agents at behest of whole, are free to react. a sane person will normally weigh the risk/benefit ratio before breaking with community values. the consequences of actions like these are largely determined by one's community (through laws, taboos, cultural norms, religion etc). that's why, i think anyways, we grouped together in the first place-safety in numbers so to speak.

    but one is free to do with their own body what they will. and i firmly believe that one's freedom regarding what they do to their own body (like enter it on the "free" market) is limitless, and not just because that's what the word means, but as the fundamental, inalieable human right--whether recognised by the state-of-the-day/community or not.

    i agree that most prostitution is exploitative, but so are many capitalist economies, governments, etc. i think a community where no one felt the need to buy or sell sex (where free love reigned) would be a fabulous place, but ít'd take a lot of healing and recognising of inherent dignities in order for folks to value free love that much, methinks

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.