'Recipes for Disaster'
A family tries to give up oil, and home life seizes up.
No oil? No shampoo for you.
The other day I had a conversation with someone about what happens when a relationship is overtaken by ideology. Self-righteousness and moralism versus insurrection, duress, rebellion, resentment. All of that and love mix to an often incendiary effect. Sometimes things blow up completely. Witnessing this at first hand can be quite entertaining, as long as you're not actually part of the couple that's exploding.
Recipes for Disaster, screening as part of DOXA's film series at the Vancity Theatre on April 16th, 2009, is about what happens when one family decides to forgo using petroleum-based products for one year. It is also about what happens when couplehood and ideology get combustible. Hell hath no fury like a woman forced to give up shampoo.
Filmmaker John Webster, and his Finnish-Anglo family, including his lovely wife Anu and two extremely charming children, Benjy and Samuel, give up anything packaged in or made from plastic. The list is endless -- soap, frozen foods, shampoo, mascara, etcetera. The family also gives up its car and begins to try and discover ways of coping without the everyday convenience of modern oily world.
Some things prove easier than others; making homemade hair gel, which John and Anu then test on their children, isn't so bad. The toothpaste made from salt and baking powder is less of a success. The film's environmental message is clear and explicit. Less clear is what their ideological purity does to the people involved.
Testing, testing
Very quickly the polarizing begins, especially between husband and wife. The loaded conversations that take place in bathrooms and kitchens begin innocuously enough, with questions and responses like...
"What's so shameful about this?"
"Are you testing me?"
"Do you think that everything I do is pointless, then?"
"That's why you are a real wanker. A real Jesus!"
...and then spiral into outbursts of anger and frustration.
Every time a new change is proposed, such as turning off the central heating, Anu fixes her husband with baleful stare and says, "You are crazy." I can appreciate her position. No one likes being told what to do, or worse, lectured by their partner. Such behaviour begets worse behaviour and soon enough Anu is sneaking out at 6 a.m. to bike to the local gas station and buy packaged treats for a school party.
Little fibs
Every couple I know (gay, straight or somewhere in between) has a variation of "Don't tell... (insert name of beloved here). As in, don't tell Bernie we ate at Burger King, or don't tell Marshall we went shopping. These little deceptions and rationalizations of bad behaviour are part of being in a couple. Without the constant, soothing application of creamy white falsehood, how else could most people ever get along?
But as John tries to convince his wife of the importance of the project they're undertaking, the conversation often takes place in two different languages. This is perhaps a fitting summation of the difficulty faced by any couple when it comes to communicating genuine truth and feeling. No matter how well you know anyone, it's often as if one of you is speaking Finnish and the other English. The better you know one another, the more complicated it gets, since every bat of an eyelash or twitch of a lip speaks to a world of past argument. This form of relationship semaphore needs no verbal expression at all. And the camera has the capacity to capture the unspoken language of love and resentment in all its wry dyspepsia.
It's a wonder that people persist with couplehood.
As the film's title starts to seem like a step-by-step guide to incipient divorce court, the family struggles on, trying to find ways of living the life they are used to, whether that means riding the bus to work or getting to their lakefront cottage the hard way. The scene where John turns off the outboard motor and gamely rows the family boat to their cottage, while his wife and children glower in the back seat, is excruciating enough. But it only gets worse when practically every boater on the lake stops to ask if they're having trouble with their engine.
Xmas sans plastic
Christmas holidays, that orgy of consumption, presents an especially large problem. Everything from wrapping paper to plastic ornaments for the tree must be rethought. Even pleasure itself becomes suspect. "This looks like some damn war orphan's Christmas," says Anu.
The most ordinary activities of working, eating, shopping and watching TV necessitate some degree of change. The devil is in the details. Whether it's hiding from the people at work when you're lugging home enormous industrial-sized rolls of toilet paper, or making up fake allergies to plastic simply so that you explain yourself, it's far easier to lie than it is to tell the truth. As the frustrations begin to mount, it is also much easier to vent your spleen on those nearest (and dearest) to you.
That's the problem with human beings. No matter how great the goal, they will find some means to fight each other, rather than deal with the problem at hand. This is especially true in terms of something as large and overwhelming as planetary climatic disaster. Or as John says, "Why is it that even if I know exactly what I should do, I go and do something completely different?"
'Just trying to be happy'
As the year of no oil draws to a close, the long-term consequences are what neither John nor Anu could have envisaged, or if they did, perhaps they would have rethought the entire notion. "How could that hurt the world? We were just trying to be happy," says John.
Often it's the littlest things that break backs. When a used eyeliner (passed on from John's dead mother to Anu) begets a conversation about global climate change, you know that something must give, and that's exactly what happens. I won't spoil the film's ending, but the penultimate showdown is well worth witnessing. That's the other thing about being in an ideologically determined couple. If you can't compromise your lofty ideals every so often, you will most likely end up living in a cave or a bachelor apartment, lecturing the silent walls about the coming environmental collapse. To his infinite credit, although he does actually appear to be something of a wanker, John finds ways of making it work. Whether that means taking the train to Italy for the family's annual summer holiday, or discovering the wonders of bio diesel, pleasures, big and little, can combine to create a life that is balanced between happiness, care and open communication.
Of these things, open communication still seems the hardest to achieve. Is it simply human nature (a somewhat contradictory term when you think about it) to saw off the branch upon which we are perched? Why are we the only mammal around that lies as easily as breathing? Not only to each other but also to ourselves?
Self-propelled journey
Once you change one way of doing things, there can be a domino effect. For example, for much of my adult working life I have been a bus rider, but this past year, I decided to ride my bike as much as possible. (Winter did put a bit of a damper on things.) What I discovered somewhat by accident (which is how I discover most things) is that there is no going back.
Once you have discovered the satisfaction that comes from getting from point A to point B under your own power, you can't return to waiting for the bus. You cannot give up a degree of control again. Waiting dumbly like a cow for the bus to arrive feels utterly powerless.
It is the opposite of the freedom of self-propelled movement.
Perhaps somewhere between being alone and being together there must be some happy place of compromise. Perhaps I simply haven't found it yet. But I'm not ready to become a hermit yet.
I have to believe that even if you're really only tilting at windmills, tilting together somehow makes it better. Or at least more bearable.
Related Tyee stories:
- Age of Oil is Over
And ending fast, within 50 years or less. Besides war, what's our response? - My Family's Escape from Plastic
We chucked our handy snack-stashers. Are we eco-nuts? - We Can Be Garbage Free
Trash is a choice. Time for 'Cradle to Cradle' design.




14
Login or register to post comments
PatrickMcEvoyHalston
2 years ago
Dumb cows piss sour milk
re: "If you can't compromise your lofty ideals every so often, you will most likely end up living in a cave or a bachelor apartment, lecturing the silent walls about the coming environmental collapse."
But this isn't true to your experience. You describe your isolation as that of empowered bike-ride--a life with no regrets (and the social bus-ride as all powerlessness and compromise).
You fluctuate, but over-all you seem to WANT to believe that life must inevitably contain portions of deceit and compromise (by which I think you really mean, submission). I suspect that that much of what you say here is born from the fact that you have not yet learned that the UNCOMPROMISED, UNCOWED pleasure you now take from bike-riding, can be ably applied to other parts of your life as well--yes, even to your dealings with other people. How did you once narrate your bus-riding experience? Was it always all venom? Or was it about a time to journal, watch people, reflect on life experience, all while avoiding the affront to public civicness that is the single driver cocooned within her own private space? I bet that once you start extending your ambition and reach, we'll start seeing articles from you arguing that you can't expect to milk life wisdom from those dumbly cowed.
patrick mcevoy-halston
P.S. I'm in mind to read Barbara Kingsolver's _Animal, Vegetable, Miracle: A Year of Food Life_, and see if it too amounts to a recipe for disaster. My guess is that good-natured, smiling, forever growing Barbara, shares with us a differently fated family story.
PatrickMcEvoyHalston
2 years ago
If I can expand on what I
If I can expand on what I said, I would like to argue that we should not be too ready to normalize the feeling of loss, of--as seemingly insensible as this sounds--BEING compromised, when we think of what it feels like to participate in fair compromise. If compromise is about a reaching out to and valuing of the particular needs of all those involved, and not about self-surrender, though you may not "get all that you want," the actual end experience of this sort of mutual respect/attendance and purposeful, cooperative action, will be of net gain. If it isn’t, if it feels like surrender, thwarted ambitions, if it has you considering the possibilities of the single-life--even encouraging you to ultimately denounce it so that it doesn't function in your own mind to remind you of your own inhibitions in insisting on something better, then you are involved in something unhealthy. That a lot of people are involved in such relationships is not too surprising. Free, truly happy people, make a lot of people nervous, even angry. They remind you of what you are not, of what you were not permitted to be.
When it comes to looking to our immediate environment for confirmation of the limits of human potential, fair reminder that it was not Canada but its neighbor to the south, that embraced the idea that life should be about happiness. We try to content ourselves by suggesting that this has amounted to nothing more than an insatiable, inconsiderate chase of unworthy things, though the less deluded amongst us see that this has also lead to many of them leading less capitulated lives, to real leadership and surprising and exhilarating invention and life satisfaction, as well.
And finally, my experiences of bus-riding had me thinking that after students were done with education, they should be encouraged to drive their own vehicle for a good, lengthy while, for self-empowerment sake. But you're right, the bicycle does the same, and is the better idea.
VivianLea Doubt
2 years ago
Free
"Without the constant, soothing application of creamy white falsehood, how else could most people ever get along?"
I think Fritz Perls outlined what that alternative might look like a few decades ago: free and happy, using Patrick's words. And Patrick, your explication of true compromise as gain and being compromised as loss strikes a deep chord...
I think I've never had the experience of what I was "not permitted to be" in any real sense; I push against it too hard. But why does that make people nervous? In the way that the "creamy white falsehoods" seem to soothe?
If John is really a wanker, why does Anu go along with him?
PatrickMcEvoyHalston
2 years ago
Ferris Bueller and, on second thought, I'll stick with my diet
-pepsi
Happy Saturday, VivianLea! Warning: what follows contains minor spoilers regarding movie, Revolutionary Road.
Makes people nervous because your own push threatens to show up the potential unnecessity, non-inevitableness of their quiescence/defeat--a point the movie Revolutionary Road does a brilliant job of "highlighting." In Revolutionary Road, btw, the truth-teller is the one who knows the more ideal life IS possible ("people don't have babies in Paris," he asks the couple using the pregnancy as cover for their capitulation to fear), who understands sad but apparently sagacious life wisdom of the, "Without the constant, soothing application of creamy white falsehood, how else could most people ever get along?," sort, as pure obfuscating, self-deluding, bullshit. I feel the need to say this, and specifically refer to (what are identified as) works of literature such as Revolutionary Road, because if you speak of true happiness, the literary are prone to instantly conjure, savor, and cling to the rare loftyness of knowing such to be naught but pure Hollywood fluff and fantasy.
But speaking of Hollywood and worthy truth-tellers:
When you ready Dorothy's--"If you can't compromise your lofty ideals every so often, you will most likely end up living in a cave or a bachelor apartment, lecturing the silent walls about the coming environmental collapse"--did this strike you the same way it struck me: that is, as the anti-thesis of everything Ferris Bueller?
PatrickMcEvoyHalston
2 years ago
I think I would have
I think I would have preferred to have said, "naught but pure Hollywood fizzle," rather than "naught but pure Hollywood fluff and fantasy": if even at the cost of some sense, it reads better.
VivianLea Doubt
2 years ago
Fizzle: Veuve Cliquot
Happy Saturday, Patrick. It is surely a pure mystery that you happen to refer to Ferris Bueller, since I watched his day off and remember for the beautiful exuberance portrayed in it. Exuberance is not the right word - a lusty kind of joy, maybe. As I sit and write this I can remember little of the details of the movie except the irrepressible sense of fun I got from it.
Dorothy's piece has strangely bothered me. A visceral horror of the possibilities (or lack of possibilities) - "living in a cave or a bachelor apartment, lecturing the silent walls about the coming environmental collapse" versus "creamy white falsehoods". Nicely evocative phrases, but troubling.
I once wrote a piece about the champagne current running through my life (badly written, I was very young) but I like the analogy. The look - the fizzle! - of the champagne, the way it tickles the nose, the explosion of the bubbles in the mouth, the intensity of the intermingling of taste and terroir - who could look at a glass of champagne and not want to taste it? Now champagne is lovely to share, but I am rarely averse to drinking the entire bottle on my own...
Gasps of horror...
PatrickMcEvoyHalston
2 years ago
"lusty kind of joy": like
"lusty kind of joy": like that!
Dorothy Woodend
2 years ago
Get a room, you two.
Get a room, you two.
VivianLea Doubt
2 years ago
lusty laughs
Thanks for sharing that, Dorothy - I actually laughed out loud on this drizzly Sunday morning...!
But we're in your room. Is that not what you intended with this piece?
PatrickMcEvoyHalston
2 years ago
Haaayyyy there Mrs. C.
Haaayyyy there Mrs. C.
VivianLea Doubt
2 years ago
Patrick, honey
Patrick, honey
do something! I heard a noise...
PatrickMcEvoyHalston
2 years ago
Ah Christ--I'm sure it's
Ah Christ--I'm sure it's just the dog.
VivianLea Doubt
2 years ago
:)
Well, where would we be without those "creamy white falsehoods"? But ya could have been more sooothing...
Happy Sunday.
Your turn to let the dog out.
mrsthursday
2 years ago
What the H*ll
I can only wonder what these two would do if they lived on a disability payment from BC social services.
That would really reduce their carbon footprint.
All these God-damn yuppie prats worrying about their oil use should look to their fellow citizens and share their wealth with those less well off. That would assuage their guilt.
Would they? Not bloody likely.