- Mary Carlisle is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Prem Gill is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Nancy Flight is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Justin Everett is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- John Westover is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Nora Etches is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Edward Henderson is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Bharadwaj Chandramouli is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Dean Chatterson is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Marius Scurtescu is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Robert Parkes is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- James Murton is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Susan Doyle is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Vincent Strgar is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Helen Spiegelman is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Subir Guin is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Kimball Finigan is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Joanne Manley is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- David Leach is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Joel Berger is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
Glued to the Playoffs on CNN
The roughest sport is on. Hockey can wait.
King of the magic screen.
Big night for sports buffs last Tuesday. TV viewers had their choice of channels and coverage. While CBC offered Calgary playing a game seven in San Jose, the real centre of attention was Pennsylvania. Over on TSN, the Flyers were playing a game seven against the Capitals in Washington. And back in Philly and environs, CNN called the plays as Hillary Clinton took on Barack Obama in primary game-47-but-who's-counting.
One of the games went into overtime. One of them is still there.
Washington eventually lost the hockey game to Philadelphia in an extra period. Meanwhile in Washington's more popular, more violent, and vastly more expensive sport, the Pennsylvanians scored some big points as well. Keystone State voters ensured that the Democrat's marathon battle would continue by handing Hillary Clinton a decisive victory.
As usual, CNN covered it all with a degree of detail Canadian television simply cannot offer. Primary nights on CNN are political geek-fests (unless of course you think of politics as being about policy rather than tactics -- perish the thought). Trends are examined within an inch of their lives; hairs are first split and then quartered. There's a lot of dross but CNN deserves genuine credit for not talking to down to its politically active audience. In between the spin and the endless hyper-analysis of exit polls there was genuine insight on offer concerning the ever-changing direction of this epic battle.
Watching the 'train wreck scenario'
Pennsylvania was a killing ground for the Democrats. Hillary the fabulist described her adventures under Bosnian sniper fire; Obama tried to separate himself from his incendiary preacher and then wandered off to San Francisco where he unwisely spoke hard truths about small-town bitterness. Hillary knocked back whiskey shots with steelworkers, Obama went bowling. Looking back over the six-week primary campaign and all that pandering, Republican magus Bill Bennett cracked on Tuesday, "She did shots better than he bowled." When it was all over Clinton had won the Pennsylvania primary by a crushing 10 points. For Democrats and their northern cheering section, not a good night.
CNN analyst Jeffrey Toobin called the results "the train wreck scenario." Obama emerged from the night badly wounded; as for Clinton, she appears to be like the fabled scorpion that stings the frog even though it means certain death for both creatures. No one really thinks she can win the nomination, but after Pennsylvania there are new doubts about Obama's ability to win the presidency.
Wow those special FX!
It was all summed up in mind-numbing detail by John King, CNN's Minority Reporter (King may be white as fleece, but that interactive map he manipulates is almost straight out of the Spielberg flick). King waves at the map and lines appear; he slices, dices, zooms in and out, all the while delineating the voting trends and possible scenarios.
King has a tendency to ramble a bit -- unavoidable when you're spitting out that much demographic information in a condensed period. But he also offers telling analysis. At one point he compared Pennsylvania's Tuesday voting patterns to the 1988 presidential election in which Michael Dukakis lost the usually reliably Democratic state to George Bush Sr. The comparison, King noted, is the same one Clinton's people will now be making to uncommitted super delegates -- namely that Obama proved on Tuesday that he cannot win small town and blue collar voters, thus putting the Democratic base at risk. Until Pennsylvania that argument reeked of desperation. Now it carries some weight.
Pull the goalie!
CNN's analysts are a mixed bag. The network wisely marginalizes xenophobic blowhard Lou Dobbs on such nights, giving him an early panel to moderate before shuffling him off to go prowl the Mexican border with his night-vision goggles. Wolf Blitzer, Soledad O'Brian, and Anderson Cooper take turns running panels of pundits. Some are partisan spinners from the Obama, Clinton, and Republican camps. (Tuesday night, CNN pundit and Clinton supporter Paul Begala claimed that all of his political contribution cheques come with the note: "For negative campaigning only.") Others are largely unbiased observers like Toobin and David Gergen.
So it was telling to see Gergen's analysis shift dramatically through the evening. Early on he was dismissive of Clinton's victory as too narrow to be significant: "The wheels are not coming off [Obama's] wagon." When it became clear that Clinton had beaten Obama by 10 percentage points, his message was very different. It was, he agreed, a bad night for Obama.
Flames netminder Mika Kiprusoff could probably sympathize with Obama's situation. When Hillary supporters interrupted their candidate's victory speech to chant Obama's "Yes we can" slogan, it was reminiscent of the derisive chants aimed at opposing goalies after a bad goal. But unlike Obama, Calgary was eliminated by the Sharks on Tuesday. That series is over. The Democrats were not so lucky. Their series looks set to continue until everybody loses.
Related Tyee stories:
- Can I Cut off CNN?
I'm trying. But is a war a war without a theme song? - Building a Left Wing CNN
Canadian Paul Jay's drive to create Independent World Television. - Lou Dobbs and the Canadian Menace
CNN host bores in on the BC drug tunnel and more threats.




2
Login or register to post comments
Booker
4 years ago
crushing
She was ahead by 20 and won by 9 and a half. A solid win for sure, but she was supposed to win big. Obama improved his numbers with most sectors compared to the Ohio primary.
While Clinton beat him, Obama got a lot of votes from that group. Those people aren't saying "anyone but Obama", and it doesn't mean they will vote for McCain. Clinton trails Obama slightly in polling matchups with McCain.
While the Clinton camp does make that argument, it's questionable whether the "Reagan Democrats" are really the "Democratic base". Also, Obama got 44% of the white male vote -- hardly a wipe out, and he got 46% of the under $50K vote.
James Burns
4 years ago
Dead horse and pony show
The joke of the Democratic nomination race is that it is the infotainment media that is prolonging it, and that is because they $benefit$ from prolonging it. Instead of demographic analysis, just a little media analysis reveals the extent to which the tilt has been escalating against Obama, as the likelihood of his winning the nomination has increased.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/04/20/debate-analysis-abc-asked_n_97599.html
There is no real interest in substance. Even if we put aside policy, and just deal with substantive matters of character, judgment, and basically all those features that tend to indicate good leadership, they are ignored in favor of manufactured scandal. Substantive issues are of no interest to the media. The primary focus, particularly where Obama is concerned is on digging up dirt not on Obama, but on people who have some form of tenuous connection to Obama. The best they can do to pin something on Obama is to take what he says out of context, and thus we get "Bitter-gate". Clinton, on the other hand, can bald-facedly lie about her experience, yet she continues to be considered a serious candidate.
CNN and all the rest are broadcasting the story they want to believe: the story that best fits their interests. That is the laughable "secret" of this campaign. It's a sign of just how badly the quality of journalism has degraded in the US.