Opinion

A Tale of Two Kootenays

The towns and their cultures a product of geography, and the history the land imposes on them.

By Don Gayton, 15 Sep 2004, TheTyee.ca

stmaryriver

The second of a two-part series on the Kootenays, landlocked salmon, and nature's role in our sense of place, excerpted from Kokanee: The Redfish and Kootenay Bioregion.

In the Kootenays, I see the ideal location for a bioregional culture. Who are we Kootenaians? Well, we are a full day's drive from either Calgary or Vancouver. Although we do travel to those places on occasion, we are completely out of their orbit. Spokane or the Okanagan is half a day away, but other than for the rare weekend shopping trip, these locations might as well be on another planet.

The two local airports, Cranbrook and Castlegar, offer only expensive, unreliable connector flights into the main east-west routes. Castlegar airport's famous winter valley cloud and challenging approach have earned it the nickname "Cancelgar."

Like the kokanee, we are cut off. Those long drives and low winter cloud ceilings and mountain passes are our Bonnington Falls. Like the kokanee, we adjust to our isolation. Then, at a certain point, we look back and realize that relative isolation, and relative intimacy with the terms of our geography, have changed us, as they changed the kokanee, and we are pleased with our transformation. There is a bashful, self-deprecating, but persistent pride about living here, about being local.

People who lead tightly scheduled lives, who depend on cell phones and shuttle between commitments in major cities, simply cannot live in the Kootenays. The pace of life here is a little slower, a little more rooted. More than once I have had the experience of walking down Nelson's Baker Street, preoccupied with some nameless urgency, only to realize I was walking too fast and subtly disrupting the relaxed flow of pedestrians around me. In Nelson, walking at Vancouver speed is simply inappropriate.

One Kootenay, many Kootenays

As a bioregion, we must also deal with local complexity and local differences. Early on, "Kootenay" split into "the Kootenays," acknowledging two distinct cultures and ecologies. The Purcell Mountains divide our region into East Kootenay and West Kootenay.

The East Kootenays, basically the broad valley of the Rocky Mountain Trench, has a definite prairie energy, with a partly continental climate of warm summers and relatively dry, cold winters. Fifteen mountain passes through the Rockies have resulted in a strong prairie influence in the trench. The eastbound traveller on Highway 3 first sees the broad trench and the Rockies through a notch in the valley east of Moyie. Mount Fisher looms, its jagged shape chiselled across the sky, a classic Rockies mountain. In winter it often hosts its own lenticular cloud, curved over the summit.

Coming back to Nelson -- in the heart of the West Kootenays -- one returns to a totally different world of dense forest and dark rock. Rags of lingering cloud are caught and held on windless mountainsides. The West Kootenays are known ecologically as a "coastal refugium," where rain, heavy snowfall, and mild winters allow plants like salal, devil's club, and western red cedar to grow, hundreds of kilometres away from their centre of abundance on the coast.

There is even a disjunct pocket of yellow cedar thriving in the Slocan Valley, a species that belongs along the fogbound shores of the North Pacific. Botanists assume that these coastal species are a legacy of an earlier, more maritime climate that allowed them to spread right across the province, and the West Kootenays is the last remaining pocket of maritime-influenced Interior vegetation.

Mixed together with the coastal refugees, often on the same mountainside, are sentinels of the dry Interior -- ponderosa pine, rough fescue, and alligator lizards. The Kootenays are a complex ecological tangle, as well as a human one.

Hunting knives and hackeysacks

There is a fundamental social split between the East and West Kootenays. If I needed to buy a hunting knife, or hip-waders, I would certainly shop for them in Cranbrook. If a hackeysack or a handmade hat were on my list, I would look for them in Nelson. But the situation is actually much more complicated than that.

Communities of the Kootenays range from industrial to New Age and back again; downtown Trail is built around a massive lead-zinc smelter, while Rossland, ten kilometres away, is caught up with crystals, cappuccinos, and snowboards. New Denver celebrates environmentalism; adjacent Nakusp seems to be the last refuge of clearcut logging. Spread-out Castlegar welcomes strip malls and fast-food franchises; compact Nelson is a downtown-oriented, owner-operated kind of place.

Invermere is heavily influenced by Calgary; Cranbrook is nobody's suburb. Sparwood and the coal communities of the Elk Valley are another universe apart. Trail, Rossland, and Fernie all share a common heritage of radical labour movements, dormant now but perhaps someday to resurrect themselves in a new form.

Ethnic and lifestyle complexity further complicates the two Kootenays and binds them together. Swiss mountain guides, Quebecois treeplanters, German foresters, third-generation Italian immigrants, American draft-dodgers, nomadic skiers, dreadlocked hippies, suspendered loggers, Vancouver refugees, Ktunaxa, Shuswap, and Sinixt, descendants of Second World War Japanese internees, lesbian farmers, California telecommuters, nouveau Buddhists, and back-to-the-land dreamers from every jurisdiction help create the human fabric of the region.

Linkages bind disparities

East and West Kootenay engage radically different ecologies and sensibilities, yet I know of a hundred intimate linkages -- hydrographic, historic, jurisdictional, personal -- that bind them together. The kokanee forms one of those links.

The boundary between Pacific and Mountain Time Zones wanders down the spine of the Purcells, splitting the East and West Kootenays into two time zones, except for Creston, which marches to West Kootenay time in the summer and East Kootenay time in the winter. Missed appointments and meetings are common.

A Kootenay bioregionalism needs to be felt at gut level. The spawning habits of local fish, the feel of your own town on a Friday afternoon as people gear down for the weekend, the geological history of local landforms, all must be experienced and internalized. Some years ago the Whole Earth Review magazine proposed a now-famous bioregional quiz, which asked questions like "Name the waterbody that your domestic water comes from" and "Name two native bird species that nest in your area." The quiz seemed artificial, but it drove home the point that many of us didn't know that kind of basic information and had never even thought about it.

Kootenays blessed with many means

We definitely have the raw materials for a brash, earthy, and innovative Kootenay bioregional culture, plus the human energy and diversity to build it.

The Kootenay-Boundary Land Use Plan, an outgrowth of the provincial Commission on Resources and the Environment (CORE) process, released some of that energy and set the stage for an attempt at bioregionalism. The Land Use planning process brought together all the economic, environmental, and recreational sectors to work out zones of influence and reduce resource conflicts on Crown land, which makes up the vast majority of the Kootenay landbase.

The sectoral representation around the planning table was daunting. Foresters, miners, ranchers, and guide-outfitters worked out details with parks advocates, environmentalists, small business people, fishers, and trappers. Going well beyond the usual B.C. stalemate of loggers with their jobs versus environmentalists with their old growth, the process produced a number of minor revelations and unexpected points of agreement.

When they finished in 1998, the scarred veterans of the plan round-table had achieved a surprising degree of consensus and were prepared to soldier on with their innovative work. Officials were stunned by this unprecedented accord, so the Kootenay-Boundary Land Use Plan was hastily buttoned up and shuffled inside the safer confines of the government ministries.

Land measured without stories

As a minor participant in the Land Use Plan exercise, I marvelled at the process, the number of sectors represented, and the level of commitment, but I always left the meetings with a nagging feeling that something was missing. Finally, it dawned on me; there were no storytellers in attendance. No poets. No oral historians, no balladeers.

Storytelling and the oral tradition are crucial to the development and maintenance of a place mythology, but that tradition is weak in the settler cultures of western Canada, and what little tradition exists is continuously eroded by mass media culture. If we are to actually create a local narrative tradition, there are few precedents to build on. We are spoon-fed a mass culture that is suspicious of both narrative and of place, and we turn increasingly to that haven of atomistic, placeless particularity, the internet. It is no wonder that broad-based regional stories are few and far between.

As one small initiative in the development of bioregional and storytelling culture, I suggest the use of successional pathways and food chains. This information is not "owned" by any particular group, and it has good narrative and rhythmic potential. A written version of one branch of the kokanee food chain might go something like this:

dissolved phosphorous to floating diatom, harvester of Kootenay sunlight
from diatom to tiny invertebrate Daphnia
from Daphnia to silvery kokanee, molten essence of our landscape
from spawned-out fall kokanee to hibernation-minded black bear
phosphorous from bear scat captured by Douglas maple leaf
leaf falls, flows down steep and cedar-bounded creek to Kootenay Lake
elusive phosphorous captured again by diatom

This tale could be woven, expanded, and told in different ways, with different media. The fact that our knowledge of food chains is incomplete, and our knowledge of successional pathways even more so, would be a creative asset to this new phase of regional culture-building, encouraging us to speculate, research, and reinterpret.

I hope our kokanee prosper. As I glimpse the molten silver fry coming down the creeks on rainy and moonless spring nights, or marvel at the fiery red spawners returning on the quickening days of fall, I know these fish are a part of me, a clean and dignified and rooted part. I am glad that our futures are so entangled.

Don Gayton is an ecologist in Nelson, B.C., and the author of The Wheatgrass Mechanism and Landscapes of the Interior, which won the U.S. National Outdoor Book Award. This piece is excerpted from his Kokanee: The Redfish and Kootenay Bioregion, published by New Star Books in the Transmontanus series. Last spring, The Tyee also excerpted "Dad, Me and the Kokanee" from the book.
 [Tyee]

7  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • allan (not verified)

    7 years ago

    My experiences in the Kootenays, while certainly less detailed than the author's, is also based on two distinct regions. But the divisions are more toward the political. I see Cranbrook as the town that people go to because they must, where that particular local brand of chamber of commerce boosterism attempts to paint over the long-festering social or class issues apparent after only a short stroll through its dilapidated downtown. A community where Walmart was welcomed by the comunity's elite power structure despite its devestating impact on the city's older downtown core and businesses. Small town politics in Cranbrook is played with a ''winner-take-all'' attitude, one might anticipate from a community on the same time zone and many would argue, the same political page as Ralph Klein's Alberta . * * * A trip over the Salmo-Creston soon lands the observer in Nelson where local politics comes with lessons in compromise that have ensured the flavour of the community is home grown. When Walmart attempted to expand its existing store (an old K-mart outlet), locals realized quickly the expansion could doom efforts to protect the downtown's heritage values. Threats of losing a major retailer didn't deter opponents of the big-box plan. Heritage won out over cheap underwear. Nelson hasn't banned big box retailers (it has several in less obtrusive locations), but the depth and diversity of the community and the ability to negotiate and compromise, rather than ignoring dissenters or proponents, paints Nelson as a model of citizen participation. It's downtown is probably older than Cranbrook's, but is light years ahead of it in vitality, appearance, community spirit, friendliness and the sense of welcome that makes people want to return.*** Cranbrook, although a larger community, has that feel of a dusty truck-stop on the way to somewhere else, while Nelson could easily be that somewhere else of choice.

  • J (not verified)

    7 years ago

    The Kootenays, like other rural regions of this province, regretably constitute the exploited hinterlands/periphery ...where in excess of a trillion dollars from the resource rents of hydroelectricity, lumber, minerals - remember the Kimberly mine, now it is coal...wealth produced by the workers of the region...essentially leaves the region...with little benefit returning to the area. Imagine if those resources were owned by the people of the Kootenays, and the vast proportion of monies stayed there for regional social, cultural economic development...then, the 'coast' wouldn't be running the show, neither would there by over-population at the coast, with all its attendant problems, caused by excessive rural-urban migration. Yes, when I think of the Kootenays, I think regretably of a region that has essentially been 'f**ked" over by political elites within provincial political parties, Socreds, NDP, now BC Liberals. ..and this storey is repeated in every rural region of this province, North Coast, Caribou, Central, North East BC. The spirit of the Kootenay people is admirable, especially around Nelson, Slocan Valley, Grand Forks, up Kootenay Lake, but it is true..many view Cranbrook as merely a dusty 'truck stop' along the way to some where else.

  • larry (not verified)

    7 years ago

    "J", you hit the nail on the head. Exactly what was needed, and is still needed, is community ownership and control of resources. Not state ownership and not corporate ownership, but community ownership. Had this been the case the wealth would have stayed in the regions and there would have been no migration to the big cities.

  • KWD (not verified)

    7 years ago

    Not sure I agree with Larry’s and J’s reasoning. Resource ownership plays a very indirect role in determining where people settle in large numbers. The nuances that spin bioregional/biocultural differences are probably innumerable however, as the author continually points out, the category that represents the single greatest factor limiting distribution and abundance of humans is geophysical/environmental. Settlements in this province can be traced to a predominance of environmental factors not philosophical. Another fly in the ointment is the belief that the larger urban centers, like Vancouver and Victoria, lack their own unique bioregional communities. Bioregional/biocultural differences between small and large urban centers are more mythological (totems) than real, and are probably more a matter of scale. Mass transportation and communication corridors have rendered the terms ‘rural’ and ‘urban’ obsolete. Nelson, Cranbrook and Castlegar are not rural; they are every bit as urban as Vancouver. The Balkanization of BC, based on resource ownership, is not only no longer possible (and after European contact likely never was) it would be contrary to the more urgent need for the socialist cooperation that the Larry, J and the author espouse. Resource ownership and by extension, the concept of private property are the mainstays of capitalism, neocon politics and corporate rule.

  • larry (not verified)

    7 years ago

    While I may have gone overboard a bit, I don’t think local control-ownership of resources can accurately be portrayed as “Balkanization” as KWD claims. This is not what decentralization is about. For example, credit unions are locally controlled and owned , yet no one would speak of credit union Balkanization. Along with decentralization goes federalism and mutual aid. Thus, regions would work together where needed. One practical example of how local resource ownership would maintain resources – and thus the people working them – comes from France. The French have a lumber industry. Funny thing, after 2000 years they still have forests to cut, when after only 110 years, BC doesn’t. Part of the reason for this is that much of the forest is owned by the municipality – as a form of commons - and the local people decide what happens with it. Without serious local input, people are subject to control by distant bureaucracy. It isn't a matter of a choice between state socialism and corporate capitalism. There is another possibility, a cooperative, decentralized and therefore truly democratic socialism. It really is madness that citizens have to fight to keep out Wallmart or, as in Saltspring Island, to prevent logging. These things should be decided democratically, as a matter of course. But then that would tie the hands of the corporations, tsk, tsk.

  • Robert (not verified)

    7 years ago

    I think you are just a little bit hard on Cranbrook. So many nice people there.

  • allan (not verified)

    7 years ago

    Robert: You are right, but unfortunately its the municipal politicians and backroom gangs that set the tone and create the reality the rest of the world uses as a benchmark. So many of the nice people there have been told to shut up. The image is of a mean little town controlled by a mean little group who speak Albertan when they can hear themselves over the din and dust of heavy trucks navagating the strip-mall lined highway that once gave the town a reason for being.

    • No best comments selected by an editor for this story yet. To see all comments, click the All Comments tab, above.
    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.