Ontario Teachers Profit from Copter Biz in Burma
Pension plan a big investor in CHC Helicopter Corp.
Member of the CHC fleet.
For North American stock investors, good news is as infectious as a Burmese malaria outbreak during typhoon season.
So when the good news appeared for Richmond B.C.'s CHC Helicopter Corporation on Oct. 12, shares jumped over $1.20 on the Toronto Stock Exchange. The market was responding to an announcement confirming $180 million worth of new contracts to provide oil and gas exploration support in Nigeria, the Philippines, Namibia and Kazakhstan.
By all counts, the future of CHC Helicopters is bullish; the company announced revenues of over $1 billion in September, the eighth consecutive year of record revenues. Feeding this growth is a vast international cast of shareholders, including Canadian banks, North American mutual fund companies, and CHC's largest institutional shareholder, the Ontario Teachers Pension Fund.
Yet a closer look at how CHC has grown reveals a company that has aggressively courted customers and government partners in countries where most other corporations would never dare to tread. This year CHC appeared alongside Ivanhoe Mining Ltd. on the 2007 "Dirty List" representing two of the last publicly-traded BC companies profiting from operations in Burma.
Prosperity in South-East Asia
CHC's Global Operations are focused on providing transportation services to onshore and offshore oil and gas exploration/production for a who's who of multinational oil companies, including Chevron, BP, Royal Dutch/Shell Group, and ExxonMobil. Over 40 per cent of this activity is currently in Africa, and nearly 20 per cent in Asia, including Burma.
CHC's presence in Burma -- through its Canadian Helicopters International (CHI) division -- dates back to at least August 1997, when CHI signed an accord with Burma's Ministry of Transport to create Myanmar Helicopters International Co Ltd. CHC signed a contract for services with Unocal in Thailand during that same year, as well as a five-year contract with Total Myanmar Exploration and Production for oil and gas support in Burma.
According to Ottawa-based non-profit Canadian Friends of Burma (CFOB), it was during this time that CHI provided helicopter services for French oil company Total, for its work on the Yadana-Yetagun pipeline constructed between eastern Burma and Thailand from 1996 to 1998.
Fifteen Burmese villagers eventually sued one of Total's pipeline partners, American oil company Unocal in U.S. courts, alleging thousands of villagers were used as forced pipeline construction labour by the Burmese military, thousands forcibly relocated to secure a project corridor, and serious human rights abuses committed by military forces hired as security for the pipeline. Unocal eventually settled out of court in 2005, awarding the villagers a confidential cash settlement. CHC was never implicated or accused of wrong-doing in this case.
By August of 2003, CHI had a total staff of 30 working on the ground in Burma, with two aircraft operating between Yangoon and Kanbauk in support of both Total Oil and Premier Oil. This was in addition to a six day a week Twin Otter service between Yangoon, Kanbauk and Dawei. In 2004 CHC was awarded new contracts to provide ongoing helicopter services in support of oil and gas operations of Total Exploration and Production in Burma.
Support of Ontario Elementary and High School Teachers
As a publicly-traded public company on both the TSE and the New York Stock Exchange, shares in CHC Helicopters are widely held around the world. But by far the largest shareholder is 47-year-old board chairman Mark Dobbin, the son of deceased founder Craig L. Dobbin.
Outside of the family, the largest institutional shareholder is the Ontario Teachers Pension Plan (OTPP), which on June 30 of this year reported ownership of over 2 million shares in the company, worth over $53 million (US). The fund invests and administers pensions on behalf of 271,000 active and retired Ontario elementary and high-school teachers, managing $106 billion in real estate, government bonds, and stock.
When asked about its investment in CHC Helicopters, OTPP communications officer Carol Dunsmore told The Tyee by e-mail that the fund's hands are tied when it comes to ethically screening companies.
"According to law, pension plans cannot select or exclude investments on the sole basis of social, environmental, political, or any other non-financial criteria," she wrote. "When selecting investments, part of our due diligence process is to consider the [non-financial] factors on a company's long-term performance. But, again ... the pension fund's investments must be in the best financial interests of the pension plan members.
The law Dunsmore refers to is not Canadian law, but a common law precedent established in England in 1984. It is based on the case of coal miners who demanded that their pension fund divest from oil companies, which were perceived as competitors and a threat to their livelihood. The judge ruled that pension fund trustees must treat interests of beneficiaries as paramount, and defined these best interests as primarily financial.
Dunsmore also wrote that if OTPP members wanted to avoid specific investments and were willing to risk earning lower returns, teachers (through the Ontario Teachers' Federation) would have to first agree on what are acceptable investments, and then convince the Ontario government (the other plan sponsor) to officially change the rules.
Looking at the bigger picture, a quick scan of the stock holdings of the Canadian Pension Plan (CPP) demonstrates that the OTPP is no different than other plans when it comes to not screening investments. Stocks bought by Canadian citizens through CPP contributors include tobacco, weapons manufacturers, oil sands, coal and mining, including almost five million shares of B.C.'s Ivanhoe Mining Ltd., worth $67 million alone.
Not only are working and retired Ontario teachers unable to screen where their retirement money goes, they are unable to wield the collective shareholder power to improve the social and environmental practices of their investments.
The OTPP's Proxy Voting Guidelines effectively neuter the mammoth shareholder voting power that comes with being a long-term stockholder of over 1100 publicly traded companies around the world.
The guidelines state that the pension fund, when voting on resolutions at company AGMs, will "generally not support proposals that ... create a wide range of peripheral considerations the directors must take into account in evaluating a business proposal."
Out of Iraq, Into Chad
In addition to its ongoing activities in Burma, the company currently has contracts in Nigeria, Chad, Venezuela, the Philippines and up until this fiscal year, Somalia -- all regions that Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada currently advises Canadian citizens to entirely or in part avoid.
Regarding its oil and gas activities, CHC Helicopters Corp. marketing analyst Natalie Haywood told The Tyee that the company has a code of ethics that is applicable to all operations worldwide, but that this policy does not guide where the company decides to operate. She added the company does not yet have a corporate social responsibility policy.
In the cases where the company is not engaged in oil and gas operations in or around the planet's volatile states, it is often on the front lines of humanitarian aid, providing helicopter services to the United Nations. Over the last 15 years, the company has assisted UN actions in Bosnia, East Timor, Somalia, Rwanda, Haiti and even Iraq, where the company provided support for UN monitoring, verification and inspection activities late into fiscal 2003.
Related Tyee stories:
- Canadian Miners Sour on Burma
Ties with junta earned millions for BC-based Ivanhoe. - Pensions Deep into Weapons, Toxins, Sweatshops
The Canadian Pension Plan makes no apologies for its big shift into stocks, including Walmart and 15 top military contractors. - Are You a 'Global Citizen'?
Really? What does that mean?



15
Login or register to post comments
G West
4 years ago
Disgusting
Maybe CHC could get a contract with Blackwater – that would be a nice fit.
About time somebody at the Pension fund started to do some due diligence
realisticman
4 years ago
Usual Negative from GWest
Maybe you, GWest, should do some due diligence. This is the largest helicopter services company in the world and it's based right here in British Columbia. Oh right; success - that's bad isn't it? Even if they do good they must be bad so GWest wants to ban helicopters now. Nasty, noisy and expensive. An, my god, they make a profit! Yuck!
Maybe, if the teachers don't like it they should opt out of their union plan, have their union release their funds from the pension plan so they can invest them where they themselves choose.
G West
4 years ago
Yes it is bad - investors should do due diligence
If I'd written that helicopters should be banned you'd have a point - I didn't, and you, as seems more and more frequently to be the case, don't have a point; or a decent argument.
I said that pension funds should be directed by their plan holders not to invest in companies like CHC - I said the same thing about Talisman when they were involved in the Sudan - and so did a lot of other people - to the point that Jimmy Buckee finally got the picture and realized he needed to change.
I could care less how successful a company like CHC or Blackwater is - usually there is a correlation between the ethics of these companies and the kind of work they're happy to do: Big surprise at that.
Success built on slavery, crime and exploitation is not success – it is failure – ethically, morally and personally whether it is here in Canada or in Asia.
I take it you don't agree with ethical investing either...
realisticman
4 years ago
Always look on the Dark side...
don't you, GWest.
What's your point here West? I wonder if there any Toyota's in those bad, nasty countries. Suspend all operations! Pull all support, suspend operations, even if it's for school buses or UN humanitarian operations. Unethical! Boycott Toyota!
CHC has been in operation around the world for 60 years. GWest decides they're bad because he read one story. [OFFENSIVE COMMENT REMOVED. -TYEE EDITOR.]
G West
4 years ago
It is the dark side - sorry
That's the reality and you know it - Again you pretend I've said a lot of things I didn't say.
I could care less how long CHC has been in business. Krupp had a pretty long history too and so did IGFarben - for that matter, Albert Speer, the prime example of a compromised soul, came from a noble German family.
That certainly didn't help when he needed the moral authority to actually do something rather than just go along in the 'corporate' manner.
I simply said that it's important to be an ethical investor and groups like the Ontario Teachers Pension Fund ought to be.
Simple.
Nice of you to get personal again - how is that every time I respond to one of your posts you end up saying something along these lines?
Is it just frustration [OFFENSIVE COMMENT REMOVED. -TYEE EDITOR.]?
realisticman
4 years ago
That's NOT the reality
and you know it West.
CHC is working with the Swedish Maritime Administration Search & Rescue Service, among others, and you slander them and lump them in, right off the top, with Blackwater. The article states that they have had a contract in Burma for 10 years and in a court case, "CHC was never implicated or accused of wrong-doing in this case." Yet you immediately set the tone of negativity, as you so often do. We presume you're obliged to.
G West
4 years ago
And the situation in BURMA
And the situation in Burma dates back HOW LONG, Realisticman? We've been down this road before, remember.
They are involved in wrong doing simply by being there - just as Canadian and other companies in South Africa were as long as apartheid was the going rage.
I didn't set the negative tone; CHC did. They went to work in a country where you cannot be in order to make profits without making compromises with humanity and the truth - just as Talisman was doing in Sudan.
The point is that human rights trumps shareholder value in any moral equation – when it doesn’t, changes must be made. If you looked back to my original post what did I write? I said the Ontario teachers should do some due diligence – remember.
I'm not setting the corporate agenda - just commenting upon it.
When I see a company behaving responsibly, cancelling all executive travel, paying all their employees fairly and well, being as neutral toward the environment as possible - someone like Ray Anderson of Interface - I'll certainly cheer them on.
Until then, no, I won't succumb to the sirens of simple success and say 'I'm okay jack' – no one should.
CHC had the power and the duty and, I'd say, the obligation to behave otherwise. It didn't - just as Talisman and hundreds of other corporations didn't and don't. They deserve all the 'credit'...I try to see they get it in my small (and apparently from your point of view) troubling way.
And I do it without calling my interlocutor names and telling him or her to get a life.
Funny how that works.
Geoff
4 years ago
Can you please...
Knock off the personal attacks?
You can both make your points without the bickering.
Geoff.
G West
4 years ago
No personal attacks here Geoff
Read back over those posts.
By the way, here's the link to Amnesty's writing program for Burma:
http://www.amnesty.ca/take_action/actions/myanmar_peaceful_protests_list.php
realisticman
4 years ago
All my fault
Sorry Geoff. The last thing GWest would ever do is make a personal attack. My apologies.
G West
4 years ago
Thank you very much for the apology
I appreciate your acknowledgment that this all started with you telling me to 'get a life' - a remark which was subsequently expunged.
I disagree with your ideas and your approach to what's wrong with the world. I think business and globalization, unfair competition and worker exploitation is a bigger problem than you do. I think personal morality can’t make up for public and social irresponsibility, but I have nothing against you as an individual.
However, if you expect me to stand still for a remark like that you're being naive.
Your personal life and how you spend your time is your business - as is mine - if you want to actually discuss the world, compare data and results - I'm all for that - and I'll never once tell you to get a life.
Stick to issues, ideas and facts and there will be no need for redaction or apologies in the future.
ME2
4 years ago
You do not have to deal with the Devil.
Having at one time been a Director on a fairly large trust fund, as a Lefty I became, of course, interested in the issue of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
This is no small, insignificant issue, and the percentage of investors who look to CSR guidelines is steadily rising and that is having an impact upon the activities of a growing number of businesses and Corporations.
Our fund advisors put together a memorandum giving the Board a comprehensive run-down on CSR, and I was very pleased to find that it is entirely possible to make good money with ethical investing. There are now many investment firms which put together portfolios containing only CSR-accredited firms.
Lula
4 years ago
Ontario Teacher's Pension Investing
Not only does the fund invest in unethetical investments in Burma, but it puts its money into terrible environmental projects such as the Delta Port Expansion. The fund now owns DeltaPort and the expansion of Deltaport is driving new highways (Gateway Project), new rail yards and rail llines through Delta on Agricultural Reserve lands, new bridges in the GVRD and with all this comes pollution and the environmental degradation of the Fraser River Delta with death to orcas, migratory birds and people from Delta to Hope.
I wrote to the Fund and got the same run around.
greengreen
4 years ago
MORALS
GWest - gee, great to hear you use the concept of "morals". This will certainly offend some, mainly those who accept ECONOMY AS GOD.
Next thing we know, you will be talking about the "common good".
G West
4 years ago
done it already greengreen
Thanks!