Firefighters Demand Cancer Benefits
Most provinces make it easy for at-risk firefighters with cancer, but B.C. still forces them to argue each case.
The Tyee.ca
B.C. firefighters say the Workers' Compensation Board is failing to recognize the increased cancer risks they face on the job. And the B.C. Professional Fire Fighters Association is campaigning for change, citing several cases where firefighters who have contracted cancer have been denied compensation.
They want the WCB to do what Ontario and four other provinces have done to expedite compensation for certain cancers. They also believe the move would reduce the enormous costs faced by small fire departments fighting on behalf of their sick employees.
In B.C., the WCB is in charge of designating occupational diseases. Critics say it is dragging its heels amending the province's list of occupational diseases to reflect the strains of cancer associated with firefighters' exposure to hazardous materials. The amendments would expedite the process of linking their illness to their profession.
Significant increased risk of brain, kidney, and bladder cancer, as well as non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and leukemia, have been linked to fire-fighting. However, B.C. firefighters who succumb to these cancers are forced to compile both scientific and personal data linking their condition to their profession and present it for WCB adjudication.
The process is both costly and time-consuming, according to Tim Baillie, B.C. Fire Fighters Association vice-president. Baillie says collecting the necessary information can cost up to $40,000, with no guarantee of results, which makes it prohibitive to smaller fire departments.
Victims face tough times
Two members of West Vancouver Fire and Rescue were recently diagnosed with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. One of the two fire fighters retired without compensation and the other returned to work on light duties.
After going through chemotherapy, radiation treatments and a bone marrow transplant, the firefighter that returned did so, in part, because he was denied workers' compensation, according to Scott Jones, assistant chief of training at the West Vancouver department. Jones declined to release the firefighters' names.
In fact, since 1985, not one of the five B.C. firefighters diagnosed with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma has received compensation, according a WCB report.
Only 10 of the 15 fire fighters in the same period diagnosed with bladder, kidney, and brain cancer or leukemia received compensation.
The amendments to the provinicial legislation would virtually eliminate the cost of arbitration, Baillie said. "The issue is not about cancer, it's about whether the job causes cancer. What presumptive legislation does is that the WCB recognizes this type of scientific evidence, so we don't have to go through the same scientific evidence with every case," he said.
Presumptive policies or legislation are used in other jurisdictions for compensating police officers for stress-related disease, U.S. Vietnam vets exposed to Agent Orange, and even for people with chronic fatigue syndrome.
However, correlations between illnesses and their causes rely heavily on laws of probability. Several studies, including two commissioned by the WCB, found no occupational link between fire-fighting and certain cancers. Until now, the WCB has been unwilling to designate these forms of cancer as being job-related, under provincial legislation that allows it to do so.
Other provinces acted
Yet several other provinces have already changed their rules for firefighters with these cancers.
Ontario was the first to act. In 1999, the Ontario Workplace Safety and Insurance Board developed a policy where any firefighter with a minimum of 20 years on the job who develops either brain or lymphoid leukemia is deemed to have likely contracted the disease on the job.
In 2002, the Manitoba government commissioned a study by Dr. Tee Guidotti, a leading epidemiologist at the George Washington University Medical Center, which linked several cancers to fire-fighting. Guidotti's study resulted in legislation that extends benefits to those who have been on the job for a certain period and have been exposed to the hazards of a fire scene. Alberta, Nova Scotia, and Saskatchewan followed suit in 2003.
In 1997, the firefighters' association asked the WCB to recognize a probable link between brain cancer and the profession, but a subsequent report found inadequate evidence for that contention.
In 2003, after the legislation in the other provinces was introduced, the association commissioned a report of their own by Guidotti that found a reasonable link between the cancers already mentioned and B.C. firefighters. It also found evidence of an occupational link with testicular, lung and colon cancer.
Studies' methods questioned
However, Guidotti's methodology was questioned by a report commissioned by the Greater Vancouver Regional District, the largest employer of firefighters in the province.
In Oct. 2003, the WCB commissioned Cancer Care Ontario to review medical and scientific data linking occupational fire-fighting and cancer. The CCO report concluded there was limited evidence of association between fire-fighting and brain, nervous system, and colorectal cancers.
However, the CCO report was deemed "incomplete" under review and Guidotti himself questioned the methodology used in that report.
Guidotti also told The Tyee that although the B.C. WCB is generally "head and shoulders" above other jurisdictions, he does not agree with the methods it uses to determine causation.
Statistically, the chances of any one study finding an incidence of occupational cancer in a firefighter is rare, Guidotti said. By including studies that found no instance of the disease, Guidotti argues, the CCO report diluted its own test pool.
"[The CCO] made a bunch of funny choices. The choices they made seemed to throw out all the studies that confirmed that there were effects. The impression you get is that is that they were selectively detaining a lot of studies that didn't show an affect. I don't think they were doing it intentionally. I just think they weren't very experienced in this area and they don't know which studies are biased in which direction and they don't know how to weigh it," Guidotti said.
"A single case can make a pretty significant difference," Guidotti said. "Kidney cancer is very rare. In a city the size of Vancouver, you may only find a handful of cases over the last 20 years among firefighters. So, if the Vancouver firefighters had not had a case, it wouldn't mean much, because they could have one tomorrow."
Probability, not proof
Workers' compensation standards are not as stringent as those establishing a scientific probability. WCB standards run on a system of "more likely than not," Guidotti said.
"If you don't have evidence to refute a suggestion that something may be the case, even if it's not at a level of scientific probability, that's the evidence you have, and if it's more likely than not, you have to go with it," Guidotti said. "If it's more likely than not, presumptive legislation would streamline this and say, 'We're going to save people a lot of trouble. We're going to admit that the balance of probability favours this form of causation and we're going to make it particularly easy for fire fighters because they're heroes.'"
Susan Hynes, the WCB's director of policy, said the issue of occupational cancer in firefighters has been given a "high priority," but the way compensation is determined in B.C. is different than in the provinces.
"In other provinces, you'll note it was actually the government that implemented the legislative changes, whereas here, it's actually WCB that makes the decision. Because of our unique relationship, it's incumbent upon us to go out and get an expert scientific report on whatever diseases our stakeholders are looking at," Hynes said. "Part of the reason why we have a peer review is to ensure the response and the methodology is checked."
Firefighters and their employers were given a copy of the WCB discussion paper, the CCO report, and its peer review in January. Their responses are expected back in March and will be presented to the WCB. All the information will then be considered, along with Guidotti's work. A decision expected in June, Hynes said.
Scott Deveau is on staff at The Tyee.
![]()



8
Login or register to post comments
Truman Green (not verified)
7 years ago
This article certainly seems to have covered all the bases. Perhaps the BC WCB has too much power. Several other jurisdictions have initiated legislation adopting a "presumtive policy" regarding the compensability of specific cancers. Ontario's policy which extends this policy to those firefighters with 20 or more years of service who contract cancer is especially fair and enlightened. Hopefully our WCB will adopt a similar policy.
Ranbir (not verified)
7 years ago
A long-term solution is to eliminate the cancer causing material(carcinogens) ie: chemicals in construction materials, toxic paints...etc. from construction materials, so future generations of firefighters and citizens are not exposed to these risks. Not only are these chemicals causing human-illnesses, but many species of birds, amphibians and other species "die in silence" from these same causes. A short-term solution is to compensate the firefighters, but that still means that every future generation of firefighters, citizens, and other species will be exposed to toxic chemicals, which may result in cancer, and we accept the status quo of living with toxic man-made chemicals in our homes and buildings. This is another example, where MPs and MLAs should first be "required to understand science" and then amend law/policy to protect citizens.
Ed Deak (not verified)
7 years ago
Of the 200,000 chemicals in use today only less than 15,000 have been thoroughly examined for health effects. Consequently, not only the firefighters, one of the most valuable and dedicated groups we have, especially the volunteers, who are making great sacrifices to help others, but the whole human race is being slowly poisoned. Then, when a few scientists are daring to report the damage caused by chemicals in daily use, like vynil chloride based products, like hairsprays, they are being vilified by corporate hacks, even lose their university tenures through blackmail by chemical corporations who literally own whole university departments on account of governmental cutbacks. Right now two American scientists,Gerald Markovitz and David Rosner, who published a book "The Deadly Politics of Industrial Pollution", on the coverups and the known damage caused to people by poisons in our daily lives, all from secret company records and memos, are being sued by Monsanto, Dow, Goodrich, Goodyear, Union Carbide etc. for "unethical conduct". They can't deny the effects, so they demand silence. Meanwhile our governments and politicians of all faiths are just standing by with their fingers up their asses, not daring to say or do anything, for fear of upsetting the goodwill of some of the biggest criminals in history. I'm almost 78. When I was a kid in the '30s and '40s, there were virtually no cancers. No childhood leukemia. The first time my wife and I heard of breast cancer when we were in our forties and a young woman across the street in Vancouver came down with it and died. Yet, such simple statistics, facts and figures are covered up and kept from the public by crooks and their paid off, "business friendly" politicans, so they can steal more from the public's pockets in profits, while killing them.
Truman Green (not verified)
7 years ago
Yes, Ed Deak, you're right about that, as most reasonably thoughtful people have already figured out. Similarly, when I was a kid in the sixties, taking a seminar at UBC on the history of medicine, I asked my prof about the diseases the aboriginals had before Europeans came to these continents. After a bit of stammering he had to admit that there wasn't a single transmitable viral or bacterial disease in North or South America before the Europeans arrived. In fact, the first documented use of "weapons of mass destruction" was the giving of smallpox-infected blankets to the Indians. With 200,000 chemicals in our environment, there is probably no way to alter the fact that a certain percentage of us will get cancer. Perhaps the only way we can even partially protect ourselves is by refusing ever to eat a single food that has been refined. And who knows what problems genetically modified foods will heap on to future generations? I guess, as they say, "there's no free lunch."
Kent (not verified)
7 years ago
I would take issue with the statement that the B.C. W.C.B. Is "head and shoulders above other jurisdictions". I know someone who has waited more than 11 years for Compensation. They have jumped through all the hoops, spent money on travel, lawyers, etc., and more than year ago were told that the application was approved. Yet not a dime has been paid out. When a close relative phoned to ask why the delay they were told "we have many applicants who have waited longer than that." When it was suggested they were perhaps waiting for the applicant to die, they hung up the phone. Yes, we have a great system in B.C.
Marysue (not verified)
7 years ago
And so all pulp mill workers--or former pulp mill workers--should be fighting for cancer compo. I was at a political meeting once where two of the 20 people were pulp mill workers, and both of us had just had tumours removed.
shirin (not verified)
6 years ago
I have to agree with Ranbir on this case. If there are conclusive studies that show a positive correlation between certain cancers and the exposure to carcinogens by firefighters - then the logical move would be to delineate the cause of the noxious substance and ban its use. That is the most useful protection the WCB can offer the people it shelters. As a life scientist - it is difficult to make such a statement that a certain profession induces the likelihood of certain cancers because one cannot neglect the influence of gender, genetics, and lifestyle. Men have a greater susceptiblity to some cancers as may certain recreational activities which may be more prevalent among those who are firefighters - unless the correlation withstands the test of these corrections (ie - both men and women firefighters have an increased incidence of a certain cancer and this is found across the nation - then it adds strength to the argument), the WCB cannot be rushed into complying to a cause-and-affect relationship due to the implications that would have on future assumptions about the disease.
Tim Baillie (not verified)
6 years ago
The issue of fire fighter cancer's is being put forward now because of the scientific evidence that we have that can show that fire fighters have twice the rate of cancer of the public. It is important to remember that every workplace is potentially our workplace. Not only does this stand true but it is our workplace when either disaster, fire or other incidents increase the dangers to the point that we are called. Our exposures are difficult to predict or even measure due to this quickly changing nature of emergency calls. With the continued production of new products that are not tested for by-products of combustion, it is not possible to fully protect fire fighters from exposure. Our equipment is not capable of stopping especially the significant dermal exposure, and more research is showing that the inhalation protection is not as complete as was thought. Due to this, we are demanding that the members that do suffer from the workplace exposure are compensated as a cost of doing business. The main concern is the continuity of income for our families. When the fire fighter dies as a result of workplace exposures, the family should not have to suffer more loss and be compensated. It is sounds good to say that we should eliminate the threat, but this is not realistic or timely. In the meantime, fire fighters are still contacting identified cancers at twice the rate of the norm. Compensation must be established in a presumptive manner for the cancers that have been recognized in 6 other provinces in Canada and more are moving in the same direction. Why not here in BC? The other jurisdictions have accepted the scientific evidence, it is time that BC does the same.