News

Chief Battle Sparks Park Fears

Preservationists see the plan to build a gondola up the Squamish Chief as a symptom of deeper trouble for BC Parks.

By Lisa Richardson, 9 Sep 2004, TheTyee.ca

Chief

The Squamish Chief is no stranger to controversy. More than a decade ago, a proposal to turn the base of the spectacular granite monolith into a quarry was thwarted. The quarry protests helped pave the way for the area to become a provincial park in 1995. The 600-hectare Stawamus Chief Provincial Park and the adjoining Shannon Falls Provincial Park now see approximately half a million visitors a year.

At the official ceremony celebrating its designation as a Class A Park in October 1995, disgruntled loggers from the resource-dependent community exploited the occassion to protest forestry cuts. Logging trucks circled the ceremony like sharks. Bloody fistfights ensued.

Cut to 2004. Squamish forestry workers have lost the war to save local jobs and the region wants tourism to drive the economy into the future. A bigger battle is playing out over the Chief -- and it has implications for all provincial parks.

In August, two Whistler-based developers, Peter Alder of Peter Alder Enterprises and Paul Mathews of Ecosign Mountain Resort Planners, were revealed as the proponents behind a hush-hush plan to construct an aerial sightseeing gondola on the Stawamus Chief [read about it in the Tyee story: Gondolas Up the Chief? ].

The outcry was immediate.

Squamish's Megan Olesky, spokesperson for newly formed Friends of the Chief, hikes the Chief at least once a week. She contends that a gondola up the Chief is anathema to the town's growing reputation as an outdoor recreation centre. "A quick gondola ride to a viewpoint symbolizes everything that outdoor recreation is not," she says. "And the fact that this is in a provincial park makes it even worse. To me it sends the message that our protected areas are for sale to private companies. This is a terrifying precedent to set."

Parks 'open for business'?

Gwen Barlee, of the Western Canada Wilderness Committee, is also concerned that the province might set a precedent if it approves the $12 million private development. She worries that it might be the first domino to fall in parks across the province, thanks to new legislation that relaxes restrictions in parks and allows the province to ignore local rules. "What we're seeing with this proposal, with the introduction of parking meters, with the reduction of the boundaries of the South Chilcotin [Mountains Provincial Park], is an all-out war on our parks. These are public parks, and they aren't the Liberals' to give away."

The Significant Projects Streamlining Act allows the government fast-track approval and override its own and local laws and regulations for "provincially significant" projects. The subsequent Parks and Protected Areas Statute Amendment Act permits recreational and tourism development in parks that is "consistent with or complementary to" recreational values. No definition of "recreational values" is provided.

Bill Barisoff, Minister of Water Land and Air Protection, which oversees BC Parks, set the future's tone when he introduced his 2004-2005 budget estimates. "The Premier has talked about building a park system that is open to everyone. We need a range of use options beyond traditional camping that keep pace as our population ages. Our goal is to attract more people to our parks."

The government's Recreation Stewardship Panel, which delivered its report in November 2002, also troubled preservationists and recreation advocates, who objected to its "invitation only" public consultations, which took place over a mere four days. The panel, chaired by former Social Credit environment minister Bruce Strachan, recommended more user fees, more private service delivery, and more commercial, revenue-focused facilities. Strachan told CBC Radio's Almanac that the Panel wanted to see five to seven parks designated as "intensive, revenue-focused recreation locations."

New or expanded commercial operations would have to be "endorsed in an approved park management plan that included opportunities for public input." Development proponents must obtain a park use permit under the Park Act, and applications are reviewed to ensure they are consistent with the act and the management plan.

Chief plan excludes gondolas

The Stawamus Chief management plan was completed in 1997, after two years of extensive consultations. The plan states its aims to "provide non-mechanised recreation opportunities for different users to experience the park in ways compatible with the special features and natural values". The plan also marketing and promotion of the Chief, given its already high usage, estimated at the time at 25,000 rock-climbers and 50,000 hikers a year.

Contrast this with gondola proponent Peter Alder's vision: "Sulphur Mountain [at Banff] is probably the closest similar installation to the one we've proposed. We're planning to build a viewing platform over about two and a half acres, a warming shelter and chemical toilets at the top. At Sulphur Mountain, they've found that the maximum stay on the summit is about 15 minutes." Five million people are currently driving past the Chief every year, and Alder believes he can get at least 80 percent of them to go up the Chief gondola at least once.

The Wilderness Committee's Barlee wonders what the point of a management plan is if it can be overridden. "The public are so against this. I don't think the government, with an election just seven months away, would want to shine the media spotlight on this issue."

Ministry having a 'hemorrhage'

Alder is aware of the project's political sensitivity, and says the ministry is "very insecure" about it. "A lot of it probably has to do with the political nature of the comments we're getting back," he told The Tyee. "The Campbell government has buggered up three major things they've tried to do," citing the privatization of liquor stores, the sale of BC Rail and the contracting out of the Coquihalla Highway's operation. "So they want to have a very transparent process, which is fine."

Barisoff insists that the management plan won't be amended unless it represents "the desire of the community." He told The Tyee that he has instructed the gondola's proponents to take the proposal before the community and convince the citizens and council of Squamish that it's worth amending the management plan for the gondola project.

The proponents have since revealed that their delay in announcing the project to the public was at the behest of the ministry. "They're having a shit hemorrhage on this one," says Alder. "They asked us not to release any information to the public until we'd gone through the process they outlined, going to the District of Squamish, the Squamish First Nations, the Ministry of Highways and [the 2010 Olympics organizing committee], and giving them each 60 days to give us feedback. Then the minister would tell us when we could release it to the public."

The ministry now refers questions about the proposal to the proponents, "as nothing new has happened, and the minister can't spend all his time dealing with the media."

Process lacks 'fairness'

Opponents of the gondola are concerned that public consultation has been handed off to the project proponent. Barlee wonders how equity and fairness, or the appearance of equity and fairness, can be achieved in such a situation. "I don't think you can have an industrial developer run the public consultation and achieve that," she says, adding that she's troubled by the way the government directed the proposal.

Spencer Fitschen, co-chair of the Squamish chapter of the Sierra Club, and a representative on both the Squamish Select Committee for the Environment and Sea to Sky Land and Resource Management Plan, told The Tyee that "this whole proposal didn't come from ground up, but from top down. It started in the Premier's Office and came down and that raised a lot of alarm bells right off."

Fitschen said he hasn't encountered any support for the gondola proposal from local residents or the local government in Squamish. Although the District of Squamish hasn't made its position public, staff were asked by the Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection months ago to provide a recommendation on the project. "I've been told that an opinion was sent to Victoria, recommending against it," said Fitschen.

Acting mayor of Squamish, Sonya Lebans, was not available for comment on the allegation.

Park land swap lacked input

Fitschen said that although he believes the province would like to set a precedent with commercial development in a provincial park, the Chief gondola proposal is too controversial too close to an election to get the go-ahead. "I don't think the Chief would be their first choice of a test case." Fitschen does agree, however, that if the Chief gondola gets a park-use permit the floodgates will open.

A ministry official told The Tyee that although they routinely receive enquiries about commercial development in parks, "at this time we have no other third party proposals for infrastructure developments."

Still, the Western Canada Wilderness Committee has other areas of concern. A road was built through Monck Provincial Park to provide access to a private housing development. At Cathedral Grove, the government is planning to use two hectares of old-growth forest in the 20-hectare park for expanded parking, despite fears that the disruption to the forest canopy could increase the number of blowdowns in the park.

Park watchers are also concerned about deals being concluded behind closed doors.

In 2002, Intrawest's Whistler Blackcomb swapped land in the Fitzsimmons Creek drainage for 87 hectares of Garibalid Park surrounding Flute peak. No public consultation occurred. The company announced the expansion of its skiable area with great fanfare this summer. There is also concern that independent power projects may locate some infrastructure within provincial parks.

"It's all happening under the public radar," said Barlee. "These are public lands, the public commons." She said people have worked for decades to preserve them -- in the case of the South Chilcotin Mountains Provincial Park. it was 50 years -- yet the current government is cutting protections away at the behest of private commercial and industrial interests. "And the public doesn't even know what's going in. That is wrong. It's really wrong."

[Note: This beginning of this story was altered on Sept. 14, 2004 to ensure it accurately reflects the events leading up to and including the Stawamus Chief Provincial Park's dedication.]

Lisa Richardson is a journalist based in Squamish.  [Tyee]

15  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • patrick (not verified)

    7 years ago

    the gondola up the chief is clearly an idea with $$$ signs written all over it. as a resident of whistler, i can say i have not spoke to one person who is in favor of this project... not that its our decision. im sure residents of squamish feel the same way however. who moved to squamish the capital of outdoor recreation to take a gondola? is it that strenuous a hike up the backside of the chief? clearly for some elderly and out of shape people it is... but should we build a lift up it just because of it? i mean there are many vistas along the sea to sky highway that are very accesible and offer a better view of the area than the top of the chief. someone oughta slap those 2 developers silly.

  • allan (not verified)

    7 years ago

    Gwen Barlee is correct. Her ''it's all under the radar'' is the defining factor in this governments entire MO. Can't find your local Liberal MLA? Go and turn over a rock, but be careful. You may uncover an entire nest of scummy developer types instructing your government representative on how to give them things for free.

  • Jessie Johal (not verified)

    7 years ago

    You people are idiots; you just don't get it. We need jobs in this province: lots of them. Get with the progaram. This means jobs.

  • Rob, Q (not verified)

    7 years ago

    Jessie, Jessie, Jessie, perhaps you could clarify.

    How many jobs are you talking about? Are you talking career-type jobs, or minimum-wage jobs? Will these be $16-an-hour jobs? Who will benefit from these jobs? Kids? Students? Single mothers? Retirees? Would you benefit from one of these jobs?

    Perhaps you could hold a Women's Walk in favour of this project

    And just an aside — where have all the jobs gone?

  • Michael Barkusky (not verified)

    7 years ago

    Even Preston Manning is getting with the Natural Capital Program. (see the September Column by Preston in the e-newsletter of the Canada West Foundation.) But the BC Liberals - they still haven't figured out what natural capital means.

  • Stuart (not verified)

    7 years ago

    I usually will not respond to others who call people names to try and make a point. Jessie Johal , you should be the poster child for Gordo . Like others have said We are going to destroy a natural wonder, only 2 like it in the world so a scummy developer Can Profit and we get a few jobs. The guy who runs the gondolas, maybe a few students, oh I forgot the People who will work at the new Starbucks etc. If this government is worried about jobs they Would not send 500 million dollar ferry contracts oversees and kiss of 2000 good paying jobs And kill the shipbuilding industry, they would not sell BC Rail which will cost 1000;s of Good jobs in the north. This is about patronage , nothing more.

  • MN (not verified)

    7 years ago

    One question that remains unanswered is on what side would the gondola run up. Up the front or the side is just patently stupid. Up the back -- so what?

  • A BC Nature Lover (not verified)

    7 years ago

    This would really have been no big deal except for a few shrill screamers who think that any kind of developement is bad. Most people would realize that parks should be readily accessable to all not just an elite few who seem to think they own the place just because they walk it everyday. And for Stuart the government did not send jobs overseas, the ferry corporation made a determination that BC shipyards could not build the new ferries in a cost effective manner and did not have the ability to build them properly and instead chose a contractor who could. If an industry needs the government to force businesses to give them work then they are already dead. The sale of BC rail has opened up many more opportunities for northern communities instead of relying on what were essentially government subsidized jobs in BC rail. This is about getting BC back on its feet with sound business decisions that in the long run will benefit all BC'ers.

  • Stuart (not verified)

    7 years ago

    Dear BC Nature lover The Stawamus Chief dominates the area, a 1200' granite monolith overlooking Howe Sound, Canada's southernmost fijord. The Chief offers some of the finest multi-pitch climbing in the world with routes to suit a wide range of abilities. You can walk rock climb etc. It is very unique , in fact there is only 2 like it in the world. This mountain brings 1000's of people every year , it is a pristine and untouched. (We cannot be all things to all people), we have lifts at Grouse , Seymour, Whistler and many others. If we followed your standards we should build over every wetland and protected areas because a few Can't do the hike. If you look at Whistler, most of the area is private property, huge cost to park Use the facilities etc. This is what comes out of tampering with the private sector, If you want Whistler go ahead, but leave the chief be, The benefits will go into few hands, once you have Starbucks you cannot stop other private companies from entering the area. This mountain is a gem and one of a kind, lets not mess with it,he this development goes On it will open all of our public parks to private companies. As far as BC Ferries goes , the BC Lib Government gave a quasi private company the power to make These decisions, so yes the BC Fiberals did send these jobs oversees, as far as being able to build them cost effectively and having the ability to build them. Where do you think all the current ferries were built, they are larger than the current ones being proposed. BC Ferry corp did not Even bother to come to the shipyards to consider it, can you imagine Germany and Poland telling the World that its shipbuilders are incompetent, Gee David Han is doing such a great job. Is he not In Barbados now selling of our smaller routes to the highest bidder. Oh bye the way your buddy Gordo make the crown corporation a private corporation so they no longer come under Freedom of Information laws (and they refuse to show their dealings) I guess we will never know the numbers, why would they not reveal them if building oversees makes so much sense. So by your logic sending A 500 mil contact oversees , not employing 2000 ship builders who live in BC and pay taxes makes sense, Have you been smoking some BC Bud or are you on a drinking and driving rampage like your leader. The BC Rail deal stinks, already part of it has been blocked by the RCMP. BC Rail covered its dept and make from 45-51 mil profit per year, we controlled the movement of our products, we controlled the pricing, we kept the jobs in BC and the revenue. I guess you think maybe BC Rail workers are incompetent to. Please tell us how selling BC Rail has created many more opportunities in the north, northern BC which how has highest unemployment numbers than in the 80's. Check out the latest stats, the GVRD how has the highest crime rates increases in 10 yrs, from 8 in coquitlam to 17% in Delta. Is this your sound footing. Stop being spoon fed by Canwest

  • Stuart (not verified)

    7 years ago

    Surry up 16%, Vancouver up 13%, New West 11% Coquitlam up 9%, hey folks just the stats.. Delta crime increase tops other Lower Mainland communities DELTA I There's no way around it: Crime is on the rise in Delta, with provincial crime statistics for the first quarter of this year showing a 17 per cent increase.

  • A BC Nature Lover (not verified)

    7 years ago

    My, my such a lot of personal insults Stuart. In the fury of your invective you take some personal shots at me, whom you know nothing about, thereby causing all your arguments to become nothing more than shrill rants devoid of all meaning. In the future I might suggest avoid using personal insults and stick with unemotional arguments, you may find them more effective.

  • Stuart (not verified)

    7 years ago

    I guess this means you do have any response to my comments. That’s okay , I did not think you Could respond to the truth. Please show me where I have flawed in my comments, I do know allot About you based on your previous comments. 1) You don't care about protecting our public parks And natural wonders. 2) you make wide sweeping comments about an industry your know nothing About, (how do you know BC Ferries is making the best decision when all the documents are kept Private, do you not want to at least see the other bids before kissing of 2000 jobs) 3) You have No pride when it comes to BC Workers, why not make everything in China or oversees. YOU WOULD NEVER HEAR A COMPANY IN GERMANY OR POLAND INSULTING THE WORKERS WHERE IT DOES BUSINESS, I thing your range of concern only covers what may immediately effect you. The I'm okay syndrome ,

  • Fi (not verified)

    7 years ago

    BC nature lover- "an elite few who think they own it because they walk it every day"? That's the whole point- NO PERSON should own nature or any part of it. Defacing it with an ugly gondola because some people find it more convenient is pathetic.

  • shirin (not verified)

    7 years ago

    I'm now finally convinced the BC Liberals have no game plan other than to destroy everything so that we beg the NDP for mercy and some sense of dignity in government (without a hint of irony or sarcasm in our tearful pleas). I'm already on my knees. This is not even supported by BC's recreational and fitness business people. Peter Twist (former Canucks fitness trainer and now fitness industry leading business man and owner of Twist Conditioning) has written a letter to the Campbell gov't denouncing the "Starbucks and Gondolas on the top of the Chief" (his take, not mine) - and circulated it to everyone of his acquaintances. Given the amount of opposition, the senselessness of the act, and the little payback for such an endeavour (other than further intrusion of what is left of "Supernatural BC" and more wild life aggression as we encroach upon the habitat of wild animals - and I'm not speaking about the Liberal party) I really can't understand why this thoughtless plan is not just abandoned. For every "innovative" disaster the Liberals have dreamt up - they have met with considerable opposition and have had to finally succumb to public petitions and outrage for their idiocity. Do they not see the pattern here for a completely ineffectual government in policy planning? Do they not feel that continuing with such regressive actions will seal the faith of non-confidence from the public? 'nough said already...

  • tsanh (not verified)

    7 years ago

    B.C. Nature lover, I can see by the very handle you use that it is you that doesn't get it...the "it" being that nature is just that...nature...it isn't restaurants, gondolas, billboards or the Disneyfication of what used to be natural. The argument goes that evryone should be able to see what only hikers, climbers and able enthusiasts get to see and in a lot of cases this may be applicable. Here are two reasons why I think the Chief should be left alone. 1) it is a great and singular natural wonder, a thing to be looked at in awe. Anything at all added to it changes it from natural to something that appeared natural and unconquerable to a conquered lump with a man made piece of crap running up it or sitting on it.2) this I direct to Jessie Johal, This unadorned wonder will in the long run along with all the other beauty we haven't shit on yet, provide far more economic benefit to the province than a few Mcjobs at the site. Why do people come here from all over the world? To see real wilderness, real fish in the rivers real forests, things that they dont have at home because it has already been shit on aka developed.We only have something in its natural state once...thereafter it is forever bastardized. We are fortunate to be able to have this discussion...lets not blow it

    • No best comments selected by an editor for this story yet. To see all comments, click the All Comments tab, above.
    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.