Life

The New Social Climbers

Buildering is dangerous, illegal and popular on campus.

By Frieda Luk, 25 May 2006, The Ubyssey

best of campuspress

Around 25 to 30 people are standing in front of a UBC clubhouse. The congenial atmosphere doesn't fit the image of raucous shit-faced yahoos climbing the exteriors of campus buildings at 3 a.m.

Decked out in Gore-Tex and sweats, the large group divides into smaller clusters of six or seven people. They scrutinize a map of some buildings and climbing directions. The goal is to get up to a specific destination on a building. The reward? Personal satisfaction.

Scaling the walls of buildings has probably been around for as long as there has been youth and feelings of invincibility. Beyond the rebel-without-a-cause stereotype, buildering encompasses a rich and storied past that involved rakish youths at British universities like Oxford and Cambridge.

Buildering actually started in the 1890s, and Cambridge (and Oxford to some extent) developed a sophisticated subculture that flourished in the 1920s and 30s. After Geoffrey Winthrop Young, the noted English writer and mountaineer, published The Roof Climbers Guide to Trinity in 1899, a succession of Cambridge buildering references followed: Wall and Roof Climbing (1905), Climbing in Cambridge: An essay and some incidents (1921), articles in the Alpine Sports in Cambridge (1924) and A Novel Climb in Cambridge (1926). The holy grail of buildering references is the highly influential and much revered The Night Climbers of Cambridge, published in 1937 under the pseudonym "Whipplesnaith," which detailed, along with diagrams and photographs, the classic routes on campus: King's College, St John's College and The Senate Leap.

Illicit behaviour

Slowly but surely, shrouded in notoriety and illicit appeal, buildering found its way over to North American universities. Things don't seem to have changed that much, because climbing buildings -- or, for that matter, anything -- has not lost its allure.

With its sports-inclined and rugged outdoorsy image, it's fitting that UBC has its own classic buildering routes that date back to the 1960s.

Talking to a connoisseur of urban climbing who goes by the name Whipplesnaith Reborn (an appropriate alias if there ever was one), I learned that every building on campus can be climbed. A particularly good building, Whipplesnaith noted, is Koerner Library because of its myriad of architectural detailing. Another good climb is the Buchanan buildings, a mass of interconnected structures running zigzag from blocks A to D.

Impossible to hold

Whipplesnaith says the appeal of climbing is the challenge of scaling architecture that seems impossible, that lacks grooves and handholds. He told me, slyly, that despite appearances, Hebb Theatre is an excellent climb because of the cracked features at the back of the building.

Outside of UBC campus, Whipplesnaith's dream buildering gig would be to climb the former Macmillan Bloedel building on Georgia and Thurlow Streets in downtown Vancouver. He compares the feeling of reaching a buildering goal like a high from the drug ecstasy, to which he quickly adds, "I would imagine."

The same sort of sentiment is echoed by UBC student Kurt Amundson, who builders, he tells me, because of the adrenaline rush, although he sheepishly admits that this rationale is "quite immature." Armed with a background in mountain climbing, Amundson has been buildering for six months. He was one of those active kids who started out climbing trees and then graduated to rock climbing and then buildings. He recently went on one of his most enjoyable buildering escapades, in Nelson, B.C., where he climbed the roof of an elementary school. Why so good? He went up with people who had never buildered before; the teamwork involved plus the excitement from first-timers contributed to the immense post-climb rush.

Though builderers are hardly the illuminati, their secrecy speaks to the threats meted out by authorities who probably suffer constantly from near nervous breakdowns over legal implications from climbers. As Amundson notes, "The more publicity buildering gets, the more the sport suffers."

The new skateboarding

He points to what happened with skateboarding in the downtown core. Edges on railings have been clipped with stoppers and blocks put out to prevent skateboarding. Whipplesnaith emphasises that builderers don't advertise because their sport is underground by nature. Even out of the public eye, buildering websites like Buildering.net -- with which Whipplesnaith is affiliated -- get a lot of traffic from Lower Mainland and even international posters.

The risks involved are significant. Although most builderers do not attempt large-scale escapades like the world-renowned urban climber Alain Robert -- who had scaled skyscrapers in Kuala Lumpur and Abu Dhabi -- the lack of proper technique and equipment can be fatal. Buildering, like any sport, demands a certain fitness and skill level for it to be safe. It is both a physical and a mental sport, and requires upper-body strength and concentration. Amundson checks the myth of tower-scaling climbers by noting that most climbs do not exceed 15 metres and that there are spotters in place in case of mishaps. Being something of an unofficial activity, though, the danger really comes from its lack of safety standards and professional equipment.

The more serious impediment that haunts buildering is its questionable legality. Ard Arvin, a long-time Vancouver champion of buildering and creator of Buildering.net has, for a while now, been dogged by legal imbroglios with the UBC legal department.

The problems started a couple of years ago, when he participated in a buildering competition on campus. Whipplesnaith, a close associate of Arvin, insisted that Arvin had renounced buildering and now engages only in virtual buildering. When asked what that is, he explained that viritual buildering is the process of cutting and pasting a picture of oneself onto a picture of a building.

"The photos on the site www.buildering.net," Whipplesnaith repeats in a serious tone, "are strictly of virtual buildering."

"Arvin deeply wants to take up buildering," he goes on, "but cannot because of the legal problems."

Throughout its rather infamous history, buildering has unofficially combined athleticism and rebellion; as Alain Robert, jailed numerous times for climbing, famously said, "I'd rather stay in a prison than in a hospital."

Next Olympic sport?

Unlike other fringe sports like skateboarding, Amundson doubts that buildering will ever crack the mainstream. The problem he finds is that the sport is a little "too dangerous" for mass appeal, and he adds that he hasn't met that many builderers in the city. Moreover, buildering is more about the skill than the image and the huge risks involved make it less than appealing. For decades, buildering has existed under the radar and its popularity remains on university hubs, which seems to suggest intrinsic limits to its popularity.

But I'm not so sure. With the pop culture machine devouring and co-opting every morsel of tradition available, buildering might go in the way of punk rock and skateboarding: watered-down and safe. But hopefully the stalwarts of the sport will prevent that from happening.

This past January the first World Buildering Championships were held in Cologne, Germany. The informal atmosphere, charming unprofessionalism and lack of international participation in the competition belied the grand title. But it expressed the underlying geist of buildering, which turns out to be simply about good friends and good climbing. Basically, the World Buildering Championships is a gathering of likeminded people who cheer each other on. It's endearing.

Like with rock climbing, the trick is to find the perfect holds with the right overall body positioning and adequate balance. The difficulty with climbing buildings is that the uniformity and evenness of the exterior make it difficult to find the grooves for holds. It is like a physical enigma, being solved only through ingenuity, persistence and foolhardiness. Buildering is a lifestyle and a philosophy of taming modernity by conquering the urban environment.

Beauty is indeed in the eye of the beholder -- buildering thrives on imperfection and alters how urban decay is perceived. Although it is a dangerous pastime, I applaud climbers for their restless frontier spirit. Amundson maintains, "We're not that crazy." I'm sure the authorities would be thrilled to hear that.

As for the existence of a buildering subculture, Whipplesnaith underscores, with a measure of tongue-in-cheek, that "the only subculture is dressing up in Spiderman costumes." I'm all for it.

Please be advised that The Ubyssey (like The Tyee) does not endorse these activities in any way. Climbing on university structures is extremely dangerous and is not permitted. Any person found doing so could face university discipline or legal proceedings. Furthermore, The Ubyssey (like The Tyee) will accept no responsibility for any injury or loss caused by such activity nor any effect caused by the reading of an article about such activity.

Frieda Luk is the features editor at The Ubyssey.  [Tyee]

19  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • freebear

    5 years ago

    Comments on "The New Social Climbers"

    "Please be advised that The Ubyssey (like The Tyee) does not endorse these activities in any way. Climbing on university structures is extremely dangerous and is not permitted. Any person found doing so could face university discipline or legal proceedings. Furthermore, The Ubyssey (like The Tyee) will accept no responsibility for any injury or loss caused by such activity nor any effect caused by the reading of an article about such activity."

    So who is responsible when the "idiot" falls off a building?

  • Logjam 603

    5 years ago

    "He points to what happened with skateboarding in the downtown core. Edges on railings have been clipped with stoppers and blocks put out to prevent skateboarding."

    thank gawd 'cause the littel moronic scofflaws were destroyng public fountains, rails, seats etc and all sorts of private property as well.

    Arrest the little bastards and make them pay for the damages they have caused.

    As for people climbing buildings, life is boring n'est pas ??

  • Rhea

    5 years ago

    Quote:
    He points to what happened with skateboarding in the downtown core. Edges on railings have been clipped with stoppers and blocks put out to prevent skateboarding.

    And this is a bad thing because...? Skateboarding on rails and benches in the crowded downtown is a public safety hazard and damages public and private property that has to be repaired (and it's not cheap) using taxpayer or owner dollars better spent elsewhere. If you don't like it, go and build your own skate park or use one of the public skate parkes available to you. Don't whine that you're being "deprived of your rights".

    I'm so sick of hearing the whining about people who think that because their sport is "cool" they are somehow entitled to ignore the rules that apply to everyone else. If the university doesn't want you climbing on the buildings, here's a novel idea: go climb on your own building or a friend's building where you have permission, or find a rock face. Bitching about how the university "doesn't understand" or is somehow being unreasonable makes you sound like a spoiled five-year old who isn't getting their way.

  • adamw

    5 years ago

    I've started a new "secret" sport: workering, where over-educated bourgeois indolents covertly take-on blue-collar jobs. Don't tell anyone.

  • Truman Green

    5 years ago

    what rhea said.

  • mleyne

    5 years ago

    Way to miss the point entirely, all you working stiffs. Nobody's saying skaters have a 'right' to skate downtown. The appeal in street skating is using boring concrete wastelands in a new, unintended way: to have fun. Downtowns are becoming more and more like malls, sanitized 'public' spaces designed to ensure no activity takes place except shopping, with uniformed mustachioed billy-club wielding law enforcers urging you on your way the moment you sit down without visible signs of recent consumerism.

    Capped rails suck, but they're inevitable, and that's why Vancouver has more skateparks than anywhere in NA.

    Quote:
    I'm so sick of hearing the whining about people who think that because their sport is "cool" they are somehow entitled to ignore the rules that apply to everyone else.

    Whose whining? It seems to me that builderers are actually doing something creative and fun in an attempt to enjoy their life.

    These comments reek of bitterness and jealousy. Not everyone has to be a drone, but thanks for taking one for the team.

  • deeby

    5 years ago

    Actually, isn't buildering kind of boring...the sort of thing one does when there simply isn't time to leave campus? We used to do this on the wall of the Commons Dining Room at UVIC--nice stone and masonry--however since that only extended about 10 feet up, we'd traverse sideways for 80 yards or so, never more than 5 or 6 feet off the ground.

    But seriously, isn't this what climbing walls are for? And isn't it a lot more rewarding to end one's climb on a crag or peak, instead of a tar-and-gravel roof? Not to mention the possibility of having to downclimb....

  • Rhea

    5 years ago

    Quote:
    The appeal in street skating is using boring concrete wastelands in a new, unintended way: to have fun.

    Oh, OK. Then I'm sure you won't object if I gallop my horse on your lawn. I mean, come on - it's using boring suburban space for a new, unintended purpose! And who cares if you have to shovel the crap and re-sod to fix the damage - you just don't appreciate people who know how to have fun!

    Quote:
    Capped rails suck, but they're inevitable, and that's why Vancouver has more skateparks than anywhere in NA.

    So what's wrong with the skate parks?

    I hate to break it to you, but I used to do building hacking at SFU. Until I grew up a bit and realized that trespassing and property damage (lock breaking) isn't cute or cool. Riding rails and benches wears the hell out of them, and costs taxpayer money to fix. If it didn't cause so much damage, and if the skaters actually took public safety into account (I've seen people do ollies off the rail in the middle of a crowd in the Terminal City Club Plaza and just missing the pedestrians), maybe you wouldn't have this problem of people spoiling your fun.

    If you can't figure out why certain actions have consequences, honey, I suggest you go back to grade school. You obviously missed the lesson on personal responsibility.

  • mleyne

    5 years ago

    Nothing's wrong with lots of parks, that's my point: skaters are NOT bitching and whining about capped rails (much), they're raising money and building parks.

    A few idiots ollieing into crowds doesn't represent everyone who skateboards.

    If I ever find myself in the unlikely position of owning a suburban lawn I'll be better positioned to comment on the comparison of scuffed-up handrails to mangled and shit-covered yards, but for now I think everyone in the above story is demonstrating enough personal responsibility: they know they might get hurt. They do it anyways.

  • Tax Cutter 99

    5 years ago

    Skateboarders are a nuisance. It was cool in the 70's...give it a rest. Its not like you guys are doing anything original. Its the equivalent to roller skating without the belly shirts and leg warmers. As for the "culture" most of these kids come from suburban BC but are adopting someone ELSE's culture (California surfer/skater). It would be like me playing soccer so living, looking, eating, speaking like a Brazilian street kid.

  • Yammer

    5 years ago

    I admire skateboarders. It is damn difficult to learn. I have been trying off and on (mostly off, on my butt) for years and years. These people are athletes. You can't do it when you're stoned and you can't do it if you are lazy.

    Buildering sounds a lot like parkour, which is basically skateboarding without skateboards. I admire the hell out of them too for the same reasons.

    It sounds kind of dangerous but it is more about being slightly naughty and adventurous. When I was at SFU I used to love to poke around and explore the dungeon levels and to get up on top of the concourse roof and all that. I never risked my life, only a stern warning and the occasional chase by security. It is a good thing! Kids having fun!

  • mhoule

    5 years ago

    As a pedestrian, I've had more near-misses from cyclists riding hell-bent-for-election on the sidewalks than with skateboarders. In fact, I don't recall ever having a safety problem with boarders (public space damage I can't speak to), but many cyclists seem to think that riding at high speeds on the sidewalk is their right (as well as disobeying street signs while on roads). Perhaps because it is more middle class acceptable to ride bicycles, there are fewer people who frown on their anti-social behaviour; easier to complain about skateboards because it's a subculture perhaps? And no, I'm not a skateboarder - just a boring middle class worker who thinks there's too much flack given to those who love to board.

    Although the thought of buildering scares the wits out of me, I do recall at SFU climbing out a window on the 7th floor of the library (used to be the criminology department) and sitting on the slanted ledge. This was fine over the concourse mall roof because it felt safer because there was something under me (what a view let me tell you!), but when I did it on the north side with nothing below but grass and concrete, I scared myself silly and never ventured out again. I thought to myself, "that would be a really stupid and embarassing way to die."

  • deeby

    5 years ago

    Taxcutter, your analysis of skater culture is about .5" deep. What a surprise!

    That culture was forged during the skateboarding revival of the late 70s and early 80s. It was a Pan-West-Coast phenomenon, which included people traveling up and down the coast btw Vancouver and LA to attend events, or to skate particular pools, ramps, parks, parkades, etc.

    The subculture burgeoned in parallel with the West-Coast Punk/Indie/Alternative scene, (indeed it was a sub-subculture of that). Many road trips were taken not just for the purpose of skating, but also to attend gigs at clubs, in halls, or in basements up and down the coast.

    Your assertion that it was a California phenomenon ignores the fact that fashions, innovations and other trappings of the subculture proliferated in all directions. You only need to look at the clothing worn by members of the so-called Grunge movement in Seattle to see that. There was a dress and style associated with this West-Coast subculture which evolved in the skating and music scenes, and which continued to evolve right into the nineties, when it entered the cultural mainstream.

    Latter-day skaters have inherited this subculture, regardless of where they're from, and local skaters are no more or less poseurs than skaters from California are....

  • doggone

    5 years ago

    As a builderer proud to claim a few structures in Vancoucou in the early eighties: City Hall (too easy), Fisheries/Customs on Pender in those days, and the old Blue Horizon in New West (can't tell you even the decade 'cause the five cops who responded might still be looking for me up there) I should tell what I know of any reason for this activity.

    For me it was great to be up high in a sleeping city (I only climbed at night) I had no design on the occupants of the building nor any particular interest in them. They, however, took immediate interest in me as I passed on the way up. In those days the roof-top exit was generally open or only locked from the inside so I simply went through and down the elevator and out through the lobby. Don't try this at home: City police arrived as I walked out of the elevator.
    Never caught (yet) though a couple of security guards might twig if they read Tyee comments.

    I moved to an area where the tallest thing to climb is the fir by the house.

    Cities make people act strangely.
    I'm feeling much better now

  • cosmo

    5 years ago

    Man,

    What a bunch of lame up-tight people. Yes, people climbing on buildings is not what they were designed for, and the kids need to accept liability when they bail.

    However, I can't believe how many people are complaining about this and skateboarding as some horrid act. To me, the horrid act is to build cities where the only purpose of all the public places is to dash from your home to work, and back again. Come on, our culture has more public life than that.

    So to all the skaters and builderers, all I say is shine on you crazy diamonds. Watch out for pigs, try not to damage anything, and don't forget it is all your fault if you get hurt. So don't be stupid, but don't stop finding new ways to have fun.

  • shmendrick

    5 years ago

    ya, arrest those little skateboard punks, it would cost way less in tax dollars to police rails and fountains 24/7 then to replace then now and again... skateboards at 3 am are annoying for sure, but give me a break.

    ...buildering... boring... right... climbing a nearly featurless wall with no protection and big consequences, after divining a strategically planned but difficult route... sounds closer to the exciting end of things to me...

    and to y'all complaining about cyclists, sure if you have to ride on the sidewalk(you sometimes have no choice), ride slow... but hey, keep in mind that the only way a cyclist can be noticed by the majority of the car-drivin' lunatics out there is to run stop signs, cut cars off, and take the lane! (no matter how much glitter you stick on the bike and cyclist). SO next you get cut of, remember, it is all about bicycle safety!....non-official driver training to get folks used to seeing bikes on the road!

  • ardarvin

    5 years ago

    Quote:
    I've started a new "secret" sport: workering, where over-educated bourgeois indolents covertly take-on blue-collar jobs. Don't tell anyone.

    Absolutely brilliant Adam. Could I please, please employ you to write for buildering.net? Although I’m sure that your “over-educated bourgeois indolents” descriptor was intended for the likes of myself, I must take exception with the “over-educated” part, as I did have to look up the definition of indolents, and am still unsure of it’s usage as a noun. Kudos to you my man.

    As for the rest of you, there isn’t a lot I can say that hasn’t already been said, however I will say one thing: I’m not here to defend myself or what I do, nor do I really care what you think – although I must say that every “littel [sic] moronic scofflaws” and “public safety hazard” comment does make me feel much better about myself, as it reminds me of who I’m NOT. Does that mean I think I’m superior to everyone else? Most definitely - although solely on the fact that apparently I’m one of the few people in here who can laugh at himself.

    And when that day comes when I fall and I suddenly join the ranks of other famous two-dimensional beings, you can be as sure as hell that I’ll be suing Freebear.

    -ardarvin

    PS: Oh and Rhea, feel free to bring your horse by my house in Marpole. Just let me know beforehand so I can bust out the beers and sugar-cubes. We could use a little more life in the NEIGHborhood. Get it…neigh? Hello? Is this mic on?

  • YveoftheNorth

    5 years ago

    I don't think that anyone really cares about skateboarding, or seriously sees it as a distinct "culture", other than skaters themselves. Even they eventually grow up or cripple themselves sufficiently to move on to more sedentary endevours. It takes an extrordinary amount of skill to do well, it's fun and fun to watch, but so what? At the end of the day you are rolling around on a glorified scrap of fibreglass thinking you belong to a "sub culture". Real deep. And Cosmo, "watch out for pigs"? Funny how the police are the first to be scorned until you need them.
    As for personal responsibility, who foots the bill when one of these idiots injures himself or someone else? I'm sure that falling off of the occasional building or flying down a flight of concrete stairs racks up the medical bills for the taxpayer. That's right, tax payer. You know, people who have jobs and fork it over to the government to pay for the broken collar bones and vandalised public spaces. It's great to have fun on someone else's dime. Nice "culture".

  • ardarvin

    5 years ago

    Hmmm...sounds like someone is scared of her perfect little world being challenged by a rather large demographic of people who have different ideals than her own.

    How else could someone formulate the ludicrous argument that an activity that is practiced by hundreds of millions of people throughout the world, and has captured the imagination of youth and major media for the last 30 years, is not in fact a culture.

    Oh and Yve, be careful that you don't trip and fall down the stairs next time you gather your frail old body together for bridge night (I know you are old since skateboards haven't been made out of fibreglass [sic] since the 60s). I wouldn't want the highly coordinated and physically fit skateboarding demographic to have to pay for your sorry ol' ass.

    • No best comments selected by an editor for this story yet. To see all comments, click the All Comments tab, above.
    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.