Artsculture

Brunettes Have it Better

A born-blonde reflects on 'The Blonde Mystique.'

By Shannon Rupp, 16 Nov 2007, TheTyee.ca

Blonde (Roy Lichtenstein style)

Blondedom: State of mind?

As any woman born blonde will tell you, golden tresses guarantee a lifetime of weird encounters. Certainly, with men who have bought into the myth about the sexual allure and availability of blondes. Just consider Mae West's quip, "A hard man is good to find," or Lauren Bacall's famous catchphrase in To Have and Have Not, in which she tells Humphrey Bogart that if he wants her he should "just whistle."

"You know how to whistle don't you?" she asks, confronting him with what became know as The Look. "You just put your lips together and blow."

That kind of blonde promotion is just a curse for anyone who lives outside of celluloid.

Then there are the teachers and employers who suspect blondes are dimwits. Other women may view them with hostility as strong competitors for the (dubious) favours of men in general, or as predators eyeing their man in particular.

Blondedom isn't the party everyone thinks, and I've long waited for someone to discuss it. So I was disappointed by W channel's documentary The Blonde Mystique (which airs Sunday evening) because it didn't get much beyond the Clairol question of whether blondes have more fun -- meaning more attention, or more men. (And I'm here to tell you that "men" and "attention" don't necessarily add up to fun.)

We're treated to a few facts about the centuries-old lure of blondes. For example, Canadian anthropologist Peter Frost published a 2006 study in the journal Evolution and Human Behaviour that showed that blondes ruled even in the Ice Age. How else to explain the prevalence of bright hair and blue eyes in northern European tribes, except by the preference a relatively small pool of men showed for blonde mates?

But our young women investigators -- one blonde and two brunettes -- spend most of the showing bringing stereotypes to life. There's the broken-down car at the side of the road test in which a hidden camera records the blonde actress attracting four times as many men to her rescue as her brunette sisters. Then again, men practically queue to ask blondie if she remembered to fill the gas tank -- a question no one puts to the women with brainier tresses.

In the bar, the blonde has much the same affect on men as a Venus flytrap on insects, while the two brunettes (who are both prettier) get a fraction of the free drinks. But here too there's evidence of the dark side of light hair. While blondie enjoys free flowing booze, she also earns the crude comments and clumsy mauling that brunettes are spared.

Is that because men assume brunettes are the only ones with self-defence training? A risky assumption, I'd say, and I was wishing someone would ask that masher what the hell he was thinking.

Dumb assumptions

What is it about flaxen locks that implies blondes are an easy mark? That's what the faired haired really want to know.

Why are only blonde women assumed to be dumb? If blonde is the ne plus ultra of femininity, and masculinity is defined as dark, then why haven't men been combing soot-based concoctions into their hair for centuries? And why is that the icon of feminine beauty is also the image of stupidity? Is it because smart women are less feminine?

But our trio doesn't dwell on any unpleasantness, they're all about the mystical power of blonde. Of course, glossing over the hazards is part of the myth of blonde supremacy. Everyone remembers the bombshell of bombshells, Marilyn Monroe, and her signature film, Gentleman Prefer Blondes. They conveniently forget that the film was inspired by an Anita Loos story, and the rest of the saying is "...but they marry brunettes."

Blondes are obviously perceived as playthings rather than people -- several men our trio chats up claim fair-haired girls are "more fun" and I don't think they were referring to their wit. One also comments that they're "more approachable." Whoa! What makes him think that? I want to hear more of his musings. Alas, our guides are less reporters than they are walking mike stands. Apparently blonde is a state of mind as much as a hair colour.

And therein lies the problem with this doc -- or maybe that's its appeal? -- it's written for bottle blondes. For the record, it's the peroxide queens who give blondes a bad name, and they're a hefty audience -- hair dye companies say blonde shades sell 5-1.

How do I know they inspired the belief that there's a connection between the brightness of a woman's hair and the dimness of her intellect? Because you'd have to be a fool to volunteer for all the unwelcome attention, patronizing, and downright harassment that comes with a head of hair that is actually telling the world that you come from a long line of Celtic warriors whose ancestors were the models for Valkyries. Yeah, and some blondes still have the ancestral broadsword, boyo...

But I digress.

Roman goddesses

The documentary includes sound bites of the occasional academic theorizing about Rapunzel, Goldilocks, Aphrodite and all the other fair-haired babes. Historians tell us that blonde has long been the hooker's halo, and that call girls in ancient Rome dyed their hair to compete with the Nordic spoils of war their husbands brought back to populate the brothels. The Virgin Mary was depicted as a chaste brunette in art, until the 14th century when the relentless spread of Christianity into Europe began equating light skin and hair with superiority and virtue.

Evolutionary biology contributes the idea that since pale hair is common in children, it's perceived as a sign of youth and therefore fertility in grown women. Then there's the simple explanation: sunny locks make a woman more noticeable.

Maybe. But then, why aren't red heads the ones with all the mystique since their hair is far more noticeable than blondes? And given how rare a natural redhead is, you'd think there might be some cachet in catching one. But I've never heard some wag commenting about a Titian-haired girlfriend the way he would about a blonde mate, with the line "...and she's a real redhead, too." The quip is always accompanied with some variation on a nudge-and-a-wink that invites a retort of equal wit. Perhaps with a broadsword?

No, this doc is a frothy romp that reinforces the notion that blondes do have more fun. Well, for most of the show. Our trio decides to swap hair colours and run all their tests again, with some predictable results -- the blondes still get all the attention. Only the girls don't enjoy it as much as they (or other non-blondes) might expect. One former brunette admits that she felt she had to keep proving herself to people because they assumed she was dumb.

Much hairdo about nothing

In the end, no one wants to part with her raven hair, even the natural blonde who is going to need upkeep on those fair roots. Turns out these three aren't psychological blondes after all, just actors who know how to pull the biggest audience. And their conclusion is n eye-opener for any dusky-haired woman who has envied a golden girl.

So the audience that really needs to see this doc is hairdressers. Especially the woman who has cut my hair for more than decade and watched my luminous locks mellow into a caramel colour that is much less of a nuisance. Recently, she decided it was time to return it to its original shade, and couldn't understand why I balked.

"I thought everyone wanted to be blonde?" she asked, perplexed.

Nooooo. Genetics thrust it upon me. And as the filmmakers found, once you've achieved the hair colour of credibility, you shouldn't mess with it. Although it wasn't the film's intention, The Blonde Mystique ends up showing us why it's so much better to be a brunette.

Related Tyee stories:

 [Tyee]

24  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • James Burns

    4 years ago

    Blondie

    Well one suggestion I've heard as to why paler skin tends to be preferred is that it is easier to see indicators of health. That may be a possibility. It is certainly easier to see someone with pale skin blush from a distance. On the other hand, Shannon, blonde hair is most definitely easier to notice than most "red" hair, because it tends to be brighter.

    While I don't think I personally have any set in stone preferences in terms of skin shade or hair color, as someone who has tended to have long term relationships with darker skinned women, I don't understand the blonde mystique. When I was a child I was blonde, and I recall getting a hell of a lot of attention for that hair of mine, especially from women. What's more, in talking with some relatives, apparently some of my grandparents had a marked preference for their only blonde grandson. And I vaguely recall occasionally taking advantage of it as a child.

    But for the life of me I can't understand the attraction. I suspect it's part biological and a whole lot cultural.

  • nightbloom

    4 years ago

    Good piece. It's nice to

    Good piece. It's nice to have something playful & light-hearted to leaven the serial exhortations that are published here.

    I have no idea why women are made the passing victims-and-beneficiaries of a full spectrum of abstract assumptions and projections by perfect strangers.

    We project absolute characteristics and sometimes even pseudo-divinity onto women in a manner that has no masculine analogue. Women with a gentle disposition are beatified, and women with a hint of crustiness or impatience (effectiveness?) are demonized as witches 'n bitches. Women are made into symbols by strangers dozens of times each day of their lives. It's part of the blessing & the curse of being a woman, I suspect.

    The blond thing seems to be as old as the hills. The most peculiar thing about it is that there seems to be some truth to the dichotomy, although I'm sure that's just a case of an individual's personality being shaped by external appearances, media saturation, and the ambient expectations & social rewards attached to those characteristics and the behaviours that go with them.

    Blond hair definitely works - many, many times have I watched with exasperation as all the male attention in a room is siphoned away to a single late-arriving bombshell with the sudden whoosh of air being sucked out into space, leaving only a vacuum. If you want to see the look of pure hatred, tear your eyes away and scrutinize the other women. Men aren't supposed to see that. It's as if women have internal barometers, and know without even looking when the pressure drops and their relative market value takes a sudden a plunge.

  • Kelly Crane

    4 years ago

    The socially constructed blonde

    I think the blonde mystique, as it were, is fed by popular media which so loves to take a stereotype and run with it: The dumb blonde, the classy brunette, the sassy redhead. I also believe that many a plain woman dyes her hair blonde with the intent of putting herself herself in the crosshairs of those men who are drawn to .... those stereotypes. I suggest it is not her blonde hair per se that draws the man to the blonde, (especially the cheap overprocessed straw blonde), but what the woman is telling men about herself. She is saying she is willing to become Barbie to please him, to conform to that bubblehead ideal to attract him. It is not so much that the dumb blonde caricacture is true, as it is that the brunette or redhead [or whichever] who dyes her hair blond is dumb. Don't get me wrong, I am not saying most woman who dye their hair blonde are dumb, but there is most definitley a sub-group that embraces the dumb blonde ideal with all it's attendant behaviour to get the attention of men.

  • biscotti

    4 years ago

    Blondeism a subset of sexism?

    Good article; I've seen this stuff in action. Seems to me that in the big picture, though, blondeism is a subset of sexism.

    There was a v interesting interview on CBC's The Current two mornings ago with Robert Jensen, author of "Getting Off - Pornography and the End of Masculinity" (South End Press). You can listen to it here: http://www.cbc.ca/thecurrent/media/200711/20071114thecurrent_sec3.ram
    or to an interview on WORT-FM here: http://lists.wort-fm.org/archive/permalink/wort_070309_120401apafri.mp3

    Jensen's analysis of the destructive impact of pornography on men, as well as on women, is very sobering. In this sense, blondeism degrades male perpetrators, too; what's really "dumb" is oppressive behaviour!

  • freebear

    4 years ago

    Boo Hoo I am Blonde!

    Bo Hoo I am blonde too!

    So what?

    Do an article on being ugly!

    As Jerry Seinfelds says: you don't see too many good looking homeless people!

    Societies and cultures are often shallow, but crying because of being labled a 'blonde' is pathetic!

    Boo hoo I am too short, too etc. etc.....

  • Shannon Rupp

    4 years ago

    Hey!

    Who told you I was ugly? And short? Although, really, aren’t they the same thing?

    Wait a minute. There are no personal defects, only job skills.

    And there is an upside to being ugly…

    I can work with that idea.

    Thanks for suggesting a future column.

    S.

  • biscotti

    4 years ago

    Seinfeld is a bimbo

    He obviously doesn't know any homeless people!

    I look forward to whatever you write about "ugliness", Shannon ;-)

  • biscotti

    4 years ago

    An expert on "ugly"

    I first saw David Roche http://www.davidroche.com/ in the KickstArt! video about the festival of Disability Arts and Culture that took place in Vancouver a few years ago. He's a very funny standup comic, and also a powerful and inspiring teacher.

    Dave also appears in Bonnie Klein's film "Shameless" http://www.nfb.ca/webextension/disabilitymonth_shamless/index.html

    Shannon, I think he and his wife Marlena Blavin are in the process of moving to the Sunshine Coast. Contact info is on his website.

  • dolphin

    4 years ago

    Blondes

    Marilyn started it, and Goldie Hawn continued it on the Laugh In show. I like a line I heard from a purple prose contest: It was a blonde. Not just any blonde, but that kind that would make a bishop want to kick out a stained glass window.
    I have two blonde daughters: one very bright, focused, in a demanding profession, the other, well, scattered. We still laugh about the time she accidentally wandered into a men's washroom, and came out wondering about the "funny sinks". On the negative side, my other daughter was approached by a sleazy guy in a British pub, who asked her if he could lick the sweat off her cleavage. Ewuugh! Her poised response: Uh, tempting, but no.
    But I still laugh at blonde jokes, e.g.: Two blondes walking on either side of a creek. One blonde says to the other, "How do I get to the other side?" The second blonde says, "Silly, you ARE on the other side."
    Or, A blonde driving down a prairie road, spots another blonde in the middle of a wheat field in row boat, rowing away. She stops the car, goes over to the fence and yells, "Hey, what are you doing?" The blonde in the boat says, "I'm rowing through this sea of wheat." The other one says, "That's so stupid. It's blondes like you that give the rest of us a bad name. If I could swim, I'd come out there and kick your butt!"

  • Canis Latrans

    4 years ago

    Only...

    Only some ditsy blonde could have written this piece. :-)

    Sometime I must tell you the sad tale of woe about my humongous penis. Ehhh, don't laugh. It's a real tear jerker about the folly of men-, and the women for whom size really does matter.

    :-D lol

  • snert

    4 years ago

    Blonde humour.....

    ...is just the natural response of jealous people. Make fun of someone you envy. As long as it's not malicious, who cares.

  • nightbloom

    4 years ago

    Kelly's comments are

    Kelly's comments are interesting. I can't decide whether I agree or not. I don't think it's *entirely* socially constructed, but then I wouldn't go so far as J.B. in terms of biological determinism.

    As for women dyeing their hair blonde...doesn't it come down to personal priorities? If you like big jocks, free drinks, and you know that's how you get both, doesn't that just make those women smart (some of them)? They know what they want, they know how to get it, and they're taking the initiative while playing every susceptible man in the room. It's men who are being led my their noses (or some other appendage) here.

    I can't believe someone used the word "perpetrators" to describe men who fall for "blondeism" (another funny word). That's so, like, 1980s-womynz-studies. Besides, what about all those white boys I see who can't take their eyes off any half-decent asian girl. No blondism there - just a touch of infantilization, hyper-femininity, leavened by decidedly small and downright boyish hindquarters. But that's a whole other article! ;-)

  • biscotti

    4 years ago

    Blondeismo

    Fair enough, Nightbloom, in my 1st posting I probably should have put quote marks around "blondeism" to be ironic, and I shld have used a different word than "perpetrators". At the time I was thinking of pornographers and porn junkies more than men who simply let their blonde fantasies and delusions guide their thoughts and actions. Sloppy writing on the run :-o

    How about the term blondeistas?

    As for white men fixated on Asian women: there's a long history of "exoticism" in western perceptions of the east, and certainly lots to write about. (Which is what makes the photos of CD Hoy http://www.civilization.ca/media/docs/fshoy1e.html very interesting: a non-western "gaze" of all sorts of folks.)

    Do you sometimes wonder when men have a generic recipe for what's "hot" based on hair or race or body shape(s) etc., some weird recording might be operating? Makes it kinda hard to connect with the individual inside; so much for intimacy.

  • Fii

    4 years ago

    I think it all comes down to

    I think it all comes down to exoticism. Growing up in Canada, blondes were/are still rarer than brunettes. I remember in grade 6 the girl everyone wanted to be friends with was blue-eyed and had long, straight shimmering blonde hair.

    I lived in Asia for several years, and though we all stood out, the blondes got more attention- because they were the most "unlike" the race of people we were living among. That, I think, explains the attraction of Asian women to "white" (I hate that term :) men, and let's not forget, vice versa. I'm always perplexed at how we focus on white men liking Asian women, when it works both way- Asian women are often strongly attracted to, and actively pursue, white men as well. Having said that, as an ESL teacher I have heard it said over and over from Asian men that they would be thrilled to date "Canadian" women~ and I've asked what this means; sometimes it means "white", sometimes just any woman who is not of their race, and so I am starting to believe more and more that it is simply the thrill of experiencing intimacy with someone who is as genetically heterogeneous from you as is possible.

    Among my "white" female friends I have one married to a Korean man, one to a Chinese-Cdn, and one marrying a man from India. That's tomorrow, in Kamloops :)

  • Fii

    4 years ago

    Hey my brother lives in

    Hey my brother lives in Norway right now~ wonder if he still finds the women really attractive (as he said he did when he first moved there) or if it is starting to just get plain boring :)

  • James Burns

    4 years ago

    Well I don't think it's all

    Well I don't think it's all or even mostly biological determinism. If it were then I am certainly an exception. I think it is mostly cultural. I think exoticism can play a role in attraction, but simple exoticism rarely makes for good long term relationships.

    In my case I think it's simply that like all humans, I'm attracted to symmetry, and health (at least on the physical level, personality is a far more complicated story). Skin shade and hair color don't seem to matter to me (I don't think they do anyway), so long as the colors appear healthy.

    As for NB's comment that asian women have boyish hindquarters... well you've been paying attention to wrong women (are you sure they were women?). That's certainly not my experience, and sounds far more like yet another stereotype. Boys simply don't have that female hip to waist ratio, for starters.

  • nightbloom

    4 years ago

    Quote:Do you sometimes

    Quote:
    Do you sometimes wonder when men have a generic recipe ... some weird recording might be operating? Makes it kinda hard to connect with the individual inside; so much for intimacy.

    Yes, I totally agree, Biscotti....with the caveat that men are sometimes sorted by some women in a similarly dehumanizing way.

    J.B. - I see it as more than "exoticism" (which in my opinion is a myopic explanation intended to compliment existing race- and sex-oppression narratives). Although exoticism is certainly a factor. I think the near-universal down-grading of the traditional Reubenesque beauty in white and latin North America and Europe (not among African-Americans) in favour of boyish, petite, boy-bummed, waifish, skinny fashionistas is symptomatic of something else entirely.

  • nightbloom

    4 years ago

    O.M.G. .... Check this one

    O.M.G. .... Check this one out:

    Stress, Pain, and Paris Hilton
    http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2007/1105/1

    Maybe a touch of 'biological determinism' isn't so far off the mark...Now all we need to to isolate the blonde hair as a co-factor...

    Quote:
    Paris Hilton: Actress, author, ... analgesic? Neuroscientists have found that a cardboard cutout of the ubiquitous Hilton Hotel heiress has a painkilling effect on mice. But don't expect clinical trials to begin anytime soon: Paris works only for males, and it may be only because she stresses them out...As in humans, Paris's effect appears to be gender-specific. Male mice spent less time licking their wounds when fake Paris was in sight, but females showed no such effect, the researchers reported here Saturday at the annual meeting of the Society for Neuroscience. When the team put up a screen to block the rodents' view, the effect went away. Following a Paris Hilton encounter, male mice--but not females--also had lower-than-usual expression of a gene called c-fos in a part of the spinal cord that transmits pain signals to the brain, suggesting reduced neural activity in this pain pathway.

  • G West

    4 years ago

    biscotti

    I think you're actually closer to the nut of the problem (and it is a problem) than most.

    This is a question of sexism. And education. And the role of pornography in modern life - especially in the media.

    The item on The Current (Robert Jensen) is well worth listening to.

    I’d also recommend Forbidden Knowledge: From Prometheus to Pornography by Roger Shattuck

    These matters aren't just important to women - they're at the heart of how men see themselves as well.

  • BLONDE PITBULL

    4 years ago

    Humourous article,

    Humourous article, interesting comments. As a born to blonde I've gone through through life putting up with and using the the attitudes of others of both genders to my advantage and furiously fought the same attitudes. I am in total agreement with one comment of Ms.Rupp's as I've aged and my hair colour has mellowed I have no interest in returning to a brighter shade any more than I wish to return to relive the lessons of my youth. Cheers.

  • Romeogolf

    4 years ago

    Don't Judge a Book...

    I have to agree with J.B. There's what one is physically attracted to, then there's the more important "getting to know you" part. The strength of a relationship comes from the non-physical aspect.

    Exoticism may somewhat explain a popular preference for one type of person over another. But once you get past the superficialities, a princess is a princess and a jerk is a jerk, no matter what race or hair colour.

    I don't pay much attention to the media or fashion industry for my conception of beauty. They don't reflect reality. To believe an anorexic, pale as death woman is beautiful is seriously perverse.

  • whimsyfish

    4 years ago

    Blonde

    I dye my hair blond simply because that hair colour suits my complexion the most. My natural hair colour is a mousy shade that is neither brown or blond. I've been told by mostly straight women that blond suits me because of my very pale skin. I do not dye my hair blond to get attention from men, to be someone's "Barbie," or to get "the jocks." I am 38 years old and have been colouring my hair since the age of 20. Rarely have I received more attention from men just because of my hair colour. There have been many more occasions when I have gone to bars or parties with my brunette friends and men have hit on them and ignored me completely. I consider myself attractive, I'm tall and thin, well-dressed and well-spoken, but that's not the issue here. The issue is if a blond woman receives more attention from men, it is because of the energy she produces, the way she walks, the size of her cleavage, the way she's dressed etc., and not just because she is blond. Not all blond women colour their hair just to get attention or to be a floozy. They just happen to like that hair colour.

  • Gary Lund

    4 years ago

    re: the article: Blondes have it better

    It isn't only the female blondes who are stereotyped.

    In film and television, haven't you noticed that if there is a blond man or blond teen-aged boy in the story, he is always the villain, the mean one, the jerk.

    He's the young muscle-jock who kicks sand in the face of the scrawny dark-haired nerd, or the creepy cowboy in the bar who beats up the nice guy who's just trying to mind his own business.

    What makes Hollywood want to depict blond males as such arrogant, conceited, and cruel creeps? Are blond males supposed to be more attactive and have more fun,too, so it all goes to their head?

    -- A blond male

  • G West

    4 years ago

    Jack Bauer

    Would you say Kiefer Sutherland is an example of this phenomenon or an exception to it?

    I can't quite decide...certainly many of his other roles fit your criteria though.

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.