- Mary Carlisle is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Prem Gill is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Nancy Flight is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Justin Everett is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- John Westover is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Nora Etches is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Edward Henderson is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Bharadwaj Chandramouli is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Dean Chatterson is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Marius Scurtescu is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Robert Parkes is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- James Murton is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Susan Doyle is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Vincent Strgar is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Helen Spiegelman is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Subir Guin is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Kimball Finigan is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Joanne Manley is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- David Leach is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Joel Berger is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
The Angry, Radical 'Constant Gardener'
Le Carre's anti-corporate venom blooms in film adaptation.
The dean of spy novelists, John Le Carré, has, with his last two efforts, blistered his pages with anger at corporate power and the stuffed, imperial arrogance of the United States and Great Britain. In his most recent work, Absolute Friends, for instance, a tale of two veteran spies morphs into an aggressive denunciation of the U.S.-U.K. war on Iraq.
This rage at re-invigorated empire is blended effectively into Jeffrey Caine's screenplay for Le Carré's previous novel, The Constant Gardener, itself in large part an expose of the pharmaceutical industry. In this way the author's work -- rather than losing in substance along the way from print to the big screen - is enriched for the recently released film version. This, combined with perfect casting and stellar performances from the leads, brilliant (if occasionally dizzying) cinematography, and a touching, unconventionally sequenced love story, makes for a very compelling film.
The Constant Gardener manages to stimulate both intellectually and emotionally, with its portrayal of personal and political tragedy and betrayal. Set in Kenya, Ralph Fiennes (Schindler's List, The English Patient) plays Justin Quayle, a mild-mannered mid-level British diplomat, very recently married to the young, impetuous and rebellious Tessa, played by Rachel Weisz (Constantine, The Shape of Things). Tessa meets Justin after excoriating him at a public lecture for Her Majesty's Government's illegal invasion of Iraq. The staid career civil servant is captivated by Tessa, but her political fire is foreign to him; he prefers gardening to "leading the revolution." The newlyweds' passions prove to be short-lived -- interrupted by Tessa's absorption with activism amongst the Kenyan poor, and clouded by suspicions of her infidelity -- and are ultimately ended with her brutal murder while on an expedition to a remote region of the country.
Lechery and chauvinism
Quayle's search for the real culprits in his wife's death drives the story, bringing him into conflict with the corporate heads Tessa had been investigating, as well as many of his colleagues among the increasingly morally degenerate British bureaucrats. Of these characters, actor Danny Huston's (Silver City, The Aviator) performance is memorable, playing the despicable Sandy, who combines lechery, British chauvinism, and slavish service to the powerful.
Along with the authentically compromised diplomats, the Africa on offer here is much more authentic than in so much unfortunate Hollywood fare - the worst exemplified by, for instance, the unfeeling and dehumanized video game hordes of Ridley Scott's Blackhawk Down. Part of The Constant Gardener's success owes to the insistence of director Fernando Meirelles (City of God) for shooting on location in Nairobi. The squalor of the slums is conveyed, and yet the humanity of the inhabitants is highlighted, rather than denied. African stereotypes, for the most part -- such as the racist notion of the hyper-sexualized male -- are played with and even inverted, rather than just being perpetuated.
Swiss-Canada, Inc.
Refreshingly, one of the villainous companies is Swiss-Canadian, suggesting that the culpability for Africa's continuing oppression extends to the entire developed capitalist world and its rampant corporate power, and not just to those particularly despicable heads of government currently residing in Washington and London. And while the bad guys are clearly white-skinned or lackeys of these imperial interests, it should be noted that the indignant heroes, too, are with few exceptions white. In this sense the Africans are assigned only the role of victim; resistance is only expressed, or at least is expressed most loudly and articulately, by the dissident whites. And though this is disappointing, the film's clear locating of responsibility for Africa's crisis at the feet of the former colonial masters is nevertheless a refreshing antidote to the demagogy and moralizing of the almost all white rock stars at this summer's Live-8 concerts, where organizers reportedly banned criticism of Bush and Blair, at least from the stage in London.
The venom that the film conveys is very much in keeping with the spirit of the Le Carré's recent work, which has become quite overt: In Absolute Friends one of his characters, somewhat incredibly, even speaks of the benefits of reading Naomi Klein, Arundhati Roy and Noam Chomsky.
The Constant Gardener, too, provides a lot for viewers to reflect upon after they leave the theatre. That the film is rendered and acted so eloquently, and calls forth such a range of emotional responses, should only increase the number of people who see it and who, hopefully, will take the time to reflect upon its important political message.
Derrick O'Keefe is a founding editor of Seven Oaks www.SevenOaksMag.com, an on-line journal of politics, culture and resistance where this review originally appeared. ![]()



6
Login or register to post comments
Cycling Commuter
6 years ago
Comments on "The Angry, Radical 'Constant Gardener' "
Sounds interesting. But couldn't you give us more specific details? I don't want to further enrich overpaid Hollywood moguls by paying to watch the actual movie!!
I'm not a big fan of oversized, bloated, bureaucratic, bullying organizations of any kind - regardless of whether they're corporations, governments, marketing boards, unions, or whatever. They're always so disconnected from real-world needs. They all have too many MBAs in management. They all have the same general attitude. Just look at the way Glen Clark glided so effortlessly from union boss to NDP boss to corporate boss without ever getting his hands dirty doing any actual front-line work. Same with numerous other union bosses.
What's Ken Georgietti's annual income? I'm sure he makes a pretty penny running the Canadian Labour Congress. And he's a corporate director too, according to a Georgia Straight article at http://www.straight.com/content.cfm?id=2644 I'd be very surprised if his total income is under $200,000 per year. Doesn't that make him part of the rich elite, the bourgeoisie? Why is he not living off $30,000 - $35,000 per year like the average Canadian?
In another thread, someone provided a link to a fascinating explanation of how we came to be slaves of oversized, bureaucratic organizations of various kinds doing repetitive, boring work. It's well worth checking out. See http://www.mutualist.org/id71.html
My latest tangle with bloated bureaucracy involved an exchange with Microsoft's hotmail.com I received a Nigerian spam/fraud e-mail from a hotmail account, so I forwarded the spam (including headers) with a complaint to
. My complaint was bounced by Microsoft's spam filters on the basis that my spam complaint contained spam keywords. Duh! Right up there with the classic MSDOS error message: "Keyboard not connected error. Press any key to continue..."
Luceo
6 years ago
Thanks.
I'll watch it!
skeptikool
6 years ago
Cycling Commuter,
You seem to be really reaching, in using thia film revue to beat up organised labor, Glen Clark and the NDP.
You say in your 2nd paragraph what you are not a fan of, as though John Le Carre was opposed to those sentiments - yet Le Carre's "anti-corprorate venom" is mentioned in the sub-head of the article.
Please don't ask for the whole plot. Go to a thrift store and pick up a dog-eared paperback of the story for 50cents.
You were quite wrong about Glen Clark. The guy was and is a workaholic. Jim Pattison suffers neither fools nor employees who don't produce.
As far as union executive remuneration is involved, perhaps some are overpaid. I doubt it's anywhere near that of most CEOs in the private sector.
I'm a great fan of John Le Carre and am looking forward to see this latest movie - especially since I so despise many in the venal, pharmaceutical industry.
Budd Campbell
6 years ago
My wife and I saw this film last week. It's certainly not very flattering to Her Majesty's Government, as the British foreign service is portrayed as being involved in corruption and numerous murders, including those of Quayle and his wife, as well as more than 50 Africans who die during drug trials run by the Swiss Canadian company.
Police around the world, in the UK and and in Germany, are all in the pockets of the big drug companies. Maybe the Swiss Canadian company could have been presented as a "Vancouver biotech success story", but instead it's HQ is Montreal.
The actual killers are local Africans, and they are not presented as any less culpable than their employers. One of their victims, an African doctor, is not only murdered but tortured and then "crucified" in a particularly barbaric fashion. These men enjoy their work every bit as much as any Mafia hitman.
Overall, I found this portrayal a bit too extreme to be taken literally. No doubt economic interests cause governments to become involved with unsavoury interests, and some of those are business interests. But outright murder is a bit outside the usual realm of corporate and government deniability, and outside the range of immorality that most business and engineering school graduates will put up with.
skeptikool
6 years ago
From an article: Ginko Below by Stephen G. Michaud (found at Salon.com Health & Body
excerpt:
Sexual dysfunction is a huge problem in my practice, as it is with anybody treating patients with these antidepressants. The pharmaceutical industry underplays the problem. I see it in 50 to 70 percent of my cases."
Among the patients participating in Cohen's study was "Nancy," who is in her early 50s and suffers from thyroid disease-induced depression. "When Cohen first told me to try ginkgo, I thought the guy was nuts," she recalled. "I said, 'Hey, you've got to be kidding me.' But ginkgo is really, really good. I've been on five different antidepressants, and they all caused sexual dysfunction, but ginkgo helped with each of them. I'm too young to let that part of my life go down the drain," she continued. "When Dr. Cohen asked me to be in a new study which would mean I'd go off ginkgo for three months, I said, 'I don't think so.'"
So then why haven't the big herbal supplement manufacturers or pharmaceutical companies cashed in on ginkgo biloba's evident erotic promise? Why do they stick with the brain-food pitch, especially since the herb is largely unregulated, outside Food and Drug Administration control?
Susun Weed, an herbalist who has published widely on alternative and complementary medicines and women's health, believes that an outdated marketing mind-set is at play: Herbs such as ginkgo that do more than one thing make the big companies' marketing departments nervous. "They think such claims might confuse people," Weed surmised. "Also, herbs are trying to become more legitimate, so they think it is better for them to play down their multiple personalities."
Say no more.
kurt
6 years ago
Best movie I've seen in ages. le Carre rules!