- Mary Carlisle is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Prem Gill is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Nancy Flight is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Justin Everett is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- John Westover is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Nora Etches is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Edward Henderson is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Bharadwaj Chandramouli is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Dean Chatterson is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Marius Scurtescu is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Robert Parkes is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- James Murton is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Susan Doyle is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Vincent Strgar is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Helen Spiegelman is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Subir Guin is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Kimball Finigan is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Joanne Manley is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- David Leach is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Joel Berger is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
Better Dumb TV, through Science!
OK, if a gnarly croc fought a Great White, who'd win? Animal Face-off seeks answers our greatest minds (past age ten) have ignored.
You know Discovery Channel--worthwhile, educational programming and the chance to watch animals have sex. But Discovery has gone far beyond that now. Thanks to the new Animal Face-Off, Discovery is out there on the cutting edge. Creating better dumb TV--through science!
Animal Face-Off is dumb all right. It is sublimely dumb, the kind of dumb that requires effort, expertise, and inspiration. The program employs scientists and engineers to create realistic simulations of animal-to-animal fights of the sort rarely seen in nature, e.g. saltwater crocodile vs. Great White shark. At last, someone has put a finger on the main drawback with the animal kingdom--it's just not enough like the NFL.
Or more to the point, not enough like the sort of water-cooler discussion favoured by ten-year-old boys. For kids, this kind of who-beats-who debate ("The Punisher would kick Batman's caped butt!") are the conversational equivalent of the weather. It's basic social lubricant. Discovery has merely transposed those hypothetical superhero showdowns to the natural world, and backed them with a bewildering level of scientific and technical expertise.
Don't underestimate the Death Roll
On each episode, jaws and claws of the competing beasts are reproduced with life-size animatronic models, cast from metal molds and calibrated to replicate the actual force of the creatures in question (the models are also equipped with red or yellow high-beams for eyes. You are no doubt familiar with this scientific technique if you have seen any of the Terminator films). Those models are then tested and mapped by computers to create realistic programs of each combatant. After that--well, shoot, it's just a video game. Will the croc's death-roll beat the Great White's threshing action? Yee-hah!
What's astounding about Animal Face-Off is the amount of expertise on display. They really ought to have stuck two guys into crocodile and shark suits and had them fight it out, but no. Replicating the shark's head required a hydraulic system that captured the unusual movement of its jaws, which move independently of the skull. Done. As for the mechanical crocodile, its jaw was required to duplicate the most powerful bite in the world--over 2000 pounds per square inch. "Is this a girl or a boy croc?" an engineer asks. "Definitely a male!" the scientist enthuses. Know your demographic, lads.
Discovery Channel is typical of the modern polarized cable environment--male and female channels, watched in separate rooms. Its name may still carry the whiff of edifying content but thanks to guy fare like Frontiers of Construction and Monster Garage, today's Discovery is about as highbrow as TSN.
Why we need the space program
Not that these shows lack for PhD's. In fact, watching Animal Face-Off it becomes clear that people are wrong to criticize the space program. Going to Mars is too darned expensive, they say, and we should save our money. But it's a false economy. As the Discovery Channel has now proved, idle scientists who would otherwise be plotting trajectories to the Red Planet are now building fake fish while trash-talking the wimps on the crocodile team. Those who wonder why cold fusion has not saved the world with clean, renewable energy should wonder no more--them pointy-head folk are busy making metal kitty-cats.
One episode pitted a lion against a tiger, but metaphorically speaking, Animal Face-Off seems more inclined to match the Detroit Lions against the Detroit Tigers--crunching tackles versus home-run power. Improbable scraps like shark-against-crocodile and gorilla-tackling-leopard capture the spirit of comic book-swapping kids, attempting to compare the universe inhabited by Spider-Man with that of The Green Lantern. And sure enough, Discovery's online bulletin board discussions of the show quickly offered up a Superman vs. Hulk debate, with one poster suggesting Chewbacca vs. Big Foot. The potential for educational spin-offs here ought to be tremendous.
There is talk that Animal Face-Off will eventually feature a tournament format, with winners proceeding through the playoffs. Will some future episode pit an elephant against a giant squid? Oh, please please please. This is what science is all about.
Steve Burgess is traveling in France to detox after watching a bit too much television on behalf of The Tyee. ![]()



8
Login or register to post comments
effle (not verified)
7 years ago
It's not PBS that's for sure. Discovery Communications Inc is big business. Here's a question and I don't mean it ironically, well, not really. What is it that accounts for the CHEESE FACTOR? By which I mean, how DO you explain the qualitative differences between a Discovery production and something likey to be aired on, say, PBS? I mean, why does commercialism always pander to.....what IS it?.....I'm not sure why that is actually....why productions for the mass market need to be so stupid. Is it the dumbing down of America?
The REAL Barking Mad Fox Channel (not verified)
7 years ago
At last! STEPFORD CRITTERS, the virtual nature show. No more boring shots of animals as they really are: sleeping, scratching, peeing ... umm, breathing. Now, thanks to science, we can have animals who experience no shame when they are compared to Ann Coulter.
lewis swift (not verified)
7 years ago
The ominous trend that led to the discovery channel taking its cue from world wrestling federation marketing strategies, began with steve irwin's the crocadile hunter. Everyone knows that the only way to shut up an australian male is to take firmly rolled-up new york times and tamp it firmly down his throat -although loud mumblings may still be audible for hours....watching irwin, run down and harass innocent animals from jeeps, helicopters and sundry other modes of transport,while talking them half to death as well was the beginning of the end...but I propose a new mode of educational television, throw steve irwin naked into a small ampitheater (perhaps, built along the lines of a bear-baiting pit) add voracious wild life, and give steve a bic pen to fight them off...this would be difying educational, and much easier on wild life, and would additionally be a wake-up call for the discovery channel...
Lucas TdS (not verified)
7 years ago
Oh C'mon! This is great stuff! It's times like these that I wish I had cable. No harm done... it's something that you always wondered as a kid and now they're answering it for you.
Rick (not verified)
7 years ago
I an still holding out for polar bear vs. cobra.
Graz (not verified)
7 years ago
Has anyone noticed the similarities this has with 'Dangerizs creatures'. By the way, I love Stevie Irwin, although granted I do not consider him educational. We need a 4some showdown polar bear vs cobra vs S.I. vs Walrus, no education value but sure enough to bypass education.
bob (not verified)
7 years ago
great white shark
susan atrach (not verified)
7 years ago
what would happen if a grizzly bear the strongest and heavist of the bears met the liger the largest cat in the world met. Will the grizzly bear tear that big cat. Or will the cat kill the teady bear to shreds. Please tell me who do you think will win this face-off. Thanks for hearing my note.