Books

Mark Vonnegut's Sane Response to Psychosis

The famous novelist's son broke with reality in BC's wilds. His new memoir offers a clear-eyed chance to learn from his mental illness.

By Susan Inman, 6 Oct 2010, TheTyee.ca

VonnegutCover

Vonnegut's bipolar disorder is under control, and he's a practicing physician.

Related

  • Just Like Someone Without Mental Illness Only More So: A Memoir
  • Mark Vonnegut, MD
  • Delacorte Press (2010)

Mark Vonnegut lost his mind in the wilderness of British Columbia in the early 1970s. His account in The Eden Express of his journey in and out of madness is still the best description of psychotic experiences that I've ever read. The book is also a tribute to the idealistic vision of his era, now regularly mocked, of young people trying to figure out how to live together in peaceful, self-invented communities away from mainstream culture.

Because Mark was part of a group of people I knew from Swarthmore College who had started a commune in the forests 12 miles north of Powell River, tales of his encounter with insanity found their way to those of us still in school. In those days, we were enthralled with R.D. Laing's politically correct mantra that "Insanity is a sane response to an insane society." He and other prime movers of hippie consciousness saw psychotic episodes, about which we, in fact, knew nothing, as valuable altered states. They were to be considered as akin to shamanistic revelations pointing the way to "deeper truths."

When I actually saw Mark, soon after coming to Vancouver, and after we travelled up to Powell River together, he had begun to write his memoir. By then he was past the experiences that had shredded his psyche and was more than adequately lucid. He would refer to things that had happened during his ordeals and say, "That's going in the book," a useful approach to chaotic experiences that came back to me many years later when my own daughter plunged into the hell of a serious mental illness.

Mark soon left the commune, returned to Massachusetts, went to Harvard Medical School, and became a very successful paediatrician. His new memoir, Just Like Someone Without Mental Illness Only More So, mostly focuses on these later years. However, people with an abiding interest in Mark's father, iconic writer Kurt Vonnegut, will learn more about him than they did in Mark's earlier book. With wisely seasoned age, Mark offers both a more insightful and balanced perspective on this brilliant and troubled man.

Against R. D Laing

Mark's memoir will appeal to many people for many reasons. His take on medical education and especially his inside look at Harvard's program, is fascinating. This was the only one of the 20 med schools to which he applied that accepted him. His comments on the contaminated relationships that physicians have to establish with insurance companies are also illuminating for anyone thinking that privatizing medical care in Canada is a viable option.

The most valuable aspect of the book for people whose lives have been blown apart by a serious mental illness of their own or, as in my case, in a family member, is his open and sensible probing of his own experiences with a difficult brain. When my younger daughter developed a catastrophic schizoaffective disorder 10 years ago, Mark was one of the first people I contacted to help me get a grasp on what we needed to learn. His kindness and compassion meant a lot to me even if he wasn't in a position to offer specific advice.

As I suspected, his diagnosis of schizophrenia that we learn about in The Eden Express had been eventually replaced with that of bipolar disorder. Basically this meant that even though he had dealt with psychotic experiences, he didn't have ongoing struggles with the frequent components of schizophrenia. Although it sounds like he, like his mother, did continue to experience voices, they didn't fit into any kind of delusional system.

Nor did other common aspects of what are known as positive symptoms of schizophrenia (e.g. other hallucinations, ideas of reference) plague him. He didn't have the negative symptoms of social withdrawal, lack of affect, poverty of thought, or inability to experience pleasure that can develop. And he certainly didn't have to contend with any of the cognitive losses that can occur. Mark's keen intelligence and well-integrated creative sensibility helped him rebuild his life, a life that he realized could easily stay completely derailed by his experience with serious mental illness.

VonnegutBook

Vonnegut's follow-up, seven years later, to The Eden Express

When Mark was recovering from his initial psychotic episodes, he revisited the naïve views about mental illness that were popular in alternative culture and that, surprisingly, are continuing to have an impact. His article for Harper's, "Why I Want To Bite R. D Laing's Leg" challenged people to separate their urges to conflate independent thought with the mystique of psychosis. Mark became one of the first high-profile people to use his experiences to advance the grim state of public education about these disorders. He eventually connected with the work of the National Alliance for Mental Illness, the U.S.-based group that is a world leader in helping consumers of mental health services, their families, and mental health professionals incorporate science-based approaches to understanding the neurobiological illnesses of bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, and schizophrenia.

Insanity isn't a sane response to anything. Mark wouldn't agree with some current Canadian mental health commentators who once again want us to think of "mental health problems as a response to social stresses, to a history of loss, and to experiences of trauma and abuse. . . they are illnesses but they are normal reactions to life. . . " -- from Schizophrenia of Society board member Neasa Martin's presentation on Sept. 9, 2009, to the Ontario Select Committee on Mental Health and Addictions.

Mark doesn't think that his illness is just a normal reaction to life's problems; he carefully describes how a psychotic relapse he suffered many years after the onset of his illness was related to his problematic decision to suddenly stop taking a sleeping medication to which he'd become addicted.

In defence of Lithium

Mark is very clear about the fact that the ongoing stability and success of his life has been built on his willingness to use lithium to keep his bipolar disorder under control. His criticisms of pharmaceutical companies are as sharp as any anti-medication ranter and his anguish about the side effects of long exposure to lithium, especially his problematic hand tremor, is palpable.

Mark never claims that society's problems or the behaviour of his parents gave him his illness. Mark knows that most people don't lose their minds when their girlfriends are unfaithful or their parents divorce. He lays out the stricken genetic pool of his extended family that provides the context for the development of his disorder.

VonnegutHead

Mark Vonnegut today, a paediatrician in Boston.

Canada is currently experiencing a crisis in mental health care. If Mark were again wandering the streets of Vancouver in a delusional state, he would barely be noticed. The devastating impact of untreated mental illness has had its way with many homeless people who are constantly visible. Since one of the most common characteristics of psychosis is that people don’t understand that they are ill, people often refuse treatment. Particular points of view about what constitutes human rights have begun to prevail and it's becoming more difficult for ill people to receive the treatment that their illnesses make them want to refuse. I know many consumers and even more families who understand the deadly consequences of protecting people's "rights" to be mentally ill. Many families, including mine, have endured the painful struggles of helping an ill family member receive treatment against their will; we are rewarded when the person, well again, thanks us for fighting on their behalf.

Helping mentally ill get treatment

Mark was fortunate that when he became ill, his friends, misguided as they were in some of their ideas, knew enough to ensure that he was hospitalized in Vancouver until his illness could be stabilized. Today, because of various barriers to treatment, he might not be so lucky. However, in the case of a relapse in the U.S., he might be much more likely to receive treatment even if he didn't understand that he needed it. Although the mentally ill in the U.S. are even more apt to end up in prison than in Canada, the U.S. has begun responding to its crisis in mental health care by making it easier to help ill people get treatment. In recent years, 44 states have decided to have some form of assertive outpatient treatment which enables the law to help, rather than hinder people to emerge from debilitating and dangerous psychotic episodes. (See www.treatmentadvocacycenter.org)

There is a lot of discussion in mental health circles these days about how best to promote recovery from a serious mental illness. Mark's book needs to be read by people who want to understand how one man's efforts to thoroughly understand his mental illness and his need for drugs that, flawed as they are, have enabled him to rebuild his life. His memoir lets us know that this life is full of love, highly productive work, and a creative vision that has been realized through the restoration of sanity.  [Tyee]

11  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • Booker

    2 years ago

    Romantics

    This is a very well written article and an important message. It has been a battle for a couple of generations now to overcome the romantic ideas of "madness" that were promulgated in the sixties and seventies by the likes of R.D. Laing. The anti-establishment fervor that was quite beneficial in some areas too often became anti-science. The moves against institutionalization, while well intentioned, led to many seriously ill people walking the streets, homeless, cold, hungry, and shunned. I hope that we have come to a time when evidence-based treatments are more common than not. It is through the work of people like Mark Vonnegut and the author of this article that things are, I hope, improving for people who suffer from serious mental illness. This is a nice antidote for the nonsense spread by celebrity kooks like Tom Cruise, Jenny McCarthy, and Oprah.

  • Jeffrey J.

    2 years ago

    Middle Road Ignored by Policy Makers

    Like all discourse in mainstream society, the options we are given in responding to people with atypical brain chemistry are reduced to an all or nothing choice. Black or white. People can either (a) wander around in a crazed state or (b) be sent to an institution.

    Virtually EVERYTHING is described this way, yet nothing in reality is actually like this. This is a systemic, ingrained pattern in our elites which has dumbed down addressing virtually any problem in society.

    In fact, the real options are much more diverse. If we cared about the health of our citizens (both physical and mental) as much as we do about oil or gas or money, society would be dramatically different. But if you treat these issues as a mere footnote to building a massive economic monopoly, this is what you get. No real surprises.

    A real democracy could collectively decide to put very significant skills and expertise and resources into the mental health of our citizens. With well funded in-patient, out-patient, outreach programs, along with community workers, you could see people with atypical brain chemistry playing a myriad of roles in our culture.

    Great book. I salute Mr. Vonnegut in his courage to address this timely issue.

  • mopled

    2 years ago

    Mental illness can be helped with orthomolecular medicine

    But the drive against it by Big Pharma and their handmaidens the FDA and Health Canada continues in spite of clinical evidence which supports the use of nutrients to help control schizophenia, ADD, BPD, and OCD.
    http://www.truehope.com/truehope_bipolar_disorder_research_empowerplus_1.aspx

    The simple fact that nutritional elements like vitamins and trace minerals can't be patented means that those forces which thrive on disease promotion can't profit from them, which leads to the disgraceful suppression by government as exemplified by the raid on Marigold Natural Pharmacy in Courtenay this year.

    http://www.pacificfreepress.com/news/1/6532-marigold-natural-pharmacy-raid-redux.html

  • John Greg

    2 years ago

    mopled ...

    There is, so far as I can find, no legitimate medical research or documented peer reviewed articles or research showing that orthomolecular medicine in fact works, or is in any meaningful way any different than something as free of legitimacy as homeopathy.

    Orthomolecular medicine is so far nothing more than just another flavour of CAM with no proof as an effective form of medicine. It is just another wish fulfilling and rather expensive placebo.

  • Intention Pure

    2 years ago

    placebo

    Many prescription pills act as placebo. Many drugs are prescribed for uses other than those approved by the FDA and Health Canada. Orthomolecular medicine is a fancy name for food that still has nutrient content, plants that have well known and proven medicinal properties, and minerals and vitamins that are necessary for normal and healthy cellular metabolism. Orthomolecular medicine is life as the creator intended, as opposed to medicine created by the powers that be that want only one thing. . . .profits.

  • mopled

    2 years ago

    Yes, but where have you been looking?

    You remind me of the drunk looking for his latch key under the street lamp because the light is better there than where he dropped them.

    Having been the beneficiary of orthomed myself, I know that the hatchet job done to it over 40 years ago by Fishbein and the AMA. Medical journals rely on advertising from Big Pharma and the scandals of the last few years show how corrupt the system has become.
    http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2009/jan/15/drug-companies-doctorsa-story-of-corruption/

    Unless you are a shill for the Medical Industrial, do yourself a favor and investigate it yourself.http://www.orthomed.org/

  • mopled

    2 years ago

    It's late, sorry I didn't proof read the above

    Another place to look:

    http://www.rosenthal.hs.columbia.edu/Databases.html

  • jcaputa

    2 years ago

    Medical Journals Relying on Advertising?

    You're kidding right? I just looked on line, the premier medical science journal, The New England Journal of Medicine doesn't contain a single ad; at least not in the e-edition. Scientific journals, unlike magazines make money from subscriptions paid by doctors, scientists, universities and libraries, not from ads.

    I've been working as a scientist for two years now, and I've yet to stumble across a single ad in my research. Get your head out of where it is.

  • mopled

    2 years ago

    Just for the record

    Not only has the plentiful research been ignored, it was actually suppressed during the years that Morris Fishbein was head of the AMA. http://www.naturalnews.com/008845.html

    "Tens of millions of innocent, unsuspecting Americans, who are mired deeply in the mental “health” system, have actually been made crazy by the use of or the withdrawal from commonly-prescribed, brain-altering, brain-disabling, indeed brain-damaging psychiatric drugs that have been, for many decades, cavalierly handed out like candy -- often in untested and therefore unapproved combinations of drugs -- to trusting and unaware patients by equally unaware but well-intentioned physicians who have been under the mesmerizing influence of slick and obscenely profitable psychopharmaceutical drug companies, a.k.a. BigPharma."
    http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_6267.shtml

    Given the above, give me a placebo anytime.

  • mopled

    2 years ago

    jcaputa

    You must have a magical program that filters out ads because as the links below show, the NEJM accepts ads for both their print and online versions.

    http://www.nejmadsales.org/

    http://www.nejmadsales.org/html/ratesandclosingdates.html

  • bill metcalfe

    2 years ago

    Intellect

    I am a contemporary of Mark Vonnegut and followed some of the same paths he did then, and the saddest thing (along with the happy things) about us at that time was that we were so anti-intellectual. Anything that came out of any institution like a university was automatically suspect. We thought this was a realistic stance to take because we knew that very soon our new way of living would make universities, hospitals, mental hospitals, police forces, supermarkets, automobiles, and so on, obsolete-- they would just disappear from lack of use. We believed this fervently and denounced any attempt to really examine it. Ignoring your intellect means you ignore your emotions too because you are uncritical of your emotional and spiritual responses. This double ignorance can lead to the kind of trouble discussed in the article. This was not just a problem in my youth. It's still out there, magnified by the internet.

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.