Genghis Khan, Feminist
When his sons ruined the empire, it was a woman who re-created Mongolia in the late 15th century.
Genghis Khan: Put women in charge.
- The Secret History of the Mongol Queens: How the Daughters of Genghis Khan Rescued His Empire
- Crown Publishers (2010)
Historian Jack Weatherford has conducted a single-handed rehabilitation of Genghis Khan. In an earlier book, he traced the conqueror's impact on world history: one of the biggest and best-organized free-trade zones the world has ever seen; complete religious tolerance within the Mongol Empire; even the concept of diplomatic immunity comes from Genghis Khan.
In this new book, Weatherford argues that it was his daughters, not his sons, who made Genghis's empire a success. And when the sons ruined the empire, it was a woman who re-created Mongolia in the late 15th century.
Temujin, the young man who became Genghis Khan, grew up in an unimportant clan in an unimportant people. Other pastoral nations flourished on the 12th-century steppes north of China. They raided and traded with China, and fought to control the Silk Road. The Mongols, meanwhile, were minor players.
Raised by his mother, Temujin learned Mongol spirituality -- a balance between male and female, Mother Earth and Father Sky. More powerful Mongol lords had little respect for the female aspects of the world.
By the time Temujin became Great Khan of the Mongols in 1206, he was in his 40s, with a large family including "four self-indulgent sons who proved good at drinking, mediocre in fighting, and poor at everything else."
But he also had seven or eight daughters, whose names and lives are far less well-known; Weatherford has had to "re-assemble" their stories from various sources. They were clearly remarkable young women.
Marriage as a military assignment
Genghis Khan adopted a policy of strategic marriages. He would marry off a daughter to the king of an allied nation. The king's other wives were dismissed. Then he would assign his new son-in-law to military duty in the Mongol wars, while the daughter took over the rule of the kingdom. Most sons-in-law died in combat.
In this way Genghis Khan built a shield around the Mongol homelands, while expanding beyond them. In his marital instructions to his daughter Alaqai, "He left no doubt that this was a major military assignment. She was not there merely to administer, but to rule -- thereby beginning the expansion of the Mongols from a tribal nation into a global empire."
By the time of Genghis Khan's death, his daughters ruled from the Yellow Sea to the Caspian. Probably never before, or since, have women held so much power over so vast a region.
The sons began whittling away at that power as soon as the old man was dead. Each had received an inheritance of territory, and the easiest way to expand it was to take it from his sisters.
As the daughters aged and died, the sons (and grandsons) seized their kingdoms. A new generation of women gained power: the daughters-in-law of Genghis Khan, who took power while their husbands drank themselves to death.
Destroying Genghis's legacy
The Mongol Empire began to fall apart into quarrelling provinces, but rulers always had to be of the Borijin family of Genghis Khan. Often they were mere children, installed by a locally powerful warlord and then killed when they grew old enough to be dangerous.
In 1464, the Great Khan Manduul took a teenage bride named Manduhai. Despite his title, he was effectively a prisoner of local warlords, and Manduhai was a person of no great importance. But by the time Manduhai was 23, the Great Khan was dead, so was his heir apparent, and the last Borijin was a five-year-old boy in uncertain health.
Marriage to the Great Khan's widow was the direct way to the throne (for what it was worth). But Manduhai turned down the likeliest suitor. Then she married five-year-old Batu Mongke and proclaimed him Dayan Khan.
In an anarchic society where family ties were everything, says Weatherford, "They were both totally alone in the world.... They had no parents, siblings, aunts, uncles, nieces, nephews or even cousins.... The orphan and the widow could scarcely be expected to survive alone, but they were not alone. They had each other."
The warrior queen
While raising her husband, Manduhai also went to war. She had to unite her people, control strategic grasslands, and break the power of local warlords -- and to keep the Ming dynasty at a distance. She went into battle alongside her soldiers, and steadily won.
Meanwhile, she was giving her boy-husband a good education in how to be an effective ruler. Weatherford notes that "Genghis Khan's shortcomings as a father, in the end, helped bring down his empire and thus undid his lifetime of work. ... She had but this one boy, and she was determined to make him into a leader in war and in peace."
She succeeded remarkably well. It took 30 years of war and diplomacy, but Manduhai united Mongolia without fighting China. (The Ming preferred to build the Great Wall instead.)
She also had eight children by Dayan Khan, including three sets of twins; the succession was assured. His descendants would rule Mongolia until the Soviets arrived in the 1920s.
Weatherford, an anthropologist, clearly explains the complexities of Mongol culture and politics, showing how they affected everything from family life to waging war. That culture respected women; Genghis Khan's personal respect for them enabled him to achieve far more than he could have with men alone.
While Manduhai the Wise has always been a folk hero to the Mongols, few records about her survive. Weatherford had to piece together her story from many sources. A remarkable story it is -- an empire built by a brutal genius who respected his wives and daughters, lost by his wastrel sons, and regained two centuries later by a brave young woman and the old khan's last descendant. ![]()




12
Login or register to post comments
dorothy
1 year ago
That figures!
.
Luck
1 year ago
Rebirth now
ALL CANADIANS SHOULD READ THIS TIMELESS ARTICLE THAT TYEE.CA PUT OUT. ANOTHER GREAT ARTICLE FOLKS.
WE DEFINITELY NEED MORE WOMEN IN GOV.
READ YOUR HISTORY BOOKS FOLKS.
MEN THAT RUIN EMPIRES HAVE WOMEN RESTORE THEM.
GET YOUR HEAD OUT OF THE SAND MAN AND ENCOURAGE WOMEN TO RUN FOR OFFICE WITH MEN.
WE NEED A NEW BREATH OF FRESH AIR NOW.
THESE OLD GUYS IN GOV.STINK.
LETS START A NEW PARTY FOR EQUAL OPPORTUNITY FOR WOMEN AND MEN WHO REALLY CARE ABOUT OUR COUNTRY FIRST.
IF THIS AINT POSSIBLE BRING ON THE RAPTURE NOW.
denis_f_oliver
1 year ago
Rewriting History
The writer is attempting to rewrite history substituting the truth with lies.
RickW
1 year ago
Speaking as a male...........
........why don't we let the women run things, while we could be (in the words of Robert Service)"...whooping it up in the Malamute saloon".
They'd likely do a much better job of it anyway, judging from Khan's daughters.
Crawford
1 year ago
Denis?
I'm curious to know why you think Weatherford (or I) would be lying. I had no particular opinion about Genghis Khan until I read Weatherford's first book, which reflected considerable research. His second book reflects still more research, into a subject where most of us are pretty ignorant. That was enough to make me respect his findings and review his book.
So if you're aware of more persuasive and reliable data than Weatherford's, I'd be grateful to know what it is.
Cynic
1 year ago
Hey Luck, are you trying to
Hey Luck, are you trying to get read? As soon as I saw the allcaps I scrolled right by, didn't read a word.
Crawford, like me Denis hasn't a clue about what happened in history, but it appears he thinks he does because probably he read it in a book somewhere and now he "knows". Like a bible thumper.
I'd love to "know", but it's just not possible outside of my own experience.
arthurjhanks
1 year ago
Interesting peice on an
Interesting peice on an relatively unknown figure, but is fairly cavalier with the historical record.
Genghis Khan's empire continued to expand after his death, and reached its apogee during the reign of his grandson Kublai Khan, founder of the Yuan dynasty. Of course, there were civil wars among the male heirs for the succession of the Khaganate, many of these internecine conflicts apparently fueled by their equally power-hungry wives and mothers. But calling them all wastrel sons seems like a reach.
The 15th century restoration mentioned in the piece of course does not include China, Russia, Persia. It's a Greater Mongolia, but its not a recreated Eurasian empire.
I do not want to sound pedantic, but this article is full of such annoyances. all in all, kinda twee for the Tyee.
Jerry Munro
1 year ago
Another Tyee Best... :-D
Ehhhh, women can be imperialists and impose empires upon the worlds masses too! Duhhh, I woulda never thunk it. I thought they were all little angels.
We are soooo lucky guys. Women can be elitist, reactionary and cold booded killers too.
Like I said, who woulda thunk it? Such sweet, frilly things too....
Another Tyee best.
dorothy
1 year ago
No, Really!
Most people today think of Mongolians as part of the great Islamic multitude, as dull as the rest. But it is actually one of these outliers, just like the Berbers and the Kurds, where you may find Islam on the outside, and quite something else on the inside. Mongolian culture of old was a pastoralist culture, and quite oriented towards female deities and a female shamanic as well as warrior tradition. The 'damned mongolians' (check out the South Park episode), are a fascinating, complex people with a dramatic and colorful history. Here is a bit of peep into their world of today:
http://www.iaed.org/mongolia/
As for 'sweet and frilly' - Golda Meir? Indira Ghandi? Margaret Thatcher? Benazir Bhutto? !!
But I can't disagree on the 'tyee best'!
dorothy
1 year ago
OOOps
I see I have forgotten that Mongolia has, since its Islamic days, reconverted back to Buddhism, another dull, paternalistic religion, so technically,I'm wrong, but essentially not. There is, however, as I said, something more elemental and alive hidden underneath
RickW
1 year ago
denis_f_oliver
Ever heard of the Gulf of Tonkin "incident"? Or the "Maine"?
Only two relatively recent events of "history" that are entirely false - yet which served to deflect the course of subsequent events. Given just these two, would you say they are aberrations - or would they be more indicative of what we are told is "history"?
AP Latham
1 year ago
Militarizing Marriage
Arranging the death of spouse for pensions, lands and family resources. Sun Tzu's "Art of War" arranging victory, before raising army to overthrow empire. Manifest Destiny, say it is so, print it on paper. Fractional reserve banking system, based on heavy metal infrastructure. Very interesting. Parallels today?