Artsculture

'Inception' Is a Dream of a Movie

Finally, a summer blockbuster film that invites you to use your brain.

By Steve Burgess, 16 Jul 2010, TheTyee.ca

Inception, movie still shot

Trouble in the land of Nod.

Related

Ten years ago director Christopher Nolan unleashed Memento, one of the most brilliant cinematic puzzles ever created. A decade on, now a Hollywood superstar as director of the Batman franchise, Nolan offers up another cinematic Rubik's Cube to perplex and intrigue. Inception builds a world of dreams within dreams and challenges the audience to follow. Whether you love the puzzle or wish you'd never started the damn thing, you have to give Nolan credit. Few other summer blockbusters will ask audiences to put down the popcorn and pay attention.

Inception stars Leo Di Caprio as Cobb and Joseph Gordon-Levitt as his partner, Arthur. They are extractors -- people who enter dreams in order to steal vital information from the subconscious minds of their sleeping targets. Hey, it's a living. The film's opening scenes set the tone with Cobb and Arthur locked in a tense negotiation with a businessman named Saito (Ken Watanabe), in a place that may be a dream or perhaps a dream within a dream.

And that's just for starters.

Before we're through there will be a dream within a dream within a dream, and below that a fourth level of dreaming limbo. Never mind the plot twists -- think of the zoning issues.

Wake up and pay attention

Saito hires Cobb and Arthur to pull off something more difficult than mere information retrieval. He wants "inception" -- to plant an idea in someone's subconscious brain and make that person believe it is their own. The target is a young business mogul named Fischer (Cillian Murphy). Cobb and Arthur must convince Fischer -- or make him convince himself -- to break up his late father's business empire.

Cobb and Arthur hire a team including Ariadne (Ellen Page), a brilliant young student whose job is to create the architecture of the dream world, like the city planner of Nappy Town. Tom Hardy and Dileep Rao play members of the Slumber Land Swat Team in charge of logistics and sedation and such.

Complications? There are a few, none bigger than Cobb's wife, Mal. Played by Oscar-winner Marion Cotillard, Mal is, in the corporeal world, deceased. But in Nod, she's everywhere. And she's trouble. Cobb has plenty of unresolved issues surrounding his wife's death. Some of those issues are causing him real-world problems, such as an inability to return to the States to see his children.

Professionally, Cobb's wife issues threaten everything his team is attempting to do. She has this way of showing up in Cobb's subconscious, pursuing her own agenda. It all has to do with their murky past and just how Mal ended up dead. Cobb must deal with his personal history or risk sabotaging the whole dreamy operation.

Meeting of minds

The cast also includes Michael Caine, Tom Berenger, Pete Postlethwaite and Lukas Haas. Nolan and company have some fun along the way. Check out the musical cue intended to bring the dreamers back to reality: Non, Je Regrette Rien, the signature tune of Edith Piaf, the tragic French icon whose biopic brought Cotillard her Best Actress Oscar.

Then there's the initial establishing shot of Paris, panning across the rooftops to take in that famous landmark -- the Sacre Coeur cathedral. Nolan may be the first filmmaker in history to switch up Paris landmarks on us. (Alas, Mr. Eiffel's creation shows up a little later. Even in dreams, you can't break too many rules.)

Setting a movie in dreamland is a challenge that has defeated more than one filmmaker's imagination. The usual approach is to go all Dali-esque, a temptation Nolan largely avoids. In fact, despite some suspension of the laws of time and physics, Nolan's dream world is remarkably mundane for the most part. Perhaps the plot allows for this, since these dreams have actually been constructed by an outside architect in order to seem like reality. But the sleeping world of Inception rarely conveys any of the wondrous, frightening quality of dreams and nightmares, which seems like a lost opportunity.

Instead the movie creates a set of rules that govern the dream world. Grasping the rules helps you understand the plot. But it doesn't lend Inception the magical feel it might have had.

Inception requires vigilance to follow the bread crumb trail leading from one dream to the next and the next. What will make the movie succeed or fail for you is whether that concentration seems worth the effort. The emotional heart of Inception is the story of Cobb and Mal. If you buy into it, Inception will seem like a work of genius. If it leaves you cold, Nolan's film will seem like a large, expensive Rube Goldberg contraption -- impressive in its way, but ultimately pointless.  [Tyee]

15  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • offended

    1 year ago

    Tom Hardy

    steals the show.

  • Chris H

    1 year ago

    Hmmm.

    But District 9 was terrible?

  • wintermutt

    1 year ago

    21st C. Solaris?

    It sounds like Nolan owes more than a little to Andrei Tarkovsky's iconic film Solaris.
    The protagonist in Solaris is also haunted by the recurring appearance of his deceased wife, in a dreamworld made real by forces external to himself.

  • Steve Burgess

    1 year ago

    Headlines

    Ah, still with the District 9 comments. Tyeesters will never forgive me for panning that movie. I still don't like it.

    I just want to make a point here that I've made in the past: sometimes the headlines and display copy can distort the tone of a review. Remember, writers only write the actual story, not the packaging elements. I think the most positive thing about this review is that glowing headline, which tends to shape the reader's reaction to what comes next. In fact my opinion is better reflected by my final remark.

  • Jerry Munro

    1 year ago

    Di Caprio, Brando and Caine...

    I have always been an admirer of Di Caprio as an actor, I must concede I'm not quite ready to declare him another Marlon Brando, but I do think his skills are exceptional. (He IS close to being a Brando, without the politics I more or less admired in Brando.)

    In any case, I do fully intend to see this movie... myself and the old lady being long standing, from our early romance days, movie buffs. (I read too much "fact" stuff, and movies are my fiction novel substitute.)

    Anyway, I'm looking forward to seeing this movie. (Besides, it has the added bonus of Michael Caine. While he is not a "great" actor, in my view, he always brings special qualities, fully believable, to any movie he is in. I always enjoy anything he is in as well.)

  • John Greg

    1 year ago

    For what it's worth Burgess ...

    I thought your review of District 9 was pretty close to spot-on. A highly over-rated, and somewhat cliche-ridden movie, in my opinion. I guess I've finally forgiven you for beating me in the '98 Western Magazine Awards. LOL.

    I am definitely looking forward to seeing this latest Di Caprio exercise.

  • Steve Burgess

    1 year ago

    Mr. Greg

    Someday you will discover the value of greasing the right palms.

  • David Beers

    1 year ago

    Administrator

    just watched District 9

    gotta say, I'm with Steve on it. too many holes and leaps of logic. the allegory was obvious but not complex in the telling. so fire away at me, too!

  • David Beers

    1 year ago

    Administrator

    and as the guy who wrote the headline

    for a Burgess review, this read to me a pretty positive one! but there is such thing as a double entendre, and that was what I dreamed of achieving with the headline.

    You have to do a fair amount of work when you edit Steve Burgess. He never writes the headlines himself, and he gives as his byline 'Burgess' so I have to go to the trouble of typing in Steve. Every time. Nothing else ever needs editing, because he writes so well, but if he's gonna complain about the headline, I'm gonna point out that he's too lazy to send stories with his first name on them.

  • Steve Burgess

    1 year ago

    M... M... Mister Beers!

    I... I didn't realize you were listening, sir! What I meant was.. er... Dorothy was the one who put me up to it...

    No, the thing is, the headline is appropriate, strictly speaking. It's just that, accurate though it is Mr. Beers, people take it as evidence of a rave. And as you point our, Mr. Beers, it's certainly no pan. I admire what they're trying to do. But I was more equivocal than the headline suggests.

    But gosh, Mr. Beers, that is one swell tie you have on! Dorothy called it loud but I rebuked her, Mr. Beers, Yes, sir.

  • JamesG

    1 year ago

    "I still don't like it."

    Thank goodness 91% of Rotten Tomatoes reviewers did like it, along with the voters in the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences who nominated it for both Best Picture and Best Adapted Screenplay. It made me feel much better about enjoying it.

    As for this review, can I rely on it to reflect on what I'll see if I go to the film? Mr. Burgess, in his review of "Avatar", admitted to having not been to a 3-D film prior, despite many such films having been released that year, including one Oscar winner and Best Picture nominee that contained this four minute sequence:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8QYJMnika0Y

    I'd expect a movie reviewer to have seen that when it was released.

  • John Greg

    1 year ago

    Aha!

    Quote:
    Someday you will discover the value of greasing the right palms.

    So that's your secret?!?

    /just joshin' ya B

  • Chris H

    1 year ago

    I agree JamesG

    How could you have missed "Up"? It has, perhaps, one of the most powerful first 10 minutes of any film I've seen. Maybe he watched it in 2D. It was available in both.

  • warbler

    1 year ago

    Regarding the popcorn...

    It's true, Burgess, I did actually have to, reluctantly, place my 3/4-full bag of popcorn on the floor about 20 minutes into this one. I can think of only 3 other films over the past 20 years for which I've had to do this.

    Burgess, please take more care in your choice of diction. A filmmaker does not 'unleash' his/her film unless, of course, the film's subject matter is related to dogs or wild animals.

  • Steve Burgess

    1 year ago

    No unleashing?

    So "unleashing" is reserved only for dogs, krakens, and dominatrix clients? How about blockbusting? It has been brought to my attention theta a "summer blockbuster," whether in digital format or old-fashioned celluloid, is completely incapable of busting a block in summer or any other season.

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.