Independent
journalism that swims
against the current.
Views

Memo to the Mulroney 'Probe'

Some vital questions that need answering.

Rafe Mair 26 Nov 2007TheTyee.ca

Rafe Mair writes a Monday column for The Tyee. Read previous columns by Rafe Mair. To register for free to hear Rafe Live, Mair's new webcast, visit www.rafelive.com.

image atom
For his sake, too, let's find out.

Probe: "A penetrating or critical investigation."

Is this what Prime Minister Harper intends as he orders a "probe" into the business affairs of Brian Mulroney? Or will it be confined to a bit of a look-see into the $300,000 in cash the former PM received from the Airbus Mr. Fix-it, Karl-Heinz Schreiber? If the latter, neither the Canadian public nor, if he's innocent, Mr. Mulroney, will be well served.

The issue is a serious one indeed. In 1988, while Mr. Mulroney was Prime Minister, Airbus sold 34 A-320 jets for $1.8 billion to Air Canada, then a federal crown corporation. Karl-Heinz Schreiber was the de facto owner of a Liechtenstein company called IAL which brokered the deal. Contrary to what Mr. Mulroney said under oath in 1998 (of which more later), he knew Schreiber well, had received financial help from him in his 1983 campaign to unseat PC leader Joe Clark, and in fact had pressured Schreiber, upon completion of the Airbus deal, to pay a fat commission to Mulroney's crony, the late Frank Moores.

Mr. Mulroney doesn't deny receiving this money from Mr. Schreiber, a fugitive from German justice who has engaged in a hugely expensive fight to avoid extradition.

These questions about the $300,000 cash payments arise.

If the payments were to Mulroney, and they were for legal fees, surely he had to report this to his law firm or be guilty of breach of trust. In legal partnerships members of the firm generally can't do legal work on the side.

This raises another question:

These questions must be taken in the context of a National Post article published Friday, Nov. 9, 2007, which reports: "Businessman Karlheinz Schreiber alleges in an affidavit filed in court yesterday that an advisor to former prime minister Brian Mulroney requested a transfer of funds to Mr. Mulroney's lawyer in Geneva related to the Airbus deal."

More questions:

Which spurs another question:

And the questions hardly stop there:

Throughout this saga, a Swiss bank account named BRITAN keeps popping up and Schreiber claims it was from this account he paid Mulroney.

I've commented extensively on the reluctance of Canada's "old boy" media to investigate this entire matter but have not raised this matter of great importance to Canadians: The RCMP has, throughout, behaved as if they act or don't act depending on how tight their political masters hold the leash.

Which leads to:

This is not a matter of a political vendetta against former prime minister Mulroney but rather an attempt to raise issues which must be dealt with. The facts as we know them, and the questions they have prompted, raise serious concerns about Mr. Mulroney's actions while in office. The questions are not difficult to understand though they may be difficult to deal with. If they are not satisfactorily answered, many Canadians will believe that Brian Mulroney, in Stevie Cameron's famous phrase, was On the Take.

If Mr. Mulroney is innocent of any wrongdoing, it's in his interest to have this entire affair thoroughly examined.

Whether he's innocent or not, Canadians have the right to know what the real story is.

Related Tyee stories:

 [Tyee]

  • Share:

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Comments that violate guidelines risk being deleted, and violations may result in a temporary or permanent user ban. Maintain the spirit of good conversation to stay in the discussion.
*Please note The Tyee is not a forum for spreading misinformation about COVID-19, denying its existence or minimizing its risk to public health.

Do:

  • Be thoughtful about how your words may affect the communities you are addressing. Language matters
  • Challenge arguments, not commenters
  • Flag trolls and guideline violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity, learn from differences of opinion
  • Verify facts, debunk rumours, point out logical fallacies
  • Add context and background
  • Note typos and reporting blind spots
  • Stay on topic

Do not:

  • Use sexist, classist, racist, homophobic or transphobic language
  • Ridicule, misgender, bully, threaten, name call, troll or wish harm on others
  • Personally attack authors or contributors
  • Spread misinformation or perpetuate conspiracies
  • Libel, defame or publish falsehoods
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities
  • Post links without providing context

LATEST STORIES

The Barometer

Where Are You Feeling Inflation the Most?

Take this week's poll