Marking 20 years
of bold journalism,
reader supported.

Ten Questions I Posed to the Riot Review Panel

Here was my submission to the commission. How many answers will we get?

Mark Leiren-Young 1 Sep

Mark Leiren-Young posted this to his blog yesterday and is reprinted here by permission. He was on scene at the riot and among the first to file a published report, posted on The Tyee that evening.

[Editor's note: Check The Tyee later today for Bob Mackin's reporting on the riot review commission's findings, to be released today.]

So today we get the official report on Vancouver's Stanley Cup riot 2.0.

My submission to the commission asked several questions... I'm hoping all of them are answered -- though I confess... not so optimistic. Here's what I wrote...

To the Vancouver Riot Review:

I'm one of the people who believed this couldn't possibly happen again. I wrote a story for The Tyee about why this wasn't going to happen again. The day before the game I went on CBC's As It Happens, praised the Vancouver Police Dept. and said this wasn't going to happen again. And then... several hours before game seven was over... it became clear to me, and everyone I knew who was downtown, that this was going to happen, and I find it utterly baffling that everybody I know who was downtown saw this coming, but whoever was in charge of crowd control downtown apparently didn't.

These are the questions I'm hoping you'll answer.

1. I watched game six at the CBC Fan Zone, and during the second period a police officer politely informed me that my foot was on the green carpet that was part of the special emergency exit row and that if I didn't move it, I would be asked to leave. I moved my foot and was convinced the police were completely on top of things that night.

During game seven, I was told that people were freely drinking mickeys of alcohol inside the Fan Zone.

What happened?

2. During game six, friends with children were watching the game at the Fan Zone.

During game seven, friends with children were leaving the Fan Zone at the end of the first period because it was clear to them that this was not a safe place to be.

What happened?

3. During game six, fans were frisked before they were allowed in the Fan Zone.

At the start of game seven, I received a call from my girlfriend saying the Fan Zone had been closed because it was full. Minutes later she called to say that one of the barricades at the library was being removed, no one was being frisked and people were drinking openly.

What happened?

4. Who decided to take down the barricades and who decided to stop frisking people before allowing them into the family friendly zone?

5. For game six, I had my backpack searched and was patted down by a security guard in order to enter the area near the main post office.

For game seven, it appears someone was able to park a truck in front of the main post office loaded with explosives or at least accelerants.

What happened?

6. I talked to all sorts of people who left the Fan Zone -- or who felt unsafe in the Fan Zone -- well before game seven was over, people who were leaving after the first period -- not after the third.

Bluntly... Why is it that every civilian I know was able to sense trouble brewing that night -- and could sense the dangerous undercurrent from before the start of the game -- but whoever was in charge of security for the night apparently didn't?

7. And considering the fact that game seven was clearly a more significant event for the people of B.C. than any of the Olympic events including the men's gold medal hockey game -- and considering what happened in '94 -- why was the police presence at game seven clearly a fraction of the police presence we saw for the Olympics?

8. And considering the fact that the entire province was celebrating in Vancouver -- and the information to date seems to confirm that a lot of the more active troublemakers were from outside city limits -- why wasn't the province or, at the very least, the GVRD picking up part of the tab for policing something that was clearly much bigger than a municipal event?

9. Also... What was the point of closing liquor stores early if people were being permitted to drink from early in the afternoon at nearby bars?

Was anyone checking the neighbourhood bars to make sure they were following the Serving It Right guidelines that day?

10. Is there any consideration being given to charging any of those neighbourhood bars -- and I'm thinking of one sports bar in particular that I heard from several people was serving some of the same fans from noon -- with violating the Serving it Right guidelines? If any of the anecdotal reports I heard from friends and callers to AM 1040 were true, then I'm wondering why one particular sports bar on the edge of the Fan Zone isn't facing major fines and/or a license suspension.

I'm including my report on the riot that night for The Tyee which raises a few other issues.

And this is what my girlfriend wrote about her experiences and how the ugliness started long before the game was over.

If there is anything else you'd like to ask either of us about any of this submission, please feel free to contact us.


Mark Leiren-Young  [Tyee]

Read more: Politics

  • Share:

Get The Tyee's Daily Catch, our free daily newsletter.

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Comments that violate guidelines risk being deleted, and violations may result in a temporary or permanent user ban. Maintain the spirit of good conversation to stay in the discussion.
*Please note The Tyee is not a forum for spreading misinformation about COVID-19, denying its existence or minimizing its risk to public health.


  • Be thoughtful about how your words may affect the communities you are addressing. Language matters
  • Challenge arguments, not commenters
  • Flag trolls and guideline violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity, learn from differences of opinion
  • Verify facts, debunk rumours, point out logical fallacies
  • Add context and background
  • Note typos and reporting blind spots
  • Stay on topic

Do not:

  • Use sexist, classist, racist, homophobic or transphobic language
  • Ridicule, misgender, bully, threaten, name call, troll or wish harm on others
  • Personally attack authors or contributors
  • Spread misinformation or perpetuate conspiracies
  • Libel, defame or publish falsehoods
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities
  • Post links without providing context

Most Popular

Most Commented

Most Emailed


The Barometer

Should Fossil Fuel Ads Be Restricted?

Take this week's poll