We hope you found this article interesting, enough to read to the bottom. Help us publish more in 2022.

Thanks for coming by The Tyee and reading one of many original articles we’ll post today. Our team works hard to publish in-depth stories on topics that matter on a daily basis. Our motto is: No junk. Just good journalism.

Just as we care about the quality of our reporting, we care about making our stories accessible to all who want to read them and provide a pleasant reading experience. No intrusive ads to distract you. No paywall locking you out of an article you want to read. No clickbait to trick you into reading a sensational article.

There’s a reason why our site is unique and why we don’t have to rely on those tactics — our Tyee Builders program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip in a bit of money each month (or one-time) to our editorial budget. This amazing program allows us to pay our writers fairly, keep our focus on quality over quantity of articles, and provide a pleasant reading experience for those who visit our site.

In the past two years, we’ve been able to double our staff team and boost our reporting. We invest all of the revenue we receive into producing more and better journalism. We want to keep growing, but we need your support to do it.

We’re on a mission to add 650 new monthly supporters to our ranks to help us have another year of impactful journalism – will you join us?

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Help us hit our year-end target of 650 new monthly supporters and join Tyee Builders today.
We’re looking for 650 new monthly supporters to fund our newsroom – are you one of them?

Small independent news media are having a moment – we’re gaining supporters, winning awards, and publishing more impactful journalism than ever. We’re starting to see glimmers of a hopeful future for independent journalism in Canada.

The Tyee works for our readers, because we are funded by you. We don’t lock our articles behind a paywall, and we focus all of our energy into publishing original, in-depth journalism that you won’t read anywhere else. It’s our full-time job because readers pay us to do it.

Over the last two years, we’ve been able to double our staff team and publish more than ever. We’re gearing up for another year and we need to know how much we are working with. Thousands of Tyee readers have signed up to support our independent newsroom through our Tyee Builders program, and we’re inviting you to join.

From now until Dec. 31, we’re aiming to bring aboard 650 new monthly supporters to The Tyee to help us do even more in 2022.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Help us hit our year-end target of 650 new monthly supporters and join Tyee Builders today.
We value: Our readers.
Our independence. Our region.
The power of real journalism.
We're reader supported.
Get our newsletter free.
Help pay for our reporting.

Coalition 2.0: Open Letter to Ignatieff, Layton and May

I wrote to all three, none answered, so I'm taking this proposal straight to their parties.

By John Ryan 26 Mar 2010 | TheTyee.ca

John Ryan, Ph.D., is a retired professor of geography and Senior Scholar at the University of Winnipeg.

image atom
This time, create distance from the Bloc.

"Canada's last two elections are proof positive that we have a flawed electoral system. Does it make any sense that it's impossible to get a government that reflects the views of the majority of our population? How is it that a little more than a third of the electorate can determine who forms Canada's government?"

This is how I once began an article on the need for a Liberal-NDP-Green electoral coalition. Find it here.

The article doesn't deal in the abstract. It includes a set of tables that I compiled from the 2008 Elections Canada data which provide the basis for determining that in a coalition, in the next election, the Liberals could win up to 125 seats, the NDP 46, and the Green Party two seats -- for a majority government of 173 seats. The Conservatives would be reduced to 92 members and the Bloc Quebecois to 41.

In the last two elections, almost two-thirds of our electorate did not vote for the Conservatives, yet it is the Conservatives who formed the government. This is a bizarre state of affairs. As should be apparent to everyone, the majority vote was split amongst four parties, and with politics as usual, it is unlikely that this is going to change.

At present we have a dysfunctional political system in which the views of the majority of Canadians cannot be represented by a single political party. Given what's at stake, in the interests of Canada, the opposition parties have an obligation to reconsider their usual political strategies.

Several months back, with a similar message, I wrote to Michael Ignatieff, Jack Layton and Elizabeth May. I also sent them my previously published article on the urgent need for an electoral coalition. The article deals at length with the framework and the advantages of such a coalition. Somehow I didn't expect a response, and I didn't get one. Although the leaders appear determined to go on with politics as usual, I am now writing this open letter with a direct appeal to you members of parliament and to Elizabeth May to get your parties to try a different election strategy.

Conservative majority in reach

From all indications, if an election were to be held in the next while, it appears that the Conservatives may once again form a minority government, but it is not inconceivable that they could get a majority government. Despite their recent success in appearing somewhat innocent and benign, there is no reason to believe that the party has turned its back on its original raison d'etre. Given this, one term of office with a majority could enable them to carry out most of their underlying agenda and do irreparable harm to Canada's social and economic fabric.

A different coalition this time

It should be made clear that an electoral coalition would be totally different from the Dec. 2008 coalition that included the Bloc Quebecois. That coalition was discredited by the Conservatives largely because of two circumstances: 1) the Liberals had been soundly defeated a few weeks before, so for many people it was somewhat unseemly for Stephane Dion to suddenly want to become prime minister, and 2) although the Bloc was not formally part of the coalition and the NDP are far from being socialists, Harper, through distortion and lies, portrayed this as a "socialist" and "separatist" coalition.

At this stage, if the Liberals, the NDP and Greens established a formal coalition, before an election, it would be difficult for the Conservatives to try to discredit this. Importantly, the Bloc would not be part of it. The coalition should be upfront and in the open, as coalitions are in Europe and elsewhere. It's time that people in Canada came to realize that this is now the reality of the situation in our country -- that there is nothing wrong with the centre-left forming a coalition, with a combined platform that reflects the country's political and ideological structure.

Despite entrenched party loyalties, what centre-left Canadians need is a new political entity which the Liberals, the NDP, and the Greens could form if they acted creatively and courageously. If they did this it could be the dawn of a new era in Canada.  [Tyee]

Read more: Politics, Elections

Share this article

The Tyee is supported by readers like you

Join us and grow independent media in Canada

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free


The Barometer

Tyee Poll: Are You Preparing for the Next Climate Disaster?

Take this week's poll