The article you just read was brought to you by a few thousand dedicated readers. Will you join them?

Thanks for coming by The Tyee and reading one of many original articles we’ll post today. Our team works hard to publish in-depth stories on topics that matter on a daily basis. Our motto is: No junk. Just good journalism.

Just as we care about the quality of our reporting, we care about making our stories accessible to all who want to read them and provide a pleasant reading experience. No intrusive ads to distract you. No paywall locking you out of an article you want to read. No clickbait to trick you into reading a sensational article.

There’s a reason why our site is unique and why we don’t have to rely on those tactics — our Tyee Builders program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip in a bit of money each month (or one-time) to our editorial budget. This amazing program allows us to pay our writers fairly, keep our focus on quality over quantity of articles, and provide a pleasant reading experience for those who visit our site.

In the past year, we’ve been able to double our staff team and boost our reporting. We invest all of the revenue we receive into producing more and better journalism. We want to keep growing, but we need your support to do it.

Fewer than 1 in 100 of our average monthly readers are signed up to Tyee Builders. If we reach 1% of our readers signing up to be Tyee Builders, we could continue to grow and do even more.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Support our growing independent newsroom and join Tyee Builders today.
Before you click away, we have something to ask you…

Do you value independent journalism that focuses on the issues that matter? Do you think Canada needs more in-depth, fact-based reporting? So do we. If you’d like to be part of the solution, we’d love it if you joined us in working on it.

The Tyee is an independent, paywall-free, reader-funded publication. While many other newsrooms are getting smaller or shutting down altogether, we’re bucking the trend and growing, while still keeping our articles free and open for everyone to read.

The reason why we’re able to grow and do more, and focus on quality reporting, is because our readers support us in doing that. Over 5,000 Tyee readers chip in to fund our newsroom on a monthly basis, and that supports our rockstar team of dedicated journalists.

Join a community of people who are helping to build a better journalism ecosystem. You pick the amount you’d like to contribute on a monthly basis, and you can cancel any time.

Help us make Canadian media better by joining Tyee Builders today.
We value: Our readers.
Our independence. Our region.
The power of real journalism.
We're reader supported.
Get our newsletter free.
Help pay for our reporting.

BC Green Leader Introduces Bill to Stop Sexist Dress Codes in the Workplace

‘This is absolutely a no-brainer,’ says MLA Andrew Weaver.

By Sharon J. Riley 10 Mar 2017 |

Sharon is a journalist and researcher from Alberta. She is a regular contributor to the Harper’s Weekly Review, and her writing has been published by Maisonneuve, The Walrus and Harper’s, among others.

To mark International Women’s Day, British Columbia Green Party Leader and MLA Andrew Weaver introduced a bill Wednesday that would ban dress codes that require women to wear high heels in restaurants — or any other workplace.

Weaver said a Tyee series on sexism in the restaurant industry by Rachel Sanders was brought to his attention last month.

“I was dumbfounded that in British Columbia, employers could actually dictate that staff members have to wear high heels,” said Weaver, whose daughter has worked in the restaurant industry. “This is 2017.

“This surely has got to be easy to fix,” he said. “This is a form of discrimination.”

Weaver proposed a bill designed to “prevent employers from setting varying footwear and other requirements based on gender, gender expression or gender identity.” In other words, he said, no more sexist requirements for women to wear high heels in restaurants.

Weaver isn’t alone in taking on the issue. In the U.K., lawmakers debated a ban on requiring high heels in the workplace earlier this week, in response to a petition started by a receptionist who said her employer required her hair have “no visible roots,” her makeup be “regularly re-applied” and her heels be between two and four inches.

And in Ontario, the Ontario Human Rights Commission announced that some progress had been made since it released a 30-page report on discriminatory dress codes last year — and encouraged certain companies to make sure anti-discrimination policies are being implemented on the ground.

Here in B.C., six out of eight women who spoke with The Tyee for last month’s series reported that dress codes requiring high-heeled shoes were causing problems in their workplaces.

As one woman put it, “I would ask to take the heels off. Like, ‘My feet are bleeding, can I please put on my flats?’” Her requests, she said, were not heard.

Another woman recalled that at one downtown Vancouver restaurant, she was required to wear two-inch heels, which she said put her at risk of falling on slippery laminate floors, “so everyone would see what you were wearing underneath your skirt.”

This problem isn’t unique to B.C. According to a policy position released by the Ontario Human Rights Commission, “sex-based dress codes undermine women’s dignity and may make them more vulnerable to sexual harassment from other staff, customers and management.”

This statement came as the Commission conducted an inquiry after current or former restaurant staff raised concerns — whether in the media, through petitions, on social media, by holding events, or through making human rights and workplace safety complaints.

‘An immediate health and safety risk’

Weaver said he commends any action that reduces gender-based discrimination, but is cautious about who should bear the responsibility to bring these issues to the forefront of the conversation.

To Weaver, bringing forward a human rights complaint or starting a media campaign is a daunting task — and a lot of work for already stretched-thin restaurant staff.

“Why would we put the onus on the employee to do this?” asked Weaver. “It’s difficult for people to complain when they’re trying to make ends meet.”

His bill, he said, could eliminate sexist dress codes right away. Though it will be difficult to pass. With the legislature session expected to end next week, the bill will be among dozens of private members’ bills unlikely to be called for debate.

Weaver is clear that he isn’t against women — or anyone — wearing high heels if they so choose. The problem, he said, is when one type of footwear is required for a particular gender group.

With the passage of his bill, he said, “an employer could require that all — all — employees in the restaurant have to wear high heels. All the cooks, managers, busboys and waiters. Everybody’s got to wear high heels. We all know this would last about one day.”

Weaver is concerned that requiring high heels for certain gender groups isn’t only an issue of discrimination, but is dangerous as well. Working long hours wearing high heels can lead to back and foot problems, he said.

“This is an immediate health and safety risk,” he said, saying it can be addressed immediately, with the stroke of a pen.

Weaver acknowledges that wage disparity and differential minimum wage rules, like the reduced minimum wage for liquor servers, are also issues, but is not planning to introduce legislation on these topics in the immediate future. Addressing discriminatory dress codes is his focus for the time being, he said.

“This is absolutely a no-brainer,” he said, and noted that he is receiving nothing but positive feedback about the bill on social media since it was introduced.

“I’ve got 100 per cent positive feedback on this,” he said. “I could talk about puppies and I’m still not getting 100 per cent positive feedback.”

Weaver is certain a lot of British Columbians aren’t aware that sexist dress codes are allowed in the provinces, and is hopeful that this bill will gain support across the legislature. “I would expect and hope that the government will do this now.”  [Tyee]

Share this article

The Tyee is supported by readers like you

Join us and grow independent media in Canada

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free


The Barometer

Tyee Poll: What Coverage Would You Like to See More of This Year?

Take this week's poll