Independent
journalism that swims
against the current.
News
Federal Politics
Elections

Electoral Deformed? Things Getting Weird on Committee Studying Reforms, Says NDP

Liberal retreat on promised new voting system would be ‘immoral,’ says MP.

Jeremy Nuttall 20 Oct 2016TheTyee.ca

Jeremy J. Nuttall is The Tyee’s reader-funded Parliament Hill reporter in Ottawa. Find his previous stories .

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s musings on abandoning his promise of electoral reform are making things “weird” for a parliamentary committee examining Canada’s voting system, says MP Nathan Cullen, committee vice-chair and the NDP critic for Democratic Reform.

The all-party committee has heard from 336 witnesses and received 163 briefs on ways to reform Canada’s electoral system and has to present a final report with recommendations by Dec. 1.

But Cullen said Trudeau’s comments to a Quebec newspaper this week suggesting the issue is now a lower priority had an immediate impact on the mood of committee meetings.

“We had one this morning, and it was a bit weird,” the Skeena-Bulkley Valley MP said Thursday.

Cullen said he found it strange that Liberal committee members were reluctant to accept a motion inviting Minister of Democratic Institutions Maryam Monsef to debrief the committee on her recent public consultations on the issue. Monsef has been touring the country hosting “town hall” meetings to gather opinions on what changes people would like to see to Canada’s voting system.

Despite the Liberals’ hesitations, the motion was passed Thursday evening unanimously.

Trudeau and the Liberals promised the 2015 election would be the last time Canadians voted under the current first-past-the-post system. The committee was established to study alternate systems, like proportional representation or ranked ballots, which could ensure Parliament more accurately reflected voters’ preferences.

But Trudeau appeared to be moving away from the commitment this week.

In the interview with Le Devoir, Trudeau said Canadians are less interested in changes to the voting system since his election. The desire for electoral reform might have been linked to the unpopularity of the former government of Stephen Harper, he said.

Some analysts have said it appears the prime minister is testing how a retreat from the promise would be received. Critics have said that the Liberals, having power under the current system, want to stick with it.

Whether it’s part of a plan or just a poorly worded comment by the prime minister, Cullen said the comments were “unhelpful.”

“For the prime minister to pour a bucket of cold water on the enthusiasm that Canadians have for this would be incredibly cynical,” Cullen said.

Trudeau “is essentially saying the system was only broken until they elected me,” Cullen said.

On Thursday Monsef missed her deadline to submit a report to the House of Commons detailing the results of the government’s consultations with the public on the issue.

Cullen said abandoning the electoral reform promise would be “immoral.” He’s still optimistic the changes will go through, he said.

The Liberals’ current popularity may have sparked a desire to abandon the promise, he added.

“It seems to be that they are entering or well into that self-delusion stage, that some polling or likes on Facebook has given them the license to take every promise they made as a conditional thing.”  [Tyee]

  • Share:

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Comments that violate guidelines risk being deleted, and violations may result in a temporary or permanent user ban. Maintain the spirit of good conversation to stay in the discussion.
*Please note The Tyee is not a forum for spreading misinformation about COVID-19, denying its existence or minimizing its risk to public health.

Do:

  • Be thoughtful about how your words may affect the communities you are addressing. Language matters
  • Challenge arguments, not commenters
  • Flag trolls and guideline violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity, learn from differences of opinion
  • Verify facts, debunk rumours, point out logical fallacies
  • Add context and background
  • Note typos and reporting blind spots
  • Stay on topic

Do not:

  • Use sexist, classist, racist, homophobic or transphobic language
  • Ridicule, misgender, bully, threaten, name call, troll or wish harm on others
  • Personally attack authors or contributors
  • Spread misinformation or perpetuate conspiracies
  • Libel, defame or publish falsehoods
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities
  • Post links without providing context

LATEST STORIES

The Barometer

How Are You Engaging with Black History Month?

Take this week's poll