Independent
journalism that swims
against the current.
News
Energy

New Maps Show Seven Million Americans at Risk from Industry-Made Quakes

US science agency highlights 'potential ground-shaking hazards.'

Andrew Nikiforuk 1 Apr 2016TheTyee.ca

Andrew Nikiforuk is an award-winning journalist who has been writing about the energy industry for two decades and is a contributing editor to The Tyee. Find his previous stories here.

This coverage of Canadian national issues is made possible because of generous financial support from our Tyee Builders.

For the first time in its history, the United States government's premier science agency has issued maps identifying "potential ground-shaking hazards" from industry-induced earthquakes caused either by high-volume fracking or the injection of wastewater into the ground.

The new United States Geological Survey's risk assessment shows that approximately seven million people now live and work in regions that could be affected by earthquakes triggered by the oil and gas industry in the central U.S.

The USGS had previously published maps showing hazards only from natural earthquake activity.

However, a dramatic increase in earthquake swarms since the advent of high-volume hydraulic fracturing led the science agency to change its earthquake hazard assessments.

Scientists have known for decades that the injection of wastewater or the injection of millions of gallons of fracking fluid (including water, chemicals and sand) to blast apart rock can destabilize underground formations by over-pressurizing natural faults and fractures.

The residents of six states face the most significant potential shaking hazards, including Oklahoma, Kansas, Texas, Colorado, New Mexico and Arkansas, according to the USGS.

"In the past five years, the USGS has documented high shaking and damage in areas of these six states, mostly from induced earthquakes," reported Mark Petersen, a spokesman for the USGS.

"Furthermore, the USGS 'Did You Feel It?' website has archived tens of thousands of reports from the public who experienced shaking in those states, including about 1,500 reports of strong shaking or damage."

Once seismically quiet

Before the shale gas revolution, an average of 24 earthquakes of magnitude 3.0 and larger per year shook the U.S. Midwest between 1973 and 2008.

But the shale gas industry and high-volume hydraulic fracturing changed the seismically quiet area into one of the most active regions in the country, as the rate of shaking steadily increased from 2009 to 2015. Tremors of magnitude 3.0 averaged 318 per year and peaked in 2015 with 1,010 earthquakes.

Approximately 226 earthquakes of magnitude 3.0 and larger have shaken the central U.S. region in the last three months. To date, the largest earthquake located near several active injection wells was a magnitude 5.6 in 2011 near Prague, Oklahoma.

To reduce the industry-made earthquakes, Oklahoma state regulators plan to reduce the amount of toxic wastewaters injected miles into the ground by more than half a billion barrels a day over a 5,000-square-mile area.

In an earlier report, the USGS explained that "the most probable risks in areas of increased seismicity include life-threatening injuries caused by falling objects and economic loss from damage to structures with low capacity to absorb moderate earthquake shaking... there is no question that increased hazard accompanies higher levels of earthquake activity."

Seismic activity, whether natural or industry-made, poses two key problems for the oil and gas industry. Gas Migration, a well-known industry textbook, notes that industry-triggered earthquakes can form vertical and subvertical faults and fractures above petroleum reservoirs.

Seismic vibrations can also increase the permeability of the rock and increase upward gas migration into the atmosphere. Gas leakage can pose serious environmental risks.

Current research suggests that induced earthquakes can trigger larger earthquakes on known or unknown faults than natural earthquakes. Throughout oil and gas drilling regions, scientists suspect there may be thousands of faults that could rupture in a large earthquake as a result of fluid injection from industry.

According to the USGS, induced earthquakes also tend to exhibit swarm-like behaviour with more numerous and smaller earthquakes at shallower depths.

Canadian induced-quakes mainly caused by fracking

In contrast to U.S. studies, Canadian experts largely attribute dramatic increases and changes in seismic patterns in western Canada to increases in hydraulic fracturing as opposed to wastewater well injection.

To date, the fracking industry has caused more than 1,000 minor and felt earthquakes in southern Alberta and northern British Columbia. Steam injection for bitumen appears to have caused earthquakes near Peace River, too.

A new Canadian study has confirmed that most earthquakes triggered by the oil and gas industry Alberta and B.C. have been caused by the unpredictable technology of hydraulic fracturing.

Some of the world's largest injections of frack fluids to crack open underground rock have taken place in Canada.

In particular, the scientists identified 39 fractured wells that triggered earthquakes greater than magnitude 3.0 with a maximum magnitude to date of 4.6. They also identified 17 disposal wells responsible for earthquakes as great as magnitude 4.5.

"The nature of the hazard from hydraulic fracturing has received less attention than that from wastewater disposal, but it is clearly of both regional and global importance," the Canadian scientists concluded.

The study added that "It is possible that a higher-than-recognized fraction of induced earthquakes in the United States are linked to hydraulic fracturing, but their identification may be masked by more abundant wastewater-induced events."

Although industry and regulators have denied or played down the connection between earthquakes and injecting frack fluids or wastewater into the ground near faults, scientists identified the risk nearly three decades ago.

A 1990 report by the USGS reported that hydraulic fracking in Oklahoma had set off multiple earthquake swarms as early as 1978. "The process once started, may not be controlled completely or readily," concluded the researchers.

Due to limited monitoring, industry and government lack a full understanding of how industry-triggered quakes are changing groundwater flow in the region or altering the migration of gases such as methane, radon and carbon dioxide into the atmosphere throughout northeast B.C and central Alberta.

High rates of methane have now been detected above fracked landscapes in Oklahoma, New Mexico and Australia. Fractures can form in rock as a direct consequence of drilling, acidizing, cementing and fracking activities. These fractures can then serve as potential pathways for methane and other gases.

Earthquakes triggered by the shale gas industry in B.C. have not injured anybody or damaged public property to date. But industry-made tremors in the U.S. Midwest have caused millions of dollars of damage in Oklahoma and created new insurance liabilities.  [Tyee]

Read more: Energy

  • Share:

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Comments that violate guidelines risk being deleted, and violations may result in a temporary or permanent user ban. Maintain the spirit of good conversation to stay in the discussion.
*Please note The Tyee is not a forum for spreading misinformation about COVID-19, denying its existence or minimizing its risk to public health.

Do:

  • Be thoughtful about how your words may affect the communities you are addressing. Language matters
  • Challenge arguments, not commenters
  • Flag trolls and guideline violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity, learn from differences of opinion
  • Verify facts, debunk rumours, point out logical fallacies
  • Add context and background
  • Note typos and reporting blind spots
  • Stay on topic

Do not:

  • Use sexist, classist, racist, homophobic or transphobic language
  • Ridicule, misgender, bully, threaten, name call, troll or wish harm on others
  • Personally attack authors or contributors
  • Spread misinformation or perpetuate conspiracies
  • Libel, defame or publish falsehoods
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities
  • Post links without providing context

LATEST STORIES

The Barometer

Who Do You Think Will Win the Conservative Leadership Race?

Take this week's poll