We hope you found this article interesting, enough to read to the bottom. Help us publish more in 2022.

Thanks for coming by The Tyee and reading one of many original articles we’ll post today. Our team works hard to publish in-depth stories on topics that matter on a daily basis. Our motto is: No junk. Just good journalism.

Just as we care about the quality of our reporting, we care about making our stories accessible to all who want to read them and provide a pleasant reading experience. No intrusive ads to distract you. No paywall locking you out of an article you want to read. No clickbait to trick you into reading a sensational article.

There’s a reason why our site is unique and why we don’t have to rely on those tactics — our Tyee Builders program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip in a bit of money each month (or one-time) to our editorial budget. This amazing program allows us to pay our writers fairly, keep our focus on quality over quantity of articles, and provide a pleasant reading experience for those who visit our site.

In the past two years, we’ve been able to double our staff team and boost our reporting. We invest all of the revenue we receive into producing more and better journalism. We want to keep growing, but we need your support to do it.

We’re on a mission to add 650 new monthly supporters to our ranks to help us have another year of impactful journalism – will you join us?

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Help us hit our year-end target of 650 new monthly supporters and join Tyee Builders today.
We’re looking for 650 new monthly supporters to fund our newsroom – are you one of them?

Small independent news media are having a moment – we’re gaining supporters, winning awards, and publishing more impactful journalism than ever. We’re starting to see glimmers of a hopeful future for independent journalism in Canada.

The Tyee works for our readers, because we are funded by you. We don’t lock our articles behind a paywall, and we focus all of our energy into publishing original, in-depth journalism that you won’t read anywhere else. It’s our full-time job because readers pay us to do it.

Over the last two years, we’ve been able to double our staff team and publish more than ever. We’re gearing up for another year and we need to know how much we are working with. Thousands of Tyee readers have signed up to support our independent newsroom through our Tyee Builders program, and we’re inviting you to join.

From now until Dec. 31, we’re aiming to bring aboard 650 new monthly supporters to The Tyee to help us do even more in 2022.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Help us hit our year-end target of 650 new monthly supporters and join Tyee Builders today.
We value: Our readers.
Our independence. Our region.
The power of real journalism.
We're reader supported.
Get our newsletter free.
Help pay for our reporting.

UBC Faculty Launch Board of Governors No-confidence Vote

March 22 vote could tell board it 'does not meet the standards we expect,' says association president.

By Katie Hyslop 3 Mar 2016 | TheTyee.ca

Katie Hyslop is The Tyee's education and youth reporter.

They've tried sending letters, requesting meetings, and protesting a board of governors' meeting, but the University of British Columbia Faculty Association says the board has essentially ignored them.

"It seems to be of the opinion it doesn't have to talk to us," association president Mark Mac Lean said of the board. "It's a disrespectful approach to dealing with the faculty."

Tension between the two groups has been growing since late January when internal communications between the board and then-UBC president Arvind Gupta were leaked. The emails revealed secret meetings some government-appointed board members had with Gupta in the weeks leading up to his Aug. 7 resignation.

The revelations angered faculty, students, and the public over the board's lack of transparency, leading to so-far unheeded calls for an external review of how the board operates. Now the faculty association is preparing to make its "unprecedented" next move: a non-confidence vote regarding the board's ability to lead UBC.

Set to take place after a March 22 special meeting, if members vote in favour Mac Lean says it will tell the board the faculty association "very much believe that the manner in which you are operating does not meet the standards we expect of you."

University governance expert Donald Fisher says a faculty association non-confidence vote won't harm the UBC board of governors. That doesn't make it any less serious, however, because all universities depend on the confidence of their faculty.

But Fisher, a UBC educational studies professor emeritus, is optimistic a no-confidence vote means the board "will in fact become more transparent... in the way it operates, and that will be the end of it."

Board stresses April meeting invite

The vote comes after the faculty association sent an open letter to the board, copying Advanced Education Minister Andrew Wilkinson and Premier Christy Clark, that called for an external review of the board's actions regarding Gupta, as well as for the resignation of board member Greg Peet and university chancellor Lindsay Graham -- both present at the secret meetings -- from the university's presidential search committee.

In their only communication with the faculty association since last November, the board responded to the open letter with an invitation for association member to attend their April meeting.

Mac Lean says the association views this as an attempt to avoid talking about the problem. But the board, speaking through UBC vice president external Philip Steenkamp, says April is ideal because the board's five new members -- new chair Stuart Belkin replacing John Montalbano who quit in October, as well as two appointed and two elected board members whose terms ended in February -- will all be in place by then.

"If you're going to talk to the board, it's better to talk to board members who are going to be here for a few years," he said.

The vote was triggered by a petition calling for a non-confidence motion that was signed by roughly 15 per cent of the faculty association's 3,000-plus members.

Although Mac Lean acknowledges a robust minority of faculty disagree with the motion, the feedback he's received from members so far indicates a strong likelihood the motion will pass.

Faculty poll supports non-confidence

Earlier this week the faculty association published the results of a member survey on the presidential search committee: 70 per cent of the 885 members polled expressed a lack of confidence in the presidential search committee "as it is currently constituted" and a desire for Peet and Graham to step down from the committee.

But Steenkamp says the search is well underway and there are no plans to change committee members.

Because the conflict between the board and faculty has reverberated throughout the Canadian academic community, Mac Lean says the one positive aspect to come out of this fight is any presidency candidates will have to approach the position with a plan to bridge the gap between the board and everyone else.

The final choice for next UBC president is expected to be announced by the end of June.  [Tyee]

Read more: Education, BC Politics

Share this article

The Tyee is supported by readers like you

Join us and grow independent media in Canada

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free


The Barometer

Tyee Poll: Are You Preparing for the Next Climate Disaster?

Take this week's poll