Marking 20 years
of bold journalism,
reader supported.
News
Rights + Justice
Politics
Federal Politics

Anti-Terror Bill Presents a 'Bogus Choice': Mulcair

'We don't have to choose between our freedoms and our safety,' says NDP leader.

Jeremy Nuttall 18 Feb 2015TheTyee.ca

Jeremy J. Nuttall is The Tyee's Parliament Hill reporter in Ottawa. Find his previous stories here.

This coverage of Canadian national issues is made possible because of generous financial support from our Tyee Builders.

The federal New Democrats will oppose the Conservative government's new legislation aimed at stunting terrorist attacks, stating the bill has "several serious problems" including a lack of oversight for the new powers it would grant the Canadian Security Intelligence Service.

Bill C-51, the Anti-Terrorism Act, allows for authorities to "disrupt" suspected terrorist activities and make preventative arrests of suspected terrorists. The bill also criminalizes the spreading of terrorist propaganda.

Critics in the media and government have said the proposed legislation is too broad, leaving it open for abuse by the government.

In Ottawa today, NDP leader Thomas Mulcair said the bill is too vague and "likely ineffective," while it undermines the freedoms that define Canadian values.

"What Stephen Harper is proposing is a bogus choice," Mulcair told reporters in French. "We don't have to choose between our freedoms and our safety; we have to deal with both at the same time."

Conservatives contend the bill strengthens the ability of law enforcement to intercept and stop terrorist activities by expanding on current laws.

Mulcair said the Conservatives must not "railroad" the bill through Parliament, and that his party will do everything possible to ensure it is properly debated and amended.

Current laws enough: Mulcair

Mulcair said that current legislation in Canada gives police the tools they need to effectively stop terrorism. He pointed to six terror-related charges in Ottawa since the beginning of the year to show that the current system works.

He said the bill is an example of the Conservatives finding a way to bully their opponents, such as those who resist pipelines. Yesterday, Greenpeace said it was concerned about a leaked RCMP report that called anti-pipeline activists an "anti-Canadian petroleum movement."

Mulcair said the broad nature of the bill enables law enforcement to target those opposed to anything the government supports simply by labelling it a threat. The bill lumps in the economic and financial stability of Canada with activities that could undermine public security and defence.

Mulcair said that certain measures in the legislation, such as requiring a judge to approve acts like preventative arrests, don't do enough to ensure it won't be abused.

The British Columbia Civil Liberties Association has said the bill can be used to directly target those who oppose government policy.

Last June, the government sent an order to Canadian government departments telling them to conduct better monitoring of demonstrations across the country, an order deemed illegal by one academic.

Mulcair, meanwhile, took a shot at the federal Liberals' support for the bill.

"I think that the Liberals are frightened of being frightened," Mulcair said. "I have to admit, I find it pathetic to hear them say they oppose the bill, but will vote in favour of it anyway. I've never seen that in my career."

Liberal leader Justin Trudeau said today his party is "unequivocal that this bill needs oversight and a review process," and that he will continue pressuring the Conservatives to adopt such measures.  [Tyee]

  • Share:

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Comments that violate guidelines risk being deleted, and violations may result in a temporary or permanent user ban. Maintain the spirit of good conversation to stay in the discussion.
*Please note The Tyee is not a forum for spreading misinformation about COVID-19, denying its existence or minimizing its risk to public health.

Do:

  • Be thoughtful about how your words may affect the communities you are addressing. Language matters
  • Challenge arguments, not commenters
  • Flag trolls and guideline violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity, learn from differences of opinion
  • Verify facts, debunk rumours, point out logical fallacies
  • Add context and background
  • Note typos and reporting blind spots
  • Stay on topic

Do not:

  • Use sexist, classist, racist, homophobic or transphobic language
  • Ridicule, misgender, bully, threaten, name call, troll or wish harm on others
  • Personally attack authors or contributors
  • Spread misinformation or perpetuate conspiracies
  • Libel, defame or publish falsehoods
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities
  • Post links without providing context

LATEST STORIES

The Barometer

Are You Concerned about AI?

Take this week's poll