journalism that swims
against the current.
Federal Politics

Would Funding Boost Save the CBC?

NDP would bolster budget if elected, but critic says money alone isn't the problem.

Jeremy Nuttall 22 Jan

Jeremy J. Nuttall is The Tyee's Parliament Hill reporter in Ottawa. Find his previous stories here.

This coverage of Canadian national issues is made possible because of generous financial support from our Tyee Builders.

The CBC will have more cash if the New Democrats are elected to govern the nation later this year. But a funding boost might not be enough to help the troubled public broadcaster, says one of its most outspoken critics.

NDP Leader Tom Mulcair announced Thursday that his party will restore $115 million in funding cut from the CBC in 2012. Those cuts will lead to the loss of 650 positions at the public broadcaster by the end of this year, the CBC has said. They're on top of $357 million in cuts ordered by the Chretien government in 1997.

The party said it wants to bring the $115 million back over three years to enable the CBC to be an "independent" broadcaster.

The NDP also pledged to bring in a new process for nominating members to the CBC's board of directors.

"In today's fast-paced environment dominated by instant media from a variety of sources, it is more important than ever to have an effective public broadcaster with quality programming that offers Canadians a window onto their world -- at home and abroad," said the NDP's outline of the plan.

Problems are 'structural'

Writer and journalism instructor Andrew Mitrovica is a former CBC employee, where he worked at the Fifth Estate.

Now an outspoken critic of CBC operations, he said while "money is always good," the NDP would also need to take a look at the inner workings of the public broadcaster if it wanted to successfully fix the organization.

"They need to think more deeply about organizational and structural problems at the CBC," Mitrovica said. "You've got to look at some of the people running the CBC."

He said there's been a corrosive element in the broadcaster that has been eating away at what the CBC is supposed to be about, and furthering the private financial interests of a few people rather than fulfilling its role to serve the public at large.

NDP Heritage critic Pierre Nantel agreed the situation goes beyond money. Part of that, Nantel said, includes the culture of using casual workers.

Casual staff may work regular fulltime hours at the CBC, but aren't official staffers enjoying the same protection of the union or the benefits. Some, he said, work up to a decade under those conditions. Others leave for greener pastures.

"We are losing our youngest and most promising resources for Radio Canada and CBC," Nantel said.

New board process needed

Nantel said the NDP idea to begin an independent commission to pick the board of directors for CBC will help shape how the organization operates, adding the current board has too much of a connection to the ruling Conservatives.

"Of 12 members, 10 of them have given money to or are members of the (Conservative) party," he said. "This is obnoxious, it cannot be."

Canada's public broadcaster was hit by criticism after it was revealed that top personalities such as Amanda Lang and Rex Murphy received speaking fees from outside organizations.

Allegations that former Q host Jian Ghomeshi abused women were also a massive PR hit. Ghomeshi was fired last fall and faces criminal charges, but they have not been proven in court.

Despite the whirlwind of controversy, Mitrovica said, many Canadians still have a "deep vein of affection" for the public broadcaster and would like to see it improved.

"People like me, who have been raising questions about the current state of the CBC do it because -- and I don't want to sound Pollyannish about this -- we do care about the CBC," he said.  [Tyee]

Read more: Federal Politics, Media

  • Share:

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Comments that violate guidelines risk being deleted, and violations may result in a temporary or permanent user ban. Maintain the spirit of good conversation to stay in the discussion.
*Please note The Tyee is not a forum for spreading misinformation about COVID-19, denying its existence or minimizing its risk to public health.


  • Be thoughtful about how your words may affect the communities you are addressing. Language matters
  • Challenge arguments, not commenters
  • Flag trolls and guideline violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity, learn from differences of opinion
  • Verify facts, debunk rumours, point out logical fallacies
  • Add context and background
  • Note typos and reporting blind spots
  • Stay on topic

Do not:

  • Use sexist, classist, racist, homophobic or transphobic language
  • Ridicule, misgender, bully, threaten, name call, troll or wish harm on others
  • Personally attack authors or contributors
  • Spread misinformation or perpetuate conspiracies
  • Libel, defame or publish falsehoods
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities
  • Post links without providing context


The Barometer

How Do You Read Your Books?

Take this week's poll