The article you just read was brought to you by a few thousand dedicated readers. Will you join them?

Thanks for coming by The Tyee and reading one of many original articles we’ll post today. Our team works hard to publish in-depth stories on topics that matter on a daily basis. Our motto is: No junk. Just good journalism.

Just as we care about the quality of our reporting, we care about making our stories accessible to all who want to read them and provide a pleasant reading experience. No intrusive ads to distract you. No paywall locking you out of an article you want to read. No clickbait to trick you into reading a sensational article.

There’s a reason why our site is unique and why we don’t have to rely on those tactics — our Tyee Builders program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip in a bit of money each month (or one-time) to our editorial budget. This amazing program allows us to pay our writers fairly, keep our focus on quality over quantity of articles, and provide a pleasant reading experience for those who visit our site.

In the past year, we’ve been able to double our staff team and boost our reporting. We invest all of the revenue we receive into producing more and better journalism. We want to keep growing, but we need your support to do it.

Fewer than 1 in 100 of our average monthly readers are signed up to Tyee Builders. If we reach 1% of our readers signing up to be Tyee Builders, we could continue to grow and do even more.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Support our growing independent newsroom and join Tyee Builders today.
Canada needs more independent media. And independent media needs you.

Did you know that most news organizations in Canada are owned by just a handful of companies? And that these companies have been shutting down newsrooms and laying off reporters continually over the past few decades?

Fact-based, credible journalism is essential to our democracy. Unlike many other newsrooms across the country, The Tyee’s independent newsroom is stable and growing.

How are we able to do this? The Tyee Builder program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip into our editorial budget so that we can keep doing what we do best: fact-based, in-depth reporting on issues that matter to our readers. No paywall. No junk. Just good journalism.

Fewer than 1 in 100 of our average monthly readers are signed up to be Tyee Builders. If we reach 1% of our readers signing up to be Tyee Builders, we could continue to grow and do even more.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Support our growing independent newsroom and join Tyee Builders today.
We value: Our readers.
Our independence. Our region.
The power of real journalism.
We're reader supported.
Get our newsletter free.
Help pay for our reporting.
Mediacheck

Prying Loose the Grip of Broadband Giants

Three key competition concerns driving CRTC Internet provider policy.

By Michael Geist 7 Sep 2010 | TheTyee.ca

Michael Geist, whose column on digital policy and law runs every Tuesday on The Tyee, holds the Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-commerce Law at the University of Ottawa, Faculty of Law. He can reached at mgeist@uottawa.ca or online at www.michaelgeist.ca.

Recent data on Internet use in Canada suggests that most people reading this subscribe to broadband services and that virtually all those subscribers are with a major telecommunications or cable company. Indeed, the 2010 Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission report on communications in Canada found that the incumbent telecommunications and cable companies control 95 per cent of the residential broadband market, a figure that has remained virtually unchanged for the past five years.

Injecting greater competition into that market lies at the heart of last week's CRTC decision to require incumbent telecom companies -- such as Bell, Bell Aliant, and Telus -- to provide independent ISPs with speed-matched open access to their networks (speed matching enables competitors to offer Internet services to their retail customers at speeds that match the speeds provided by the incumbents to their own retail customers).

The decision is part of a continuum of hearings and decisions stretching back many years. The CRTC began requiring incumbent carriers to make their wholesale broadband access available to independent ISPs at matching speeds as far back as 2006. When the commission removed the requirement in 2008, the incumbents wasted little time in limiting the speeds available to the independent ISPs, leaving them at an enormous competitive disadvantage.

In 2009 the CRTC reinstated the speed matching requirement, only to have the incumbents petition the government to reverse the decision. Late last year, the government acquiesced, ordering the commission to reconsider its decision with a particular focus on the competitive and investment impact of the access requirements.

The arguments in the latest proceeding boiled down to competing claims about investment and competition. The incumbents argued that speed matching requirements create a disincentive to invest in faster networks. To address that concern, the CRTC required independent ISPs to pay a 10 per cent premium to help defray the incumbent costs.

Three key broadband competition questions

While the investment concerns are unquestionably important given Canada's middling international performance on broadband speeds and pricing, the CRTC decision is fundamentally about answering three questions about competition.

The first is whether the Canadian broadband market is competitive when viewed from a consumer perspective. The incumbents maintained that it is, while the independent ISPs -- together with MTS Allstream -- argued that the practical reality for Canadian consumers is closer to a duopoly with most choosing between a telco and cableco. The CRTC sided with the independent ISPs in ruling that mandating matching speed access would enhance competition by allowing new entrants to compete more effectively with the incumbents.

Second, should the competitiveness of the market be viewed solely through the prism of wireline broadband (ie. telco or cableco services), or do wireless and satellite Internet services provide an effective alternative? Citing pricing and capacity limitations, the CRTC found that wireless and satellite are not effective substitutes, though this could change.

Third, does ordering open access with speed matching provide independent ISPs with everything they need to effectively compete? The commission was divided on this question. The majority ruled that it does, while commissioner Tim Denton dissented, concluding that competition on price alone is not good enough. Denton noted that independent ISPs will be required to pass along all the network limitations (such as traffic management practices and bandwidth caps) imposed by the incumbents.

Despite these limits, the incumbents indicated they plan to see if the government is willing to overrule the CRTC. For Industry Minister Tony Clement, the issue provides a crucial opportunity to offer his answers to the questions about the state of ISP competition in Canada.  [Tyee]

Read more: Science + Tech

Share this article

The Tyee is supported by readers like you

Join us and grow independent media in Canada

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free.

LATEST STORIES

The Barometer

What Issue Is Most Important to You This Election?

Take this week's poll