Marking 20 years
of bold journalism,
reader supported.
Science + Tech

Internet Ad Words, a Rough Game

BC Court backs Vancouver Career College's aggressive buying of ad keywords.

Michael Geist 8 Jun

Michael Geist, whose column runs here every Tuesday, holds the Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-commerce Law at the University of Ottawa, Faculty of Law. He can reached at [email protected] or online at

image atom
Muscling in on other people's online names can be okay.

Google has grown to become the world's leading Internet company based largely on accurate search results, yet its financial success owes much to tiny advertisements that are posted as sponsored links alongside the "organic" search results. The determination of which sponsored links appear on a Google search result page comes from a keyword advertising system in which marketers bid on specific words.

The marketer willing to pay the most for a particular word has their ad appear as the top sponsored link. Whenever a user clicks on the sponsored link, the marketer pays Google the bid amount. Each click may only cost a few pennies, but with millions of clicks every day, the keyword advertising business is a multi-billion dollar business for Google and has been emulated by competitors such as Yahoo and Microsoft.

Keyword advertising has been a huge commercial success fueling many ad-supported websites, but it has not been without legal controversy. The practice has generated a steady stream of cases addressing whether the use of a competitor's keyword raise potential trademark or misleading advertising issues. For example, is Coca-Cola permitted to bid on the Pepsi keyword so that when an Internet user searches for Pepsi they are presented with a sponsored link for Coke?

The issue has been litigated in other countries, but late last month a B.C. court provided the Canadian perspective for the first time.

Aggressive keyword buying

The case pitted the Private Career Training Institutions Agency, a regulatory body that oversees career training institutions that operate throughout the province, against Vancouver Career College (Burnaby) Inc., which provides a variety of post-secondary educational services under various business names, including Vancouver Career College, CDI College, and the Vancouver College of Art and Design (VCC).

The agency applied to the court for an order blocking VCC from engaging in misleading advertising. The claim arose from keyword advertisements on Google and Yahoo in which VCC purchased the keywords of competitors.

VCC was an aggressive Internet advertiser, having entered bids on more than 7,000 keywords. The court was presented with considerable evidence that VCC regularly purchased keywords of competitor institutions so that searches using terms of those institutions would generate VCC as the lead sponsored link.

The agency began to receive complaints from competitors over the VCC practice and even fielded a claim from one student who said she had mistakenly registered for a course at VCC after searching for Vancouver Community College, though oddly the registration came after a 90-minute in-person interview and the completion of an admissions test.

Watch what you click

At the heart of the case was whether VCC had engaged in deceptive practices. VCC argued that its Internet advertising strategy is essentially a modern day version of the common marketing practice of a company placing its advertisement in close proximity to a competitor's advertisement.

The court sided with VCC, concluding that its use of competitor names in its keyword advertising strategy was unlikely to deceive potential students.

The judge noted. "where a student erroneously chooses to examine a VCC Inc. 'sponsored link' website instead of the website of the institution they originally wanted, I am satisfied the information readily available on the various VCC Inc. websites is more than adequate to inform the student that they are examining a VCC Inc. institution and not the one they were initially searching for."

Given the importance of keyword advertising to the financial success of companies such as Google and Yahoo, the case is an important win for legitimizing increasingly common Internet advertising practices and serves as a reminder to Internet users that they should pay attention when they click.  [Tyee]

Read more: Science + Tech

  • Share:

Get The Tyee's Daily Catch, our free daily newsletter.

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Comments that violate guidelines risk being deleted, and violations may result in a temporary or permanent user ban. Maintain the spirit of good conversation to stay in the discussion.
*Please note The Tyee is not a forum for spreading misinformation about COVID-19, denying its existence or minimizing its risk to public health.


  • Be thoughtful about how your words may affect the communities you are addressing. Language matters
  • Challenge arguments, not commenters
  • Flag trolls and guideline violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity, learn from differences of opinion
  • Verify facts, debunk rumours, point out logical fallacies
  • Add context and background
  • Note typos and reporting blind spots
  • Stay on topic

Do not:

  • Use sexist, classist, racist, homophobic or transphobic language
  • Ridicule, misgender, bully, threaten, name call, troll or wish harm on others
  • Personally attack authors or contributors
  • Spread misinformation or perpetuate conspiracies
  • Libel, defame or publish falsehoods
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities
  • Post links without providing context

Most Popular

Most Commented

Most Emailed


The Barometer

Should Fossil Fuel Ads Be Restricted?

Take this week's poll