Marking 20 years
of bold journalism,
reader supported.
Rights + Justice
BC Politics

Reconciliation with a ‘Heavy Heart’

BC says a deal with the West Moberly First Nations over Site C damage shows reconciliation in action. The nations’ Chief disagrees.

Ben Parfitt 13 Jul

Ben Parfitt is a resource policy analyst for the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives B.C. office.

In 2015, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, tasked with informing Canadians about what happened to Indigenous peoples in residential schools, defined reconciliation as a process of “establishing and maintaining a mutually respectful relationship between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal peoples in this country.”

The commission said that for true reconciliation to happen “there has to be awareness of the past, an acknowledgement of the harm that has been inflicted, atonement for the causes, and action to change behaviour.”

Based on that definition, the recent announcement by the B.C. government, BC Hydro, the federal government and the West Moberly First Nations that an agreement had been reached to end the First Nation’s legal efforts to halt the controversial Site C hydroelectric project, strikes a decidedly discordant note.

Both provincial cabinet ministers featured in the government news release announcing the deal spoke about it as reconciliation in action.

“I want to acknowledge the good faith, commitment and hard work of West Moberly First Nations in coming together with BC Hydro, the Government of Canada and the province in the spirit of reconciliation to negotiate these important agreements,” said Energy Minister Bruce Ralston.

“Today’s agreements with West Moberly First Nations are an example of our shared commitment to pursue negotiations over litigation as the primary forum for achieving reconciliation and renewed Crown-Indigenous relationships,” echoed Indigenous Affairs Minister Murray Rankin.

Such assertions, however, are undermined by the actions of the current provincial government and the governments before it.

Ever since April 2010, when then-premier Gordon Campbell jetted up to Hudson’s Hope to unveil his government’s plans to build a third major hydroelectric dam on the Peace River, the province has done all it can to paint First Nation opponents of the culturally and ecologically ruinous project into a corner.

The point of no return

From that day on, but in particular after Campbell’s successor Christy Clark vowed infamously to push the project “past the point of no return,” one side — and only one side — has been the aggressor in the so-called “reconciliation” process.

Some, but by no means all, aggressive actions by the provincial government and BC Hydro include:

All of this and more put a crushing weight on the shoulders of Chief Roland Willson, who has been elected over and over again to lead the West Moberly First Nations.

'A heavy heart'

Willson was the first to speak in the news release where Ralston and Rankin made their reconciliation claims.

“The Site C project has had major impacts on our community, and the flooding and operation of this dam will have effects that will be felt for generations to come. The decision to settle this part of the court case was taken with a heavy heart and with serious considerations of the best interests of our community. Our focus now turns towards efforts to heal what remains of our land, to heal our people, and to protect our way of life in the face of all the resource development in Treaty No. 8 territory.”

Contacted by phone after the announcement, Willson said that he did not accept the proposition that what had been announced came even remotely close to reconciliation.

“Reconciliation starts with avoiding deliberate, unnecessary impacts to First Nations communities, not ignoring them. As everyone knows, Site C is not needed. To say reconciliation is working would be not developing Site C and working with us to identify better options, not ignore everything we say,” Willson said.

Two snow-covered tire tracks lead through a field of brown stubble toward two white teepees. In the distance the bank of the Peace River rises above the landscape.
First Nations have inhabited the Peace River Valley for over 10,000 years. Dams and industrial development have threatened their territories. Photo by Zoë Ducklow.

The task of healing what remains of West Moberly’s once bountiful lands was already severely compromised by decades of industrial development long before Site C’s construction even began. Those developments included the massive W.A.C. Bennett dam and the smaller Peace Canyon dam downriver; vast areas of forest that were stripped of their old-growth trees in industrial logging operations that ruined traplines and compromised fishing and hunting opportunities; and a spiderweb of natural gas developments including illegally built dams, huge pits filled with toxic wastewater, thousands of fracked gas wells, pipeline corridors and seismic lines that only deepened the destruction wrought by the logging industry.

Those developments brought local caribou populations to the brink of extinction and have made it harder and harder for Treaty 8 members to hunt moose.

And if or when the grotesquely over budget Site C construction project is completed and actually withstands the pressure of all of the water it is supposed to impound, a reservoir that eats up 5,500 hectares of land along 120-kilometres of the Peace River and important tributaries like the Moberly and Halfway rivers.

No fish, at least none worth eating

In a stark reminder of what the future holds for West Moberly members, Willson travelled to Victoria in 2015 with 90 kilograms of frozen bull trout and other fish caught from the Crooked River in the nation’s territory as the fish returned from the massive Williston Reservoir created by the W.A.C. Bennett dam.

When reservoirs flood lands covered in vegetation, the decaying plant life releases mercury. “Typically, you’d be proud of this fish,” Willson said then. “But we can’t eat this.”

That same fate awaits with the Site C reservoir, a water body that will not only yield contaminated fish but will prove a barrier to ungulates like caribou trying to cross from one side of the reservoir to the other.

West Moberly’s lands, like those of its other Treaty 8 neighbours, are now a giant industrial sacrifice zone, with the cumulative impacts of industrialization piling up so quickly that it is harder and harder, and in some cases impossible, for nation members to hunt, fish and trap as they once did.

An aerial view shows the Peace River and its valley. A new bridge crosses the river in the foreground. Above it, there is an earth dam and on the left a concrete structure that will house the power-generating equipment. Above the dam, the river valley is flanked with wide swaths of dirt where trees have been logged in advance of flooding.
The Site C dam will flood about 5,500 hectares — an area about half the size of the City of Vancouver. Photo from BC Hydro.

Cumulative impacts, particularly those relating to hydroelectric dams, had promised to be a central feature in a civil claim filed by the First Nation in 2018 and which the B.C. Supreme Court ruled must be dealt with before BC Hydro was permitted to fill the Site C reservoir.

The reconciliation agreement has now taken that case off the books.

There’s very good reason to believe the province was extremely anxious not to see that lawsuit not proceed to court.

While it was awaiting trial, another case brought by a First Nation ended before the B.C. Supreme Court and eventually resulted in a precedent-setting ruling that found that the provincial government had failed to take into account how the cumulative impacts of industrial development had infringed on the treaty rights of Blueberry River First Nations’ members while it approved individual projects.

Supreme Court Justice Emily Burke’s ruling was the first in Canada to recognize that treaty rights had been infringed due to the cumulative effects of multiple industrial projects over many years.

And provincial government ministries and entities like the BC Oil and Gas Commission were responsible for those infringements because they had approved project after project as if somehow those projects existed in complete isolation of one another.

The ruling included references to many embarrassing things to come out in the trial including:

“One agency is of the view that the other will consider treaty rights and the other is of the view that treaty rights have already been considered, or that they need not be as the area is designated for development,” Justice Burke wrote.

It is no coincidence, Willson says, that after that ruling the provincial government suddenly embraced reconciliation.

Under the agreement, which Willson reiterates was not what he and others had hoped for years ago when the nation first opposed the project, BC Hydro and the province will provide undisclosed financial benefits, contracting opportunities and a transfer of provincial Crown lands to the nation as well as working with it to jointly develop “land management measures” over provincial Crown lands in its traditional territory.

In exchange, the nation has agreed to end its claims against the Site C project.

The deal remains only a “partial” settlement of West Moberly’s civil claims, Willson said, with the full outcome still to be worked out with BC Hydro and the provincial and federal governments.

And hopefully, when that day comes, the settlement will be so large that maybe, just maybe, it will prompt future provincial governments to reconcile with First Nations before megaprojects like the Site C dam are approved, not after the fact.  [Tyee]

  • Share:

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Comments that violate guidelines risk being deleted, and violations may result in a temporary or permanent user ban. Maintain the spirit of good conversation to stay in the discussion.
*Please note The Tyee is not a forum for spreading misinformation about COVID-19, denying its existence or minimizing its risk to public health.


  • Be thoughtful about how your words may affect the communities you are addressing. Language matters
  • Challenge arguments, not commenters
  • Flag trolls and guideline violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity, learn from differences of opinion
  • Verify facts, debunk rumours, point out logical fallacies
  • Add context and background
  • Note typos and reporting blind spots
  • Stay on topic

Do not:

  • Use sexist, classist, racist, homophobic or transphobic language
  • Ridicule, misgender, bully, threaten, name call, troll or wish harm on others
  • Personally attack authors or contributors
  • Spread misinformation or perpetuate conspiracies
  • Libel, defame or publish falsehoods
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities
  • Post links without providing context


The Barometer

Are You Concerned about AI?

Take this week's poll