- Ms Kaye is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Mary Carlisle is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Prem Gill is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Nancy Flight is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Justin Everett is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- John Westover is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Nora Etches is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Edward Henderson is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Bharadwaj Chandramouli is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Dean Chatterson is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Marius Scurtescu is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Robert Parkes is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- James Murton is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Susan Doyle is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Vincent Strgar is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Helen Spiegelman is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Subir Guin is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Kimball Finigan is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Joanne Manley is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- David Leach is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
Canada and the Big Powers
We should strive to play broker to China, Russia and the US.
Putin: Channelling old fears.
*Story updated at 11:51 a.m. on June 23, 2009.
Today, in 1941, Hitler invaded the Soviet Union less than two years after the world-shocking Ribbentrop-Molotov agreement in August of 1939.* Despite warnings from Churchill who was picking up German messages through the Ultra Machine the Brits had, Stalin was taken by surprise and the Wehrmacht made huge gains in the early going. Indeed it took Stalin two weeks before he could get himself together again and rally the nation -- and rally them he did.
Communism does not work except when the only customer is the state and there it works very well. To see this picture clearly, I recommend Hedrick Smith's The New Russians, Random House, 1990 (it has been updated to include the fall of Gorbachev.) Because Communism has no marketplace, demand is created by supply, not the other way around. When demand is by a government at war, the marketplace is the armed forces. By war's end, Soviet tanks and fighter aircraft were considered, by many who know about these things, to be the best in the world.
What is little remembered is that in 1938 and 1939 Soviet and Japanese armies tested each other in two full-scale battles along the border of Manchukuo. Ironically, a neutrality pact was signed in April 1941 -- two months before Germany invaded the USSR, with Germany as intermediary!
The war deaths in the USSR are estimated to be more than 26 million.
Putin's inherited fear
Fast forward to April 1945 when the so-called "Big Three" -- Prime Minister Churchill, American President Franklin Roosevelt and Stalin -- met at Yalta in the Crimea. It has been said that Churchill, weakened by a crumbling empire, and a dying Roosevelt lay down before the Soviet dictator and let him get away with what he wanted in Eastern Europe. This just wasn't so. Stalin simply refused to pay any attention to the agreement once the Soviet army had Eastern Europe and much of Germany under its control and, as Churchill observed, there was nothing anyone could do about it.
Stalin's objective was what had always been "Mother Russia's desire -- to have its borders buffeted by neutral and friendly countries. Once Czechoslovakia went Communist in 1948 and Mao's Peoples' Liberation army had secured Russia's western extremity in 1949, the buffer had been completed. (It should be borne in mind that the USSR had already neutralized Finland while nations to her south hated the West as much as feared the Soviet Union.
Once we understand that Russia was not trying to build an expanding empire but was protecting itself from having nations on its borders being in league with its enemies, the Cold War and its aftermath become easier to understand. Premier Vladimir Putin's increasing coolness to the United States and its allies or (as they seem to Mr. Putin, its satellites) is prompted by a historic national fear of being surrounded.
The new missile gap
When the Soviet Union disintegrated in 1990-1 it seemed to many in high places in the U.S. that this was the opportunity to castrate the Russian bear. We know the story -- instead of abandoning NATO because the opposing Warsaw treaty was dead, NATO was expanded to include former Soviet satellites. One has to wonder why? The only answer I can see is triumphalism. The United States wanted to rub Moscow's nose in it ignoring the fact that Russia was still a very powerful country indeed with enough of a nuclear force to blow the world up almost as many times as the U.S. can.
Then the European community began to expand into the former Soviet sphere -- another pair of upturned fingers to Moscow.
Then came what may be the fatal gesture of U.S. missiles based in former Soviet satellites.
Putin doesn't buy the American assertion that these are defense missiles aimed at Iran. Putin understands the obvious. If the U.S. builds a defence shield that neutralizes Russian ability to shoot back, it gives the Americans the ability to strike first. No leader can permit his nation to become defenseless.
The North Pole vantage
Now, let's fast forward to today. If one looks at the globe from the North Pole instead of the equator, the proximity of Russia to Canada and the United State becomes starkly obvious. Looking at the globe that way shows the Arctic shelf which is thought to have huge oil reserves. This potential bonanza has spawned studies that, in an amazing coincidence, say that the country that paid for the study has the best of all claims. These studies have been enhanced by flag-raising under the ice pack reminiscent of Europeans of yesterday planting flags and claiming ownership in the name of their monarch.
What then of the prospects for world peace 20 years after the fall of the Berlin Wall?
I would argue worse than ever. Russia is upgrading its military, including its nuclear capability and with China now competing for first place in the power race, and so many former satellites, all with grudges, on its western borders, it sees itself surrounded on all sides. That means we have an ongoing danger worse, in my view, that during the "Cold War."
It's said that even if you back the most timorous rabbit into a corner, it becomes vicious and dangerous.
Russia is no timid rabbit and now there is a common sense president in the White House. It's in Canada's interest to become the "honest broker" amongst the great powers of today -- The United States, China, and, yes, Russia.
Related Tyee stories:
- Curse of the CIA
Reviewed: Legacy of Ashes: The History of the CIA by Tim Weiner - Orwell Lives in Poland (photo essay and report)
When Americans want to put their missiles in your town, should you be happy or sad? - Silent Bombs in Kazakhstan
Nuclear tragedy worsens with new generation. A special report.
\=paragraph




6
Login or register to post comments
Dan the socialist
2 years ago
It's in Canada's interest to
It's in Canada's interest to become the "honest broker" amongst the great powers of today -- The United States, China, and, yes, Russia.
----------
ha ha ha Your dreaming. Canada is now viewed as a US Puppet state and Dear Leader Harper will side with the Americans and probably let them drill for next to nothing..
You also have the wrong date on your article, it is the 21st today not 22nd. :)
Wilfred Laurier
2 years ago
Delusions of Grandeur
I have a feeling this might be a summer column that has been saved to be published during a vacation but.....
Canada is a pissant nation of 33 million people. It is tiny on the world stage. Few people outside of Canada know anything about Canada. There is no way that a country as small and as insignificant as we are are going to be any kind of intermediary between great powers. It is pure fantasy.
In reminds me of the Mouse that Roared.
ME2
2 years ago
"honest" broker? Yes Dan - ha ha ha
In a world running short of nearly everything, and with near-dictatorships of greedy power elites everywhere (Obama notwithstanding), yes indeedy - things look pretty bleak.
Oh well, I've only a few more years to go, so I can only hope that MAD doesn't become unglued before I do.
Van Isle
2 years ago
There was more than one
There was more than one reason the Americans used atomic weapons in Japan in '45. It was also a warning by the Americans to Stalin to back-off cuz they now have a big stick and are willing to use it if they have to. With that threat it worked very well until the Soviets acquired atomic weapons themselves.
RB
2 years ago
Canada and the Big Powers
Am glad than you mentioned the real aim of America's anti-missile program but to explain further, the program is a first strike program. The system would not be able to defend against a Russian first strike but it would help against a weak Russian counter attack after the devastation of an American first strike attack. The stated aim of defence against an Iranian attack is too farcical to even comment on.
A few more twists on little known history.
During WWII the western allies set up their own Italian government after the fall of Mussolini and did so without consulting their Soviet ally thereby setting the precedent for the post-war period in eastern Europe. After the war they continued to manipulate the situation to keep it in power.
The central focus of Soviet policy in Europe was Germany. It is minimized in the West that the Soviet Union/Russian suffered two major attacks from that country within 26 years.
It should also be remembered that during it's civil war they were attacked by almost every other major and minor European, North American and Asian country. This within the lifespan of Stalin and every other Soviet leader.
After the rise of Hitler when he was first threatening Czechoslovakia there was an alliance formed between France and the Soviet Union to go to her aid. It was foiled because for the Soviet army would have to cross a miniscule section of Poland to reach Czechoslovakia and Poland would not allow it. Britain would not pressure Poland and that explains Stalin's distrust of the western powers after that.
In as far as Canada playing a part between the great powers it would be that of a dispassionate mediator as was played at times during the 40s to 60s but I fear that we have become too much of a vassal state with a vassal state mentality, at least among our elites, to fulfill that role.
brg61
2 years ago
Honest Broker
Canada has to be involved in any treaty concerning the arctic whether it be about resource ownership, borders or future year round ice free ship lanes.
One of the few issues where I agree with Harper is asserting our jurisdiction in Canada's arctic. This appeared to be a priority in his first term but is off his radar while he's consumed with getting a majority.
I hope wnoever wins the next election gives serious attention to our northern frontier.