Opinion

A Tyee Series

Charting May's Chances against MacKay

Green leader a long shot to unseat Tory stalwart in Central Nova.

By Will McMartin, 8 Oct 2008, TheTyee.ca

Peter Mackay electoral support graph cropped

[Editor's note: This is the latest of a new feature on The Tyee through election day: Charting the Votes. In charts and prose, veteran political analyst Will McMartin breaks down the important factors in key B.C. races.]

Elizabeth May, leader of the Green Party, does not have a seat in the House of Commons. She needs one, of course, if the Greens are to be a serious factor in federal politics.

Yet for reasons best known only to herself, May opted to run in the current federal general election in the long-time Tory stronghold of Central Nova.

For 36 of the last 40 years, Central Nova -- one of 11 federal electoral districts in Nova Scotia -- has been held by either the Conservatives or the Progressive Conservatives. And for nearly all that time, a MacKay has been its member of Parliament.

Peter MacKay's deep roots in riding

Central Nova currently is represented by Peter MacKay, a high-profile member of Prime Minister Stephen Harper's Conservative government. He initially headed the Department of Foreign Affairs, and now is minister of national defence.

MacKay has been victorious in Central Nova in each of the last four general elections, topping the polls in 1997, 2000, 2004 and 2006. (The riding was called Central Nova from 1968 through to 1997, then became known as Pictou-Antigonish-Guysborough, and reverted back to Central Nova in 2004.)

Elmer MacKay, Peter's father, first won the riding in a 1971 by-election. He was re-elected in 1972, 1974, 1979 and 1980, but then resigned in 1983 to make room for Brian Mulroney, the then-new Progressive Conservative leader who did not have a Commons seat.

The elder MacKay regained the riding in 1984 when Mulroney returned to his home province of Quebec, and then held it again in 1988. In appreciation, Prime Minister Mulroney named him to a succession of cabinet posts, including solicitor general, national revenue and public works.

The sole occasion over the last four decades when Central Nova was won by someone other than a Tory occurred in 1993, when the once-mighty Progressive Conservatives were reduced to just two Commons seats. Elmer MacKay did not stand for re-election in that contest, opting instead to retire after a 21-year career as the riding's MP. His successor was Roseanne Skoke, a Liberal, who served a single term.

Peter MacKay then ascended to the family seat. Now 43 years of age, he has lived in Central Nova for nearly his entire life.

Third time the charm for May?

In contrast, Elizabeth May, 54, is a newcomer to the riding. Born in Connecticut, May was 18 years old when her family relocated to Nova Scotia's Cape Breton Island -- which is next-door to Central Nova -- in 1972. She graduated from Dalhousie Law School in 1983 and moved to Ottawa two years later. (MacKay also has a Dalhousie law degree, which he obtained in 1990.)

May worked as an environmental policy advisor in the Mulroney government for a couple of years, and in 1989 became the founding executive director of the Sierra Club of Canada. She held that post until 2006, leaving to become leader of the Green Party.

This is May's third attempt to win a parliamentary seat. She ran in Cape Breton in 1980, finishing fifth while representing a tiny fringe party, and then contested a byelection in London North Centre in 2006 as Green leader. She finished second in the latter contest.

Will Dion deal pay off?

Does May have any hope of victory on Oct. 14? There are at least two reasons to suggest that the Green leader could win the party's first-ever seat in Canada's parliament, although such a result remains a decided long shot.

First, May no doubt has elevated her personal profile in the riding as a consequence of participating in the televised leaders' debates on Oct. 1 and 2. Some Central Nova voters may decide she deserves their ballots on the basis of her performance, or her status as a national party leader.

Second, thanks to a controversial backroom deal with Liberal leader Stephane Dion, the Grits will not field a candidate in Central Nova. (The Greens similarly have pledged not to run a candidate against Dion in his Quebec riding of Saint-Laurent--Cartierville.)

May, therefore, may be able to reap putative Liberal votes in addition to historic Green support -- as small as the latter may be. The Greens did not run a candidate in the riding in either 1997 or 2000, and then got just 1015 votes in 2004, and a minuscule 671 ballots in 2006.

Still, that combination of Green-Liberal support gets May to about 13,000 votes at most -- well short of the 17,000 or so that Peter MacKay has averaged over the last four elections.

NDP rising in Central Nova

A major factor to consider is that recent elections in Central Nova have seen rising support for the New Democratic Party. After pulling fewer than 4,500 votes in 2000, the NDP obtained nearly 10,500 ballots in 2004, and then climbed to almost 14,000 in 2006.

Indeed, in the last two contests, the New Democrats got more votes in Central Nova than did the Grits. (It must be said that much of the growth in NDP support over those two elections was due to an extraordinarily popular candidate, Alexis MacDonald, who, nonetheless, could not defeat MacKay. She moved to Halifax so as to succeed the retiring former New Democratic Party leader, Alexa McDonough, but was unable to win the party nomination in that city.)

The challenge facing Elizabeth May is straight-forward. To upset Peter MacKay and win a seat in the House of Commons, she must retain the backing of all those residents who previously voted for either the Liberals or the Greens, and she must win over at least 6,000 or so former NDP supporters. It's a tall assignment.  [Tyee]

10  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • G West

    3 years ago

    Good luck to Ms May

    Peter must be taking her seriously, 'cause he's been invisible anywhere other than in Central Nova...at least from my perspective.

    As May's daughter put it - relative to her debate with Harper - 'Kick his ass, Mom.'

  • bilbo2

    3 years ago

    May is Strategic Voting Pick

    If enough people in Central Nova practice strategic voting, May will get her seat in Parliament. The strategic voting website, voteforenvironment.ca, recommends Elizabeth May as the candidate most likely to take down the Conservative incumbent. Step up, voters in Central Nova! Canada loves May!

  • Budd Campbell

    3 years ago

    MAY - DION PACT: Blocking the NDP

    The real purpose of the May-Dion Pact, along with side deals with ENGOs, was to block the NDP's progress. Hence the decision to put Elizabeth May's candidacy into Central Nova, a riding where the NDP was gaining strength and could take the riding.

    By putting in May, and backing her up with Liberal controlled votes and resources, the object of the game is to steal the winds of change and put them into a non-NDP column.

  • G West

    3 years ago

    I know you're right Budd

    It's typical Liberal electoral subterfuge - I doubt May will make it and, from my reading, the Greens probably won't win any seats again...still, it wouldn't bother me much to see little Peter go out and make an honest living for a while...he still has a lot to live down with the old red tories ---- if there are any of them left.

    I hesitate to read much into poll numbers but it looks to me as if the NDP may be doing better that Dion (and Harper) thought they would.

    Going to be interesting.

  • ME2

    3 years ago

    Neocon "ethics"

    I find it hard to believe that MacKay's public breaking of an agreement that he would oppose merging the Alliance with the Progressive Conservative Party which he had made with David Orchard - signed on paper and publicly acknowledged on National TV - received so little comment at the time, and seems to be forgotten now.

    That despite this public display of utter dishonesty, he was subsequently re-elected and then rewarded with a cabinet post, speaks volumes about the intelligence of the voter as well as the credibility of Harper's "Conservatives".

    I also recall that at that same convention (2003) where MacKay displayed his soullessness, Mulrooney was voted "the best Canadian Prime Minister of all time". Nuff said?

    http://www.pej.org/html/index.php/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=2539

  • alive

    3 years ago

    creampuff May

    I have a problem with May's utterances: she claims her party gets support from every side and many consider her left-leaning but she endorses Dion and praises Mulroney?
    Where exactly does she think she stands?
    If she have any ambitions of being taking seriously, she will need to identify where her policies go and how she intends to vote on critical issues.

  • David Lewis

    3 years ago

    Green politics

    The Green climate policy isn't much better than what the US Democratic Party under Obama has written down, and if it was fully implemented, would be in line with what James Hansen, arguably the best climatologist in the world, has said is "a recipe for global disaster".

    May endorses Mulroney because she was working on staff at the time for his Environment Minister, and as she has written, she actually believed Canada was doing great, world leading things then. As if. Canada wanted something on acid rain so it acted first then took this leading position into negotiations with the US. That's it for the leading. After that it was all talk. The Changing Atmosphere conference was a great thing, but it happened in Canada, it wasn't Canada doing something like taking actual action as a country to solve an environmental problem. Canada did what was cheap and easy, i.e. host and pay for the meetings. Canada let the rest of the world lead on ozone, and has done less than nothing on global warming. May seems to think all the talk and no action meant something. She looks on the Mulroney era as if the activity on the environment file meant Mulroney cared especially, ignoring the polls that showed that briefly, back then, environment was top of voter's mind. It was voter's concerns, not Mulroney, that drove the activity.

    Dion stands for what is possible to do on climate and May knows it. She admires him because he is the most climate aware leader ever to be seen in Parliament. And she may be in the process of helping to drive the stake into his heart that will end his career in Parliament.

    I could understand what she is doing if she was standing for a solution on climate where no one else can or will, but that isn't what is going on.

    What the point is we will never know. She appointed as her Deputy Leader Adrianne Carr, the former BC Green Party leader who campaigned against proportional representation and defeated it in BC. Its like a federal NDP leader bringing a provincial NDP leader who defeated medicare on board.

  • crh

    3 years ago

    this could backfire on her

    The Liberal voter may be feeling a tad angry with them not running in their riding. I think you will see a strong protest vote going to NDP or Conservative to show that they can be so easliy manipulated. I don't see any seats going Green again.

  • crh

    3 years ago

    oops

    I meant, to show that they cannot be so easily manipulated....

  • margot

    3 years ago

    Taliban excuse for pipeline bloodbath

    May and McKay seem to agree on Afghanistan, while not saying so.

    When Ms May told Peter Mansbridge she was critical of Harper for endangering our troops in Afghanistan, by announcing the 2011 departure date, I woke my pets up laughing. Maybe she has a top secret, much earlier, return date in mind that she can't say aloud for fear of alerting the Taliban.

    Now that the TAPI pipeline is official, with funding organized by the Asian Development Bank (of which Canada, US, UK, France, other NATO countries are members), with construction to begin in 2010, it is time for negotiation, big juicy carrots. Otherwise, with the ghouls drooling in the wings, the bloodbath is going to escalate with Canadians leading the rampage in the Kandahar region.

    (TAPI= Turkmenistan (gas), Afghanistan, Pakistan, India)

    To support our troops, we as voters must change their orders and direction. Home.

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.