Opinion

Whites Sneering at Whites

Persons of pink mocking themselves is hot, and two Canadians are cashing in.

By Shannon Rupp, 14 Aug 2008, TheTyee.ca

Stuff White People Like book cover

Lander's opus is really about class.

If the idea of mocking "white people" offends you, then you can consider yourself one: Being Offended is #11 on the list of more than 100 things that comprise the Stuff White People Like. (www.stuffwhitepeoplelike.com)

You should get used to being offended by jokes about persons-of-pink, since there seems to be a growing trend in white whipping, led by a pair of Canadians.

Christian Lander, an ex-pat Canadian living in Los Angeles, began the blog as an impromptu joke for his pals with entry #1 Coffee. They chuckled, made suggestions, spread the word, and since January the thing has taken on a life of its own. In July he released a book (which, ironically, always seems to be the proof of a successful website) Stuff White People Like: The Definitive Guide to the Unique Taste of Millions. As of this writing the list is up to #105 Unpaid Internships. Apparently white people love these, particularly in fields like film and journalism.

Of course the term "white people" has less to do with the shade of one's hide than the pretensions of one's class. In this case, the figures of mockery are all those striving middle-class-income sheep who aspire to having "the best" and keep the sellers of trendy $200 sneakers and $5 coffees in business.

The blog satirizes aging yuppies and their larvae, as well as innocents like you and me who have inadvertently been caught up in their enthusiasms. I cringe to see myself in #97 Scarves (worn for reasons other than keeping out the cold). But in my defence, I'd like to say my style of dress was greatly influenced by French films viewed at a tender age. (#3 Film Festivals; sigh.)

I predict that Lander's white wit will spawn two new groups: people who immediately stop doing whatever appears on that list and people who embrace their WP habits as an identity. Finally, someone thinks they're interesting enough to satirize.

Do you 'dress like butt'?

That sort of impact is unlikely for the second tome exploring "white" as a stereotype. The White Guy: A Field Guide is the book where wit went to die. The 204 page paperback of interminable length is written by Stephen Hunt, another Canadian who lived in the U.S. However his comments have all the insight of someone who watched too many reruns of that sitcom Loud, Stupid, Ugly Guy and His Inexplicably Hot Wife, or whatever it was called.

Now, I'm all for mocking men of every race, creed and income, but is it too much to ask for a little originality? Hunt gives us a chapter devoted to how white guys don't talk about their emotions; another on how they watch sports on TV; and yet another on how they cling to old, ratty, stained clothes for decades. Oh yes, they like to eat red meat too. There's more, but I won't spoil it for you.

He also treats us to the equally banal views of his American wife Melanee, whose insights include such snappy lines as white guys "dress like butt."

Sadly, Hunt gets nothing right. It would be more accurate to say that North American men "dress like butt." Skin colour is irrelevant. So are income, education and intellect. Baseball caps are the great equalizer here, where men all dress like adolescents, complete with over-priced running shoes.

Canadians get the class thing

As tedious as Hunt's book is, it shares something with its smarter counterpart -- only Canadians would think of using "white" as a catchall term for discussing socio-economic class. It suits our sense of irony (#50 on SWPL) to hang out in the U.S. and mock two obnoxious classes in America's allegedly classless society. (Canadians have always acknowledged class distinctions. That's why we're so busy levelling the playing field with universal health care, the social safety net, publicly funded education and equality laws.)

Lander is understandably affectionate when satirizing the urban-strivers who are desperately trying to climb that social ladder since that is his tribe. Hunt covers their counterparts, the suburban-smug, who are sliding downward as fast as their love of reality TV and freedom fries will take 'em. Is that his tribe? Possibly: his bio says he lives in Calgary.

So Lander uses "white" in a way that's reminiscent of that British Empire usage when a military man propping up the Raj might describe a guy's good deed as being "damn white of him." In that sense it means the ruling class, and as you read Lander's line-up you realize Barack Obama isn't just #8 on SWPL, he's actually "white people" too. Hunt notes the habits of the guys American WPs would probably call "white trash" or Canadian WPs would call Wal-Mart shoppers. Come to think of it, "Protesting Wal-Mart" should probably be on the SWPL list.

Hunt even borrows on Jeff Foxworthy's "you might be a redneck" schtick with "You know you're a white guy if… The nut on the radio actually makes sense about a) Terrorism b) Immigration or c) The idiots running the country. Or… You have an opinion on the IRL v. NASCAR."

'Ethnic brownnosing'

But what skewering whiteness really reminds me of are the people New York Times columnist David Brooks christened "Bobos" in his 2000 book Bobos in Paradise: The New Upper Class and How They Got There. Brooks, who describes himself as a "comic sociologist," has a gimlet eye when it comes to describing how culture and marketing have been synthesized into products that Bobos -- short for bourgeois-bohemians -- will fancy. He notes that while these people have embraced all the conventional values about getting and spending, they like to style themselves rebels -- which is why they wear high-priced outdoor adventure clothes to the office.

And what does the would-be intellectual Bobo love? According to Brooks, that would be the sort "ethnic brownnosing" found in books just like these two. (See also the painfully dumb-but-popular How to be a Canadian, or books like How the Irish Saved Civilization and How the Scots Invented the Modern World.) Both books on the dark side of white should get good pick-up among Bobos, who are known for having more money than brains.

Who can still be satirized?

With that in mind, I'm even inspired to write my own quickie book about a stereotype, but what's left?

Cougars have potential. Certainly there are a lot of aging baby boomers (female) working double-time to bag the sort of boys they weren't all that keen on when they were that age. Although it might be too obvious. What do Cougars like? Candlelight, Spanx and botox.

Moses Znaimer, the man who gave us MuchMusic, is working on reinventing seniors by calling them zoomers -- boomers with zip. Although I think he's being optimistic, largely because he just bought a host of media properties aimed at seniors, including the magazine for CARP, the Canadian Association of Retired People. And what do zoomers like? Judging by the carping, I'm guessing it's hip replacements.

I could answer, definitively, Freud's famous question: What do women want? But again, who couldn't? Shoes, chocolate, Daniel Craig's trousers. Oh, and yoga pants as street wear.

As for mocking men: fish, barrel. Not to mention redundant. The things men do is another reason satire is dead.

Maybe the quickie book is harder than it looks? Or maybe I need to do the Canadian thing and move to the U.S. where our brand of cranky nationalism is bound to give me a few ideas.

Related Tyee stories:

 [Tyee]

9  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • athanael

    3 years ago

    SWPL #99 Grammar

    The author writes: What do Cougar's like? [sic]

    I would like to see good editing.

  • nightbloom

    3 years ago

    This article doesn’t

    This article doesn’t “get” its subject matter (and I usually try to give Shannon the benefit of the doubt on these things).

    SWPL is about self-parody. The social critique contained in the article would have been more effective if the author had seized upon a more nuanced angle: namely, that “white” is free to indulge in this kind of self-deprecation precisely because of its privilege and its (relative) freedom from the historic and socio-economic baggage that would make similar parodies on black, latino, or First Nations subcultures totally beyond the pale and hurtful. That doesn’t make SWPL wrong however – in fact, attaining social conditions where everyone can comfortably laugh at themselves is the desired state.

    I never read Stephen Hunt’s book, but I suspect the target market for that humour isn’t exactly Shannon’s demographic. Fine. But why all the simmering resentment? The recurring presence of something seething between the lines risks becoming a defining characteristic of Shannon’s articles if the tendency isn't curbed – in fact, articles like this risk becoming an inadvertent analogue to the self-parody of SWPL, but of what demographic segment I can only guess.

  • G West

    3 years ago

    You've got it about right nightbloom

    Seething is what Shannon 'does'.

    Not quite sure why, but she lacks the humour and the necessary tone of mild self-deprecation necessary to carry it off, because, in the end Evelyn Waugh she's not.

  • Stump

    3 years ago

    Hack on baseball caps all

    Hack on baseball caps all you want, but guys aren't the jackasses tottering around in shoes that ruin your spine and deform your feet!

    Some dudes certainly do dress like eternal adolescents. This would be worse than the women who look like they've raided their daughters' closets in what way again?

  • towelpower

    3 years ago

    Teasing whites ain't so bad, even if the jokes aren't funny

    Nightbloom raises a good point, one I'm surprised wasn't mentioned in the article. White people, Christianity, men, and maybe even conservatives are all safe targets for ridicule in our culture because they're top dawgs. I don't really have a problem with that. Yeah, the white jokes aren't very original or funny, but poking fun at the priveleged upper classes and hegemonious power structures isn't terrible. Like nightbloom says, attaining a situation where everyone can comfortably laugh at themselves is the ideal, but historical oppression has created an unequal playing field where to do so with minority groups isn't the same thing as it is with the majority. So in fact making fun of whites is probably the most desirable target--better than visible minorities or homosexuals, anyway. Besides, if you can't laugh at yourself, you're probably a douchebag.

  • wacqueline

    3 years ago

    SWPL's website is hilarious in itself.

    I love the graphics across the top banner, the choice of typeface, the 'tasteful' and strategic use of negative space. That's stuff white people like. Towelpower's right. If you can't laugh at yourself, you are, indeed, a douchebag.

    Class plays a huge role here, perhaps more than anything else. Here like in many other situations, 'race' masquerades as class.

    One thing I find interesting about the entire Stuff White People Like premise is its almost complete avoidance of the North American hipster whose portrait the big list paints quite vividly.

    I find the SWPL enterprise self-deprecating, funny, at times frustrating, but ultimately making interesting, mass-culture gestures towards a social dilemma where identity, class, and culture converge. And, in true 'white people' fashion, it's super awkward.

  • wacqueline

    3 years ago

    Also,

    I'm not actually white. But the fact that I see myself in the SWPL list is probably not uncommon among the non-whities who read the Tyee, which, if we follow the logic of SWPL, is a very BC thing that 'white people' like.

  • Rick in PG

    3 years ago

    Stuff White People Like

    Stuff White People Like #107?

    "The Tyee"

  • nightbloom

    3 years ago

    Another unexplored nuance

    Another unexplored nuance behind SWPL, which wacqueline touches on, is the expansion of "white" well beyond its original meaning. I'm just old enough to recall the last gasps of that archaic worldview in which Irish, Italians, and French Canadians (i.e. the Roman Catholic minorities of the Anglosphere) were not considered "white" (whereas Protestant minorities of Germans, Dutch and Scandinavians were considered indubitably "white", by way of contrast).

    It's a double-edged litmus, however, because the increase in the acceptability of these "non-white" groups to the secularized but still deeply neo-Protestant "Whiteosphere" has occurred in direct proportion to their loss of cultural distinctiveness. Compare Irish-American erstatz-culture today (now reduced to St. Patty's Day kitsch) to the deep, dark, devout, and lyrical culture of their grandparents and ancestors. Italian-American (and Italian-Canadian) cultural breakdown is taking longer but is showing signs of the same trend (Camille Paglia recently penned a lament about this).

    It's double-edged in another way too: visible minorities who manage to transcend the oppression narratives of identity politics are invariably tarred by ideological elements as "white" traitors, and they are bludgeoned with ugly epithets like "oreo" or accusations of "self-loathing" and race-betrayal, etc. Identity politics is our modern Inquisition. That's what happens when people take themselves too seriously...so SWPL (and that kind of light-hearted self-mockery) is cathartic. People who see themselves in it shouldn't read too much into it, and should just avail themselves of the opportunity to chuckle about something that has long been in desperate need of an infusion of humour.

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.