Sell Your Car, Stay Sane
Car sharing works. Hop in, Harper!
Maybe you don't need one.
What can be done about the craziness experienced daily on the streets of Canada's major cities? The car, whose greatest selling point is supposed to be convenience, is actually becoming less and less convenient as gridlock frays our nerves and lengthens our commute times.
However, going without a private automobile in most of Canada's major cities can seem a daunting proposition. If all cities improved their public transit systems to Toronto's standard (even this is slipping), they might be able to achieve its low level of car ownership. That is not going to happen any time soon, though, with the bone-headed policies pursued by the Harper government (about which more later).
One way individuals can help things along is to join a car-sharing network. Car sharing is an organized system that allows individuals to give up their privately owned cars by providing them with access to vehicles in their neighbourhood. From the user's perspective, it is a remarkably simple process, with instructions as simple as: "You book a car, you go to the car, you drive around, you bring it back."
Combined with walking, biking, public transit and the occasional car rental, car sharing gives many city dwellers a feasible option to private car ownership. Hourly fees and distance charges mean car sharing does not work for daily commutes and long distance trips. But for a night on the town, grocery shopping, picking up home furnishings -- the kind of trips that are a challenge without a car -- car sharing works extremely well.
Less cost, less hassle
Susan Shaheen, a University of California transportation expert, did her doctorate on car sharing. In an interview with The Tyee, she gave what might seem a surprising explanation of car sharing's appeal: that it is actually less of a hassle than owning a car.
"From an individual's perspective, car sharing can provide the flexibility and reliability of car ownership without the personal hassles involved in insuring and maintaining a car," said Shaheen. Interviewing car-sharing members, she heard many say, "It is the right thing to do for the planet," or, "Taking one more car off the road makes me feel good."
Although Shaheen cautions that car sharing is still very much a niche market, the environmental potential is real: "We see about six to 10 cars being taken off the road for every car-sharing car. It's a much more efficient way of managing land use, since privately owned cars just sit parked between 95 and 98 per cent of the time. There is an average reduction of 44 per cent in kilometres travelled by car for car-sharing users, which means a substantial reduction in carbon dioxide emissions."
Shaheen explained that the reductions in distances travelled by car are achieved because the car sharing's pricing system encourages behavioural changes. When people are paying per trip rather than having the fixed costs associated with ownership, they make more conscious decisions about which mode of transport fits with a particular trip -- whether it is public transit, biking, walking or using a vehicle from the car-sharing network.
Sharing cars: a brief history
Car sharing began in Europe in the mid-1980s. One of the earliest tries in North America, and now one of the most successful, is Vancouver's Co-operative Auto Network. Started in 1997, CAN's membership has grown to 3,800, and the network will have 200 vehicles in its fleet by January 2008. Those members collectively got rid of 1,900 cars from Vancouver streets. Compare that to buying even 1,900 Priuses. The amount of urban space lost to parking is also reduced through an arrangement with the City of Vancouver that allows fewer parking spaces per residential unit for buildings participating in the co-op.
What members get is access to a variety of vehicles in their neighbourhoods -- compact cars, pickup trucks, minivans -- that they never have to worry about taking into the shop, or getting broken into.
Better vehicle maintenance is one of the added environmental benefits of car sharing.
And car sharing is incredibly cheap, a tiny fraction of the estimated $9,000 to $11,000 it costs each year to own a car. Last year, it cost me an average of $60 a month -- and rarely was there not a car available if I booked a day ahead for one of the six cars located within four blocks of where I live.
Backwards business model?
Tracey Axelsson, CAN's lone employee in its infancy, told The Tyee that the co-op is working to manage an annual growth rate of 35 per cent, now has a staff of 18, and has assisted in efforts to spread car-sharing to China. Axelsson said that as a co-op, CAN is able to base its decisions on advancing the public interest. So car location decisions are made with the goal of increasing convenience to members, rather than what will be easiest for the organization to administer. The rates charged members are intended to serve social justice goals, to make the co-op as affordable as possible to low income members.
CAN is a funny kind of business that actually seeks to see its services used to a minimum as part of an effort to reduce car usage. On its website, CAN "encourages members to use alternative transportation as much as possible (walk, cycle, take transit) and to use cars as a last resort."
Hop in, Harper!
What a contrast to the message we are getting from the Harper government, which prefers providing tax cuts rather than better public transit.
Recently Finance Minister Jim Flaherty gave away $60 billion in tax revenue. When just a short time later Canada's mayors asked for $22.8 billion for the transit funding necessary to keep up with public demand, Flaherty turned them down flat and accused them of whining. (Flaherty's latest bright idea is to target even more tax cuts on those who need them the least, the super-rich.)
Meanwhile, the estimated deaths from air pollution in Canada are already 5,000 per year. The greenhouse gas emissions from transportation are growing faster than those from any other sector. The roads, parking lots and scrap yards needed to service private automobiles keep swallowing more and more green space and agricultural land -- a problem that no amount of hybrid-car buying can fix.
The success of Vancouver's Co-operative Auto Network shows people are willing to experiment with environmentally friendly transportation options. But a strong public transit system is a key factor in the potential success of car sharing, and until the federal government wakes up and commits the billions needed, we'll continue to choke on our own exhaust while we contribute to global warming.
Related Tyee stories:
- My Life as Ethical Test Driver
I tried everything from electric bikes to the trendy Prius. - Pimp Your Ride
Rent your car out, save the planet. Here's how. - No Fares! (series)
Time for a free ride on public transit.



8
Login or register to post comments
The brain
4 years ago
Excellent job, Murray!
I've got nothing but praise for your efforts this year.
I once considered your efforts to fall short while Paul Martin was in power and quite frankly, its because I believed Stephen Harper was far more dangerous.
These links speak for themselves.
http://www.harperindex.ca/ViewArticle.cfm?Ref=0010
http://www.harperindex.ca/ShowCategory.cfm?Show=Cat3
http://www.harperindex.ca/index.cfm
And where has your focus gone since Harper was elected? Where it should be. On Stephen Harper and I have nothing but praise for this. I do not know of a more dangerous man to this nation and the dreams our forefathers had when they built the systems this country runs on.
There is no democracy when there is no representation and what is missing the most for average voters to make the best possible decisions? Try the truth.
And you've been there.
http://www.canadians.org/wordwarriors/Murray_Dobbin.html
It always comes back to where Harper came from and just like Mulroney's help from Schrieber for taking the leadership from Joe Clark, so too, has Stephen Harper gotten his help from the most powerful corporate lobbiest organization in this nation, for the sole purpose to expand U.S. corporate ownership of the rest of Canada's economic sectors and I mean all of them.
http://www.nupge.ca/news_2005/n07se05a.htm
While Canadians might believe Americans own us already, its not quite true. The U.S. doesn't own our healthcare system, our wheat board and sales, our insurance, our CBC and other crown corps and most importantly our banks, along with our government regulations that keep ownership Canadian in this country with essential services.
But the U.S. born multinational board members and CEO's south of the border, sure does want to own us. And they belong to a an organization called the National Citizens Coalition. No need to roll in the tanks when they can do a coup starting with the Conservative party of Canada.
There should not be a voter voting in the next election that does not know about the National Citizens Coalition, its purpose and its past leader, Stephen Harper. And too, they should be well aware of what U.S. foreign policy has been over the last 40 years, which is to essentially own the world. And if a nation doesn't give them what they want, they try to bribe them. When that doesn't work, they try a coup. And when that doesn't work, they invade the nation in question.
Its at the coup stage with Canada. And they own most of our oil and gas, but some economic sectors remain protected and that takes deregulation, changes in legislation. For newcomers to this site, this war of ownership began long before this site existed. But one of the purposes, I believe, is to shed light on you, the voter, to make the choices needed to keep this nation ours.
Happy reading!
Van Isle
4 years ago
The worst investment that
The worst investment that one can make is purchasing a car. A couple of years ago I read a book, an American publication, about the whole concept of handling money. In one chapter the author wrote about how much a car costs in a year. Just crunching the numbers it's by far cheaper for example to walk or take a bus to the supermarket and use a taxi to get home with your groceries. This also applies for all the other errands and outings that one does with a car. Now if one decides to go on a road trip a couple of times a year then by all means go, and rent a car, truck, or camper van of your choice.
SharingIsGood
4 years ago
excellent piece
Thank you, Murry Dobbin, for spreading words of sanity.
werdnagreb
4 years ago
Car sharing works for some...
...but not for everyone. I would love to get on board with car sharing, and indeed my wife and I almost did. But, then we got a child. It's great, but makes car sharing difficult since we require a car seat whenever we drive. I know that some shared cars come with child seats, but are they properly installed, are they still functioning...?
Even if car sharing works for only 20% of people living in urban areas, that's still a heck of a lot of people and could mean that many cars are taken off the road.
Stump
4 years ago
kids and cars
Having a kid isn't a good enough reason to say you can't make life work without a car. Too many people do it to have it be a viable argument. Most people just don't want to inconvenience themselves. Call it like it is... Dick Cheney's non-negotiable way of life.
Our children will probably not have the luxury of our choices... because we keep making poor choices.
Rhea
4 years ago
Rhea
Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't car seats portable? Otherwise I'd think an awful lot of people in two-car families would be driving around with the spawn in the trunk.
dorothy
4 years ago
Enough is enough
“...a strong public transit system is a key factor…and until the federal government wakes up and commits the billions needed…”
Methinks we don’t need billions right away, but applying intelligence to the problem would help. Just the fact that one bus comes up a Nort-South street, people get off, and while they are waiting for the light to change, so they can cross the main East-West street, the bus they were hoping to connect with takes off. There are twenty minutes till the next one. They waited twenty to twenty-five minutes to get on the first bus, because they work along a street, where bus coverage is largely done by buses going to and from the depot, which means they run like the wind blows. Going through this every day, taking an hour or more to get home after a long day, when a car can do it in twelve minutes is enough to opt for your own wheels.
Truth is, we get delivered in the morning for work, because employers would crap about it otherwise. But in the evening, when we are on our own time, ‘they’ don’t give a damn how long it takes to get home. Getting your own wheels and belching out some greenhouse gases in the course of getting home at a decent hour is simply howling with the wolves we find ourselves amongst. If the brightest and best (movers and shakers, top guns, crème de la crème) don’t give a damn, why should we on the factory floor do so?
dogbreath
4 years ago
Convenient for some
I love car sharing. We got rid of our car when we lived in downtown Vancouver & the co-op worked great. But when we moved to New Westminster, because 1. we had a baby so 2. we couldn't afford to stay downtown, I found that car sharing doesn't work at all when no one is sharing with you. The CAN cars are distributed by neighbourhood, according to how many CAN members live in that neighbourhood. So in our West End neighbourhood there were three cars within a block; in New West, there are (or were, at my last count) 3 or 4 cars for the whole area of New West. A 15 minute busride is required to get to the closest car. In itself, not terrible, but with transit being as sketchy as it is (ie: every 30 minutes on Sundays - unless the bus just doesn't come at all) and throw a baby with its associative crap into the mix (yes car seats are portable, in the same way that TVs are portable - we bought a convertible car seat which lasts the length of the baby's life, rather than having to buy three or four...baby + seat weighs about 30 lbs) and you're looking at a very long day to get to where you need to go.
Realizing that those are all justifications for making my lifestyle more convenient and spending more time with my family rather than more time in transit, we bought a used vehicle when my son was 6 months old. We use it sparingly and we are still CAN members (I use the CAN cars when I'm downtown & need to go somewhere) but I look forward to awareness growing around car sharing in the suburbs, where the congestion is perhaps less than downtown, but the need for reliable transportation is just as great (if not greater...that's a different debate)