A Whale of a Love Affair

The irresistible, but blinding, charm of cetaceans.

By Colleen Kimmett, 21 Jan 2008, TheTyee.ca

Humpback breach

Cousin to 'Mr. Splashy Pants.'

Majestic is an adjective often used by those lucky enough to spot a great whale in the wild. How else to describe a 40-tonne cetacean as it breaches the surface of the water in a seemingly gravity-defying feat? Well, splashy, for one.

Mister Splashy Pants was in fact the name given to one of 20 humpback whales currently being tracked by Greenpeace as they take a migratory journey from the warm South Pacific Ocean, where they breed, to the cold waters around Antarctica, where they feed.

Greenpeace put the christening of the whale to citizens in an online vote. Despite other more majestic names such as Aiko and Shanti, Mister Splashy Pants won the hearts of the vast majority of approximately 100,000 voters in December (even after an initially skewed total, the result of a click-happy hacker, was corrected).

The accompanying logo, a round, smiley blue whale character reminiscent of a bath toy with the words Mister Splashy Pants beneath, is being used to raise awareness about the Japanese Fisheries Agency practice of killing whales in the name of research.

Since the campaign began, the Japanese government has confirmed it will not kill any humpbacks this season, but Greenpeace maintains the fight isn't over to end whaling for good. "You named him, now save him," urges its website (and wear him -- Mister Splashy Pants t-shirts are also available for sale.)

Mister Splashy Pants attracted a lot of attention for Greenpeace's humpback campaign, and perhaps was the impetus for all the bad press that may have made the Japanese government change its mind.

Dolphin playmates?

Do endangered animals stand a better chance of survival if people think they're cute, if we anthropomorphize them to make them more pitiable? Or when Mister Splashy Pants' five minutes of fame are over, will his face, and fate, disappear in to the wild blue yonder?

In a poll of "top 10 things you must do before you die, the winner by a country mile was to swim with dolphins," reads the introduction to Whales & Dolphins of the North American Pacific from Harbour Publishing. (A photo essay from the book accompanies this article.)

And whales and dolphins are part of every type of folklore. Why? "They are beautiful, powerful, diverse, graceful and distinctive. Their intelligence and social bonds suggest a strong kinship, yet they inhabit a world that is as different from ours as we can imagine," writes Bernardo Alps, the president of the Los Angeles chapter of the American Cetacean Society, in the book's foreword. He suggests that different people and groups identify with different species.

Hungry killers

Here in B.C. orcas often take front and centre. There are inflatable and TV-based orcas at GM Place during Canucks' games, and the BC Lions society chose them for its highly visible, highly successful Vancouver-wide fundraiser "Orcas in the City."

Charming, aren't they? Except Lance Barrett-Leonard, head of the Vancouver aquarium's cetacean research program, reminds that orcas have been spotted eating "pretty much every animal in the ocean."

They're top predators and will prey on seabirds, seals, otters, sea lions and other species of whales -- even blue whales, which can reach up to 150 tonnes and are the largest animal on earth.

Which simply serves to remind that whales and dolphins, despite their size, intelligence and beloved status among most humans, don't live in a bubble. They exist in complex ocean ecosystems that are at risk from climate change, pollution and industrial fishing.

For example, people have been excited to spot large groups of Pacific white-sided dolphins in the Strait of Georgia in the past few years. This may seem like a good sign for dolphin-watchers and conservationists. However, Lance Barrett-Leonard says the species used to stay offshore, and researchers are puzzled about why they are moving closer and closer in.

"Whether it's due to good reasons, there's lots of food here, or bad reasons, like a loss of suitable habitat, we don't know," he says.

"Sightings coincided with the peak of the last international high seas flying squid industry. Many had nets spread out in deep waters in the North Pacific . . . it could have been [the dolphins] were tired of dying in nets."

Pity the plankton

As Dr. Daniel Pauly, marine biologist at UBC, has long pointed out, overfishing of the oceans has led to humans "eating down the food chain." The global appetite for sea food is threatening smaller sea creatures with little charisma going for them. Now even jellyfish are being scooped up to land on people's plates.

Perhaps a "Save the krill," or "Save the glass coral" campaign slogan isn't as catchy, but if Mister Splashy Pants and others are to survive, it's going to take a worldwide effort to protect all life that lies beneath, not just the cute creatures.

Related Tyee stories:

 [Tyee]

10  Comments:

  • grumpyguy

    21-01-2008

    Who will save the plankton?

    You've hit the nail right on the head. Hmmm....or is it "the whale right on the blow-hole?".

    It's relatively easy to get people to care about whales and other similar "charismatic macrofaunal" species like polar bears, penguins, even the much-maligned shark.

    However, despite forming the base of the food chain and being key prey items for many marine mammals, including humpbacks, I've found that it's pretty tough to get people excited about saving plankton; the "uncharismatic microfauana" of the ocean, the unsung heroes of marine foodwebs everywhere!

    In fact, as a plankton researcher, the (tongue-in-cheek) rallying cry among my grad students has long been "For the love of God, won't SOMEBODY think of the PLANKTON!!!!!"

  • gkam

    21-01-2008

    Hey, Grumpy

    Are you really a plankton researcher? Shades of Soylent Green!

    What is the state of the Thermohaline Conveyor? Is there any change in nutrient upwelling as a possible precursor to more dramatic consequences of Global Climate Change? It ought to start showing up there, as the large volumes of cold freshwater cascade into that ocean current in the North Atlantic.

  • gkam

    21-01-2008

    part II

    Of course, I meant the upwelling of nutrients in the North Pacific part of the Conveyor, which can be influenced by the injection of fresh meltwater in the North Atlantic, slowing down the ocean current that not only feeds the ocean ecosystem, but makes it possible to grow crops in Europe.

    When this happens, we'll pine for those hot days, locked in our Ice Age.

  • bikerbill

    21-01-2008

    White sided Dolphins

    I saw a huge pod of white sided dolphins in November 2004 between Lund and Savary Island. It was an incredible experience, 10, 20 in every direction hunting fish in small groups, perhaps 50 or more in total. We were spell-bound in our kayaks for about an hour.

  • bikerbill

    21-01-2008

    White sided Dolphins

    Here's a link to some images I took with my video camera:

    http://www.bill.tubbs.name/lund2004.html

  • lorax

    21-01-2008

    anthroposensisizing animals

    It is true that the naming of large loveable or splishy splashy grandeur animals is used to personalize animals to protect their existence through public support. Should this be considered a negative thing though? People wont love Krill, concern themselves with plankton or theorize over the plethora of diversity that encompase the habitat which these whales depend upon for survival. Behind every campaign to save a keystone creature is usually a large amount of support for protecting these habitats. The whales are just the easiest most loveable ways to make the point.

  • ME2

    22-01-2008

    Question for Grumpy

    Hey Grumpy

    i am in total argreement with your concern for the plankton. Clearly, without the plankton converting the Sun's energy to food, the oceans would lose almost all of their non-plant life.

    But what of the forage fish (herring, sardines, menhaden, pilchard, etc) which are in turn the primary harvesters of the plankton, and which then feed the larger predators such as salmon, which are those species at the top of the food chain we use for food.

    The forage fish are being drastically reduced in numbers, (as fodder for fish farms) and they at best down to barely sustainable numbers. Where once their schools were measured in cubic miles of biomass, they are now measured in so many tonnes.

    Given what we know about predator-prey relationships, such as the beneficial effect most predators have upon their prey, it would seem to me that that this present situation represents a very unhealthy intervention in that relationship.

    Am I wrong in that assuptiom? If not, would I be wrong in suggesting we should not be harvesting forage fish?

  • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.