Opinion

Unfinished Business in Great Bear Rainforest

BC's government is slow to implement remaining milestones of the original, heralded agreement.

By Jim Pojar, 23 Nov 2012, TheTyee.ca

Waterfall

Promises trickling away: Cascade and pool deep in the Great Bear Rainforest. Photo by Michael Ambach from Your BC: The Tyee's Photo Pool.

Shaken, stirred-up and mindful of the eastern monster Sandy, many British Columbians could be reflecting upon extreme natural events on our coast. And again upon the weather, now that the usual rainy or snowy conditions have settled in. Before you forget the prolonged summery weather and autumnal glow of not so long ago, consider this: what if such warm, dry growing seasons become the rule not the exception on the B.C. coast? Weather isn't climate, but if that was a sample of the "new normal," drinking water, wild salmon, forests, and coastal residents could be in for more trouble.

As you contemplate the fall storms, spare a thought for the Great Bear Rainforest, where the future is still uncertain, the horizon is not serene but troubled by spectres of tsunami debris and oil tankers, and some of the forests are still being logged at excessive rates. The Great Bear Rainforest agreements of 2006 have still not been fully implemented.

The provincial government, First Nations, industry and conservation organisations have been working for years to make the Great Bear vision a reality but since 2009 progress has slowed and now seems to have been stalled by a lack of government and industry leadership. In 2006 all parties agreed to support the transition to a conservation economy, and to designate 70 per cent of natural, background levels of old-growth forest off-limits to logging. In 2009 all parties agreed to an interim compromise: meet a 50 per cent milestone and move to the 70 per cent goal no later than 2014.

Falling short of the scientific prescription

Scientists who helped develop the new management regime (seeking to achieve healthy ecosystems and healthy human communities) for the Great Bear Rainforest are clear that we need to conserve 70 per cent of the natural levels of old-growth forest in order to keep the whole system functioning properly. Currently, only 50 per cent of the forest is off-limits to logging. That's a praiseworthy achievement but it’s still insufficient. Too much habitat is being logged to maintain the health of the forest and the species that depend on it.

Meanwhile things continue to heat up in the rainforest, as they have noticeably for decades. We cannot predict what the outcome will be but we can with certainty say that future forests will have a different mix of species, different soils and disturbance regimes compared to contemporary forests. And we can predict that the cutblocks of today will not eventually replace the old-growth stands we've logged. Secondary coastal forests will regrow, but even if they are allowed to get old (300+ years) they will not recover to the primary condition -- they will be different in composition, structure and function.

In recent, protracted negotiations about flexibility in timber supply and criteria for "functional old growth," industry and government have invoked "ecosystem recovery" as a management goal -- on paper anyway. But recovery of coastal old-growth forest, which requires several centuries to fully develop, is an inappropriate anachronistic concept, given rapid climate change, system unpredictability, and scientific uncertainty. Old coastal forests are effectively non-renewable resources in the present circumstances. For that reason alone, you could argue that the remaining large intact areas of old-growth temperate rainforest -- globally rare to begin with -- should not be logged.

What ecosystems do for you and me

The Great Bear Rainforest is one of the jewels of British Columbia's dazzling, globally significant array of climates, landforms and ecosystems. The province has become a refuge for species, such as grizzly bears and Pacific salmon, that have declined precipitously or been eliminated elsewhere across their historical range. British Columbia also has a global stewardship responsibility for a large proportion of the world's remaining ancient temperate rainforests, wild rivers and rich marine ecosystems. Fulfilling the terms of the Great Bear agreements is vital to the province living up to its responsibility, and to ensuring that this rainforest system will remain part of Canada's living legacy in the face of challenges from natural resource demands in a changing global climate.

Ecosystems are affected by climate change but they can also mitigate and slow climate change. Ecosystems -- especially forests and peatlands -- influence the rate and extent of climate change by capturing CO2 from the atmosphere and storing it in wood and soils.

Keeping ecosystems healthy conserves living carbon, which in turn generates and stores dead carbon as various forms of organic matter.

The conservation of natural ecosystems has clear and immediate benefits for adapting to and mitigating climate change. B.C.'s temperate rainforests store millions of tonnes of carbon, more than 50 times the province's annual emissions of greenhouse gases. Logging results not only in severe losses to carbon stocks, but also in lower rates of sequestration for decades. The Great Bear Rainforest is an important carbon sink that plays a key role in the province's carbon budget. Large-scale, interconnected forests can help conserve the biological richness of the Great Bear, with the added benefit of sequestration and storage of carbon.

What the government gives the government can take away, and it can renege on its promises. The recent deliberations of the Special Committee on Timber Supply in the interior (looking for wood in all the wrong places), and the Province's subsequent willingness to disavow land use plans and go after timber in designated reserves, emphasize the need to solidify the Great Bear agreements. It's time for the B.C. government to follow through on its commitments by fully implementing the remaining conservation milestones of the Great Bear agreements as soon as possible.  [Tyee]

Read more: Environment,

5  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • Morg

    29 weeks ago

    Stop logging all Old-growth

    Of course this Liberal government is dragging its feet on protecting the Great Bear because they want to keep logging .it is apparent after the timber supply review that they want to log everything and protect nothing.It is time to end ALL old-growth logging in BC.This includes coastal rainforest and inland rainforest.To save our forest vote out the Clark Liberals and tell the NDP that they must end old-growth logging or else!

  • AnnElk

    29 weeks ago

    Point of No Return

    What's not commented on, or figured into the economic equation, is the fact that the old growth that is there now is a meagre percentage of what once was. So I'd say we're already dealing in single digit percentages.

    The old growth forests are already like "living zoos", small islands of relative sustainability.

    What the article alludes to is that what's left may be totally unsustainable; any biosphere can only take so much, and then, without notice, begin an unrecoverable slide to full collapse. And the Canadian petro-state seems to be hell bent on the final insult: the spectre of a fully-laden bitumen tanker wiping out what salmon runs there be left. Then will go the carnivores and whale populations, and then the logging can proceed apace, the forests will be pretty much emptied.

    Read Jensen's "End Game", and weep.

  • RickW

    29 weeks ago

    Has this government actually implemented ANYTHING........

    ......involving real conservation? There's been a lot of words but has the rubber actually hit the road?

  • Waltz

    29 weeks ago

    The upcoming provincial election and the GBR

    The leaders of the four main provincial parties should read this excellent article very carefully. For the opposition parties, to complete the unfinished business of the GBR agreement and to restore leadership on this project should be a no-brainer as a platform issue on forestry and the environment.

    Wake up opposition parties! Let's hear what you have to say on this issue.

  • x4estworker

    28 weeks ago

    A glowing article that belies some ugly truths

    The secret backroom discussions to forge any old deal for the mid coast forest with environmental groups was a travesty from start to end. The Campbell government was desperate to improve its green credentials and the once mighty B.C. forest industry, which has shown itself to be completely incapable of defending its interests, was eager to appease environmentalists in any way it could.

    That resulted in a backroom deal that was hammered out between a few environmental groups and a few forest companies. That in turn resulted in the forest companies leaving with their tails tucked between their legs and environmental groups getting everything they wanted. The Campbell government gave the deal its seal of approval. What was missing was any kind of meaningful public input that made sure that a wide cross-section of the public was able to participate in the consultation process.

    Yet environmentalists are the first ones to start frantically phoning reporters when they don't believe that they have been adequately consulted or they just plain don't get their way.

    Despite what Dr. Pojer may believe, old-growth forests are very poor at capturing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and storing it in wood. Any significant carbon capture in old-growth forests has already occurred in years past. Old growth forests in many cases are net emitters of carbon dioxide because many of the trees in those forests are dead or dying and have started to release CO2 as part of the decomposition process. The live old-growth trees have very slow growth rates and do not sequester much carbon dioxide. It is fast growing vigorous second growth forests with high rates of photosynthesis that are the most efficient at capturing and storing carbon dioxide.

    The mythology surrounding old-growth forests only gets bigger by the day.