Years of downplayed offences by the Mounties demand sweeping, structural changes.
Ignoring sexism in their own ranks: this is why women don't report rape.
How low will they go? Sexism in the RCMP is nothing new, but as the evidence against the force continues to mount, the old boys club mentality becomes harder and harder to swallow.
Sexual harassment and, more generally, a deep lack of respect for women seems to be standard operating procedure for the RCMP.
We might look back just a couple years when, in 2009, an officer in Hamilton, Ontario was sending explicit emails and texts to an intern, asking her to strip for him and demanding to know the colour of her underwear. The officer, Patrick Simpson, was docked seven days pay.
That same year Donald Ray, an officer in Edmonton, was discovered to have exposed himself to a female employee. He had also, apparently, been having sex in the polygraph room with a female subordinate. At the time he was charge of the polygraph unit at the RCMP's Behavioural Sciences Unit. Ray lost 10 days of pay and was demoted.
That official indifference to rooting out and effectively punishing destructive sexist behaviour in the ranks is sadly typical.
Const. Justin Harris was accused, in 2004, of having sex with prostituted girls between 1993 and 2003. One claimed she had sex with him when she was between the ages of 13 and 15. She wasn't the only one he allegedly exploited. A number of women said they had sex with Harris while they were teenagers. He claimed innocence and was put on paid suspension until the charges were thrown out in 2006 because the RCMP took too long to bring their case against him.
Apparently they became aware of the allegations of misconduct in 2002 and decided to just let it slide for a couple of years. Whoops!
See no evil
Turning a blind eye is a pattern for the RCMP. Especially when it comes to women.
Though it was called a sham by many activists and women's groups, the B.C.'s missing women inquiry made public questions about the conduct of RCMP officers with regard to the women who were disappearing from Vancouver's Downtown Eastside.
Though the RCMP were aware that women were going missing since 1997 and had evidence that women were being murdered at the Pickton farm, they failed to begin an investigation until 2002. Apparently they were too busy watching porn to be bothered.
And of course most recently, Cpl Catherine Galliford came out about the sexual harassment and assaults she endured during the 16 years she was a member of the RCMP. Galliford says she developed PTSD, agoraphobia and developed an alcohol dependency as a result.
After she went public about her experience, a number of other female RCMP officers came forward with similar stories.
Why women stay silent
But who knows, maybe all these women are just bored, looking for attention, and looking for yet another excuse to harp on those well-meaning Mounties. You know how women are, always making up silly stories about abuse for kicks.
That's what the RCMP is saying anyway.
Five female officers have now launched legal action against the RCMP, claiming harassment. The RCMP are denying everything. Not only that, they are doing their very best to discredit Galliford, painting her as an unstable alcoholic who simply refused to stay away from the men who she says were harassing her.
This is why women don't come out about abuse and harassment. This is why women stay silent for years. This is why rapes go unreported. This is why sexual harassment in the workplace continues. Because not only do many male dominated workplaces like the RCMP function like frat houses but because when women do come forward and tell the truth, they are routinely discredited and shamed and blamed for their own assaults and abuse.
The shocking response from the RCMP includes telling women to toughen up and that putting up with sexism is just part of the job.
Wait a minute. What year is this again? In 2012 are we really telling women that they need to accept misogyny as just part of the job?
Get serious about change
When will the RCMP be held accountable? We've witnessed decades of unacceptable behaviour and they very clearly still think they're going to get away with it. And who knows, maybe they will. It certainly wouldn't be out of the ordinary.
It's time the RCMP join us in the 21st century. Sexual harassment, assault, and exploitation is unacceptable behaviour for any member of the public, never mind from those who are meant to serve and protect us. It appears as though the only ones they are interested in serving and protecting are themselves.
New changes to the RCMP Act allow the commissioner more power, in particular the ability to fire Mounties who sexually harass women or engage in others kinds of misconduct. At very least we should now be able to move beyond a slap on the wrist, which is essentially how these matters have been dealt with in the past. Losing a week's pay hardly sends a message of intolerance.
But it isn't just policy that needs to change. The RCMP is, in many ways, a microcosm of a larger societal attitude. The blame-the-victim mentality displayed by the force is prevalent throughout our society. We treat women who come forward about abuse and assault with skepticism, often making excuses for the men who are responsible. If we look back at the RCMP's record of misconduct, it seems clear who should be on trial, yet we can see already that these women are going to be put through the ringer.
The RCMP need to, for once, be held accountable. They are very clearly not capable of policing themselves, never mind the public. ![[Tyee]](http://thetyee.cachefly.net/ui/img/ico_fishie.png)
Meghan Murphy is a Vancouver journalist with a focus on women's issues. Her website Feminist Current is here.
25
Login or register to post comments
Hakuin
43 weeks ago
start chopping at the top
when you get down to the heads at the rank and file level, give them all pink slips and START OVER.
The metastasis is out of control.
snert
43 weeks ago
I have to ask
"That same year Donald Ray, an officer in Edmonton, was discovered to have exposed himself to a female employee. He had also, apparently, been having sex in the polygraph room with a female subordinate. At the time he was charge of the polygraph unit at the RCMP's Behavioural Sciences Unit. Ray lost 10 days of pay and was demoted. "
Was she coerced? Further, what was her punishment?
And in a slightly lighter vane, was there a clear policy against having sexual relations in the polygraph room?
solvo
43 weeks ago
Accountability
That's a word that comes up in the RCMP literature a lot, as well as on courses, on assessments and on promotional exams. Sadly it means less than nothing and I've worked for a couple of guys who would be hard-pressed to spell it correctly.
Hakuin
43 weeks ago
crime in Canada
is at a forty year low. This is because people have learned who comes when you make a report.
alive
43 weeks ago
Cancel them all!
The typical RCMP officer has no respect for anyone, period!
They managed to assemble a troop of egomaniacs and give them unlimited power.
That it also extends into the abuse of female officers is only the tip of the iceberg, we are talking total abuse of power in practically every situation!
zalm
43 weeks ago
Bit of a short-sighted article, considering....
This is what happens when you get traditionally male-dominated areas learning (slowly) to live and work with people who are different than they are. Think the RCMP is the only place for this? You'll find the military rife with it, along with some trades shop floors as well. Male-dominated unions have tended to have it bad too, and so have boy's schools. And it's not simply about dominating women, it's about dominating anyone different than the "norm" - heaven help you if you're gay, Asian, black, effeminate, musical, artsy, studious, introverted or any of a hundred other characteristics.
This isn't about the RCMP, it's about breaking up the old culture of male-ness and promoting a new one - pick the paradigm that suits you.
But don't stop with the RCMP.
zalm
43 weeks ago
Ignorance runs riot
"Was she coerced? Further, what was her punishment?
And in a slightly lighter vane(sic), was there a clear policy against having sexual relations in the polygraph room?"
In labour law, it has been understood for nearly two decades, and implicit for far longer, that a subordinate is routinely unable to refuse the advances of a superior, and thus the burden of proof always falls on the superior. Were the genders reversed, the principle would stand, as some female teachers accused of abusing males students have recently found out.
We don't even have to talk about sex anywhere at work - that is a firing offense for hourly-paid employees in most corporations as it's considered "theft of time" and evidence of moral turpitude... the theft, that is, not the sex.
I mean, really! Why does this have to be spelled out for you?
mjscox
43 weeks ago
training
Perhaps the RCMP needs to look at a new training program, modelled on the VPD/Justice Institute's successful one, rather than continue to rely on an out-moded "boot camp" program in Regina. The VPD are among the best-trained cops anywhere, and have a higher percentage of female officers than most city police forces.
MEW
43 weeks ago
Real civilian oversight is the only answer
The problem with the institutions is not necessarily the policy on paper. Most totalitarian governments have wonderful constitutions that guarantee their citizens unlimited rights. It is the daily practice and the people implementing the policy that really count.
The RCMP's culture is violent and misogynist and that is the problem. I have taken courses at the JI and some of their instructors are excellent. However a JI instructor, teaching our "peace officers" the proper use of force in situations involving citizens, was charged with going out drinking with his buddies and putting the boots to a "brown" person. That incident highlights for me that our police culture is out of control.
Learning is not only reading books and taking lectures it is also the assimilation of the subtle messages. That instructor trained hundreds if not thousands of police officers in the "proper" use of force. I wonder what kind of subtle messages he imparted with the course material.
The RCMP needs to be brought under local citizen control where it acts as a municipal police force and the VPD and NWPD etc need to have their civilian oversight overhauled. I think that the oversight committee should be elected by the people at municipal election time.
cyberclark
43 weeks ago
They arn't all bad!
The RCMP is a paramilitary organization. The training is gender slanted and rightly so. The majority are male.
It is very true what you say about the old boy's club. I have seen the cubs sit in a half circle while the old wolf tells his war stories.
It is comradeship at its best and that is part of what makes them the worlds finest police force.
I agree the gender mix has got out of line but, that is a fixable thing. Their mothers should have fixed it but, what can one say.
snert
43 weeks ago
zalm
In case you haven't figured it out yet there is the law and then there is reality.
Sometimes the law does not solve the problems it is intended to correct simply because it ignores reality.
Case in point, you are in a cross walk, a car is approaching, you put yourself in the path of that car and wind up in hospital. Guess who the "law" sides with? Not the driver of the car. Now has that crosswalk (read, the law) solved the problem of pedestrian/vehicle collisions? Not.
There is always the matter of personal responsibility and hiding behind a law, any law, is not conducive to solving the problem that a law is trying to prevent.
Sorry sir but 'tis you who should check the spelling.
One may even go as far as to suggest that your reasoning in this instance is flawed to the point of being part of the problem itself.
Hakuin
43 weeks ago
a new federal police force is inevitable.
What should we call it and how will we make sure that absolutely none of the former force's members ever get into it?
solvo
43 weeks ago
" ... the world's finest police force."
Really? According to whom? The rcmp has for decades sold itself as the world's finest police force (for example shilling clothing emblazoned with the words RCMP Elite) but the facts do not support such a claim. The rcmp hasn't needed to be fine; they just had to look fine and coast on reputation. That's where they've put their money over the decades - appearance over reality. The Musical Ride over actual police work. The Red Serge over modern firearms and efficient cold-weather uniforms. Its only recently that the rot has come out into the open. Its only now that they are (hopefully) learning that writing it on a t-shirt doesn't make it so.
trylogic
43 weeks ago
depressing...
but, considering recent history, I wouldn't trust the statment of any rcmp officer, male or female. Coming out years later claiming sexual harrassment at work sounds suspect. Women joining the force are cut from the same "cloth" as the men. They have the same training and have a gun and a taser. So if a colleague starts sexual harrassment give him one warning. If he does not get the message next time it is a bullet into the knee cap or a taser shot you know where...problem solved.
Hakuin
43 weeks ago
I thought you said
try logic?
igbymac
43 weeks ago
"best"?
Being a police officer is a rather despicable calling designed for the truly indoctrinated to begin with. Being good at it only solidifies ones rank as a true guardian of state and an enemy of the people, intentions aside.
Hakuin
43 weeks ago
Any good person I have ever known
Who decided to become a cop found it impossible to remain one.
snert
43 weeks ago
Hakuin
Remain a good person or a cop?
Hakuin
43 weeks ago
hyuk hyuk! Surprise surprise
http://www.theprovince.com/news/fraser-valley/Former+RCMP+officer+Monty+Robinson+jail+time/7000873/story.html
Hakuin
43 weeks ago
and I'm sure you all saw this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLo18EcZxsY
http://www.theprovince.com/news/Kelowna+Mountie+Const+Geoff+Mantler+acquitted+assaulting+drug+user/6997305/story.html
ChiefEngineer
43 weeks ago
The GRC might have to
join the 20th century first!
zalm
43 weeks ago
snert
Thanks, we've had a few millennia in your "reality". Perhaps you could try the more up-to-date post-modern version for a few months more before you pronounce it "not conducive". After all, several million women who have experienced sexism and rape at the hands of unpunished offenders would likely disagree with you.
As for your opinion of the law and its relation to reality - well, you're starting to sound a lot like those nutbars who insist that not wearing a helmet while riding your bike is a lot safer than wearing one because helmets discourage cycling...
Sigh. Sometimes I feel like I'm back in a Grade 7 creative writing class listening to childish versions of "What I wish I did last summer".
snert
43 weeks ago
zalm
I'm certain some of them would. You can disagree all you want but that does not necessarily address the issue.
You have an interesting style of responding to comments you don't agree with. It speaks volumes. It also seems to fit into a pattern of behaviour that might very well be at the root of the problems addressed in this article.
Fascinating.
Further, I've never heard anyone say that "not wearing a helmet while riding your bike is a lot safer than wearing one because helmets discourage cycling..."
I have heard them say that 'helmets may discourage cycling'. This might explain your difficulties differentiating between the Law and reality.
MkumbaJoe
42 weeks ago
recollection
I will always remember a colleague
at work whose husband was a counter-espionage RCMP operative.
He sure as hell didn't strike me as a very bright guy, and I started to worry about Canada's security with someone like him, whose dynamism reminded me of a bowling alley attendant.
I can't say that she was less dull but at least she didn't occupy a position of importance.
Hakuin
42 weeks ago
counter-espionage? ...riiiighttt...
http://www.rcmpwatch.com/canada-pm-apologizes-over-1985-air-india-bomb-failure/