Opinion

Stopped in Our Tracks by a Sham Democracy

On decisions that matter most, how much say do you and I really have?

By Rafe Mair, 9 Jan 2012, TheTyee.ca

Stick men in shape of Xs representing democracy or voting

Paper politics: This system only pretends to empower us.

Related

On New Years Eve, in addition to looking to a new year like the rest of you, I started my ninth and likely last decade.

Before going on, let me thank all of you who helped celebrate my roast back on Nov. 24. It was a night I'll never forget and I spent the lot of it shuffling through tears and laughter.

(In the laughter department, as well as in the teary part, the editor of this journal, David Beers, brought the house down!)

Sadly, the Vancouver Island group, including Mike Smyth and Moe Sihota, were kept away by high seas and no ferries. I was especially sad that Dr. Gordon Hartman, one of the celebrated "dissident scientists" from the DFO, who helped so much to win the Alcan struggle with his honesty and integrity, was stuck home in Nanaimo.

Gordon fashioned a beautiful walking stick for me, to be presented that night, made from a rare B.C. willow and an even rarer African hardwood. On the cane itself he has etched many of the environmental battles I've been in over the years -- the Skagit, the Nechako (Alcan), Fish Lake, fish farms and private power. If you chance upon me in your travels -- I mean this -- ask me to show it to you. It means a great deal to me.

It's traditional at this time of the year for loud mouths like me to look into the crystal beer glass and pronounce upon what is to come.

Since the beginning of time, the struggle has been between them that has and them that hasn't. This goes back, I daresay, to Uncle Uglug's time, as he fought over hunting grounds. I know that what I've just said seems trite but it is especially worth pondering as we look ahead to 2012 and beyond.

The less advantaged levels of society have always fought for whatever they could nip from the pie, always securely held by those who control the treasury and the law, controls that largely pass from generation to generation.

History, largely written by the "haves" (of which I and my family are a part), tells us that the progress from feudalism through the Renaissance/Reformation, the 100 Years War and the revolutions of the 18th and 19th centuries has brought a steady supply of positive change to lower income groups and that things changed.

Looked at objectively, that's a hard case to make. The Reformation didn't break the power of the church, just made a few more of them. Powerful priests remained, moderators and archbishops replaced cardinals, and took a little power from the Pope and spread it around a bit. The 30 Years War made countries into nations but scarcely ended wars, which, as always, are soldiered by the "lower" classes; the Industrial Revolution brought even greater prosperity to the rich (rather it created a whole new rich class) while devastation for labourers who lost their jobs to machines; revolutions came and went leaving little to show other than grudging extensions of the franchise, gradually to women and to men who owned property; revolutions or fear of them forced western "Establishment" to recognize, grudgingly, some rights for others; slavery was abolished in the U.S., 80 years after their lofty Bill of Rights was passed -- in actuality it wasn't really abolished, it was just that "massa" had to pay (pitiful) wages and he couldn't sell his labourers.

It's hard to detect any comparative change -- if the poor did improve their lives, the improvement of the richer class was proportionately greater.

What was created was a "middle class," which to the poor was indistinguishable from the upper class.

Rights grudgingly granted

But didn't 19th-century democracy bring the trade union? The vote? The right to property for all? The right to seek the justice of the law?

Marginally.

After uprisings like the Tolpuddle martyrs, the blood of the Peterloo massacre, The Haymarket massacre and the fear of worse, the Establishment grudgingly expanded rights, always keeping their hands on the till, on the justice system and the tools of governing. In fact the yielded rights did nothing to erase the caste system and the "rule of law" meant laws set down to preserve the status quo. The inner cities of the Industrial Revolution have been replaced by the ghettoes and homeless in that part of our cities the nice people choose to ignore.

We are witnessing the "Arab Spring" as millions, here in the 21st century, seek, in the same way as in olden times, equality and freedom, the right to prompt and just justice, the right to vote and have that vote count. The Establishment will, maybe, ease the burden of the poor by gently transferring chump change to the poor from the rich without them fussing too much. The reality mostly being "same old, same old." My point is a simple one. The powerful, be they Uncle Uglug, Henry VIII, Napoleon, or the evil dictators of the 20th century or the governments of so-called democracies -- the names may change but political and economical reality hasn't. If you have the bucks you get what you want.

What do we have in Canada today?

Much better freedom and justice than, say, Pakistan, North Korea or Saudi Arabia. But do we have a democracy where everyone counts and justice is free, prompt and just?

Of course we don't -- and our so-called justice system is none of the above. Judges are selected by the "haves" behind closed doors, the time the system takes as it mosies along at its leisurely pace is contemptible and the cost puts the system beyond the reach of all but the rich. What is or is not a crime -- and the punishment -- often militate against the poor and often forgive the well off.

Do we have a stratified system?

Of course we do and any who strays outside the acceptable bounds of dissent is "sent to Coventry." The Mainstream Media is owned by the Establishment and those who work in it either self-censor or are censored. The "journalist" doesn't need to be told what to say or write. As the wise man said, "You cannot bribe or twist / Thank God the British* Journalist. / Considering what the man will do / unbribed, there's no occasion to." (*Put in any nationality to suit.)

Ask anyone who's been jailed for defending ordinary citizens against the bulldozers of the large corporations how fair the system is.

Ask those who want to protest conferences or other gatherings of heads of state and government who, in a just world, would be behind bars.

Ask those who protest the building of a highway through pristine natural preserves.

Illusion of democracy

What we have in Canada is the appearance of democracy, but as the scales fall from our eyes, we see the sham. In the U.S. we see millions being spent to elect a governor who makes $250,000 a year, hundreds of millions to elect a president who makes half a million. Are we to assume that no payback is expected for this, ah, generosity?

In Canada it's no better. We spend hundreds of thousands electing MLAs and MPs who have exactly zero influence on what government does. We say "let's vote for Bloggs, he'll make a great MLA" -- even though he goes to Victoria as a slave to the premier. Indeed the premier likely pays more attention to his barber than poor Bloggs or any one in his caucus (Maybe he should!).

Think upon it. If you are a Canadian voter, in your hand is the ballot paper, the key to power and the exercise of that power, right? Permit me to put a few questions,

How much say have you in permitting salmon farms? In their proliferation? What say do you now have as the licences increase?

How much say did you have in saving BCRail? In fact, Premier Campbell promised not to sell BCRail but did it any way. Did you have any say, Hell, knowledge, of the criminal aspects to how it was sold?

How much impact have you had on an energy policy that devastates our rivers so that private power companies can sell the power to BC Hydro, which though it doesn't need it must buy it for double what they can re-sell it for? When did you vote to change a public-power system into a private one? What power do you have to save BC Hydro from the bankruptcy it's technically now in?

How much say will you have stopping pipelines carrying tar sands gunk to Kitimat to be sent by tanker down our coast, at the same time the most beautiful and treacherous coastline in the world?

Here it is in a nutshell. We, the people of B.C., have not had and never will have the slightest impact on these decisions, which will destroy our way of living. They'll all be made by CEOs, approved by a paid-for premier or prime minister, who having no one to stop him will have it approved by a captive cabinet then by the lickspittles on the government backbench.

We have never needed democracy more than now and the lack of it will cost us dear. For unless there's a sea change in how we're governed, we will have violence. The public knows that our environment is in serious jeopardy because our governments are so in thrall to the corporate boardroom that they dare not fight them. The public sees that the democratic option is gone.

End of their tether

Now we see Premier Photo-Op surveying the scene, pronouncing that she will have no opinion on the Enbridge pipeline and the consequent tanker traffic until the Environmental Assessments -- the "rubber stamp" process -- is complete!

Any damned fool, with the exception of Premier Clark, knows that pipeline ruptures and tanker spills are not risks but certainties waiting to happen. By approving the pipelines and tanker traffic we will have certain disaster... not perhaps, not maybe, not only if we have bad luck, but certain catastrophe.

What can the enraged and neutered populace do?

Do we allow these desecrations to our home take place without a fight?

When an all powerful autocracy emerges, history teaches us that the resultant combination of frustration added to anger turns good men and women to civil disobedience,

You tell me, Madam Clark, Mr. Harper -- what are we to do?

Depend on Parliament/legislature? Depend upon the courts to back us up on our quest to save and return our heritage? Uphold the rule of law when it has been reduced to that which suits the powerful only?

I put it to the captains of industry and their purchased politicians -- read your history! See what happens when the public has reached the end of its tether. Then ask yourself, what's different today?

And how long do you think the public will take this shit without fighting back?  [Tyee]

47  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • Fiat lux

    19 weeks ago

    Rafe, I'll be 85 in April,

    Rafe, I'll be 85 in April, WW2 vet on the wrong side, lived in 4 countries, 57 years in Canada, 3 citizenships under every known ideology.

    The horror stories of history you mention are very real, but they've always been caused by "faith", hammered into people's heads to force and persuade them to climb the scaling ladders against the castles of neighbouring lords and fall to their deaths in "glory".

    History's tragedies, and I've researched this since 1945, and have written 286 columns on it in the Gold River Record, are always caused by two simple sentences, hidden under the covers of religions and ideologies.

    "Wealth is the temporary control of energy"

    "Wealth can not be created, only taken from others, the environment and future generations"

    That's all!

    History's tragedies have always been caused by the "learned", the priesthoods, and now by our university economics departments, the sectors who have always licenced colonizations, enslavements and mass murder, while calling it "The Will of God" and now "wealth creation.

    There's no point in blaming the ruling classes of history and of the world, without questioning where their criminal actions are licenced and coming from?

    Don't blame the executioners, but the judges who send the victims under their axes.

    And I still want to live to see the day, when humanity wakes up and starts living, instead of following and existing like slaves to nuts and crooks.

    Ed Deak.

  • lindi6676

    19 weeks ago

    end of tether

    I agree, with E. Deak, we need to move away from blame, we need to understand the system humanity has created and seek new ways of changing this system.
    We the people have the power, we just need to stop playing the game that we have jointly created. Time for a new game!!!!

  • pwlg

    19 weeks ago

    collective voices unite, what do we have to lose?

    Just why are our governments and big business so keen to extract our collective resources as fast as possible?

    Enbridge and the Son of Exxon, Stephen Harper, believe it is in "Canada's economic interest" that we build the Northern Gateway Pipeline. I wonder if a study has been done to determine the costs of extracting a finite and dwindling non-renewable resource now instead of leaving it in the ground for future generations? What are the benefits of leaving the tar in the ground for future generations?

    Canada, nor BC, has a policy of putting the revenues they receive from oil and gas extraction into a trust fund for future generations like Norway.

    The Great Recession had an impact on Canada's economy (Tar Sand Extraction). Tens of thousands of workers were sent 'home' from construction camps in Northern Alberta due to the recession and subsequent drop in oil prices. Metal fabrication shops closed their doors or laid off thousands more workers.

    As the Tar Sand developers ramp up again for more expansion, prices for materials and labour will increase creating an imbalance in an economy that should be more diversified for Canada's best interest. Extraction of the tar sands may just be one of drivers to kill a once significant manufacturing industry in Canada.

    Selling crude oil to other countries leaves Canada poorer.

  • ron wilton

    19 weeks ago

    Criminal Acts

    I have often heard it said that "behind every great fortune, there is a criminal act'.

    Obviously the MacLeans, Daniels, Campbells, Bennetts,Morgans,Kinsellas,Colemans,Harpers, Mulroneys,Martins, MacKays,Marine Harvest, WFP, Alcan, Encana, Enbridge, GE, etc. etc., have taken this edict to heart and do it flagrantly and proudly, as if criminal behaviour is now the hallmark of power and success.

    We should then all look upon the works of the mighty and despair, whilst our world withers and dies.

    Intervention is nigh.

  • Van Isle

    19 weeks ago

    I remeber reading a statement

    I remeber reading a statement a couple of years from a retiring US Senator. He basically said that our system is wired for the people with advantage and its Governments duty to try and make our system more of a level playing field for all of its citizens. If anything the opposite seems to be the norm.

  • alive

    19 weeks ago

    Feed 'em cake!

    The simple fact is that the system has always handed out just enough bribes to the poor, so they will not rebel!

    Today those bribes are the latest gizmo's and gadgets that people are brainwashed to believe they need.

    I can just hear them:"Sure this is shit, but if we go on a strike, I will not be able to pay my credit-card bill, and they may reposess my new toys".

    85% of the population are stupid, and that stops progress!

  • Fiat lux

    19 weeks ago

    The main culprits are the

    The main culprits are the fraudulent "free trade" rackets that have destroyed our industries, caused huge unemployment and poverty, and now are forcing governments to sell the country from under the feet of the people, while calling it "job creation".

    The Asians need out resources for their slave labour factories to fill our lives with short lifespan junk products and cover the world with garbage, so that their ruling classes can bring our monies back to buy up our countries, welcomed by "conservative" governments as "wealth creation".

    Just watched Minister of National Resources Joe Oliver on CBCTV, expounding that they'll cut the environmental review process for the Enbridge pipeline so they can supply communist China with Tar Sands oil in the "national interest", while blaming "foreign socialist money" for trying to stop it.

    The country is up for sale, but it is "foreign socialists" who are trying to stop it.

    Makes a lot of "conservative" sense.

    Ed Deak.

  • newbutold47

    19 weeks ago

    Sham Democracy

    Rafe, I couldn't agree with you more! I am 64 years old. I wake every day with a feeling of dread. I can see the future all too well and it scares the hell out of me. I fear for my childen and grand children.

    I wish there was a non-violent way to show our disgust for this both governments. Unfortunately history will repeat itself. civil disobedience will happen eventually. And in a small way is hppening now.

    The unfortunate thing is too many of our young people are hooked on "Stuff". Corporations continue distract our youth through million dollar media campaigns. They either can't or don't see the direction our government is taking us and the world.

    Our MPs and MLAs continue to tow the party line ignoring the people who elected them to the cushy job.

    Rafe Mair for Prime Minister, Premier, God!

    Regards, Brian Turner

  • sunshine coast girl

    19 weeks ago

    I'm in....

    whatever it takes to stop this is what I'll do. And these are words from a 54 year old woman who has spent her life following the rules and staying out of trouble. Her 73 year old mother has said she'll be right there too, as well as her 83 year old father. Throw in the mid-twenties kids as well. All life-long British Columbians; all part of the "radical foreign interests" who are objecting to this the loudest, according to our very own Joe Oliver. Steven Harper has badly miscalculated if he thinks British Columbians will take this. Better get a move on building those jails Harper. You're going to need every one of them. And WTF is with Premier Photo Op? What kind of a leader sits back and lets two Albertans and an Ontarian run the show? Take a stand missy, if for nothing else than your own son's future.

  • mdonovan

    19 weeks ago

    First there were despots and

    First there were despots and monarchs. Then there were elected politicians. Are we done? Are we at the end of human progress? Or does something come after politicians? I suggest: sortition. The Greeks defined democracy this way. So should we.

  • morechatter

    19 weeks ago

    not just the kids

    But adults are programmed just as media campaigns are the norm along with programming to sway voters or the public to get on board.
    If Corporations care so much who took the coke out of coke?
    Alive says "The system has always handed out enough bribes to the poor so they will not rebel." It is simply not true. The poor have beaten down and their rights have been put on a shelve. The low income are forced to leave their dignity behind before food poisoning is even handed out. It is the welfare challenge because financial clerks will cut people down to size as demoralization is the name of the game.
    How soon does a poor man's money run out? Usually with in the first week and those on assistance do 5 week months or 35 days.
    How do the poor fight back when some can't even get out of bed or so busy wondering where they are going to lay their head? Many have disabilities. Now we don't cart the mentally disabled off to wards but to prison cells or in caskets as police are quick to deploy their own tactics. Which often leaves those with serious problems with a bullet through their head or a senseless beating that ends up taking another life. First you demoralize, then you legalize and then you dehumanize.

    We vote in people who are not accountable to hang out with rich folk who have their own agenda which is not the human race or the environment but greed if its all the same.

  • Skywalker

    19 weeks ago

    Well done Rafe.

    You are so right on. I think it is becoming clearer each time why you no longer have your radio talk-show. They are afraid of you and these days the field is fertile for something better that isn't being offered. What it will take is for someone to start a new movement along the principles you are talking about.

    Sometimes i feel like the world is going to hell in a hand basket and all I can do is watch. I'm still hopeful that someone, something will come along to relly change the inevitable outcome.

  • morechatter

    19 weeks ago

    The Fraser Institute

    Has been instrumental in helping government deploy the necessary tactics to take down the poor and take away any rights they have enjoyed as Canadians.
    The Social Safety Net is something to be very weary of. Be very careful. When the low income land in the net many have difficulty even staying alive and some have been burned alive for just being poor.
    First they demoralize and then dehumanize and then delegalize and ultimately destroy.

  • Fiat lux

    19 weeks ago

    The Fraser Inst. is one of

    The Fraser Inst. is one of the string of PR/advertising agencies, set up in the mid 70s by big business, to sell and force the neoclassical market economic theory, taught in our universities as a "science" and now enslaving the world, to governments and the public under the fraud of "economics".

    Their purpose is to eliminate any public/ democratic power, any public ownership and privatize everything into the hands of the multinational corporate mafia.

    "Wealth can not be created only taken...." and they're the enforcers of the taking, justifying the stealing the most from the most, the same way as religions have been used to legalize the ultimate powers of aristocracies, since the beginning of times.

    Ed Deak.

  • Bucket of Oil

    19 weeks ago

  • Grumpy

    19 weeks ago

    Damn right - it's pitchfork time!

    We are a sham democracy, where the countries elites have all but completely taken away what little rights we have.

    Canada is now a vast ponzi scheme where politicians and their friends grow fat by screwing the little guy. The average Canadian is seen has nothing more than an ignorant hick, just fallen off the back of a turnip truck, ready to be fleeced of what little hard earned money he/she has.

    Elections are few and far between, with most Canadians seeing them for the sham they are.

    Canada is fast coming to a very bad end and violent revolution, with all its vile and ugly glory will rock this country. This will only happen when a collective pent up hatred for Canada and Canadian politicians reach a point that absolutely nothing will be able to stop it.

  • straightshooter

    19 weeks ago

    Great column Rafe

    Hello all

    I just received the following url for this video today from a friend and for what will be seen as obvious reasons, recommend it to you all.

    http://www.djenvy.net/?p=11497&utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=the-photographs-of-your-junk-will-be-publicized

  • Shane

    19 weeks ago

    Doggerel cavil

    The Humbert Wolfe verse begins: "You cannot hope to bribe or twist..."

  • max von smartt

    19 weeks ago

    end of the republic

    America is now a de facto military police dictatorship with a thin democratic facade, now preparing for another devastating oil war, this time with Iran in the crosshairs. Canada is a slavish satellite which has just dispatched another war ship to the Eastern Mediterranean to combat "terrorism". Does anyone but a child really believe that previous assaults on Iraq and Libya were about democracy and not Oil?? And that Iran possesses nuclear weapons of mass destruction??

  • straightshooter

    19 weeks ago

    Rafe, great column!!!

    Hello all

    I just received the following url for this video today from a friend and for what will be obvious reasons, I recommend it to you all.

    http://www.djenvy.net/?p=11497&utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=the-photographs-of-your-junk-will-be-publicized

  • snert

    19 weeks ago

    lindi6676

    Quote:
    Time for a new game!!!!

    Kinda puts us back to square one, doesn't it?

  • Fiat lux

    19 weeks ago

    Humanity has always been

    Humanity has always been controlled and enslaved by conspiracy of three ruling sectors, throughout history.

    1. The Merchants, who in the past invented the demands for "wealth creation", otherwise known as legalized theft, into their own pockets. Now represented by big business and banks.'

    2. The priesthoods, who invented the legalization of theft by the merchants. Now represented by so called "economists", basically the priesthood of the non existing Money God,

    3 The military, who enforced the demands, hoping for the absolution of their crimes by the priests.

    So, what has changed ? We had at least 3-4
    B52s on practice flights over our heads today and on most days.

    Ed Deak.

  • lindi6676

    19 weeks ago

    Hey Snert

    Yes, thats what makes starting fresh so exciting and open to many wonderful possibilities. That we learn from the past and never repeat this past again. Its time to make a huge shift in humanity.
    When the majority of humans come to realize consciously that we are not ok with how our systems work, people will begin to step out. In order for change to begin( and it is) its up to each individual to start with oneself and when we return to our truths, our inner wisdom, each person will know what role they will play.
    Yes many may think its impossible for our systems to change, and many may not want these old archaic systems to change (due to fear of change). But I have deep faith that we will eventually evolve as a species that will create a way of life that is good for all on this earth!
    I know many will never believe change is like this possible but I know there are many that feel differently and are taking action. There is no one making the rules, and leading the ways its an individual movement and its growing.

  • igbymac

    19 weeks ago

    Rafe Mair personally crosses the tipping point

    ...and this time (dare I say finally?) takes dead aim. Kudos!

    I will say this, We are what we learn.

    And as Bertrand Russell said, we are recruits taught by those "instructed with learned ignorance, and furnished with unlearned wisdom".

    I wonder, is it even possible to derail the system; some blaming the politicians, others blaming the educators? Chicken, meet egg.

    Ultimately the burden of oppression must eventually become too much to bear, and the people will revolt. Until then, 'do unto others ...'

    Again, a great, honest article Rafe Mair. The best ever, imo.

  • greengreen

    19 weeks ago

    voting is the answer

    If all the decisions that have been made at the federal and provincial level that you and I disagree with had gone the other way, many could say "I didn't vote for that". And they would be right, and.....pissed off.

    Any democracy depends on the involvement of the people. When only 20-40% of the people get involved (voting), of course the powerful will take over. If 100% (maybe even 80%)of eligible voters voted in the last federal election, would Harper have won? I doubt it very much. Easy to blame the system, but even "pr" systems will be little more representative if most don't vote.
    With modern technology, perhaps every decision to be made could be voted on, perhaps with a 2-3 day window. Wouldn't that be fun!

  • Gryphon Sable

    19 weeks ago

    I haven't always agreed with

    I haven't always agreed with you Rafe, but this is one of the best succinct histories of civilisation I've read. May you continue to be a thorn in the side of liars, thieves, con men--oh, what the hell, ALL politicians and their minions.

  • David Huntley

    19 weeks ago

    SFU economist

    I just want to support a point that Ed Deak periodically makes. A few years ago I was introduced to a faculty member of the SFU Economics Department. I asked him how we could get rid of NAFTA. His reaction was one of incredible horror that one should even think about such a thing. He clearly thought I was stupid.
    I am a faculty member in the SFU Physics Department.

  • Cynic

    19 weeks ago

    Good one Rafe. I often feel

    Good one Rafe. I often feel sorry for our elders who have had to endure a lifetime of false hope and empty promises from our so-called leaders. They've tried to be good and live a decent life, participating in a system that was sold as a democracy but is really little better than slavery, while watching the world descend into a sordid mess. It's brutal.

    Those of us who are paying attention can only be appalled. The money/banking scam which empowers the elite and lays waste to our planet is barely on the people's radar. Just today, the rhetoric in support of the enbridge pipeline is over the top. On new year's eve the ndaa was signed into law by our saviour obama and the u.s. is now legally a police state.

    Get a good helmet.

  • Dan the socialist

    19 weeks ago

    Things really have not

    Things really have not changed much since Kings ruled..We just get enough crumbs to keep us in line.

  • BDD63

    19 weeks ago

    Rafe, you neglected the

    Rafe, you neglected the single most profound advancement of the underclasses in Europe. An event that brought the Dark Ages to a close and was the catalyst for the Renaissance and the rise of Labour Guilds and the original Middle Classes. And it was courtesy of that Grand Dame that mankind tries his best to out do or ignore, Mother Nature. In the space of little more than 24 months bubonic plague wiped out 25% of Europe's population.
    Suddenly, human resources, that previously were so dime a dozen that any member of the Medieval court could skewer any old peasant with his sword just because he felt like it, became for the first time in history, worth their weight.
    The workers could pick and choose which Prince or King they thought was worthy of their sweat and made them pay. Plus they made advancements in human rights that their fathers and grandfathers would never have been able to even conceive of in their wildest dreams.
    And anyone who thinks that Mother Nature isn't busy in her kitchen right now, cooking up a new recipe for The Black Death to be delivered to the human race via our industrialized farm and food production and debasement of the planet, is in for a most nasty surprise.
    Bon Appetit

  • Fiat lux

    19 weeks ago

    David....Was the economist

    David....Was the economist Herb Grubel ?

    Straight out of the Stone Age. He was on TV once declaring: "No country can afford universal health insurance".

    No wonder he was elected as "fellow" by the Fraser Inst.

    As a physicist, would you agree that no religions, ideologies or economic theories can overrule physical laws?

    If the physical definition of efficiency is "The most work done with the least physical inputs", like resources and energy, how can so called "monetary efficiency", used for making the same products, declare that it makes no difference how much energy and resources are used, as long as the monetary costs are "cheaper", regardless how they're achieved ?

    In other words, how can two contradicting definitions be used for the same product, or fact and called a "science"?

    Yet this is what economic textbooks teach to brainwash students with.

    Yes, I have the evidence in an official textbook "ECONOMICS,Principles , Problems and Policies" by Campbell R.McConnell U of Nebraska-Lincoln, William Henry Pope, Ryerson, Toronto. 1982 edition, Pages 20 and 120. Published by McGraw-Hill Ryerson Ltd.

    Most likely also taught at SFU.

    The ruling economic system uses no liability, or debit columns. If we use physical inputs for economics, like my "Principle for the application of physical efficiency to economics" Copyright 1991 to establish the date, it shows that resources exported to China and then the reimporting the products, is not "cheaper" but far more expensive.

    Could you please comment on this and also why genuine scientists are not breaking this fraud to pieces ?

    Ed Deak.

  • Worrywart

    19 weeks ago

    Exporting Crude

    If Harper is such a good economic manager (self acclaimed), why is he shipping crude to China for processing? Of course Michael Campbell will tell us that Canada does not have the refining capacity, while conveniently neglecting to say that BC closed three refineries in 1995 and shipped at least one of them to China.
    Harper is a economic failure. Who else would plan megaprisons at a time of decreasing crime rates?

  • kmdyson

    19 weeks ago

    Occupy

    it is time for the citizenry to take to the streets and occupy and peacefully protest all the things that are wrong...and shout loudly until they realise that we are serious...I am almost 58 and socialist and an atheist ... and have waited many a long year for the under-classes to rise up and demand to be heard but more importantly actually taken seriously by both the powers that be and the media...with the Spring will hopefully come a return of the Occupy movement...in even greater numbers...

  • KWD

    19 weeks ago

    “What’s different today?”

    Unless there is a sea change in voter participation … considering that 60% of eligible voters, or more in some cases, don’t participate in the democratic process … there won’t be a corresponding change in how we are governed. Although, even with greater voter participation there is no guarantee conditions will improve. A majority decision does not guarantee a helpful, productive decision. Appropriate decisions require an informed public.

    Although it is the duty of every eligible voter to do whatever is necessary to protect society from government, they won’t fight back until they are continually in pain. Unlike many Europeans and Middle East folk, Canadians are like anorexics and bulimics they don’t see a problem even when the suffering is obvious. They are a long way from reaching the end of their tether. The abysmally small turnout at the Occupation sites in Canada was an indication of the level of recognition of pain being felt by the public.

    “What’s different today?” The captains of industry have already asked themselves what lies ahead when the public becomes unruly: their answer was to reinstate the extreme right wing Conservative ideologies of the past. The symmetry between past fascist-lead periods of barbarism and today’s governments is undeniable: monolithic ruling parties, police states, preparation for mass incarceration and the suppression of independent, critical thinkers.

  • igbymac

    19 weeks ago

    So Ed Deak

    I hear the universities are training economic theory that suits the status quo; and the status quo is directing the school and university curriculums. Stamping it out is like trying to stamp out christianity. It's ideological warfare, and their side guards the pulpit.

    Asking the establishment to break this chain is like voting in contemporary Canada -- we are faithfully asking for what is never going to be given.

    In my view, both Thermodynamic and Behavioural Economics having legitimate merit but (and even if they become self evident, given time) how can we break this playback loop from carrying on?

    For heaven's sake, Ed, people don't even recognize the inherent criminality, the blatant absurdity, in the Bank of Canada borrowing with interest from private banks rather than creating its own interest free money.

    It seems clear to me that we face the age old problem of usury, not credit. Outlaw usury and let's see where the chips land :)

  • Frank

    19 weeks ago

    Its the 30 Years War, not 100 Years War

    Rafe, its the 30 Years War that led to the Treaty of Westphalia and modern nation-states. The 100 Years War refers to a series of wars between Britain and France and unless you're concerned about why Aquitane isn't on modern maps or you just love Henry V's Saint Crispens Day speech it has very little relevance to your topic.

    Otherwise I agree about the Enbridge pipeline, a few jobs just isn't worth it to us.

  • OwlRol

    19 weeks ago

    Good one Rafe, you nailed it.

    Good one Rafe, you nailed it. Wish your message could get into the mainstream media.

    The most recent example of Diktat and Doublespeak has to be Joe Oliver's speech, which let out a little bit of the ignorance and fear mongering the Harper government is trying to feed to all Canadians.

    It was the start of a planned attempt to preempt and sabotage any opposition to the Northern Gateway project, but oh so, so crude that Harpo must be grinding his teeth. Yet other interviewed Con. MPs stuck to the script like glue, spouting inane statements while ignoring serious questions as if they were never asked.

    "Billionaire Socialist" is an oxymoron. Soros is, at best, a very successful but concerned Capitalist. Makes you wonder what the Harperites think a socialist is, perhaps they should provide a definition to clarify this for average Canadians. Name calling is so lame when it lacks any accuracy.

    "Environmentalists and other radical groups". David Suzuki outlined how Joe's concepts were flipped 180* as the groups referred to were the conservatives while the fossil fuel industry and their political minions are the radicals.

    "Good science", ha ha ha, only if it promotes the project. Just look at the "good science" practiced by the province and DFO vis a vis the open net fish farms. But this is immensely bigger, including the various risks, local and global.

    As mentioned above, blaming foreign intersts in trying to stop this project is such a joke when compared to the immense foreign fossil fuel interests' lobbying and influence to rush this through.

    And anytime you read or hear "jobs", substitute corporate profits.

    The railway to Treblinka also provided lots of jobs, especially in the building phase. Of course, when the "product" (everything is now commodified, including human life) would run out, the jobs disappear.

    If 70 or 80% of the people along the route, or even among all BCers strongly objected, would it still be pushed through? Is that why the Harperites want to have the decision their way in under two years, before their mandate runs out and aanother election is called?

    I suspect that this and the Keystone XL are both done deals, if not this year, than next or possibly the following.

    Prisons are paid for out of taxes, even if they are P3s, not by oil companies.

    You're right Rafe, ..."as the scales fall from our eyes, we see the sham." Just not enough people have dropped the scales yet. Or they don't see a solution and feel stumped.

  • VICTREX

    19 weeks ago

    Canada's Democracy ? ?

    Canada's political system IS a SHAM ! When 40% of those who bothered to vote makes a majority government, just makes a dictatorship, that really stinks. Harper is making Canada just a COLONY of the 21st Century Colonialists---the 1/10 of 1 % of the world's wealthiest. The New Colonialists do not need huge armies to exploit the whole world, just be the majority shareholders of all the Corporations that control all the industries and resources of any country. If maximum profits can not be made in one country then the industry is shut down---usually at tax-payer expense---and moved into the 3rd world where there are NO wage laws and NO environment laws. Free-Trade agreements allow the goods to be sold throughout the world without duties or prohibitions. The welfare of the citizens is of NO concern. The dog-eat-dog system has NO compassion. Poverty is only the concern of the poor---the Colonialist profiteer does not care. A citizen's democratic VOTE is basically just a ruse to fool the citizen into believing that they are living in a democracy, but in reality it is just a dictatorship running the country--paid for by the Corporation. If a President or Prime Minister does not do what the Corporate World wants, then that person is quickly removed or if necessary---just assassinated. Leaders are just as expendable as the workers. Nothing is to stand in the way of PROFIT ! It won't be long before the "BIG BROTHER" Corporations will implant a chip into everyone's brain at birth so all will be monitored--used and abused---will not be able to hide anywhere---a police state of the near future---everyone monitored by cameras and computers and satellites. All done for the profits of the Colonialists. Some of those Hollywood Movies are not too much of a fantasy to be the future of the world. SAD FUTURE ! !

  • Fiat lux

    19 weeks ago

    igby....I look at myself as a

    igby....I look at myself as a "general practitioner" who diagnoses the sickness and then lets people make up their own minds what to do about it.

    We realized in our war and refugee years, even as teenagers, that there's something wrong with the brainwash we've been subjected to by our teachers, priests and governments of all ideologies and decided to search for ways to become as independent as possible, in friendly cooperation with others, trying to reach the highest degree of self sustainability.

    Not competition, but cooperation between free people, not by ramming our ways down anybody's throats.

    As far economics are concerned, I've spent a lifetime searching for the causes of history's repetitious tragedies, without finding a common thread, until I've read an interview with economics professor Herman Daly in the Mother Earth News in 1980. He pointed it out even then that the theory being taught and used was and is wrong. Yet, very few took notice.

    Started reading economics in 1982 and by '85 it was very clear to me that the whole system was nothing more than a fraudulent religion to mislead people into giving up their freedom and properties.

    Very similar to the tragedies, when families were urged by the priests and proud to see their daughters thrown into volcanoes, as ordered by the gods, to bring rain.

    Without public support and the use of democracy, there's no hope for changes for the better, but the proof will have to come from the learned people and professors in our universities, not from an old guy in the sticks.

    I've been maintaining it to my scientist and professor friends for many years, that the answer is in their hands, showing and proving it to people that the system is criminal, which can be proven very easily with the application of a few, well known physical laws, like Thermodynamics and Newton's laws on speed and reaction.

    I can't do it, but they can, yet, all we can hear from them is silence, while their economics departments are going wild, destroying the Earth and humanity with the perceived power in non existing, imaginary capital licencing the biggest crime wave in history.

    The solution is in the 2 definitions I wrote in my first note on top of these exchanges.

    I think, there's a way and hope that humanity will wake up one day.

    Ed Deak

  • snert

    19 weeks ago

    Hey, lindi6676

    Quote:
    There is no one making the rules, and leading the ways its an individual movement and its growing.

    Look a little more closely at this new "movement" and you will find that if they are not in a leading roll already then there are a bunch of leader wanna-bes that will soon start to run things the way they figure it should go. The new game may be afoot but it still does not represent significant change.

  • realisticman

    19 weeks ago

    How it Works.

    Anyone interested in how this country was designed to work should read Chantal Hébert's column published yesterday.

    Anyone interested in a new and improved national energy program, or a national housing program, or any other similar, should read it too.

    Rafe should read it too.

    The Constitution of Canada is not about to be changed and the Supreme Court recently clarified the divisions between Federal and Provincial areas of jurisdiction.

    http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/politics/article/1112925--hebert-liberals-top-down-view-of-federalism-out-of-date

  • Fiat lux

    19 weeks ago

    Very interesting. In theory

    Very interesting. In theory at least.

    Unfortunately, we now have the most interventionist, top down , dictatorial government.

    The so called "free trade agreements" destroying the democratic decision making powers of people, the great, tax free benefits given to the multinational corporate mafia and the forcing through of the environmental disasters of the Tar Sands and the Keystone and Enbridge pipelines are the best examples.

    With the free trade rackets having destroyed Canadian industries and with them decent, well paying jobs, causing illness, poverty, foodbank lines, the country now has to "diversify". To use the immortal words of "conservative politicians" by selling everything the resources and soil to foreign "investors" and building up the economies of slave labour countries, like commie China, so their cadre can come back and buy up our housing and real estate.

    If the "free trade" rackets, like the coming CETA, wiping out even municipal powers, are not top down interventions, what are they?

    If foreign companies can sue for the loss of profits against Canadian decision making powers, what the hell are they if not top down dictatorships, with more and more to come, wiping out all democracy?

    Ed Deak.

  • igbymac

    19 weeks ago

    Ed Deak,

    "Not competition, but cooperation between free people, not by ramming our ways down anybody's throats."

    Agreed. Unfortunately people are far more moved (swayed, coerced) through emotion than reason. And the power elites always have the big stick. But this, too, may be a learned behaviour to some degree. We never seem to give cooperation and peace a chance.

  • change the system

    19 weeks ago

    Sham Democracy

    At last, Rafe, you can see that we have to change the BC political system, not just keep changing the party in power. Ten years ago a BC party was formed to change our political system so that the people have decisive input into how we are governed. You were not ready to discuss systemic change 10 years ago, but now you are rightly crying out for people control of government – every day, not just once every four years. Such a political system has existed in a European country for over 150 years, and that BC political party still exists. It ran 22 candidates in the last provincial election. Your wish may come true yet ?

  • VivianLea Doubt

    19 weeks ago

    "not competition, but cooperation..."

    The question that Rafe doesn't address, really, is why the majority of us would allow the minority to become the 'haves', in terms of material wealth, in any event. It has been suggested (at various times, other threads, and by numerous people)that this is because we are sheeple, because we watch too much TV,or because we don't vote - but to my mind this describes symptoms, not the illness itself. The illness, I would say, is that most of us still aspire to a vision of becoming a 'have'. The fact that we still aspire to this, in spite of study after study that shows the wealthy are no happier, and that the drive for acquisition is rooted in pychological dysfunction, is perhaps the elephant in the room.

    At some level, I think it is true that we must examine ourselves and our deepest, innermost desires. Ed Deak is right about cooperation, and he is right about sham economics - and Rafe is at least partly wrong about the struggle always being between the haves and the have-nots. There are at least a few examples of societies that coperated marvelously. But I suppose the thing I really came here to say is that it really is true: money does not buy intelligence, or looks, or sensitivity, or grace. It may buy art, but not the ability...the things that people have always valued most, in the final analysis, are family, community, culture and they cannot be purchased.It is only the spirit of coperation that will bring about happy families, healthy communities and vibrant culture.

  • Fiat lux

    19 weeks ago

    As JK Galbraith, who was one

    As JK Galbraith, who was one of the few economists in history who had brains, said it decades ago; "The purpose of competition is to eliminate competition"

    The logical purpose of democracy is equality with no lords, no legalized thieves and no losers.

    The logical and physical fact is that all forms of competition increase costs because of the ever increasing energy demands to stay on top, until the system burns out.

    No competitive society can survive as we can see hundreds of examples of their self destruction, in history.

    In a competitive system there are a few winners and a majority of losers, who, in any society claiming even sham democracy, have to be looked after, which means a "welfare society" the winners hate with a passion, even when they cause it.

    Which brings on the idea of the welfare society that was developed by a Conservative British government before WW2, fearing that another depression could bring on widespread violence.

    In other words it wasn't a "socialist" invention, but logic to prevent violence.

    In the USA Edwardes Deming has done a lot of work, proving that competition leads to major failure and the only way economies can survive is by cooperation between all sectors.

    Definitely not with the top Canadian income of $61. million last year, or the top 100 making an average of $9. million all of which came out of the pockets of all of us.

    There's no such thing as the much claimed "users pay", because the users must get it from somewhere and then all the way down the line, until everybody pays for everything.

    E.g. Every time we go shopping we're contributing to the salaries of Harper, Obama, the President of China and so on and on, not to mention the stockmarket gamblers.

    Ed Deak.

  • igbymac

    19 weeks ago

    VivianLea Doubt

    "The illness, I would say, is that most of us still aspire to a vision of becoming a 'have'. The fact that we still aspire to this, in spite of study after study that shows the wealthy are no happier, and that the drive for acquisition is rooted in pychological dysfunction, is perhaps the elephant in the room."

    Even the Wall Street Journal agrees, at least in subtext.

    http://blogs.wsj.com/wealth/2010/09/07/the-perfect-salary-for-happiness-75000-a-year/

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.