- Ms Kaye is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Mary Carlisle is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Prem Gill is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Nancy Flight is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Justin Everett is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- John Westover is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Nora Etches is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Edward Henderson is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Bharadwaj Chandramouli is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Dean Chatterson is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Marius Scurtescu is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Robert Parkes is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- James Murton is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Susan Doyle is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Vincent Strgar is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Helen Spiegelman is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Subir Guin is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Kimball Finigan is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Joanne Manley is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- David Leach is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
Let's Hope Minister Prentice Means It: Environmental Defence
Eco-advocacy group responds to minister's criticism of its oil sands report and Tyee coverage.
Federal Environment Minister Jim Prentice.
[Editor's note: The Tyee published on October 20 a news item on its Hook blog summarizing a newly released report by Environmental Defence urging the federal government to increase regulations on oil sands development, and lobby less on behalf of Alberta's oil interests. That article drew a response from Environment Minister Jim Prentice, published by The Tyee on October 27. Now Environmental Defence has sent The Tyee a response to Prentice. In the interest of facilitating an important discussion, we publish that piece here.]
Let's begin with what may be a surprise: we at Environmental Defence agree with much of what federal Environment Minister Prentice has said in theTyee.ca recently regarding the tar sands industry. In particular, we were pleased with his comment on that industry's role in meeting national greenhouse pollution reduction targets -- that he intends ". . . to deal with all sorts of emissions in Canada in order to achieve those targets," and that "No one, including the oil sands, will receive a bye in that process."
The reason that we were pleased is that this would amount to fundamental change in the industry instead of the tinkering around the edges that regulators have so far failed to sell the public on. As our recent report indicated, on its current trajectory the tar sands industry is on track to release more than three times its fair share of national carbon emissions by 2020, and more than 40 times by 2050, even if you are a wild-eyed optimist about the use of carbon capture and storage. If you are not, and many thoughtful people aren't, then those numbers get even worse.
Series of false starts
After initially saying it would wait for the U.S. to move on carbon pollution, our federal government has subsequently proceeded with not waiting, and is taking a sector-by-sector approach to regulating. First up have been the transportation and coal-fired power sectors. The proposed regulations in these sectors have not exactly been stellar (see here), but they have set up this inescapable conclusion: at some point the federal government must get around to regulating tar sands pollution, and if we take Minister Prentice at face value about meeting targets and all sectors doing their fair share, this must by necessity bring fundamental change to the tar sands industry.
We've had a number of false starts on this front, with multiple federal climate 'plans' being announced and not implemented. The most recent revelation had awful timing -- during the Copenhagen climate talks last December, CBC obtained confidential cabinet documents that suggested Ottawa let tar sands emissions more than triple by 2020, instead of cutting them in line with that sector doing its fair share alongside others, and in line with Minister Prentice's statement above.
So, we look forward to the federal government proposing carbon regulations for the tar sands sector that reduce its absolute emissions in line with the federal targets, and even better, in line with where science says we need to be. Anything else will place undue burden on other sectors and other regions of Canada to do even more, or mean missing our national targets, or both.
A range of tar sands hazards
Of course, carbon isn't the only area where Ottawa must fulfill its responsibilities. While we transition away from oil to a truly clean energy economy, the worst impacts of tar sands activities must be better mitigated, including the growing amounts of toxic waste, the ongoing destruction of habitat for endangered species like caribou, and increasing acid rain falling on neighbouring Saskatchewan. There's also the fact that there's no foolproof way to stop those ducks from landing on those toxic tailings ponds, so the only answer there (as even Alberta Premier Stelmach has said) is to get rid of them entirely -- the ponds, that is, not the ducks.
As our report indicates, all of these problems fall to the federal government to fix, and all of these problems added together are the reason that Canada's environmental reputation is suffering so badly around the world. We won't recover until Ottawa enforces its laws and gets the growing problems in the tar sands under control. ![]()




10
Login or register to post comments
whatthe
1 year ago
Get real
The government is the growing problem from the Tar Sands.
Yet we plead with them to get it under control?
What farcical non=-sense.
Yeahn Prentice is mad as hell and he aint gonna take it anymore, so he appointed a committee.
You direct campaigns Matt?
Well that bodes well for the tea partiers running the tar pit doesn't it?
mopled
1 year ago
Dumb and diversionary
Concentrating on how much CO2 the Tar Sands produce allows the heavy oil industry to get government grants/tax breaks to do something they are doing anyway....injecting CO2 into old oil wells to raise pressure.
"CO2 sequestration from Alberta's oil sands operations
Reuters article on Penn West Energy Trust’s ambitions to sequester and reuse carbon dioxide from their oil sands upgrading process.
Reuter’s reports in their recent article Penn West eyes upgrader for CO2 injection plans, that Penn West Energy is considering an upgrader to process tar-like bitumen from their northern Alberta's Peace River region into refinery-ready crude oil. The greenhouse gases produced by the plant would then be used to improve recovery in older conventional oil fields in Alberta's Pembina region. While CO2 injection may not be effective for heavy oil recovery as CO2 tends to precipitate asphaltenes from the heavy oil and thus damages formation productivity, it is a proven EOR approach for conventional reservoirs. While there are a number of hurdles to implement and scale this approach, it is a great example of innovative process changes ongoing within our industry that will better enable oil sands and heavy oil reservoirs to be produced economically while minimizing GHG emissions."
http://www.heavyoilinfo.com/blog-posts/co2-sequestration-to-improve-heavy-oil-recovery
RickW
1 year ago
Interesting Walrus article
http://www.walrusmagazine.com/articles/2010.10-environment-the-last-great-water-fight/
John Greg
1 year ago
LOL!
So, now Prentice has quit, and is moving into an extremely cushy and well paid job as an executive officer of the CIBC.
So, you know, I guess that's what politics really is about: rape, pillage, and lie to the people (who put you in power and pay your salary) for a few years, then get rich at a major corporation until you can retire with a retirement package of such great wealth that only about 3% of the people of the country can even dream about it.
Gods alive; they're all just a bunch of ethical whores and moral turds.
RickW
1 year ago
So I suppose the answer is......
.....Prentice might have meant it, but Harper didn't.
It's good to know though, that the golden boot-in-the-ass is alive and working well!
RickW
1 year ago
PS
I wonder why he didn't take a job in BC's forest industry?
Oh....right.....there is none!
John W. Whitmore
1 year ago
CIBC Wins!
A good man now has a job he at least has half a shot at making a difference.
Better than being in a job where you always get shot.
At least he spent the better part of the last decade trying to make a difference.
Good Luck to Mr Prentice.
I hope he will be back after his sabatical.
John Greg
1 year ago
Yikes
Gods save us from the shills, the propagandists, and the party-faithful liars.
RickOshea
1 year ago
Tar For Two
The US has the Tea Party, Canada is ruled by the Tar Party - Tea Party sycophants.
Talk of environmental protection from the neocons is as cheap as the value your children's heavily discounted future thanks to runaway environmental destruction like that being wrought in western Canada's tar sands.
pwlg
1 year ago
from the environment ministry to tar sands investment
Mr. Prentice's new job takes him into the polished head office hallways of CIBC and CIBC's vast tar sands and pipeline investments.
CIBC has a large investment in Canadian Oil Sands Trust as well as TransCanada Pipelines and Enbridge-the company proposing to build the tar sands crude oil pipeline to Kitimat.
Canadian Oil Sands Trust is a major Syncrude shareholder.
Prentice was also the Harper minority government's Industry Minister (tar sands part of the Industry Ministry's portfolio).
Prentice as Environment Minister just prior to G20 meeting in Toronto states that Canada will be phasing out its coal fired electrical generating plants. Oh really, then why did Prentice commit $700 million of taxpayers money to the coal fired generating plant industry while he was Industry Minister?
And if phasing out coal fired power plants was more than rhetoric then his home province of Alberta will have to shut off it's lights. Alberta has 23 of these coal fired power plants that emit more CO2 than the tar sand developments. Perhaps Nikiforuk could write about this dirty little secret too.
As Indian Affairs Minister Prentice brought in one of the most anti-indigenous pieces of legislation since the 1960's clearing the way for Arctic oil exploration and even more pipelines. He went on to be the Minister of Industry after his horrible performance as Indian Affairs Minister. (Gee, when will the feds finally understand that the term they use to describe indigenous peoples is a holdover from British colonialism)?
Prentice speaks with fork-tongue, saying one thing but the actions of his government differ.
Take for instance while the federal environmental assessment (acceptance) process for the proposed Enbridge pipeline is taking place another federal agency, Canadian Coast Guard, has been installing more navigation beacons on the central coast of BC.