- Ms Kaye is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Mary Carlisle is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Prem Gill is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Nancy Flight is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Justin Everett is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- John Westover is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Nora Etches is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Edward Henderson is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Bharadwaj Chandramouli is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Dean Chatterson is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Marius Scurtescu is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Robert Parkes is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- James Murton is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Susan Doyle is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Vincent Strgar is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Helen Spiegelman is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Subir Guin is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Kimball Finigan is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Joanne Manley is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- David Leach is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
Where Is BC's Game Changing New Party?
Voters are mad as hell, but that's a long way from building a serious 'third party.'
Cartoon by Ingrid Rice.
There is a lot of chatter about a significant new party coming to B.C. politics. Given the appalling state of governance and opposition, such a discussion is not surprising.
Gordon Campbell and his so-called Liberals are in high odor indeed and have created a number of issues that will still be around to haunt them in 2013, the time of the next election.
The NDP are high in the polls but that is much more reflective of Campbell's unpopularity than the popularity of Carole James & Co. In fact the NDP have got to hope that in 2013 that the Liberals will be so unpopular that, like 1991, a fencepost with hair could beat them. But, as reflected in this space before, the NDP can't run their affairs on the assumption that Campbell will be around but on the worst case scenario, namely that the Liberals will be led by Carole Taylor or Diane Watts. There is absolutely no indication that the NDP will change leaders. If they do, it will probably be too late. The NDP have always had the habit of eating themselves into a bad stew when they select leaders.
So doesn't this all point to a new party that might make a serious difference in the next election or even win?
Unhappily for the province the answer is no.
Bring back Socreds?
Let's start off by acknowledging that the BC Greens would lay claim to "third party" status today. But their base has proven to be too limited to surge to prominence in the next election. Who else then might?
The first possibility some mention is the comeback of the Socred or Reform parties. I'm told that the old Social Credit party is under the control of two or three people and is in no position to present itself, as it did in Bill Bennett's day, as a middle of the road populist party. That's sad and brings back the past where in 1991 Rita Johnston bested Grace McCarthy for leader with an election coming up. I think most "pols" would agree that if Grace had been around in the 1991 election she probably wouldn't have won but would have held the party together sufficiently to have a sizeable opposition such that in the election following they would be competitive. But that's not what happened.
The Reform Party is for -- and I avoid a lawsuit -- the optimistic misfits who always dominate the early going with any new or revived party.
What about the Progressive Democratic Alliance, the dream child of Gordon Wilson who, alas, has not been in the legislature during Campbell's reign. The PDA is not going to be the answer nor will Gordon Wilson try very hard to revive it.
The most talked about alternative is the Conservative party under former federal minister, Randy White. It won't work for a number of reasons not the least of which is that they would always have to deal with the federal Conservative wing for whose peccadilloes they will be obliged to explain away.
Gordon Wilson's war
It's instructive to look back to 1987 when Gordon Wilson became leader of the BC Liberal Party. Immediately upon taking the chair, Wilson began to remove any and all connection between what until then was a national party with a provincial wing and create a new independent party. He also knew that his party always had to look independent to be independent and he got lucky when the Meech Lake Accord came down which would have, amongst other things, have given Quebec a special constitutional place in our national affairs. I got to know Gordon very well during this period and can tell you that he it may have looked like political opportunist but he genuinely opposed it. He got behind Newfoundland premier, Clyde Wells, the leading anti Meech politician and a very popular symbol of opposition, especially in B.C., to the deal. Sincere though Wilson was, the presence of the Meech Lake Accord was serendipitous and got Wilson known and respected and helped the BC Liberal party to look to voters like a B.C. party.
Wilson got lucky again during the leaders' debate in the 1991 campaign which he worked very hard to be part of and succeeded.
Working from a physical position between Mike Harcourt for the NDP and premier Rita Johnston and was able to get off this zinger as Harcourt and Johnston quarreled -- "this is a perfect example of why nothing ever gets done in Victoria." He of all people knew that under our system all decisions are made by the premier's office and that the function of the Legislature is to rubber stamp government legislation and policy. In fact, however, it would become the campaign's most successful slogan which Wilson converted into 17 seats, up from zero. At that, though Wilson's new party went from zero seats to 17, he was a long way from winning.
NDP's vote ceiling?
It's instructive to look at past election results were you'll see that the NDP garner about 40 per cent of the vote -- the exception being the trouncing they took in 2001 when they got 29 per cent and two lonely MLAs. When there are no viable other options and it's a two horse race, they lose. When there are viable alternatives, such as 1972 and 1991, they win, with the exception of 1996 when with 42 per cent they managed to win against the Liberals who had 46 per cent. The conclusion, in my view, is that in a straight fight between Carole James against a Carole Taylor or Dianne Watts, without a viable third party in the race, the NDP will lose. With a viable third party -- and the key word is viable, the Liberals have a good chance of winning in spite of their brutal record.
Let's go back to Randy White and the Conservatives. The first question is how do they position themselves to the left of the Liberals which is where they must be to have any hope of achieving any electoral success?
How does Randy White build a team, especially when history tells us that any new party attracts the eccentric, to put it mildly? I see no evidence that White himself has any personal charisma and there's no evidence that any such people are lining up to support his party.
How does he raise any serious money? The business community will look for the best prospect of a friendly government and will support the Liberals, especially if they have a leader who can dissociate themselves from the mess Campbell leaves. The unpalatable truth is that you need money, and lots of it, to fight in all constituencies.
Perhaps White's most serious problem will be to cut loose from the national party while looking to members of that party for funds. Funding problems also exist, big time, for a new party.
Too soon to place wagers
Most of the forgoing has Gordon Campbell leaving before 2013 and that's not certain, for many reasons the major one being that leaders who don't want to go are very hard to dislodge. By 1988, Bill Vander Zalm had become a very unpopular leader of the Social Credit Party and the dissidents wanted to turf him out at the annual conference that year held in Penticton. The knives were out and there was provision in the constitution to remove a leader in a secret ballot. The backroom weasels moved a motion that whether or not there had to be an open vote to do so before any secret leadership vote could be taken! Vander Zalm stayed. Likewise, if Campbell wants to stay, he'll probably stay creating the same sort of divisions in the party that faced the Socreds after Vander Zalm left.
The NDP face a similar problem although they are so fractured at the best of times that they're more used to it. As long as James'es numbers stay high, her supporters, especially party president Moe Sihota, will probably fight her fight successfully.
It's all so like a horse race; who has the best post position? What shape will the track be in, fast, muddy or maybe sloppy? How good is the manager, namely the jockey? And what about the campaign committee, the trainer, the veterinarian, the grooms?
As we ponder our betting options, my wager is that we'll know a lot more about the race by this time next year. ![]()




79
Login or register to post comments
Grumpy
2 years ago
As the say in the 'Hurtlands' we're hooped!
[OFFENSIVE COMMENT REMOVED. -MODERATOR.]
seth
2 years ago
Recall in the Fall
All bets are off with the oustanding performance so far of the Zalm's HST team.
The BC Conservatives just have to but up a fence post with a wig as leader and they suck enough votes from the Gordo to kill the BC Liberals.
Egomaniac Carol James is hanging on and hoping. And the castrated Horgan and Farnsworth squeek away in their shrill voices cowtowing to the James.
Takuan
2 years ago
introducing:
The BC Vengeance Party.
We make no promises and have no policies save one: Revenge. The BC Vengeance Party will run on the platform of attaining power and PUNISHING those in the current government. After their loot is confiscated, their network destroyed and their asses in jail, we will immediately call another election. Vote V for Freedom!
Van Isle
2 years ago
Her Majestys Loyal
Her Majestys Loyal Opposition is looking pretty bad on this whole Kash Heed business. Hardly a peep. Where are they? They should be front and centre with the news industry, screaming from the rafters, and gnashing their teeth. If they're so incompetent at being the opposition, they don't deserve to be Government
Conductor274
2 years ago
What about a general strike?
[OFFENSIVE POST REMOVED. -MODERATOR.]
seth
2 years ago
NDP and Heed
It is very difficult for the NDP to get any press or air time on the MSM.
When they do it is usually set up so Palmer,Smythe, Good, Baldry or the like can trash what has been said without any chance for rebuttal.
Hopefully Torstar gets the Canwest papers.
Luck
2 years ago
Lots of solutions but no action reaction yet from the people
General strike
General strike
General strike
Has any one got it yet.
We need an outburst from people like we had in 1986 when real people took action.
Keep sitting back and before you know it we do not have a province or any money.
Time for action boys and girls.
alive
2 years ago
Wasted my time again Rafe
OK Rafe, You have done it again!
One more time you have constructed an article out of nothing about nothing.
I wonder why anyone pays you for such an effort?
freebear
2 years ago
No interest in Political Parties Rafe, period
A re-branding?
A re-visioning?
Ban political perties period!
Ordinary Canadian
2 years ago
A pox on parties......
It is the party system which is failing our democracy. Like government all parties have a hierarchy where a few voices are heard and the rest don't count. So no matter who is elected power remains with a few. The voice of the people will be heard when we all have a vote on the budget. When this kind of real change happens democracy will evolve as it should. We will have to accept full responsibility for the budget choices we make and we will want to be informed on the implications of our choices. Imagine Rafe, how much easier your crusade to save our precious water would be if you could say to the people "You will have a choice to make regarding BC Hydro and here is how it will affect your pocketbook." This idea needs much discussion and development but it is evident everywhere in the world that the party system as we know it is not serving us well.
P. Markunas
2 years ago
Best Comment?
Grumpy is a "best comment"? Really?
kl
2 years ago
How to move forward
Carole James needs to resign immediately. She can cite all the usual cliches such as wanting to spend more time with family etc etc.
Then, the NDP needs to implement a new means for voting for a new leader. I recommend opening up the process to the whole Province. You don't even have to be a member of the party to vote. All voting is one person one vote and done online. What this will accomplish is twofold: creating a sense of momentum for the party going into the next election and giving British Columbians a voice in the political process they so desperately deserve.
This at least is much more realistic and doable then a new party. It would just take the will of Party insiders to open up the leadership process and the will of James to finally admit she is not the right person to lead the NDP forward.
Takuan
2 years ago
general strike
needs a galvanizing moment, an event, a slogan, an icon, something. Calling for it will get plenty of agreement it is a good idea, but we need a spark to set things in motion.
samuidave (not verified)
2 years ago
Contemporary Politics is big business
...and when big-business money is involved, compromised integrity follows. Effectively, deception/misinformation/omission are now institutionalized after waging their relentless, 90+ year propaganda war on the masses.
Offer up what you will as a 'viable' alternative. It will inevitably be more of the same, perhaps a different song will be sung by a different singer, yet the show goes on -- the financial backers will demand their pound of flesh.
In a sane and thoughtful world, the people who should be running the show fail for all the wrong reasons:
* limited funding,
* lacking PR/propaganda,
* lacking charisma,
* communicate outside the soundbite,
* highly principled,
* forward thinking,
* honest
Conversely, the people who do run the show succeed because they are aligned for political success:
* very well funded,
* excellent PR/propaganda structures,
* charismatic, in perception,
* communicate within a soundbite,
* unprincipled,
* stagnant/ regressive thinking,
* dis-honest/deceptive
Although individually people can often be reasoned with, the collective wisdom of people is astonishingly dim. The propagandists know how to tune into the collective public and how to prey on them with emotional motivators while avoiding comprehensive reasoning. This has been the weapon of politics and campaigns since the bludgeon was put down as a motivator of the masses.
And an effective propaganda campaign does not come cheap. Recently, the Harper Conservative government spent over $40 million 'taxpayer' dollars to advertise its CPC stimulus spending package.
And there is the rub. Power is money.
In the end, we do make incremental democratic gains -- occasionally winning smaller, issue-specific battles, but the collective public cannot win the war without a destructive revolution dismantling the institutional structure of governance.
Obviously the power structure has no intention to hand over democracy to the people, so we either take it for ourselves or acquiesce to their rule. Those are our only choices.
As the late Howard Zinn said, "History is a weapon". Our problem is that we do not care to know much about history.
Adam M
2 years ago
Betting on Horses
Why don't we stop the wagering on what the established political players are going to do or not do and take it into our own hands?
Go to www.fighthst.com and volunteer to do some canvassing or captaining for the Fight HST initiative in your neighborhood. This will teach you the fundamentals of campaigning without having to work for a party.
Most importantly, it will be the perfect rehearsal for the RECALL IN THE FALL campaign, which uses the same rules, the same petition sheets, the same application process, as the current initiative. If the Fight HST Initiative is defeated, our now-experienced mass of volunteers will recall (fire) as many Liberal MLA's as it takes to repeal the HST. And if the NDP or independents elected in the subsequent by-elections so much as dare to not repeal the tax, we will recall their asses too!
Nothing is easy, folks, but there is a way to take the process out of the politicians', and their crooked backers', hands. It's the initiative, and then it's recall. Join up now and do your part!
the-grouse
2 years ago
Mary Ellen Turpel-Lafonde
The dismal prospect that a change in BC Liberal Party leadership could resuscitate the deservedly moribund party and give them another electoral victory is most definitely worth plotting about. My contribution is that whether it be a third party or the NDP getting their heads straight on the fragility of "marketing" Carol James, is to call for Mary Ellen Turpel-Lafond, presently the spirited and savvy BC Representative for Children and Youth, to be graciously substituted for Ms. James or elevatedto the helm of a new party.
Ordinary Canadian
2 years ago
'...'the collective wisdom
'...'the collective wisdom of people is astonishingly dim.' Amazingly all democratic progress has been made because of this 'collective wisdom'. With the possible recent exception of Bhutan I don't recall anywhere or anytime in history where power was relinquished willingly. It was because of this 'collective wisdom' that we got the franchise, that it was extended to women, First Nations,other immigrant groups etc. We need to stop pointing fingers and simply seize the power and the responsibility for our future. We should be seeking independent, ethical candidates(no party affiliations) in every constituency for the next election. Like the move against prorogation and HST simply ignore mass media. Use personal and electronic communication to say this person represents a protest vote against the way things are. Better yet in my opinion, the candidate would have a one item platform which would be to work towards giving the electorate a choice of audited budgets to choose from.
refedmel
2 years ago
Where is the new Party?
Rafe Mair is a hypocrite....when he was a media star he professed to be a republican at heart...ya right!
A republican based party[modeled on the Swiss] ran 22 candidates in 2009, its 123Plan will put the people in charge of the government.
But I guess that is not good enough for Mr. Mair, who made not a mention of The BC Refederation Party, but would rather rant on about dead and dying former parties whose platforms, much like the present Liberals, NDP are so 19th century.
ONE OF THE COMMENTS ABOVE ;. "Why don't we stop the wagering on what the established political players are going to do or not do and take it into our own hands?" The BCRefed Party guarantees that wish!!
Soundguy
2 years ago
What's wrong with the Greens?
"Let's start off by acknowledging that the BC Greens would lay claim to "third party" status today. But their base has proven to be too limited to surge to prominence in the next election."
That's it?? That's all you have to say about the Greens? I, personally think they're a perfectly viable option given the circumstances. If nothing else, at least we'd feel it save to assume there will be no offshore drilling in BC for the foreseeable future. So, why so little written about them?
David Huntley
2 years ago
The electoral system is the problem
Here is the main problem. As George Hallett wrote in 1940
“All popular government is founded on elections. It is of the utmost importance that the rules of elections shall make it easy for the people to get what they really want.”
Until we get to vote using STV we will never get the representatives we want. First Past the Post does not elect the most preferred candidate and good people will not run under the present party system.
AnthonyB
2 years ago
Where is B.C.'s game-changing new party?
You and others who have been part of the flawed political hierarchy are too steeped in the oldline party, first-past-the-post system to give the Greens the chance and consideration they deserve. From the outset you have simply written them off because they give the environment a high rating (it is, after all, our world) and fail to follow the traditional greed and dirty tricks that typify the mouldy oldies. The Greens have a solid platform that uniquely features honesty and integrity.
RickW
2 years ago
What I "don't get"......
.....is, if the Libs are no good, and the NDP is no good, they why the hell NOT vote Green? How can it possibly get any worse (except - as Grumpy says - to add a few different MLA's "on the take")?
Hermans Hermit
2 years ago
Recall
Recall all (and I mean ALL of them) 85 MLA's in the fall, flush these useless teets down the toilet, and start anew with independents and another party. The only way to go.
Takuan
2 years ago
if I recollect correctly
the problem last time (that invited the vampires over the threshold) wasn't not having a fit party/candidate to vote for. It was all those stupid, malingering, slack-witted, infinitely contemptible gits and lazy dolts THAT DIDN'T EVEN BOTHER TO VOTE!!
Ordinary Canadian
2 years ago
Old remedies
Proportional representation is old idea used in Greece for example and it doesn't seem to have cured anything. The Green Party, the Refederation Party are like other political parties with a hierarchy that operates exactly like the NDP or Liberals so there is no systemic evolution and we would just stutter along same old.
Grumpy
2 years ago
Best Comment? It would be better if Gordo the Great resigned!
@ P. Markunas
I am as stunned as you are. Such is life.
From Laila Yuile Blog
http://lailayuile.wordpress.com/
Donors that know how business works in BC.
* 2009 donation amounts listed only
Teck Cominco and subsiduaries: $150,800.00
Goldcorp: $88,500.00
Encana : $118,000.00
Telus : $68,123.52
Aquilini Group : $ 80,700.00
Brookfield Asset Management/ Brookfield Timber Management : $ 60, 000.00 ( note Richard Legault and Barry Blattman, whose names seem to come up in everything Liberal related.
Timberwest: $ 60,988
West Fraser: $ 108,089
Catalyst: $ 24, 500.00 ( guess they couldn’t have been doing too poorly if they could still afford donations to the Liberals…
Jim Pattison Group and Great Pacific Investments: $10,500.oo ( down from previous years)
All these major players expect a piece of BC's action, this is how politics work today, diverting taxpayers money to friends of the government. This is BC democratic process, this is our democracy.............NOT!
seth
2 years ago
Defang the Greens
Canada's Green Parties consist of a bunch of puerile malcontents that don't work well with others but are in possession of a brand name that environmentally conscious but low information voters identify with. The Green Party, is the most potent weapon in the Neocon electoral warchest and as such ironically the most potent weapon in their efforts at environmental destruction
People that care about the environment need to join the Green Party and pass a no participation in elections resolution, removing this miserable blight forever from the Canadian electoral process.
Okanagan Orchardist
2 years ago
It has been suggested before.....
There is only one solution to getting rid of Gordo and crew---well actually there is one more, but I can't mention it---and that is for the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th (etc.) parties to amalgamate, select an honest, determined, literate, outstanding citizen from amongst themselves (if there are any left, perhaps "Takuan" could volunteer) and steer the course of BC politics back to a position of democracy, where 95% of the populace gets out and votes.
Takuan
2 years ago
make me emperor
and you will feel the cruel bite of my lash. You'd also be better off than under Drunko.
bontano
2 years ago
Regardless of one's position
Regardless of one's position on the points made, this column is in dire need of being fine-tuned by an editor.
freebear
2 years ago
I volunteer to be the benevolent King of BC
BC: Ban cronyism!
DNA
2 years ago
Great analysis Grumpy
Grumpy, for once you are right on. Our current parties are tired - the Liberals, for being in power so long, and the NDP, for choosing a weak leader who hasn't brought needed new blood into that party. The Greens can't grow because they can't seem to expand from their single issue status.
So where will new leadership and energy come from? I don't know any more than Rafe does - possibly (on the centre left) from Gregor Robertson and his people, possibly on the centre right from the suburbs, Kevin Falcon and Diane Watts. It's unlikely to come from our depressed hinterland.
One thing I do know: if our current parties don't find new energy and leadership, they'll be dead in ten years, gone the way of the Socreds...
AnthonyB
2 years ago
The horrors that we've got
By ignorantly dumping on the promise of the Greens, Seth is simply endorsing the arrogant, lying lizards now in charge in B.C. and Ottawa. The Green parties, provincial and federal, are a sound alternative to the disgusting coverups and open corruption of the posturing lumps now filling the seats in our legislatures. Neither Campbell nor Harper would recognize integrity if it crawled up their legs.
Frank
2 years ago
The Greens are an alternative?
I thought we already had a Green party type government in power? In the run up to the last election all you ever heard from Greens was praise for Campbell and his people such as Jaccard and Berman and attacks on the NDP.
Frank
2 years ago
BC Refed Party
I went to your home page and don't understand why going back to 1867 politically is a good thing. But then I'm a Canadian who happens to live in BC, not a BCer slaving under the yoke of Canada.
arcadianross
2 years ago
Vote Independent
freebear; Ordinary Canadian;
I cannot agree more. Party politics have got to go. Please join us at the un-party. We advocate running and voting independently. Political parties will only serve those who pay their bills. We have more or less successfully separated Church and State, now we need to separate Business and State.
Visit the Facebook page;
Common Interests / Politics / The This Ain't No Party.
Takuan
2 years ago
they can be beaten
Don’t believe them. Don’t fear them. Don’t ask anything of them.
— Alexander Solzhenitsyn
Jerry Munro
2 years ago
V for Vendetta and R for Redemption...
We need another political party like most folks need another "waste" orifice.
What we really need is folks raising shit on the streets like the Greeks and Thais, and soon to spread to the rest of Europe, and out of that shaping alternative systems of " participatory democracy power" within the economy, challenging "Boss" power there AND within the political systems of our communities.
Nobody is saying its going to be easy, but is what is any easier?
Duhhh! No!
At least my suggestion offers an end to to the bullshit, and some hope of ultimate redemption for the masses, arising out of the vendetta process, if we/they can get their shit together.
Another political party, however you dress it up, is just one more of the same old, same old, go nowhere, leave it to another group of elites to screw us over.
In my own non-vindictive view, not really meant to besmirch Rafe, just be honest, he is like an old Brillo pad. He has his uses in these dirty pan threads, no doubt. He just needs to be tossed frequently for a new one, that isn't all gummed up with the past. Though he is preferable, and works better than any number of Glavins. :-)
[OFFENSIVE (Which is the way Yankees spell it, of course. We Canadians spell it OFFENCIVE. Too much Yankee influence here Editorially.) COMMENT REMOVED. -MODERATOR.] Shame for this censorship of Gumpy. Maybe we do need another body orifice, on second thought, for dispelling CENSORS from the otherwise healthy bodily system.
WillD
2 years ago
political state of bc
I'm pushing 90 and I have voted in every election i could vote in. I was surprised, when I saw what an honest appealing person Mary ellen Lafond appeared to be when I accidently tuned into Vaughn Palmer the other evening. To bad we cant trade her for Carole James. Maybe a third party with her at the wheel would be a refreshing change
Adam M
2 years ago
AnthonyB
There are many reasons to dump on the Greens, but this one does it for me (from their website):
The government is doing this right now with run of river power, except there is no environmental assessment to determine how green these projects are in the first place. One thing we know for sure: they'll divert a lot of creeks, cost us a lot, and make a bunch of foreigners tons of money!
May Day
2 years ago
Changes
Rafe, where do we go from here? A new party will just further divide the vote. There needs to be a rebranding, a new focus on an existing politican movement, not further division. At the very best we have just three years to turn this province into a democracy once again. Time is of the essence. It can and must happen. Never has the population of BC been so incensed as seen in the rush to sign the Regressive HST tax especially after we were promised it would not be enacted.
Des
2 years ago
Getting The Public
involved in the process of voting is the real conundrum waiting to be solved. Not casting a vote in order to protest political manipulation of the electorate is a useless and lazy excuse for allowing politicians to practice politics to their hearts' content, and to their own advantage.
First Past the Post is only representative when two candidates are involved. Proportional Representation inevitably leads to confusion (and entitlement issues - see Greece and Germany, et al).
But Run-Off Voting, especially when the voters can actually foresee and influence the results of balancing and bargaining election issues over a period of a few or several weeks rather than working blindly for an instant result (which binds them for several years)and would dis-allow earlier timezones from setting the agenda. Voters in later timezones could alter the total results if they chose to make changes as the voting transpires.
Power would automatically revert to The People who cast their votes, and Democracy would be better served.
Bailey
2 years ago
Too young to be so freaking cynical
Alright, alright. Let's just take a breath and get a little grip on ourselves for a minute here.
Just for the fun of it, put aside the anger, well justified though it may be, forget ideology and partisanship. Forget political posturing of all sorts, and just pick some names.
Who's your dream team? Who do you know of from any party, or for that matter, any field, that could actually be honest enough to call things by their right names, and act like a regular human? Who probably isn't a wholly owned subsidiary of some corporate agenda?
Give that person a name and a spot on the cabinet. Make a little list, like The Lord High Executioner did in The Mikado.
All things aside, who's your dream team?
Takuan
2 years ago
that little list
was for people who would never be missed. Best find a new allusion.
Takuan
2 years ago
to the point then....
bloody hard to do.... been hating so long and hard all that come to mind are the faces I'd see damned.
Bailey
2 years ago
Let the punishment fit the crime.
What better metaphor could there be for BC politics than Gilbert and Sullivan?
Anyway, to occupy our minds while we're making up our little lists...What do you think are the most appropriate G&S lyrics you can quote right now?
Bailey
2 years ago
From the ecosphere
I'll bet Alexandra Morton would rate a nomination. There's somebody who speaks truth to power.
Keep in mind I have no idea what, if any affiliation she might have to any party.
Bailey
2 years ago
Two lonely MLAs
Mr. Mair mentions them en passant above, without their names. Me, I used to watch in absolute admiration as Jenny Kwan and Joy McPhail stood fast against some of the most churlish and crude behaviour by unworthy schmucks in power, during some of the darkest days in our political history.
Illegal laws were passed in the dead of night. The honourable people we trust with our children's education were cast as criminals for speaking truth, and threatened with jail if they didn't shut up. These two women worked tirelessly, week after week spelling each other off to give honour to the parliamentary requirement for a loyal opposition, while those in power tried their damndest to kill it off, and vented their pique when they couldn't.
For conspicuous valour under fire above and beyond the call I would nominate Jenny Kwan and Joy MacPhail, regardless of affiliation.
Bailey
2 years ago
Minister for human rights
Didn't I read someplace that the Dalai Lama received honorary citizenship in Vancouver a while back?
If he's eligible, let's have him too.
G West
2 years ago
YEP Bailey
Bring back Joy McPhail...and let her pick her own running mates.
Bailey
2 years ago
Klatuu barada nicto
For Whip---Gort, the robot from The Day the Earth Stood Still.
Takuan
2 years ago
is
Geoff Olson available?
Grumpy
2 years ago
Well I'll be........................
From best comment to comment removed, I see I ruffled some feathers.
I would say that everyone again read that great novel 1984, then any story by Kafka and only then will one be able to see what is happening in BC.
We now live in a world of correct think and no evil speak, so Gordo and his malodorous lot don't get offended, so sad.
Frank
2 years ago
New category needed
"Best removed"
RickW
2 years ago
Grumpy
So what was it you said that offended the Tyee....?
Grumpy
2 years ago
???????????????????????????
Let's see RickW, I offended Campbell, I offended Carole James (thats so easy), I think I offended Stalin, I know I offended all politicians , maybe I offended Canada and just said what the majority of people in BC think.
I do know that Gordon Campbell bloody well offends me and I wish that he be removed! Maybe with recall in the fall?
Adam M
2 years ago
Recall in the Fall
For the love of sweet Jesus, Grumpy, if you want recall in the fall to happen, make sure to volunteer when it starts up, even if your riding is not the one - drive in and canvass. That goes for anyone!
samuidave (not verified)
2 years ago
reply to Ordinary Canadian
Ordinary Canadian,
You reply negatively to my assertion that 'the collective wisdom of people is astonishingly dim'.
Then you go on to agree with my argument almost verbatim. Obviously we need to define 'collective wisdom'.
For me, it is more than a relatively small collective of people fighting a single-issue within society, but the 'public mind at-large'. This 'public mind' is lead by propaganda. The propaganda campaigns over the decades have molded the public's frame-of-reference to see the world from the viewpoint of the power holders and not from our own.
We look out for, and often defend, the propagandists' desires while not even knowing our own. For example, we banter along partisan lines as though one will bring us salvation while the other won't. Now, 143 years in as a nation, we are still without democracy for the people.
Meanwhile, we have voted and therefore legitimated the political process which has 1) removed the majority of us from the land, 2) got us wholly reliant on the business interests to sustain ourselves almost on a day-by-day basis, 3) turned over the vast majority of the resources we all rely on to the business sector, and 4) enriched the top strata of society beyond any reasonable, arguably moral, proportion. Soon the rich will be eating their young.
I trust you agree, in this light, we have very little wisdom collectively.
vote4mikesummers
2 years ago
Hope is offered to BC
How just like Mair to again do an injustice to the ONE political party to offer BC a shot at democracy.
BC Refederation has these goals;
1. Direct Democracy. Giving people the power to control us. We will grant people to CONTROL us, from the first sitting.
2. Written Constitution. We will solicit the people of BC a chance to write a constitution for BC, that is similar to what Campbell did with the Citizens Assembly, except there will be no pre-conditions. we are not so naive as to think we are going to govern forever. Therefore, the people should have a chance to write a constitution, will controls all future politicians. And the system of governance should be a no holds barred thing. No system should be excluded from consideration.
3. Go after the feds for our stuff. All of it.
After that, let the chips fall where they may. We will administer, but the final say belongs to the people. Anything passed by the legislature is subject to a cooling off period, during which time it can be challenged by the people. If not challenged, after the cooling off period, it's law.
We believe that you should be asked. For a change.
samuidave (not verified)
2 years ago
"...and the Refederation
"...and the Refederation Party are like other political parties with a hierarchy that operates exactly like the NDP or Liberals so there is no systemic evolution and we would just stutter along same old."
________________________
I have no affiliation with the Refederation Party, and speak as a resident of BC only, but if there is a better suggestion being tabled anywhere in BC or Canada, let me know.
The Refeds are offering solutions, not just window dressing, to revamp a decrepit system that operates to serve the corporate interests first.
Rafe Mair is giving us his two cents yet his voice does not even address this larger, systemic problem. Is this because he fails to see it, or does he believe it cannot be fixed and so it is a moot point?
It reminds me of a conversation I had fifteen years or so back over a couple single malts with Jack Webster on Salt Spring Island. Knowing full well his legendary status in journalism, I listened intently when he complained bitterly about the youth not reading the news or keeping informed; how we were a distracted generation.
Though when I played devil's advocate with 'it hardly mattered since being misinformed was no big leg up on being uninformed', he continued to argue quite vehemently. Was it because he did not appreciate the problem regarding the fog of propaganda, or did he think it was moot? (Or was it the whiskey?)
I think this same blindness permeates us collectively. We see the repeated abuses of government yet we believe changing the political soldiers in the government will lead to a significantly different result. It does not because it cannot. The current system does not allow representative democracy for the people. And who else even suggests systemic reformation??
Frank
2 years ago
samuidave
The people had a chance to vote for system change (electoral) and they declined, preferring the status quo.
People don't want real change or more choice, they want government to keep all the tools at their disposal that they have now but to just be "better" somehow.
The stuff proposed by the BC Refed party wouldn't change anything because their platform assumes people will make the changes themselves given the opportunity. Which ignores the fact they've had opportunity already.
CanadianLatitude
2 years ago
It is true what he says
It is true what he says about NDP. The biggest mistake was not Carole James stepping down on election night. Then bringing back Moe Sihota.
They are clueless. Quiet about Kash Heed, hopping on Vanderzalms anti HST bandwagon, they could not even figure out how to run the last election campaign, kept changing 'theme'.
As long as Moe and Carole are with the BC NDP I will not be voting for them. I think the NDP is basically finished in BC or will be soon.
Like Rafe says it is more anti Campbell as to why Carole is ahead in the polls. Get Diane Watts or Carole 'I removed BC Bank tax' Taylor the Libs will jump ahead again.
I really do not know why the NDP does not get it or see it and how the membership allows this to continue. The only other party that comes close to incompetence and direction-less these days are the Federal Liberals.
The NDP need a Corky Evans, Libby Davies or Jenny Kwan at the helm or even Vancouver Mayor Robertson or Even a Jack Layton type.
The NDP need someone to inspire people, yet it seems these days they leave the inspiration to the guy that put the final nail in the Social Credit party Bill Vanderzalm.
Randy White? lol His party may be the only one in Canada other than the Wildrose Alliance in Alberta to the right of Harper..
Frank
2 years ago
CanadianLatitude
If you want vision and to be inspired, stick with Gordon Campbell. Most people just want their government to be run effectively, their services to actually be there when needed and not having to read about corruption and bullshit every day in the papers.
I'll take a quiet administrator that works to make things better over the speeches about "5 great goals", "the golden decade" and "7 prophecies I had while drunk in Hawaii" all the while shovelling money to friends.
Skywalker
2 years ago
Canadianlatitude
You never voted for the NDP and never would even if the whole bunch of them walked on water. Who are you trying to impress with this kind of nonsense? There is nothing the NDP did or could do that would rival the shenanigans of the current bunch of liberals and if you are hoping for the greens in conservative clothing you are really grasping at straws.
Carole is ineffective, Moe has some issues but nothing comes close to Campbell's pillaging of the province and a vote for the greens has given Campbell an additional 8 years. Nice going!
CHAOTICORDER
2 years ago
I am currently in Norway,
I am currently in Norway, some of you may have heard of it, a small socialist country that is also the richest per capita on the planet. 5th in oil production and the local gas\oil company, Statoil, is approx 60% owned by the government.
I say this because we should all be taking note of it's political structure.
I had the opportunity this evening to sit in on a town meeting in a place called Finnsnes, a meeting run by a local politician. The topics were Haitian aid and oil production. To focus on one moment for the oil, they are worried over the pressure mounting against offshore drilling (of where most of their production exists). The politician himself was voted in under a proportional representation style of election. He stresses very much that they continue to ensure that the citizenery here continue to support their democratic government by ensuring that the wealth of the country continues to be shared, equally, that their oil company continues to be run by the government and that they continue to disallow major companies like Walmart and Ikea (just as examples) from entering the markets here. A wise man, he understands that if you have balance in your economy and likewise your government you ensure a continued wealth and welfare of your people.
This is what I hope for in my home Country and province of BC.
Our current situation not withstanding I feel the focus should not be on which party we vote on in the next election but that we ensure we change the voting process. It works. Itæs proven that it works. Our media does not focus on it enough though as it will take away from their interests and the same with our governing bodies. The NDP committed a massive error as they withdrew their support of the STV last election. Regardless of the very very small chance of voting in the second best representative (which is very small indeed considering the size of our voting districts) proportional representation in some form is needed, desperately. While we may not fix our current problems come next election we must ensure for our own good that we change the voting process which will in turn change the tide and hopefully start to balance the way we govern ourselves.
A footnote, where I am currently has one person who is voluntarily homeless (the locals built her a house and she refused to move in), the prisons are populated with drunk drivers primarily and crime barely registers a tick. There are no mansions and no outward showing of excessive wealth. Our mindsets as well as our ways of life need to be adjusted along with who we vote for, why we vote for them and how we live our lives.
G West
2 years ago
I have a problem
I have a problem with people who seem to need someone to 'inspire' them. In fact, I can think of several very offensive historical examples of where that kind of 'leadership' gets one.
I think I'm more inclined to support the kind of quiet, non-demonstrative cooperative approach that happens in places like Norway.
As for voting for the STV, I think the vast majority of NDP voters - certainly most of the ones I know - voted YES in the last two referendums on the subject.
Some may have followed Bill Tieleman - but I hardly think HE'S setting NDP policy either now, or in the past.
realisticman
2 years ago
Fact of the matter is...
NDP support for STV was lukewarm:
"...Some progressive leaders have even gone beyond neutrality and are actually opposing electoral reform. This smells of opportunism as the B.C. NDP can win a majority in the province under first-past-the-post. ..."
Dave Meslin is a New Democrat
http://www.rabble.ca/news/2009/04/coalition-bc-stv-and-next-steps-left
jim1966
2 years ago
Where Is This Gov't Going?
One thing I've noticed is that Mr Campbell has literally disappeared from the entire BC scene. He was in Europe when the heat came down on Colin Hansen, he has yet to explain the real rationale behind this governments choice to implement a much hated tax. Yes People are mad, but does Gord and his supporters care all that much?, nope I don't think so. If Gordo and his group had any morals or even cared then he and the BC Liberals would start explaining. I think it's more about having a majority and being arrogant, unfeeling, uncaring and generally obtuse about policy, unless it's good to make a profit. People are angry for multiple reasons, being lied to is a major reason but there are many other reasons you can think of and there are many. Once again people will vote out an unpopular gov't only to replace them with more of the same, Has anyone heard what the NDP would do in this situation, during a world wide recession, what alternatives do we as a society really have, I mean it's obvious, like him or leave Mr Campbell has divided the electorate very successfully. Honestly what I think would be a better solution is to have a minority gov't in BC where as they would have to work as a parliament should. Sad but this is true. We as a society need change, if we want it to happen then we all collectively have to demand it. I don't think a general strike would be all that effective, mostly because the gov't knows the more desperate people become the more willing they are to accept whatever their leaders want to put into place, just look at Greece, general strikes, civil unrest, yet the cuts will continue there no doubt, same here only on a different scale but the results will be the same, In the end maybe Mr Campbell will go but regretfully the damage has already been done.
Ordinary Canadian
2 years ago
The problem we all have is
The problem we all have is changing our own ideas. Those who have an affinity for the Liberals or NDP continue to argue the relative merits of either party. Those committed to proportional representation see it as a cure all. I think political parties are the problem so argue against new party formation. Truly no change is possible if we don't work together. Our North American individualistic cowboy culture looks for heroes and leaders. European cultures having experienced wars, strong family ties etc are more adept at considering strength through group effort. Hopefully discussions such as this one can move us forward.
When I speak of 'collective wisdom' I consider that each individual is capable of behaving ethically and if we all did we would have a wiser society. Perhaps the only time that happens is when too large a proportion of the population is suffering and we are fast approaching that point.
If we don't want violence we have to let people feel their voice counts where it matters. I maintain the electorate being able to choose the budget they like best would give people that voice, however we proceed to achieve that.
Takuan
2 years ago
Campbell's absence?
he never was necessary to the looting programme. Just as Shoe-boy Bush was a convenient pinata for the Cheney presidency.
surlysheep
2 years ago
Change Parties?
Why would we bother to change parties? Is there really anything out there that would be all that different?
As much as we dislike many of the actions of the current group in power lets not forget that they offered a way out early on in their reign. The Citzens assembly put together a potential way out of the current paradigm and we were to afraid to support them. Even those progressive Greens balked, thanks Adrian, no I think we get what we deserve and maybe the real key to taking back power is to recognize that there is more than one way to vote and that is with the dollars we spend or do not spend. Business responds to consumers and business is government. Cheers!
Takuan
2 years ago
so propose a program
of targeted, scheduled boycotts.
Frank
2 years ago
surlysheep
People need to buy energy products, we can't all boycott Terasen, BC Hydro and the gas stations.
surlysheep
2 years ago
boycott?
Boycott? I think it is less political and more personal than that. Why not think about what we say we care about and then consume accordingly. ie. lets take energy products, look at your personal consumtion patterns and see if you can do with less, or take the time to look around and see if you can make purchases that take less energy to produce, like local in season produce.
Takuan
2 years ago
BC is no longer a funtioning democracy
the government, the courts, the police are all bought and paid for. The people cannot use traditional open force or they will be met with open force with all the weapons on the wrong side.
We can either lie down or do nothing, or we can use asymmetric economic warfare. Boycotts, strikes, civil disobedience, refusal to pay taxes, exposees and soliciting the outside aid of other political bodies are all on the table.
What is needed is central organization and coordination for these measures to work. Instead of trying to work inside the framework of the enemy by forming or backing political parties,it would be more effective to just organize to oppose the existing kleptocracy first. Political alignment can come later, after the thieves are on the ropes and running scared.
This is traditionally the role of youth in society.
Where are our firebrands?
alive
2 years ago
Takuan said:
"Where are our firebrands?"
Look in the mirror!
If not you,then who?
Enough talking already, let action follow words.
Takuan
2 years ago
what?
I'm not brandy enough? Surely cooking grade if not Napoleon?
Luck
2 years ago
Third party or Coalition parties like Israel
General strike
General Strike
General Strike
"Where are our firebrands?"
Look in the mirror!
If not you,then who?
Enough talking already, let action follow words.
Out of the ruins comes a coalition government like they have in most parts of the world.
Why? if you don't trust one party then get together a bunch of people who are determined to work together.
Lets do it.
crankypants
2 years ago
Political parties
There must come a time when we, the people, choose whether we want democracy or the pseudo democratic dictatorship we presently live under.
It is the party system that polarizes the electorate to such a point that any rational discussions on issues become impossible. All you get is my side is better than your side.
CKNW ran a couple of phone in polls on who people would vote for in the next election and the majority of callers picked a party. What if their party of choice decided to run a fencepost and give it a name. Would they still vote for them. I suspect that this fencepost would actually garner some votes, and not as a protest.
Too many people don't know which party represents their riding and many less the name of their representative. In my opinion this is because during an election campaign the majority of advertising is centred around the various leaders of the parties while the actual candidate plays second fiddle.
Then when the votes are counted, the victorious candidates that win their seat become an entity answerable only to their party and their constituents can go to hell.
It's time our political system entered the 21st century.