Phony logic

There IS nitrogen in the soil...legumes fix it with the help of nitrogen fixing bacteria. CO2 is released from the soil as plant matter decays.

"Twenty years of field studies reveal that as the Earth has gotten warmer, plants and microbes in the soil have given off more carbon dioxide. So-called soil respiration has increased about one-tenth of 1 percent per year since 1989, according to an analysis of past studies in today’s issue of Nature."
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/03/25/earth-follows-the-warming-soils-add-100-million-tons-of-co2-per-year/#more-17747

I think part of the reason the climate scam progressed as far as it did, is the deliberate dumbing down of generations. Few people know how their own bodies work, let alone how the carbon cycle does.

small variation, big consequence

There's probably 200 degrees of difference (Farenheit) between the coldest place on Earth, and the hottest. Yet, tiny variations in temperature can affect seed germination, algae blooms, and a host of other natural processes. Those changes can mean the difference between barren desert and fertile ground. Throw in the fact that some atmospheric changes are cumulative and it becomes quite clear than minute changes can have big impacts over time.

Once again, with mopled's comment we see how a climate change denier wraps themselves in the mantle of scientific rigour while demonstrating a profound lack of understanding of the processes which make life possible.

CO2 was higher in the 19th and 20th Centuries

Evidence of variability of atmospheric CO2 concentration during the 20th century
Geo-Ecological Seminar University of Bayreuth, 17th July 2008
Ernst-Georg Beck, Dipl. Biol

"Wet chemical analyses indicate three atmospheric CO2 maxima in the northern hemisphere up to approx. 400 ppm over land and sea since about 1812. The measured atmospheric CO2 concentrations since 1920 –1950 prove to be strongly correlated (more than 80 %) with the arctic sea surface temperature (SST)."
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/07/25/beck-on-co2-oceans-are-the-dominant-co2-store/

Since plants grow better and are more drought resistant with higher levels of CO2, carping about mankind's 3-5% addition to the atmosphere is counterproductive. It actually should be applauded.

CO2 does not need restriction or sequestration and the world does not need to be geo-engineered either.

Speaking of airplanes overhead Ed,

"VOLUMES OF DATA, LAB TESTS AND VIDEO FOOTAGE, FROM ALL OVER THE GLOBE, MAKE CLEAR THE CONCLUSION THAT AEROSOL SPRAYING HAS BEEN AN ONGOING LETHAL REALITY.

Aluminum, Barium and other elements have been found in surface waters, air samples and soil tests, HUNDREDS AND THOUSANDS OF TIMES HIGHER THAN EPA ALLOWABLE LEVELS."

"Here, David Keith tells the US House hearings that rich people could buy an ICE AGE with the stratospheric aerosol program, Here is the entire talk."

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/

I never suggested that those

I never suggested that those planes are spraying anything, as some people suggest. There wouldn't be much purpose for it in these rarely populated areas, only that they're practicing and training for the killing thousands, or even millions.

Depending on the weapons developed for them by "scientists".

May they all rot in hell.

Ed Deak.

WTF?

"The measured atmospheric CO2 concentrations since 1920 –1950 prove to be strongly correlated (more than 80 %) with the arctic sea surface temperature (SST).""

Mopled, you're consistently stating that CO2 cannot have an effect on the climate, yet now you are citing research that says there's a strong correlation between CO2 levels and water temperature? Would you care to explain this contradiction?

Read it again...

The man said 'correlation'. That means the two parameters walk together up and down. It says nothing about what causes what. In the article, it appears it is the other way around than what you are jumping to conclude.

thx dorothy

fair enough. That does address my question.

AEROSOL SPRAYING

I’m not gonna bother to post any links to this subject of aerial spraying and the rest of my rant because it’s off topic but for the diligent it can be easily researched and verified.

But all one had to do today if they were in Vancouver was to look up, something the hunched over devolving western Neanderthals rarely do these days.

Almost every clear day here in Vancouver they start spraying in the morning ending at sunset. At about $10,000 an hour for each military tanker jet (many of these planes are foreign) they certainly believe it’s a worthwhile investment for the taxpayer. Last summer there was almost non stop insane spraying causing an off-white haze constantly over the sky and mountains on what would otherwise be a clear blue sky, something I rarely see anymore here in Vancouver.

Could this be why asthma is up 400%, allergies all year round?

Also for those who want to get some vitamin D3 from sunlight, the aerial spraying filters out some of the UVB rays that form the precursor to vitamin D in the skin while allowing the UVA rays to pass through. UVA radiation actually destroys vitamin D and provides nearly no benefits except a tan, wrinkled and leathery skin and over time can also lead to melanoma, the most deadly form of skin cancer.

Whereas on a clear day the UVB/UVA ratio in natural sunlight helps keep your body in balance and limits vitamin D levels to optimum.

Why should people care about this? Because new research has shown that those in the northern hemisphere are deficient in vitamin D via lack of sunlight. And this deficiency is now believed to be linked to many of today’s diseases including various cancers. We’re probably worse off here in BC with all the cloudy and rainy days. .

There are a lot of real and serious environmental concerns but what do the bankster funded phony greenies spend all their time on? Promoting the evils of life-giving CO2 while they and their children are getting sprayed like a bunch of dumb insects like everyone else.

Oh my lord

Military tanker aircraft? Spraying? That would be a first. I thought they did air to air refueling. I think you better post a link then soleprobe since its so easily researched and verified or I have to call bull.
Ten thousand an hour doesn't even pay the fuel for a Canadian Forces A310 tanker. Try about five times ten thousand an hour and your getting closer.

Your friendly neighborhood Neanderthal

I timed once these idiotic

I timed once these idiotic 50 years old, B 52 murder machines flying over our heads hundreds of times a year.

They use enough fuel while I can see them, to last my 30 year old truck, 2 tractors and whatever small engines, for 10 years.

I survived enough terror bombing raids in Europe during WW2 to hate the guts of the jerks to fly and send them. Regardless of nation, colour, creed, or flag they use for excuse.

Ed Deak.

Try about five times ten thousand an hour

thanks for the correction

Self correction

I made a dumb error when I calculated the fuel cost. I transposed kilos and litres in my head when I was doing the numbers (Gimli Glider! Idiot!)
The actual cost for fuel would be around seven thousand an hour.
But fifty K an hour to rent an aircraft that size is not unrealistic

Aerial spraying

I suspect the sprayers could use a respected scientific expert such as Patrick Moore. They need to revise the aerial spraying program. It's apparently been going on for years and still hasn't achieved its purposes. Daily respraying seems inefficient. Can't they get stronger ingredients for better chemtrails? It seems the North American military forces have been so ineffective, they are now being supplemented by foreigners.

If the fees are appropriate, I'm sure Dr. Moore could help shape a program for better chemtrails perhaps by mixing in nuclear wastes.

North American military forces supplemented by foreigners.

NATO

Ask Temporary Berman about greenwashers!

Paid greenspeakers and washers!

Tzemporary Berman, an open letter

Don't miss Valhalla Wilderness Society's Anne Sherrod's letter to TzB here.

http://northerninsights.blogspot.com/2010/03/dear-greenpeace-retzeporah-berman.html

Saysme

[OFFENSIVE COMMENT REMOVED. -MODERATOR.]

These phony greenies talk to people like their stupid.