Opinion

NDP Is Right to Call for Sockeye Inquiry

The catastrophe doesn't seem to concern Tories, Grits. In fact, they don't want to know.

By Rafe Mair, 2 Nov 2009, TheTyee.ca

Sockeye Salmon

Facing a sea lice gauntlet, and maybe a dam.

The NDP tread where the Conservatives and Liberals fear to go as NDP Fisheries Critic Peter Julian and MP hopeful Fin Donnelly call for an independent judicial inquiry into the collapse of the Fraser River sockeye.

It should happen. It must happen. And it won't happen.

On reason it won't is that Fisheries Minister Gail Shea wouldn't know a sockeye from a mud shark. Another is that the fish farmers contribute handsomely to Conservative and Liberal party funds. The third reason I'll share in a moment.

Bumbling detectives

The sockeye situation is ludicrous. We know they're gone but we don't know all the reasons. However, we do know one reason -- the migrating sockeye smolts (salmon babies) must run the gauntlet of the Broughton Archipelago fish farms, and the sea lice from those cages kill them. But fish farmers are contributors to the pockets of both governments. And the claims of independent scientists are ignored.

We also know that some smolts are eaten by escaped Atlantic salmon. What we don't know is whether there are other causes when the smolts are maturing on the high seas. Indeed, in spite of what government lackeys and lickspittles are saying, we don't even know if the high seas kill any appreciable amount. In blaming ocean predators and conditions, the lickspittles and company men reason that "because we don't believe that lice from farms and escaped Atlantic salmon cause very many, if any deaths, we assume that these deaths are from causes unknown." If police detectives reasoned like that, the jails would all be empty.

Moreover, the convenient "high seas" argument ignores the fact that pink, chum and sockeye from rivers not contaminated with fish farms, or in Alaska which bans fish farms, migrate to the same "high seas" and returned in abundant -- and in some cases record -- numbers.

Rules of science and law ignored

It must be noted that the Union of BC Indian Chiefs (UBCIC), First Nations Summit and the B.C. Assembly of First Nations resolutions all oppose fish farms. Moreover, in 2007 Marine Harvest's largest shareholder, billionaire John Fredriksen, while fishing on the famous River Alta, told a reporter from the Altaposten Newspaper, "I'm concerned about the future of wild salmon. Move salmon farms out of the path of wild salmon."

There are two related rules of science and law prevailing here. The science rule is the "precautionary principle" which states that if a policy might cause severe or irreversible harm to the public or to the environment, in the absence of a scientific consensus that the harm would not ensue, the burden of proof falls on those who advocate taking the action.

The legal rule is that he who alleges has the burden of proof.

In short, the onus of proving the lack of adverse environmental impact rests squarely on the fish farmers -- but, with thanks to former Liberal ministers like John Van Dongen, they have passed this onus onto the public. As a result, the task has fallen to courageous citizens like Alexandra Morton and a plethora of independent scientists who support her findings. The fish farmers have had a free ride throughout.

The media has been shamefully silent, with the occasional exception of Stephen Hume in the Vancouver Sun and the more frequent interventions of his brother Mark in the Globe and Mail. The last electronic media person to take on this issue was me -- and in 2005 I was fired. I believe it was because I fought against these environmental nightmares.

The dam truth

Here is the third reason nothing will be done.

When jurisdiction for fish farms was given back by the province to the feds by a recent court case, fish farmers were assured that it would be business as usual. In fact, Minister Gail Shea went to a huge conference of fish farmers in Norway and assured them that Canada wanted even more of them. The bottom line is that the federal government doesn't give a fiddler's fart about west coast fisheries and hasn't for decades. And there's a reason.

Since 1871, when B.C. joined Canada, the salmon fishery has been a gigantic political pain in the ass to the federal government. When I was the environment minister back at the beginning of the Christian Era, I studied the issue and found that year after year there were problems, and year after year the government fumbled them. A good example was some years ago when the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) decided that there were too many boats chasing too few fish and started to buy back fish boats. A child could have seen that the remaining boats would increase their capacity -- they did -- and the problem remained.

All the while, there has been salvation looming on the horizon rising from the mists of time -- the proposed Moran Dam on the Fraser River north of Lytton. Here's what I wrote on The Tyee on April 24 of 2006: "[this] proposed dam (Moran) was all the rage with the post World War II Liberals, especially Defence Minister Andrew MacNaughton."

But it didn't stop there. Bruce Hutchison, in his otherwise marvelous book The Fraser, painted a paradise built with all that power. W.A.C. Bennett was all for the idea in 1967, but outdoors people made such a fuss about the concomitant loss of salmon that he backed off.

Fish in the path of 'progress'

The Department of Fisheries and Oceans was stripped of outspoken scientists back in 1986 when the two governments and Alcan agreed on the Kemano Completion project and DFO did what the politicians told them to do. That culture remains.

The only thing holding back this project is the migration of sockeye (mainly) that pass through the Fraser River past Lytton to northern spawning beds. A huge dam! Wouldn't it be wonderful! Power galore and no more of those damned salmon! If through a happy combination of fish farms and lack of care about habitat we can wipe out those salmon runs! Indeed, if we play our cards right, the only salmon left will be in wilderness rivers, left to satisfy wealthy fishermen on expensive fishing safaris. When that happy day comes, the DFO and the federal government will be rid of this millstone and there will be oodles of power to sell to California so that swimming pools can be kept warm!

Yes, give us a judicial inquiry

If the federal government cared at all about B.C. they would take on MP Peter Julian's suggestion. But it doesn't go far enough. There should be a judicial hearing into the Fraser sockeye collapse. I would suggest that the enquiry should be wider. However, we've learned that the wider the mandate, the more paid days for lawyers -- whose glacier-like pace when being paid per diem is notorious.

There are political considerations. If the NDP can combine the fish farm issue with the rape of rivers by the likes of General Electric, they could win seats that are usually Liberal or Conservative. The latter know that the NDP cannot form a government, but they could decide who holds power.

What a sad thing to contemplate. Neither the Liberal nor Conservative parties give a damn about B.C.'s fish or our rivers.

Why should they? In this country, if it isn't happening in Ontario or Quebec, it isn't happening.  [Tyee]

36  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • Dr Alexander

    2 years ago

    Rafe, Gordon Campbell is actually "committed" to the salmon

    I remember years ago, when Gordon was still in Opposition, he was on your radio show and he said that, if elected, he would shut down the Kemano Completion Project just to save the salmon.

    Oh, how times have changed.

    Just as an aside, I spent six years in Scandinavia where, in part, I did research and was involved in EU-funded projects with regards to problems related to fish farming. It is well understood "over there" that fish farms present a problem to what is left of wild runs and any possible rebuilding of previous runs. The fish farm industry in Scandinavia is a mighty powerful lobby group however.

    Ultimately, it will about damming the Fraser. I'd bet if you "put the feet to the fire" on those folks at the Suzuki Foundation, they would choose "zero carbon" Fraser hydropower over the salmon. For Berman and her gang, that is a given.

  • Gary

    2 years ago

    Write your MP's and MLA's

    Come on BC. Wake up. Salmon is a large part of our food chain. When it's gone people will go hungrier than they are already.
    Almost every MP and MLA has a spawning river in their riding. Write them all in support of this judicial inquiry. Tell them if they vote it down they have lost your vote if need be. Write the wanna be federal fisheries minister Gail Shae. Let her know you are out there. Write to MLA's and MP's even if they are not in the governing party.
    This tragedy has to be stopped now. Not next year or in ten years. Now. Get off your collective asses and do something. These people are elected officials. They are in office at your bidding. Not for the filthy rich.

  • Fiat lux

    2 years ago

    History shows us that no

    History shows us that no conquest, colonization and enslavement could have taken place through the ages without the blessings of priesthoods, who encouraged the criminal activities of the conquerors, as the "will of the gods"

    The same is happening today with the priesthood of so called "economists", licencing the destruction of the Earth as "growth" and GDP.

    There's no point blaming the politicians on their way to strings of corporate directorships, without
    questioning the garbage pouring forth from our universities, encouraging and accounting the biggest crime wave in human history, as "wealth creation".

    Could Rafe, or anybody, please explain why and how the teaching, misleading and brainwashing students, politicians and the public with fraudulent theories, is untouchable and above any questioning ?

    Unless there's some serious examination of the fraudulent theory of monetary economics will finally take place, there's no hope for the human race.

    Ed Deak.

  • Jeffrey J.

    2 years ago

    It's Up to Us

    Social progress and change, including saving our wild salmon, ONLY occurs by citizen action. We have never obtain progress by the generous willing hand of the elites. Doctors and the insurance industry vehemently opposed Medicare, which included going on strike and attacking Tommy Douglas as a crazed socialist who would collapse the economy.

    Absent the brilliant Rachel Carson and public outrage after Silent Spring was published, we'd still be spraying DDT onto our countryside.

    Wild salmon NEED the voice of the people. If they receive enough support, we CAN save them.

    Great article Rafe. I look forward to your work every Monday!

  • Illahie

    2 years ago

    DFO may not know what happened to the missing Sockeye

    But they do know that the Sockeye smolts disappeared in the lower reaches of the Fraser River, or the lower Strait of Georgia during the spring migration of 1997.

    Rafe may know this, but I don't think that he wants the public to know this. That is because these fish died within sight of the lower mainland, far away from any fish farms.

    Rafe may slag fish farms with a religious zeal. Rafe may be using the missing Sockeye as a tool in his quest.

    It is sad that he doesn't seem to care about the destruction of the 1997 spring smolt migration, only about the destruction of the fish farm industry.

    If he does care, he should research it, and write about it. Paul Sproat is an honest decent fellow. Perhaps Rafe could spare a few minutes of time to give him a ring.

  • Illahie

    2 years ago

    Spelling error

    Pauls last name is spelt Sprout.

    my appologies.

  • Fiat lux

    2 years ago

    In other words, the

    In other words, the fishfarms are not doing any harm and there's no global climate change/warming ????????

    Of course, we just have to ask the advertising agency by the name of the Fraser Institute for the correct answers. They know everything.

    Ed Deak.

  • DonMac2012

    2 years ago

    Wake Up !

    I'm from the Maritimes where I practiced law for over 20 years. I watched the entire collapse of the Atlantic Cod Fishery. I watched as a culture was decimated and MILLIONS of tax dollars were funneled into communities as a result of total mismanagement of a natural resource.

    It is going to happen on the west coast, as certain as there is cold crap in a dead cat, unless people get behind it NOW.
    I am NOT an advocate of fish farming but I am also not certain that the entire problem rests there. Over fishing by fleets that are not properly supervised bu an inadequate policing service -- give the magnitude of our coast line -- silting of spawning beds by the logging industry - again - not properly policed due to inadequate manpower requirements etc. are probably contributors as well.
    An inquiry is a necessity -- can you find an impartial
    tribunal ?
    I would certainly hope so ---- ????

  • Frank

    2 years ago

    Rafe is right

    Its a total mystery to DFO why the sockeye have disappeared but they think its nothing to worry about because they'll return.

    Of course DFO also thinks Elvis will be touring again soon.

    Sometimes its hard to believe fisheries officials could be that incompetent so one has to assume Rafe is right and they want the salmon to go extinct in order to clear the way for more American-owned "run of river" projects.

  • seth

    2 years ago

    Moran dam has been nuked

    In 1952 they were saying the Moran dam would cost $500 million, produce 32000 gigawatts hours annually and create a lake 260 km long. That's $9 billion in $2009.

    The impossibility of getting such a project approved in today's protest environment aside, Ontario has an $8 billion quote from Areva to build two nuclear plants producing the same amount of power on a 10 acre site without a 260 km reservoir. The Areva quote is more than double projected mass produced nuclear plant costs and those coming out of new Indian reactor builds.
    Since mass produced nuclear power is the only cost effective and in time solution to the world's as little as ten years away civilization ending climate disaster, it appears that the Moran dam project is a non starter and can be put on the shelf forever.

    However, given the utter stupidity and corruption shown with Canwest/Gordo's $45 billion dollar purchase of 10000 gigawatt hours of close to worthless Pirate Run of the River power - almost a world record for the most expensive "renewable"purchase yet - I wouldn't be surprised if Dick "Bagman" Coleman doesn't have a lucrative (to Gordo) proposal from some Liberal party Pirate hacks with associated campaign donations in his back pocket.

  • Donaldvisaac

    2 years ago

    NDP Sockeye Enquiery

    The NDP were part of the farm fish invasion. It's all about money and the need for feeding the future population. I recall being in seatle years ago listening to as scientist about aquaculture. with out it there will not be enough food he stated. The wild salmon can not produce what aquaculture can he said. with all the demands on the river systems the salmon is a trade off. DFO scientists whom once spoke out against fish farms were told never to do so again. So the government calls this conspiracy theories and paranoya. Fish farms bring in a lot money for government in the way of taxes Rememeber what happened in Norway and chile It's happening here

  • ReeferMadness

    2 years ago

    Keep it up, Rafe

    Rafe, thank you for continuing to write on this issue. Ultimately, we are dependent on our environment and if we continue to destroy it, we will not survive.

  • KWD

    2 years ago

    Ed, you asked; here it is ...

    The mindset within political, economic and educational spheres (from K to university and beyond), and within the bulk of humanity is a product of many guiding factors. When we examine the interconnectedness of these factors it not difficult to see why humanity continues to ignore the laws of nature. While these many, obvious factors that influence us have long histories and are deeply entrenched in all cultures, it seems religious, political and economic ideologies receive the most attention.

    But when we consider the vast differences in ideology that define religions, politics and cultures around the globe, and the fact that the problems we face are global, it must be obvious that something else is taking place. And, despite all of the mental gymnastics used to give the impression that it’s economic theory or political ideology or culture we are left with the inescapable fact that the “something” is common to all of us.

    That “something” is genetic and its ubiquitous nature is the product of natural selection. All life on this planet exists because it avoids pain and seeks pleasure. The conflicts within our human and non-human environments are the product of how we are taught to think, and how we are taught to respond to pain and pleasure (this goes beyond the basic survival response). Until we accept this, all efforts to change the political or economic components are simply so much hot air.

    You can bet that if we changed economic theory ... everything else being unchanged ... and redistributed all of the existing “wealth” on the planet, with a few years we would see the same imbalance that we see today. It may end up in a few different hands but the outcome and problems will be the same.

  • Fiat lux

    2 years ago

    KWD......I discovered in

    KWD......I discovered in 1985 that the presently ruling neoclassical theory was a fraud, because the wrong/fraudulent definitions of economic efficiency, the GDP etc. figures. Since then the world has been rapidly going downhill into oblivion.

    What I'm asking for is an economic system based on physical laws that no religion, or ideology can twist and fool around with.

    Ideologies are faith based economic religions without any logical foundations.

    I've lived in 4 countries, under every known ideology and know for certain that jumping from one into another would indeed just bring back the same destructive imbalances under the same predators, regardless what they call themselves..

    Like we have right now the Soviet type collectivization of the economy into the hands of a criminal class of multinational corporations, while calling it "free enterprise" and "free trade" etc. lying crap.

    Ed Deak.

  • KWD

    2 years ago

    Perhaps you meant ... economic ideologies are faith based,

    and lack logical foundation????

    If an economic system is to be based on physical laws it must include (as you’ve pointed out many times) the laws of thermodynamics. By extension, it must also include changes in entropy. This would be a monumentally difficult task. However, if we incorporate changes in entropy when applying our logic-based economic theory we must also have some way of determining how we deal with changing and diminishing energy supplies. Who will determine how this will happen? HAL?

    If not some computer, then those decisions will have to be made by humans. And this is the point where faith and ideology enters the equation …

  • Iwannajob

    2 years ago

    fish farms

    No one is saying that fish farms are the only cause of the decline in the wild salmon. There are many obvious causes which all need to be tackled now, but putting fish farms into closed containment and out of the ocean is a simple fix and a great place to start. Habitat destruction due to stupid logging practices, pollution, over-fishing, urban sprawl, climate change, Atlantic salmon spawning in native rivers, etc., etc. Many, many potential causes for the decline of the wild salmon, all need fixing. But where do you start? Start with the simple fixes like the fish farms and the Atlantic salmon. Lets get on with it. Doing nothing can only mean extinction for our legendary salmon. Doing nothing is just plain STUPID. STUPID. Not much of a legacy to leave our children, is it!

  • Cynic

    2 years ago

    Speaking of damming

    Speaking of damming (damning?) rivers, it's not just about power. Our friends the usians want our water, and the engineering proposal called NAWAPA is their breathtaking solution. Any dam built on the Fraser would be an eventual part of this stupendous transfer of water. Of course, no more running salmon would help sell this dam, but then again, a project like this would more likely be imposed rather than sold...

  • Cynic

    2 years ago

  • ragingran

    2 years ago

    Two Sacred Cows you Forgot to Mention, Rafe

    There are many reasons our salmon are going, going, gone. Two you didn't mention but dovetail right into the ones you did are as follows.

    First, logging right across streams has decimated the salmon runs in BC. Here is an out of print report called, "Failure to Enforce", but it might as well be called, "Let's Kill All the Salmon!"
    http://www.bcssp.ca/letters/nrdc_FIN.pdf

    Second, fish from Salmon Hatcheries have replaced most of the wild salmon runs in the Georgia Basin with single-species salmon for sports fishing. There are numerous studies on this and the competition for food and spawning grounds.

    The statistic I always remember on the hatcheries program is it cost 74 BC taxpayer dollars for each salmon raised in these hatcheries. Imagine if we had put those resources into preserving the wild stock.

    But no, it's always short-term thinking.
    I want my lolly now!

  • Intention Pure

    2 years ago

    Salmon

    Thank you to Rafe for another good effort and the NDP are the only political hope we have, as opposition to the "lying crap"! Keep telling your MP and MLAs that we want to protect our environment, and restore and rehabilitate our environment, but we will not accept current bad planning and denial of the facts and science. Mitigation, after the fact, is totally unacceptable. We need our environment intact as there is no health outside of ecology and no economy outside of nature.

  • Orcinus Cedarbough

    2 years ago

    Thank god.

    NDP just got my vote.

    Its a breath of fresh air to see some political activation within legislative bodies surrounding the state of our salmon.
    I'm sure there are some Cod Fishers from the East coast starting the phrase, "I told you.....So..."

  • Fish-counter

    2 years ago

    Were the "missing" sockeye ever there? How would we know?

    Four points to consider:

    1. The number of returning sockeye adults could be estimated from the number of outmigrating smolts and the marine survival. Are the smolts being counted or estimated as they leave the Fraser? I think not. There has never been a good smolt count on the Fraser - some its tributaries perhaps, but not at Mission.

    2. Correct me if I am wrong but the City of Vancouver releases about half of its effluent as raw sewage into the Strait of Georgia - the product of three million people and industry goes into the sea untreated. The City of Victoria releases all of its sewage into the Strait of Juan de Fuca as if it were still 1950. Add to that the runoff from the Fraser watershed and you have a recipe for a dead zone in the SoG, where the only thing to thrive are jellyfish.

    3. The resident orcas in the Strait of Georgia are the most polluted marine mammal on earth. As a top predator, orcas are a key indicator of the health of the marine environment and they dine on chinook salmon. See if you can see a connection between 1, 2 and 3. Go on, just for the hell of it.

    4. The 2010 Olympics will cost BC about $5 billion, including $1 billion for security. Don't groan but I personally would have been much happier seeing that money build state-of-the-art sewage treatment plants for Vancouver and Victoria. I know it would have meant passing up on the luge and (men's-only) ski-jumping events, but there would be a legacy we could all be proud of instead of a 17-day circus with a few bent medals (if we are lucky), at the end of it.

    Someone once said that a society that has leaky philosophy will also have leaky plumbing, and vice versa. Many civilisations in history have fallen because they had bad plumbing. BC isn't THAT bad but we could be much better than we are. We could emulate the City of Calgary, with their tertiary treatment plant. Instead we have primary treatment if any, with a promise of secondary treatment by 2015.

    We eat salmon from the Fraser River, but we would never drink the water they have to swim in. Go figure.

  • grahamlen

    2 years ago

    "salmon"

    if we should lose our salmon on the west coast, which I think is a very strong possibility we will also lose most of our local Orca population as they depend on Salmon as their main food source, we will lose all the coastal Black,Grizzly,Spirit Bears,
    all the coastal Wolf Sub specie, all of the Eagles, Ravens, Gulls, I could go on. Just think how devastating this will be, not just for us B.C.ers but for the whole world. how tragic

  • onemansopinion

    2 years ago

    Great conversation - where's the solution

    Some great points above in both article and comments - while all of these things may or may not contribute (and I agree they do) there is one key missing in all conversations.

    Yes - inquire away but why flush more dollars on reports instead of mitigating some factors and looking at solutions. Hooray to the post that noted the east coast devastation we are on the same freeway.

    Here's a novel thought - ban fishing for a year or more!! And I don't mean the province full of people who pay for the privilege to catch are release either.

    It blows me a way that our First Nations who are supposed to be stewards of nature stand next to their nets stretched across our rivers crying 'where's are salmon'.

    We are in trouble people let's work together for universal solutions not race divided ones. Where is reconciliation and working as one??? I - for one - hope we find it before we decimate our natural resources.

  • alive

    2 years ago

    Gimme gimme

    "Where is reconciliation and working as one??? "

    Working with the natives is a one-way street!
    They do for us what Quebec does for Canada.

    Sorry if that statement offends anyone, but I have been offended by this one-way attitude for a long time alreadyI

  • sicntired

    2 years ago

    At least we got back on topic

    I can remember when we used to have a really amazing fishery here.Guys would go out for a couple of months and make a whole years wages.What has happened is a crime against humanity and a total travesty.I remember when they(DFO)began buying back boats,restricting the area a boat could fish in and buying licenses,A,B,C.We used to go deer hunting right in the Harrison Valley and every little trickle of water was full of spawning salmon of one species or another.We used to talk about the "olden days"when there were salmon so thick you could walk across their backs(relax,it was just a saying).I used to catch sea run cutthroat across from the sulphur loading dock in Port Moody.Some ship dumped it's bunker oil one year and that killed all the clams and oysters and began a steady downward spiral.I know that,in spite of what some have said here,that the farms are killing salmon.That is beyond any dispute.How many and just exactly what is killing our salmon?The forest industry has admitted to causing it's share of the damage.I doubt that they've come clean any more than they've had to.There used to be fisheries officers everywhere you went that there were fish in this province.The last time I was asked to show my license it was by a bored mountie.Just after he left I stumbled onto a drift net stashed on the bank.If there's no one out there doing the enforcement and there isn't,there's another way that Ottawa shows us daily just how little they care about our salmon.If it's left to DFO and whoever is ruling in this country,we are truly screwed.I won't even attempt to justify the treasonous B.C.Liberals.

  • guystone

    2 years ago

    Rafe Mair

    Rafe wrote "If the NDP can combine the fish farm issue with the rape of rivers by the likes of General Electric"

    Even though the two have nothing to do with each other whatsover (how many run of the river projects did the Liberals approved that are now installed and have already affected the fish population? Possibly the NDP approved ones are affecting the fish?)

    Rafe is not an imbocile but manipulative. I want to be a reporter that can write any nonsense down and make alot of money as long as it has these words are said over and over again in an article:

    Big business
    Liberals
    Gordon Campbell
    Olymics (optional - forget that fact that the NDP started the olympics - that gets in the way of logic and common sense)

  • RickW

    2 years ago

    Does anyone remember in the movie "The Corporation"....

    ....where some CEO-type stated that everything should be owned? Well, it is difficult to own wild salmon, so the next best thing is to kill them off.
    And what better proof:
    http://thetyee.ca/News/2009/02/23/Waterways/

  • Orcinus Cedarbough

    2 years ago

    Mr/Dr. Alexander

    I would suggest that if you were to indeed put "the feet to the fire" on "those folks" at the David Suzuki Foundation, they would pick neither Salmon nor Zero Carbon. Rather they would remind us of our inherent ecological disposition denoting that we cannot reduce ecology in to its component parts to understand it - rather see it as a functioning system with emergent properties.
    Salmon is very much a keystone species in our carbon cycle.

  • ReeferMadness

    2 years ago

    Harper Calls Judicial Inquiry into Missing Salmon

    Sorry, Rafe. But I know you won't mind being wrong on this one. :) http://home.mytelus.com/telusen/portal/NewsChannel.aspx?ArticleID=news/capfeed/national/n1105125A.xml&CatID=National

  • Otis Krayola

    2 years ago

    Not so fast, Mr. Madness.

    What's to prevent using the inquiry as a way of stalling everything until the salmon have died completely? And all the while hiding behind the old excuse, 'It's before the courts'?

  • Otis Krayola

    2 years ago

    Don't give up the day job, guystone.

    Anybody that writes 'imbocile' in what isn't even a sentence hasn't a hope in hell of 'being a reporter', regardless of the catchwords he's memorized.

    Not that there ARE any reporters any more, anyway.

  • margot

    2 years ago

    sockeye "ranching"

    I only just became aware of the fish-farming proponents' campaign to blame everything on what they call "sockeye ranching". Tom Fletcher just wrote a column demonizing Alaska sockeye as the scourge of the sea as we now know it.

    Much of what he's saying seems to come from a burst of propaganda back in September 07, carried by certifiedorganic.ca and westcoaster.ca, in particular a piece by Vivian Krause. The germ of it is that hatcheries release too many sockeye smolts for the open sea to provide for...

    "B.C. farms about 22 million salmon while Alaska ranches 1.5 billion, 68 times as many. Ranched salmon are hatched in plastic trays, fed pellets and raised in net pens. Once released to ranch in the wild, ranched salmon consume more than 1 million metric tonnes of wild feed that is then not available for the truly wild salmon and other wild fish."

    Krause not only raises hell on this point, she claims huge amounts of grant money go to enviro groups who discredit fish farming, among whose numbers are those who promote poaching sockeye in the dishwasher. And other crazy stuff.

    If they are that greedy, they can't be believed, a favourite tactic of the late Dixie Lee Ray, an astounding old dragon whose galling and ridiculous pronouncements still make me smile.

    Whilo there may be a grain of truth to complaints about fish "ranching", where applied to trout, the kind dumped into lakes to enhance the fishing experience, I really doubt that Krause and Fletcher's accusations fit the sockeye situation.

    But I am no expert, and I would sure like to hear from one, weighing in with the proper details, such as sockeye diet versus what other salmon eat.

  • ReeferMadness

    2 years ago

    Mr. Madness??

    Mr. Madness was my father :) You can call me Reefer.

    I'm sure Harper and the Cons have some angle on this, Otis but they could have just swept it under the carpet. You can pop my bubble later.

    I would just appreciate some light being shone on the whole issue of where the salmon went.

  • KWD

    2 years ago

    margot

    I’m no expert but here’s my two bits …

    Sockeye feed on zooplankton … basically filter feeders. Although, I have caught returning adults on lures imitating bait fish. But, not being able to read “sockeye”, I wouldn’t hazard a guess as to why.

    Years ago the migration route of radio-tagged steelhead verified what everyone already knew, salmonids … from rivers and streams all along the west coast of NA … were found where there was the most feed: the north pacific.

    While it is true that not all salmon and steelhead migrate that far … some fish may spend their entire marine life fairly close to parent stream … it is also true that many local populations are at the point of collapse.

    In any event, the once-giant smorgasbord in the north pacific is not set up with designated feeding tables, identified by river of origin, it is first come first served. And available feed supplies are dwindling. The question is: Did the twenty-odd million Fraser sockeye suffer the same losses, proportionally, as the 1.5 billion ranched salmon? The math is easy; all we need are hard numbers. Maybe the inquiry will shed some light.

    Hatcheries are a problem regardless of rearing techniques. When it comes to saving wild salmon, fisheries management folk are powerless. They are bought and paid for by industry. Like so many federal and provincial gov’t departments, fisheries management is now little more than a make work project, kept alive by the need to keep folks off the street and out of trouble.

  • Orcinus Cedarbough

    2 years ago

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.