News

Province Has Chance to Make Your Medicine Cheaper

NDP’s Dix urges Clark government to seize opportunity to drive down price it pays for generic drugs.

By Andrew MacLeod, 28 Sep 2011, TheTyee.ca

Pharmaceuticals, pills

Lots of room to negotiate a better deal, says UBC researcher.

Related

The British Columbia government has an opportunity to renegotiate the price it pays for generic drugs, but has to provide notice that it intends to do so by Oct. 1.

A Health Ministry spokesperson couldn't say whether or not there are plans to take that opportunity, but New Democratic Party Leader Adrian Dix said they should.

"There appears to be an opportunity to open up the agreement again," said Dix. With the government running deficit budgets and services suffering, he said, the money is needed. "This isn't a time we should be overpaying for things."

In April 2010, The Tyee reported that B.C. planned to follow Ontario's lead on reducing the amount paid for generic drugs. Under Premier Dalton McGuinty, Ontario dropped the price it pays from 50 per cent of the brand name price to 25 per cent.

Generics are chemically the same as brand name drugs, but are sold much cheaper once patents for the brand name drugs expire. The price for generics is the same in Ontario as in Quebec, which has a law saying it will pay the lowest price for a drug that any other jurisdiction pays.

'Wrestled to the ceiling': Dix

Three months after Ontario's lead, British Columbia announced it had reached a deal to cut what it pays for generics to 35 per cent of the brand name price. Then health minister Kevin Falcon rightly claimed at the time to have saved money for the provincial Pharmacare program, other drug plans and people buying their own drugs.

The deal -- reached through negotiations with the B.C. Pharmacy Association and the Canadian Association of Chain Drug Stores -- reduced the price of generics to 40 per cent of brand name prices starting in July 2011, and to 35 per cent starting in April 2012.

But the government could have gone further then and now they have another chance, said Dix.

"They seem to have wrestled this one to the ceiling," he said. "Essentially, the British Columbia government signed a deal saying we'd pay 40 per cent more for generic drugs than they do in Ontario and Quebec. How does that make sense?

"There's an opportunity to renegotiate and save the taxpayers' money if they so choose," said Dix, who as Opposition leader is often pressed on how he would fund his party's ideas. "When people ask 'where would you find the money?' -- well this is where they're spending the money."

A spokesperson said the Health Ministry may have more to say soon. "These are complex commercial negotiations and we aren't prepared to speak to the specifics of our approach or next steps at this time but expect we'll have more to say in the coming days," Michelle Stewart said in an emailed statement.

Price already lowered: government spokesperson

"We remain firmly committed to achieving the savings outlined in the original agreement with respect to generic drugs," Stewart said, noting that the government negotiated a significantly lowered price.

There is plenty of room for B.C. to negotiate a better deal, said Michael Law, a pharmaceutical policy researcher with the Centre for Health Services and Policy Research at the University of British Columbia.

"In comparison to what other jurisdictions are getting in terms of prices, B.C. isn't getting the best deal it could," said Law. "Ontario set the bar and nobody's really matched that since.... There's good reason to think generic prices are too high in British Columbia."

The B.C. government will be paying about $50 million a year more for generic drugs than it would if it had negotiated the same price Ontario enjoys, he said. There would also be significant savings for private and union drug plans, he said.

But even at 25 per cent of the brand name price, the Ontario government is paying more than it likely has to for generic drugs, he added. Prices are even lower in other countries, including the United States and New Zealand, he said.

If B.C. was serious about saving money on generic drugs, the government could take competitive bids to see who can provide them at the lowest price. For some common drugs there are 10 or more manufacturers who could compete, he said.

Instead, the government now pays the pharmacies for the drugs, so any competition among suppliers leads to higher profits for the pharmacies, but not lower prices for Pharmacare or consumers, he said.

In 2008, B.C.'s Pharmaceutical Task Force recommended the province work on reducing the amount of money it spends on generic drugs. At the time, the panel's vice-chair, George Morfitt, told The Tyee the main problem appeared to be with the rebates generic companies give to pharmacies to provide one drug instead of another. "Nobody's quite sure how much money is going to whom and for what," he said.  [Tyee]

7  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • alive

    34 weeks ago

    Time for Dix to step up to the mike!

    Dix?
    I remember voting for him as leader, but that was the last I have heard of him.

    Maybe this is an issue where he can garner more than a few seconds on the news?

  • Luck

    34 weeks ago

    healthcare not Provincial Liberals

    YES WERE IS THE NDP ON THIS.

    THE LIBS HAVE DONE EVERYTHING TO CANNIBULIZE BC HEALTHCARE.

    ASK THE DOCTORS AND THE PEOPLE.

    COME ON NDP THIS IS YOUR BABY PLEASE DO NOT THROW OUT THIS OPPORTUNITY TO SHINE AND HELP BC BUILD RECOVERY.

  • Peter Dimitrov

    34 weeks ago

    Moxie

    Good stuff Adrian. Now, if Harper had moxie he would organize and federal-provincial conference so that collectively the Provinces & the Fed could negotiate a generic deal with Big Pharma, maybe even kick-start made in Canada generic manufacturing. That would bring both federal and provincial health costs down. Also, legislation to allow introduction of generics much faster than Big Pharma legislation currently on the books!

  • Frank Lee

    34 weeks ago

    Don't look to Dix

    I have met Dix about a dozen times and each time I walked away shaking my head about how somebody could be such a pure political animal, and be so completely warped by it.

    Yes of course, he should grasp at this straw, as well as the few extra dollars he can squeeze out of a corporate income tax hike (although the global trend is likely going to converge on a total fed plus prov corporate tax of not more than @20%, but that is a separate issue).

    The fact is that neither of those moves will garner more than a fraction of the revenue needed to pay for rising health care costs--to say nothing of NDP's other cost commitments.

    What should we do instead? Start by getting rid of both adrian dix and Christy Clark. Neither the Hollow Man nor the Shallow Woman have what it takes to really solve these problems.

  • sdgreen

    34 weeks ago

    Pharmacueticals National Issue

    It is my belief that the Federal Government should take on the responsible for negotiating bulk purchasing for all pharmacueticals on behalf of the Provinces. It really does not make too much sense for each Provinces to go their own way. One would think we would get a much better deal.

    Further, with one voice at the 'buy' table the federal government would have much greater clout.

  • BDD63

    34 weeks ago

    Rebates?

    At the time, the panel's vice-chair, George Morfitt, told The Tyee the main problem appeared to be with the rebates generic companies give to pharmacies to provide one drug instead of another.

    I thought the correct term was "kickbacks". Oh silly me. Kickbacks are illegal and "rebates" are just good business.

  • Fish-counter

    34 weeks ago

    I used to work in the pharmaceutical industry and...

    we had an industry joke that went:''Why does the government want us to have cheap drugs, anyway?"

    For the uninitated, or in case you missed the joke, we were wondering if the government WANTED people to drugged to the eyeballs so we wouldn't notice what a bunch of screw-ups they are.

    The unfunny part is that there are more people on antidepressants every year. Antibiotics are the only drugs that actually cure anything. The rest treat the disease, but seldom cure it. That is not a drug-company plot, but a reality.

    Depression is unique among the common ailments in that is almost entirely the product of our own manufacture. Cheap antidepressants may help us cope with misery without dealing with the root cause.

    Rather than applauding the government's munificence in obtaining cheap drugs, we should be trying to reduce our consumption. I know; easier said than done.

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.