News

A Tyee Series

Renegade Page Brigette DePape on Her New Series for Tyee

Where she's been since her 'Stop Harper' eye grabber, and where she's going.

By David Beers, 2 Sep 2011, TheTyee.ca

Brigette DePape, Toronto

Brigette DePape at Toronto G20 Redux protest on June 25. Photo: Toby Thain, Creative Commons licensed.

Related

Starting today, Brigette DePape will be sharing with Tyee readers her traveller's notebooks. And what an interesting journey she has embarked upon.

On June 3 of this year, as a 21-year-old page working in Canada's Parliament, DePape became a lightning rod for controversy by holding up a sign during the Throne Speech. The sign said "Stop Harper." That act got DePape booted from her job -- and onto the CBC and other venues to speak about the need for resistance at a moment when Stephen Harper's Conservatives had achieved, with their new majority, sweeping powers to change Canada.

Most mainstream media voices judged DePape harshly for violating her duties as a page and breaking the rules of Parliament. They scoffed at the idea her act might be effective. Though DePape was fired for her choice, some refused to see her as heroic, given that she didn't risk her personal safety, or even jail. Others praised her for strategically using the opportunity her position afforded, gaining visibility for a rallying cry that a single person could not have achieved through most other forms of protest.

DePape herself, appearing on The CBC television news show Power and Politics hosted by Evan Solomon, explained, "I decided to do this because Stephen Harper's agenda is destructive for people who are living in Canada as well as for my generation."

When Solomon pressed that it's "wonderful" for DePape to have a political view, but that she should have expressed it outside of Parliament rather than use her position as page as a "cover" for making her high profile protest, DePape replied, "Well, three-quarters of Canadians did not vote for Harper." She further explained, "I think we need to find creative ways to resist the Harper government. We are not going to stop Harper's agenda within the parliamentary system."

[You can watch that interview by clicking here.]

Taking Solomon and others up on their suggestion that the rogue page be afforded other opportunities for expressing her political ideas, I got in touch with Brigette DePape several weeks ago. She has agreed to bring Tyee readers up to speed on her latest travels and inquiries as they unfold, her personal investigation, she explained, into how political activism can effect change beyond the walls of Parliament.

Here are some thoughts DePape shared by email yesterday, as an accompaniment to her first dispatch, which runs today as our cover story.

What have you been doing since your attention grabbing moment in Parliament on June 3?

"I have been experiencing a new reality -- of people's movements, organizers and activists. It would be misleading to say that this is completely new to me. I have been curiously peeking into this world for a good part of my life, most recently at the G20, in Bolivia, and at the World Social Forum, and now I am happy to be more fully immersed in it.

"I've been working with Indigenous groups and climate justice groups to pressure the government to repay its historical and climate debt. As I do so, I am enjoying reflecting on the non-institutional means for creating change and writing about it.

"I've also been traveling through different parts of Canada to meet community organizers and activists. Folks have kindly welcomed me to stay on pullout beds in their homes. My favorite thing is to scan bookshelves to find books like A People's History of the United States by Howard Zinn and Listening to Grasshoppers: Field Notes on Democracy by Arundhati Roy. Books like these have become my textbooks.

What have you learned along the way?

"At university, I missed the class on social movements because it was full. Instead, I'm learning about them in another way, by joining them.

"Social movements play the critical role of making real solutions (ie. ending subsidies to oil companies) politically possible and throwing false solutions (ie. non-binding agreements) out the window. As I join with social movements, I see how this plays out on the ground.

"It is inspiring to meet the many people who have chosen to do this critical work. Though they are more than qualified, they have rejected high-paying and high profile jobs to work in solidarity on some of the most difficult and important struggles we face today.

"It is easy to understand why they have chosen this path. Not only is it the most important work that needs to be done, it is incredibly fulfilling.

"For a long time, I gave up on addressing fundamental problems like climate change. Though I cared deeply about them, I did not believe I could do anything about them, so I became disengaged. I am re-invigorated to meet with clear-eyed activists who are confronting real issues head on, despite the status quo and politicians failing to act.

"But activism is a full-time job that is extremely engrossing and challenging. As an older activist told me, given the trying nature of activism, it is important to keep a garden. By this he meant that we need to have a space for ourselves that is separate from political activism. This could mean tending to a physical garden, but for me, having not yet inherited my Mom's green thumb, this means dance parties in the kitchen with my roommates, reading and writing poetry, and spinning fire."

Any regrets about your actions on June 3?

"My only regret would be I wish I had not given up my sign 'Stop Harper' sign to the security guards. Imagine the money we could have gotten for grassroots struggles by auctioning it off!"

What would you say to critics who say those in power are pleased to see young people's political efforts poured into direct action, because it doesn't immediately threaten their hold on political power via the parties in Parliament?

"I think it's quite the opposite -- that those in power are dismayed to see young people's political efforts poured into direct action, precisely because it does threaten their hold on political power. This is the reason that the establishment and the mainstream media comes down so hard on young people when they take direct action. It's clear that we are not going to achieve change through the parliamentary system. Instead, we need to boldly choose to use street heat."

Why have you decided to write this series of dispatches for The Tyee?

"I am learning a lot through my journey and I want to share it with friends and readers in Canada. I see this as part of a dialogue. It is a way of communicating with others who are on a similar journey, as well as connecting with those who are on different paths."

What do you hope readers will take from this dialogue?

"There are a lot of misconceptions about activism and social movements in the mainstream discourse. In large part, this is because activism often challenges the concentrations of wealth and power that mainstream institutions function to maintain. As I begin to discover the power of social movements, I hope to dispel some of these myths. I hope that readers will think twice about non-institutional means for affecting change.

"I want to give an honest account of some of the challenges and barriers that arise for grassroots movements. I also want to convey some of the things that attracted me onto this path less traveled and which make joining with others to build a movement not only necessary, but truly irresistible."  [Tyee]

34  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • ron wilton

    38 weeks ago

    getting started

    The journey of a thousand miles, begins with the first step.

    Brigette has taken that step, and what a step it was.

    I hope she practices here in BC first.

  • realisticman

    38 weeks ago

    Jack Layton didn't think she was heroic

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n9oTSyiK360

  • Jeffrey J.

    38 weeks ago

    Canada's Sweetheart - Courage and Tenacity

    Many will recall the term 'Canada's sweetheart' which denoted Olympic champions Nancy Green and Barbara Ann Scott. This reflected their great courage and outstanding achievements at a very young age (admittedly, the term is dated).

    In 2011, we must turn to Ms. DePape to find the same level of courage and achievement at a young age..

    She is truly inspiring.

  • anarcho

    38 weeks ago

    Jack was good but not perfect.

    Realisticman, while Jack Layton can be seen as an inspiration, as compared to the psychopaths who rule us, not everything he did was necessarily progressive. He was a good man, but not a perfect man - and his flaws are revealed in both his attitude to Brigette and in his support for the war in Libya.

  • Amelia Bellamy-Royds

    38 weeks ago

    Worth considering other impacts of her actions

    It will be interesting to read Ms. DePape's perspectives. It's too bad she had to pull off that "Stop Harper" stunt in order to get people to listen to her.

    Not that there is anything wrong with making a public statement of criticism to interrupt a government ritual.

    But because -- by doing so in her position as page, rather than simply as a citizen -- she has likely provoked a change in hiring procedures for the page programs that will screen out anyone who has previously participated in anti-government activities.

    Ms. DePape may have given up on Parliamentary democracy. But other opinionated and politically active young people should still have the opportunities that she did.

  • Skywalker

    38 weeks ago

    Good for Depape.

    Layton, as any person elected to the House of Parliament is obligated to defend its traditions. Those traditions are really set to perpetuate a certain "respect" for the institution that few elected people reflect by their conduct and attitudes to the voter. Good on her for speaking out.

    Secondly, I watch Solomon less and less because he sounds more like the usual pundits on the hill and more like he is in favor of the status quo. Bring back Avi Lewis please at least he didn't sound so conservative.

    I expect we will see more of Depape in the years to come and that is reason for hope.

    .

  • G West

    38 weeks ago

    You're right anarcho

    Decorum can use a good kick in the nuts every now and then - Layton to the contrary.

  • happy

    38 weeks ago

    Lucky she's Canadian

    Psychopathic prime minister and all....
    Imagine if she's held up a "Stop Chavez" sign in that country. They too extract bitumen from tarsands.
    I can pretty much gaurantee we wouldn't be hearing about how she spent her summer vacation learning civil disobediance.
    In fact we wouldn't be hearing anything about her....period.

  • John Greg

    38 weeks ago

    happy ...

    Your point being?

  • realisticman

    38 weeks ago

    @GWest

    You could have searched for a different metaphor.

    Brigette is a classic baby champagne ecoist, her shtick is performance art. Her travels around the world must be lots of fun. She must be rich. Who pays for her carbon credits? Maybe she'll even meet a boy. She says she'd like to.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRU5lIus-Zg

  • happy

    38 weeks ago

    My point Greg

    was meant for the crowd around here that constantly bleets about how Canada is a police state run by a fascist dictator.
    Such drama! Where as in a real police state such as Venezuela...she would be silenced for what she did. I don't mean anything sinister - but she wouldn't be here critisizing the government or its leader.
    It would not be allowed.
    The Tyee would not be allowed in Venezuela. TV stations and newspapers have been shut down by Chavez because they offended him. Its an actual law in that country that you may not offend Chavez personally.
    Thats what you call a fascist police state.
    And thats who I would call a psychopath.

    (I can here it now...you fool happy. What do you think Harper is building prisons for. Be afraid.....)

  • G West

    38 weeks ago

    R/Man

    The point was - and you brought it up - that Layton thinks decorum is important.

    I don't really care who's doing the kicking - we've got too many hungry children and unemployed young people in this country (and this province) for anyone to be worried about 'decorum'.

    Layton was wrong, plain and simple, Ms DePape is actually doing something more significant than posting annoying anonymous comments to a mildly interesting small market news site.

    In fact, she doing something more important than most of the trained seals who squeal for their dinner in Ottawa.

    happy - I'd like to think young people won't LET stephen harper turn this country into a fascist state.

    Let me know what you think about his moral sentiments when you see his omnibus crime bill this fall.

  • Fiat lux

    38 weeks ago

    Propagandizing about how she

    Propagandizing about how she would have been treated in other countries shows that Canada still has a slight hope.

    I was sentenced to death by the nazis and to the gulags by the communists.

    So what ?

    Ms. De Pape`s act, and the fact that we have the Tyee and that the majority weren`t voting for, and many are standing up against the growing international,capitalist dictatorship, culminating with the election of Harper in this country, where I a "New Canadian" have been a registered voter since 1956, is still an example that there`s a chance for Canada to be at the leading edge
    for a movement to save the world and humanity from destruction and enslavement.

    I wouldn't want to live anywhere else and still hope to see the coming of the Age of Enlightenment, not only in Canada, but over the whole world.

    Ed Deak.

  • lindi6676

    38 weeks ago

    Propagandizing about how she

    As usual Ed great thought and insight to what is really culminating in this country. Its time to lift the blinders off the majority of Canadians, but most are still asleep or afraid. So it will take courageous souls like Ms Pape to lead others into the right direction, some will follow but many will resist. I too hope one day we will all reach the Age of Enlightenment, but its unfortunate that the majority of humanity is taking the most painful route when there truly is a simpler more joyous loving path to take.
    I think the biggest problem plaguing society is this tendency to see every solution as a War such as the war on cancer, drugs , etc etc. To overcome these challenges, society needs to drop the word War, as it carries neg energy. We must confront these problems not seen as the enemy, but as an opportunity to rise above them to help raise human consciousness.
    Since there is so much plaguing us, it can become very overwhelming to most, as it has for me at times. So my solution is to focus on what inspires oneself the most and be the change. Every small act will help move society towards enlightenment.
    Some will perform large acts and many will perform small, but all are very important in helping us move forward in this crazy yet perfect divine plan!

  • Jerry Munro

    38 weeks ago

    To The Critics of Brigette I...

    In news just released on CBC, official papers have been uncovered in Libya that show the CIA was in fact working with the Ghadaffi regime. For instance, they would send him their terror suspects, he would torture them, and provide the info back. The point being that we are dealing with a gangster conspiracy here (that like all thieves, can fall out nonetheless), and ALL actions are needed, useful and necessary to overcome this corporate mafioso global system.

    In the case of my friend samuidave's criticism of Brigitte in this series, with due respect again, I disagree with him some. (And with mopled.) In my view, we are at a place with corporate capitalism where near all "progressive" ideas roads and actions lead, in the final analysis, as time and events evolve here, where they will lead to having to challenge this anti-democratic and criminal system reality. The connecting problem they really all have in common is... capitalism.

    And this is equally true whether we are talking anti-war actions, issues of the women's movement, (and men's needs no less) challenging the system's poisoning of the planet and its natural and life sustaining systems, organizing the poor and mobilizing the working class to fightback, or struggling to bring into being a more truly democratic economic and political system order as can help move us beyond capitalism... finally. It may not always be seen and understood now, this essential unity of purpose taking shape, manifest in such as samuidave and mopled, but I suggest it will be more so, as all these movements come into being finally and evolve. There will tend to be a coming together. (One movement is not "necessarily" an example of "co-option", though such MAY be, but as likely part of the emerging whole, whether they or we realize it immediately or not.)

    It used to be said, that all roads led to Rome in those ancient times. We are again in a place and time, in my view, where "pretty much" all of the movement roads that are and will emerge out of "the people" lead to challenging the national and global status quo. And everyone and all that emerges from here on needs their own time and experience to come to realize this. None of us is the complete answer, in and of ourselves. We need each other.

    continued next post...

  • Jerry Munro

    38 weeks ago

    To The Critics of Brigitte II

    from previous post...

    Which is why the rightwingers like unrealisticman spend so much time trying to heap scorn and ridicule on the anti-Tar-sands Movement now happening here and in the US for example, the nascent movements of young radicals, students, intellectuals and workers. They sense the ultimate seriousness of what is happening here to their beloved capitalist system, and is about to happen, and the only response right now that they can think of or raise is, to attempt to hold it all up to ridicule. (Later they will get more serious, and be of greater threat... in my view.)

    The likes of unrealisticman and his pals right now though, are just troll voices bleating in their own particular kind of class political wilderness.

    Keep the faith, as they say Brigitte. And ye others such as samuidave and mopled, I urge you with full respect, mistake not your own cause as the only "true" cause... but see the whole and all its parts. In the end, the one will be strengthened and gather credibility and support from the other. We really do need each other.

  • Jerry Munro

    38 weeks ago

    A New Age of Enlightenment... Ed

    Hear, hear Ed. I agree entirely with your post above here.

    Let's all hope. And there is good reason for it because this country is not yet the US or any other place... I suppose it could change out of all recognition if the fascist voices had their way, but we are not there yet. And the best hope that we will never get there, is many, many more people committed to the country and the people... like Brigitte.

    To a New Age of Enlightenment indeed! And I hope I live long enough as well. :-) lol

  • anarcho

    38 weeks ago

    Nonsense About Chavez

    Someone has been drinking the right-wing kool aid. Nothing would happen to someone who opposes Chavez. Sectarian anarchists in that country have been publishing a paper hostile to Chavez for years and nothing happens. The bulk of the mass media is right wing.

  • Ed Seedhouse

    38 weeks ago

    Yes, we need

    Yes, we need extra-parliamentary action, and that young people are starting to realize this is wonderful. But it isn't going to change Canada by itself. It will help, but you also have to get out and vote and, more than that, join political parties and be active in them.

    Parliamentary action alone will not change society, nor will civil disobedience and protest alone. BOTH are needed. Protest away, and more power to you, but it isn't enough, you have to get involved in politics at the party level too. People who join parties get to vote twice in every election you know. Once to select a good candidate and once to put that candidate into office.

    So I applaud what you've done, but you need also to get involved in the political system and work for change their. The political system isn't going to go away, but one by one, activists like you joining parties and getting involved in elections can change that system to make it work.

  • RickW

    38 weeks ago

    R/M old man....

    Tommy Douglas was also an inspiration - and as many rightwingnut types do and did fall all over themselves to point out his erreant belief in eugenics, so you carry on that "great" tradition.

  • Jerry Munro

    38 weeks ago

    About Joining the Vanguard Party System

    "It will help, but you also have to get out and vote and, more than that, join political parties and be active in them." Ed Seedhouse.

    There is at least one, good reason why this appeal of adherents to the "working from within" "vanguard party system of capitalism" keeps falling on deaf ears. And why it is received with ever deepening cynicism, especially by the young (and some of us oldies). :-)

    In short, there is very good reason why I suggest that all the parties to capitalism and its Big Money manipulated democratic system are the one exception to "worthy movements" as I've described in my post above. (Which I suppose could change, as an extreme long shot. But is not apparent to me now.)

    This notion of working from within capitalism to transform capitalism has been around at least as long as I have. The result of which is, for all the tweaking and good intentions, and even the brief "hopeful" period of the postwar II Social Democratic State, now "corporate" capitalism is still with us, fundamentally unchanged. And the problems of inequality, poverty, war, and now dangerous environmental degradation, AND economic depression, keep coming back and back to haunt those of us in the working class. Nothing in these regards has seriously or for long changed, and what was is now being undone. (Save some for the intervention of trade unions... and even then only imperfectly and spotty. And even unions have been in retreat mode since the 70s.)

    The political system however, and all the vanguardist politicos it has spawned, corrupts, compromises and effectively co-opts all those and everything it sucks in or touches.

    But you all could change that, for yourselves and us. As this period continues to roll out and the economic and political crisis of capitalism near certainly deepens... demonstrate that you seriously can assist the transformational/peaceful revolutionary process, as the people do become extra-parliamentary engaged. Prove it to us. And if you do that in a truly serious way, assist rather than hinder and seek to side-track the coming struggle... there can and will indeed be an eventual meeting of the ways, and you a useful part of it.

    But again, you do have to prove it. Indeed, at least half the population, judging from the participation stats, and your declining membership rolls... are unconvinced.

    The vanguard party political processes of capitalism are already well established, and have been for a long, long time. Since the 1970s at least however, there has been and is a logjam... a case of severe political and democratic constipation. The stick of dynamite or the dose of Exlax that is really needed to get it all moving, favourable to the satisfaction and contentment of "the people", I suggest, is for them to leave you to your own parliamentary devices, and to build the people's movement as can scare the crap out of y'all. :-)

  • realisticman

    38 weeks ago

  • realisticman

    38 weeks ago

    Chomsky on Chavez

    Chomsky's letter
    "Judge María Lourdes Afiuni has suffered enough

    With this public letter I want to express my open support of the liberty of judge María Lourdes Afiuni, detained in Venezuela since December 2009. In November of last year I was informed of her situation by the Latin American initiative of the Carr Centre for human rights policy at Harvard University. Ever since, I have been directly involved in mediation efforts with the Venezuelan government, with the purpose of releasing her from prison through a gesture of clemency by President Chávez.

    Judge Afiuni had my sympathy and solidarity from the very beginning. The way she was detained, the inadequate conditions of her imprisonment, the degrading treatment she suffered in the Instituto Nacional de Orientación Femenina, the dramatic erosion of her health and the cruelty displayed against her, all duly documented, left me greatly worried about her physical and psychological wellbeing, as well as about her personal safety. ..."

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jul/03/noam-chomsky-hugo-chavez-democracy

  • Jerry Munro

    38 weeks ago

    Chomsky...

    "Chomsky on Chavez" unrealisticman.

    Uh, which has to do with what in this country, or being discussed here?

    Clearly, you are unaware of the state police riot at the G20, the use of illegal weapons by the Vancouver Police in the recent riot, or the pleas of those convicted of terrorism in the isolation unit of our prison system. Even if Chomsky is correct... and I don't know that, cruel and unusual punishment is not unique to Venezuala or this country. Check out the renditioning of so-called "terror SUSPECTS" to Libya for the deliberate purpose of "torture" by the CIA in the US, in order to circumvent US Law there.

    As much as "cruel and unusual" punishment is unjustified anywhere, including IF in Venezuala or on Guantanamo, or as was shamefully allowed by the Canadian government to Maher Arar in Syria. And as much as I respect Noam Chomsky.

  • Ed Seedhouse

    38 weeks ago

    Jerry: "This notion of

    Jerry: "This notion of working from within capitalism to transform capitalism has been around at least as long as I have. The result of which is, for all the tweaking and good intentions, and even the brief "hopeful" period of the postwar II Social Democratic State, now "corporate" capitalism is still with us, fundamentally unchanged. And the problems of inequality, poverty, war, and now dangerous environmental degradation, AND economic depression, keep coming back and back to haunt those of us in the working class."

    I do not "advocate working within capitalism" (though most people today have no other choice if they wish to make a living), but to work within the political system AS WELL as fighting (nonviolently) in the streets for change.

    There is nothing in the Canadian constitution or government precedents that mandates capitalism, socialism, or any other "ism".

    Now it takes at least two fingers to grasp anything, and likewise it will take reform of government and parliament on the one hand, and peaceful and effective protest on the other, working together to make real change in Canada. At the very least.

    We could make a start on parliament by deciding that we will kick the governing party out at every election unless they have done something for US. Yeah, we might get another bad government, but do it two or three times in sequential elections and even the politicians will get the point. That's something everyone can be involved in simply by voting one day in every four years. No matter how much you work on the streets you'll still have time for it.

    And it would be surprisingly easy for just a small crowd to take over just about any of the existing parties, because so few people belong to them and are active and go to meetings that a dozen or so people could pack the meetings and pass any motions they liked. That would force others who don't want their party to change into their own action and we could start to have an engaged electorate again.

    As for replacing capitalism, well you'll need something credible to replace markets with. Central planning didn't work out too well in the 20th century. I'm in favour of a mixture of both well regulated "free" markets and carefully watched governments. We need the both.

  • realisticman

    38 weeks ago

    Jerry

    Up the thread here.

    anarcho, "Nothing would happen to someone who opposes Chavez."

    It ain't necessarily so and even hard leftists are now saying so. As a realist I felt obliged to point that out.

  • happy

    38 weeks ago

    Chavez for prez!

    We're hijacking this thread pretty bad here and this is supposed to be about Ms DePape so this will be my final submission

    "Dozens of radio stations closed"

    http://uk.reuters.com/article/2009/09/05/venezuela-radio-idUKN0520744720090905

    "TV stations closed"

    http://uk.reuters.com/article/2009/09/05/venezuela-radio-idUKN0520744720090905

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/18/globovision-last-anti-cha_n_204646.html

  • Jerry Munro

    37 weeks ago

    Unrealisticman and Chavez...

    While I think, from the perspective of the Venezuelan "national interest" and that of its poor especially, that Chavez is certainly preferable to what was and served the US and "global corporate free market", not unlike Castro is at least a Cuban choice and responsibility to decide what to do with or not.... For myself, they have also great flaws as "party vanguardists", like dominate most other countries, including Canada. Neither of these men, or anyone like them, nor their approach to progressive or working class politics, is what I would want to see for Canada. (Venezuela is still a "capitalist" country... and Cuba, from my perspective, is too repeating the old Soviet model history they have too long emulated, is as well about to return to Capitalism (if State controlled as in, for example, China.)

    All that said, Venezuela is certainly AS democratic as this country, with as credible or "absent of credibility" an electoral system. With which I leave it to the Venezuelan people to eventually decide their choices.

    We have our own particular set of problems commensurate with our advanced stage of corporate capitalism development... and its ruling class "over influence" on our democratic system. Additionally, we have our own "national interest and development" problem with the declining US Empire as well... which we will have to deal with in our own way.

    I, and I suspect my comrade anarcho, are not here to make apologies for Chavez. He is more "your" problem apparently, which you merely attempt to foist off onto us, as though it is we who are invested in him. I, at least, certainly am not. Even though I admire him in many ways, for the ways in which he has dared to stand up to the US Empire, while our own ruling and political class has chosen to kiss its ass and fondle its jewels. (To say nothing of surrender up our own national "oil need" interest to it AND the global market.)

  • jimorsheryl

    37 weeks ago

    It will be interesting to see.....

    how insightful this young woman actually is. Being opposed is one thing but offering up a truly viable alternative to the mess we are in, is quite another.
    I will be pleasantly surprised in Brigette has the answers, as heaven knows, no one else seems to. That includes, Presidents, Prime Ministers and Kings ..... and oh yes journalists and bloggers.....

  • Dahlia

    37 weeks ago

    I made up a bumper sticker

    Which reads "Brigette for PM". She sounds more intelligent than many we have had. Amazingly mature for her age!

    She is actually right about activism outside of the political system. Many of us who joined politics as Mel Hurtig started his National Party, and then upon its demise tried again with CAP were disappointed with the party system. New ideas (parties) don't seem to be welcome in that process.

    So activists who want to save Canada have to turn to pressuring the governments via citizen coalitions, and direct action. It seems to be more effective. "The price of democracy is eternal vigilance", as Jefferson wrote so long ago! That means your vigilance and mine!

  • snert

    37 weeks ago

    You have to stop this Jerry Munro

    Quote:
    The likes of unrealisticman and his pals right now though, are just troll voices bleating in their own particular kind of class political wilderness.

    This is Canada and people are entitled to opinions other than yours. As far as I know there is no policy at the Tyee that says everyone must agree with you, if not they are a trolls. That's troll speak if I ever saw it.

  • igbymac

    37 weeks ago

    Ed Seedhouse

    "Now it takes at least two fingers to grasp anything, and likewise it will take reform of government and parliament on the one hand, and peaceful and effective protest on the other, working together to make real change in Canada. At the very least."

    People are free to abandon the peaceful and effective protest model you suggest, Ed Seedhouse, when the state proves it is not positively responsive to such forms of democracy.

    The entrenched ownership of politics today is beyond our control though plenty of learned people still cling haplessly to the romantic notion that change is on its way if only we keep playing by the rules.

    The problem is, the rules are designed and implemented and enforced from above. When we can see we have been robbed blind and have nothing left, that we have now have nothing left to lose, the people will rise up and do what they must. Until then, the abuses continue.

  • John Greg

    37 weeks ago

    jimorsheryl ...

    Not having answers does not render dissent moot.

    Yes, it would be lovely and wonderful if Brigitte or anyone had some practical answers to get us out of the mess we are in, both globally, and locally. But it is a supremely complex set of multiple and often conflicting issues for which any set of answers would almost certainly be equally complex, and would almost certainly have to come from a vey wide range of sources.

    Your comment, in a sense, tries to minimize and diminish the size, the complexity, and the seriousness of our various problems by implying that a single unifying answer should (could?) be forthcoming from a single dissentor ... and that does no one any good.

  • Frank

    37 weeks ago

    jimorsheryl

    Answers? Lots of people put forward solutions. The problem is people don't want answers, they want excuses.

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.