News

If Big Quake Hits, Key Ministries Won't Be Ready: Audit

Province's emergency planning and reaction skills slammed by internal report.

By Andrew MacLeod, 28 Jan 2010, TheTyee.ca

earthquake-damage.jpg

Scene from Anchorage, Alaska's 1964 'big one.'

Related

An audit of provincial government ministries found just one that was highly prepared to continue its work after a major emergency such as an earthquake. The auditors found nine ministries were moderately prepared and nine more scored "low" marks.

And when the auditors took a close look at eight offices considered "mission critical" for the government -- including the ambulance dispatch centre, highways maintenance, the provincial emergency program and the provincial treasury -- what they found was dismal.

"Overall, we found there was a low level of compliance with core policy requirements, guidelines for developing and maintaining [Business Continuity Plans] were not consistently followed, and pandemic plans, although considered, have not yet been integrated."

The Internal Audit and Advisory Services report, "Report on the Cross Government Review of Business Continuity Management," based on fieldwork done between Oct. 2006, and March 2007, was quietly posted to the finance ministry's website in 2009.

A call to the ministry of public safety and solicitor general, which is responsible for emergency planning, to ask what steps may have been taken since the audit was not returned by publication time.

A little over two weeks ago a 7.0-magnitude earthquake leveled Port au Prince, Haiti, killing tens of thousands of people and crippling the Caribbean country's government. While British Columbia premier Gordon Campbell suggests the use of wood will help the province's buildings withstand a similar sized tremor and media reports consider the population's readiness for the big one, the audit report provides sobering reading.

Ministries lack plans

The 71-page report ranked 19 ministries on the "maturity" of their business continuity plans, the plans for how they will carry on after a major emergency.

The plans are needed, as the report puts it, "to [help] ensure the availability of government services, programs and operations, including all resources involved, and the timely resumption of services in the event of a major failure, emergency or disaster."

Only the ministry of small business and revenue as it was then called rated "high" for its planning. The nine ministries with the least developed plans included forests, environment, education, advanced education, children and family development, aboriginal relations, agriculture and lands, tourism and citizens' services.

The province had no government-wide plan to carry on its functions and "the business continuity coordination centre may not be adequately resourced to ensure an effective and efficient recovery effort across government."

That lack of planning means British Columbians shouldn't count on a quick return to normal, they found. "There is a significant risk to the continuity of key B.C. Government services in the event of a major emergency or wide area event."

The government website, by the way, warns that British Columbians should be prepared to look after themselves for at least 72 hours and as long as a week after a major disaster.

QUESTIONS ABOUT EMERGENCY HQ

It took the British Columbia government eight years to find headquarters for the Provincial Emergency Program that would withstand an earthquake.

Finance ministry officials raised the concern in their 2006 audit of the provincial government's emergency preparedness and noted action should have been taken sooner. "A consultant's June 2000 report stated that the PEP Victoria headquarters were not adequately seismic resistant," noted the audit report released in 2009. "This has not been addressed; it remains a significant concern."

A government spokesperson said PEP moved offices in November, 2008, to a building that meets modern seismic standards in an industrial area north of Victoria. He did not have an immediate answer for why it took eight years from the consultant's report to the actual move.

The audit report suggested moving PEP in with the province's back-up computer system, as well as with the cabinet and central co-ordination group. "[This] would ensure physical proximity in the event of transportation or communication disruption," they found, "but could be counterproductive, since all decision makers would be in one location. This needs to be carefully considered in planning any new premises."

PEP is now housed on its own, the spokesperson said.

— A.M.

The auditors did note that after they did their field work, the government transferred management of some key areas to the newly created Emergency Management B.C. in April, 2007, bringing together emergency planning, the fire commissioner and the coroner service.

Lack of commitment

The authors of the report identified several "significant barriers" to improving ministry planning. The barriers included "minimal corporate commitment" in some ministries. The auditors found a "lack of dedicated resources" in some cases and in some there were "resources not sufficiently classified to have the right amount of influence."

It was unclear, they found, how much time it takes to plan how to continue work after an emergency, and there was "a shortage of trained staff within the ministries that possess the specific skills required to effectively analyse risks and business impacts, and facilitate the ongoing development and exercising of business continuity plans."

They made 30 recommendations for how ministries could improve their planning.

Even when the auditors turned their attention to eight areas considered "mission critical" for the government, as noted above, they found a lack of preparation. The areas included the provincial emergency program, the ambulance dispatch centre and others considered essential during an emergency.

This makes little sense in a geography prone to earthquakes, they found. "The high risk of earthquakes and tsunamis on the west coast require a wide scale emergency approach to business continuity planning," they wrote. "However, four plans did not consider wider-scale emergencies within their recovery strategies."

The plans for each office included alternate sites to use in case their normal headquarters can not be used. But in five of the eight cases the plans picked sites "within a close proximity" to their normal offices. In an event like an earthquake, if the head office was knocked out, the alternate site likely would be too.

Or as the report puts it: "Current literature on business continuity strategy suggests that alternate sites should be as far away as necessary from the principal operating site so as to avoid being subject to the same set of risks."

Resources, staff needed

A second audit report, "Report on Emergency Management Preparedness and Response," also quietly posted to the finance ministry's website last year and based on 2007 field work, found the "overall maturity of provincial emergency management through PEP is classified at the upper end of the medium range."

The authors argued for maintaining the staff and resources needed to deal with emergencies, even when everything is running smoothly. They recommended developing a human resources strategy to recruit, retain and train staff and volunteers in emergency management. Otherwise, they said, "both management and operation of the program will become increasingly difficult."

Many of the people responsible for emergency readiness are close to retirement, they noted. "The lead time necessary to train people for some roles means that the criticality of the issue could arrive very soon."

The auditors made their recommendations, keep in mind, at a time when the government's finances were healthy. It has since fallen into deficit spending and has been cutting jobs and looking for places to save money.

The auditors credited work done in the late 1990s that was done with a "strong strategic direction" and said establishing the EMBC in 2007 was an important step.

Much emergency response happens at the regional level, they found, co-ordinated by local governments. Ninety per cent of emergencies are handled locally, with the province stepping in during major events like floods, forest fires or earthquakes.

Municipalities with a "pro-active council, the tax base to support the required planning, prevention, and mitigation activities, and the vision to work with other communities in an integrated approach to emergency management" are relatively well prepared, they wrote.

"At the low end of the spectrum are non pro-active communities -- and others -- that have less comprehensive plans," they found. "Smaller communities must often rely on volunteer staff."

The authors noted that the Provincial Emergency Program does not formally review local government programs and plans or make sure they meet standards. "Training to necessary response levels is not mandatory," they noted. "There is no provincial training strategy, nor a database to identify gaps or needs."

Nor does the PEP make an effort to measure the effectiveness of its public education programs or the public understanding of what the government will be responsible for in an emergency. They write, "This could lead to unrealistic public expectations of incident response."

That means anyone who is watching Haitians dig out from their Jan. 12 earthquake and is telling themselves it would likely be different here, may well be mistaken.  [Tyee]

36  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • crankypants

    2 years ago

    This is no great surprise

    In case of a disaster our politicians would do what they always do well, worry about themselves and their kin.

    It will be left to each and every one of us to fend for ourselves as best we can.

  • Dan the socialist

    2 years ago

    Are the people even ready

    Are the people even ready either? It would be total chaos if a big one happened here.

    I guess it could happen any time but they keep saying we are over due but overdue in terms of the earth could be now or in 3000 years from now...

  • snert

    2 years ago

    The people aren't paid to be ready

    Quote:
    Are the people even ready either?

  • Grania

    2 years ago

    Earthquake Readiness

    Here in the Alberni Valley; we have one road in and out. We are sitting ducks in case of any emergency like a forest fire, quake, tsunami....and all levels of government...from city councils to provincial Campbell and Boys to federal and Harper...are woefully inadequate. We cannot look to any of these self serving folks for solutions of any kind!

  • doggone

    2 years ago

    Get started now

    There are some information resources available:
    http://www.getprepared.gc.ca/knw/ris/index-eng.aspx

    I would expect that most people would have to rely on local resources - themselves, neighbours, friends and family.
    One of the first systems to fail would likely be communications: electrical power,telephone,cellphone and computer links.
    Might as well assume you are "on your own" with what you have in your pockets at the time.
    Watching the aftermath of the Haiti event shortly after reporting began I asked myself: "What would I do?"
    Unfortunately no clear plan presented itself - who knows how one might fare - each of us could well be one of the casualties needing aid.
    It is still worthwhile to at least inform yourself and think about these issues. Matches, Batteries, candles, flashlight, radio and water first.
    Food and first aid
    later

  • freebear

    2 years ago

    Its not going to happen to me......

    That is why I bought a condo on the 16th floor......

    The 'not going to happen' attitude is necessary otherwise who would invest in an earthquake zone?

    As long as your not injured, you should be able to hang on for a few days without your internet of video games!

  • ReeferMadness

    2 years ago

    Living in denial

    Another excellent story by Andrew MacLeod. This item just confirms what I've come to believe about the Provincial Emergency Program. The PEP is a joke. It's a cover story so that after the big one hits, the government can say "We did the best we could". The senior level of government have downloaded responsibility to the municipalities and the municipalities don't have the resources. So we get the same old crap. Store extra food and water. How that will help if that extra food and water is buried (along with you) under your home is never addressed.

    Emergency coordinators used to advise you have enough food and water to last 72 hours - they've recently upped that to a week. In Haiti, people are dying for no other reason than it took help too long to arrive. We can expect the same here.

    Storing extra food and water is fine but everyone knows that very few people do it. And there are things that need to be done that require resources. Hardened infrastructure. More research into earthquake-resistant building design. House inspectors that are qualified to advise on earthquake risks. Building codes that reflect the reality of where we live.

    Governments don't want to spend the money to be prepared. Individuals often can't afford the thousands or tens of thousands it would take to secure their homes - and that's assuming there was some consensus over how to secure the homes in the first place. Renters have no good way to assess the safety of the places they rent - and very little choice to go elsewhere.

    Literally, a disaster waiting to happen.

  • UrbanWorkbench

    2 years ago

    Spending Priorities

    So this is another facet of BC government spending that has seen budget cuts in the face of the Olympics?

    Good timely reporting on this issue, Kudos to Andrew.

  • Sask Resident

    2 years ago

    Don't Worry BC

    BC shouldn't worry too much, Alberta would be over quickly to help the province and their relatives out.

    If Haiti was part of the Dominican Republic, aid would have arrived more quickly because they would still have a functioning government. If the disaster occurs in BC, or Manitoba, the federal government and adjoining provincial governments would provide assistance.

    The best thing BC could do is proper building codes, slope stability analysis, tsunami warning (provided by the USGS) and keeping people out of the flood plains.

  • doggone

    2 years ago

    Maybe a "grab and go" bag

    No, emergency supplies won't do you any good if you or they are badly crushed. If you do get through the event in a large piece some of the following list could come in very handy:
    http://gohsep.la.gov/factsheets/disasterkit.htm

  • ReeferMadness

    2 years ago

    Disaster waiting to happen

    When (not if) the big one hits, I wonder how many schools will be left standing. The seismic upgrades are moving at a glacial pace. And even for those that have been upgraded, can you really make a 100 year old brick structure survive a major earthquake?

    If legislature is in session, we may have no elected provincial governance. The legislature building is likely to collapse. A lot of people might make jokes about that but I think it's a serious issue. There would be a constitutional crisis. Perhaps the Federal Government would step in until an election could be held?

  • Name

    2 years ago

    Pray your kids aren't in school...

    Most British Columbians still don't get that their lovely old neighbourhood schools will be the most deadly places to get caught in an earthquake.

    Despite the Premier's pre-election promise in 2005 to seismically upgrade all BC's schools in 15 years, the province has to date failed to fix more than 2-3% of the 800-odd schools rated as likely to collapse. To simulate progress, they also shifted attention from fixing the most serious (and costly to fix) to the least risky schools.

    Then the clowns at Vancouver's heritage commission got into the act and are now trying to block seismic upgrades that were finally approved by the district, the province and all school stakeholders, in order to preserve "heritage" buildings that are nothing more than 100-year old stacks of unreinforced masonry blocks waiting to topple.

    It's not just government, though - we could all take simple and affordable steps to make our own homes safer and to prepare ourselves to cope unaided in the aftermath, if we could just get over the dellusion that natural disasters only happen to far-away third world countries. Katrina should have put that myth to rest once and for all.

  • Name

    2 years ago

    ..and no, don't expect help from Alberta

    ...if key bridges into the lower mainland or routes over the Rockeies are damaged, we're truly on our own. Remember that our airport is build on mud that is expected to liquify along with many communities built in the delta areas.

    South of the Fraser, you could probably count on help arriving overland from Washington State, but I wouldn't count on much more. Canadian Forces would have to mobilize all the way from Edmonton now as well, so don't hold your breath.

    And if you're just worried about losing Internet and cell phone coverage, you've obviously never tried to live a day in a densely populated community with no running water or sanitation.

  • ReeferMadness

    2 years ago

    Outside help

    Edmonton & Calgary are 12 hours from Vancouver by road, assuming it's the summer. In the winter, who knows. As you point out, the highways will likely be impassable anyway. Lose a couple of overpasses on the TransCanada and nobody's going anywhere. I'd forgotten about Vancouver's airport being built on silt - nice planning. Anyone south of the Deas tunnel - good luck. Anyone in the Deas tunnel is out of luck.

    I wouldn't count on help from Washington STate. They may have their own earthquake emergency.

    Victoria may still have a functioning airport but could be otherwise isolated. Ferry infrastructure is vulnerable as is CFB Esquimault.

  • ReeferMadness

    2 years ago

    Urban search and rescue

    Given where we live, BC should be among the world leaders in developing search and rescue expertise. Yet, the Vancouver "elite" search and rescue squad was recently downsized. Further, Canada has not sent any SAR teams into Haiti. Reportedly, part of the reason that Vancouver's team didn't go was that they needed to train for the Olympics.

    http://www.examiner.com/x-34336-Vancouver-Nonpartisan-Examiner~y2010m1d14-Vancouver-Elite-Urban-Search-and-Rescue-Unit-not-going-to-Haiti

  • cboo44

    2 years ago

    Reality Sucks for Urban BC

    "....the government can say "We did the best we could"

    The reality is that populated municipalities demand and get the major funding for emergency preparedness infrastructure, leaving the rest of BC void of any. So, when the walls and buildings and bridges come-a-tumbling down, killing all responders, WHO is left to come and help? The units in the interior towns and cities that have NOTHING.
    The Lower Mainland and Victoria are citizens should maybe remember that, the next time they demand "action". Try not to be so myopic.

  • The Blackbird

    2 years ago

    Still?

    Back in 1987, when I was in my first year of post-secondary studies, I took a 100-level political science course called Canadian Social Legislation. Each student had to select one Provincial Act to write a term paper on. I chose the Emergency Preparedness Act. My approach was to determine whether players involved in emergency readiness and response were well enough coordinated to deal with a massive geophysical disaster, like an earthquake or tsunami, in an effective manner.

    I conducted telephone and in-person interviews with the relevant personnel in various levels of the BC bureaucracy, first responder agencies, hospitals, social service agencies and charitable organizations.

    What I discovered was almost no coordination among those involved. In fact, my nosing around for answers appeared to have inspire them to start working on the problem because in the weeks following my interviews, stories began appearing in our local dailies about the effort to bring greater cohesion to the system.

    23 years later, and with an Olympic Games on our doorstep, it appears not much has changed.

  • alive

    2 years ago

    plans with flaws

    most municipalities and cities have designated emergency routes, the problem is that once the quake happens it will be every man for himself.
    Nobody are going to worry about"silly laws" if they spot a route out of the disaster area.
    I doubt that a few cops will be able to herd the panicky crowd.
    This is indeed every man for himself country, just watch how they vote, they do not give a shit about anyone but themselves.

  • ReeferMadness

    2 years ago

    What major funding??

    In Greater Victoria, emergency planning is split amongst the 13 fiefdoms. The search and rescue teams are made up of volunteers.

    How many people in Kamloops or Fort St. John are going to volunteer for SAR, knowing that the earthquake is going to be nowhere near their homes? And how are they going to get the search and rescue teams in after the earthquake?

  • brg61

    2 years ago

    Gov't should start now.

    I was impressed with the province and local officials in their management of wild fires in 2009. They were fast and most importantly they knew in advance where the risk was highest. Communication was much improved over the 2004 devastating fire season.
    The right lessons were learned in '04 when we were forced to react. Last summer the government was prepared and lives and property were saved.
    The cost of developing an emergency strategy ahead of the disaster we know will hit, is much less than reacting after the fact.
    Government showed us they can get the job done; why waste time in preparing to deal with an earthquake?

  • cboo44

    2 years ago

    More "Reality"

    "How many people in Kamloops or Fort St. John are going to volunteer for SAR, knowing that the earthquake is going to be nowhere near their homes? And how are they going to get the search and rescue teams in after the earthquake?"

    Self-centred urban myopics very well illustrated. ALL SAR units in the province are "volunteers". These rural SAR groups volunteer to help OTHERS, not themselves! How are they going to get in? Rural volunteers already have 4X4s, almost ALL of them. They also have boats and ATVs. By the way, the vast majority of helicopters are sitting in the interior, also. It is the coast that will be most affected, NOT the interior.
    You see, interior SAR units are actually committed to what they do, on hot summer days and in -30 blizzards.

  • Fii

    2 years ago

    We can't compare what

    We can't compare what happened in Haiti damage-wise with what would happen here. Certainly not if an earthquake of equal magnitude occurred. My first reaction was "Wow- they must have had some seriously BAD infrastructure to begin with", because it was a 7.0 and brought the country to its knees.

    I was living in Taiwan in 1999 when a 7.6 hit, the second largest in the history of an island plagued by earthquakes. It threw me out of bed and across the room. Though I wasn't living in the epicentre the days following were very stressful due to aftershocks (we also slept outside in parks for a few nights) but the situation following was far different from that in Haiti. Some people even went to work the next day!

    I don't think every school, hospital and grocery store would crumble here, leaving us desperate and fighting each other and days away from starvation. There would be no reason to leave Vancouver, our infrastructure is solid and help would arrive from other parts of Canada in hours.

    Even in Taiwan, at 7.6, the buildings that fell were proven afterward to have been shoddily-built and could have withstood the quake if they had been up to code.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/921_earthquake

  • Fii

    2 years ago

    Oh, and one more thing

    DO NOT underestimate your dog (or cat's?) ability to sense an earthquake. My dog was only a yr old at the time of the Taiwan quake, and had been acting odd all day. He was motionless most of the day, staring at me and refusing to eat. I remember being quite worried by his behaviour and deciding to take him to the vet the next day.
    The earthquake hit that night.

  • RickOshea

    2 years ago

    Canada – US Civil Assistance Plan (CAP)

    If the Big One hits -- like Haiti, you will have thousands of American soldiers and Blackwater Xe contractors materialize in the midst of the rubble to do what they do..

    All that thanks to the Canada – US Civil Assistance Plan (CAP) Harper signed with the USA.

    I doubt very much their primary objective is to help the victims -- it's all about protecting American corporate assets/peronnel and access to strategic resources (energy).

  • ReeferMadness

    2 years ago

    Can't compare

    Fii - I'm well aware that the extent of the damage in Haiti was related to the extensive use of adobe and unreinforced concrete. I'm also aware, however, that we are sitting in a subduction zone and could see Richter values in excess of 9. The Northridge earthquake in 1994 was 6.7 on the richter scale. It did $20 billion worth of damage and took out chunks of the California freeway. Over 8700 people were injured. Don't be complacent.

    I'm not sure the basis for you claim that help will arrive from the ROC "within hours". I do know that the Saanich Emergency Program is advising people to be prepared to go 7 days without assistance. http://tinyurl.com/yksqb3o Maybe you know something they don't?

    cboo44 - You seem to want to have an argument with somebody over urban vs rural funding. Take it somwhere else. I think it's great you have SAR teams and when the time comes we'll take all the help we can get. But the reality is the first help will come from local people and teams. And that's why we need local SAR teams who can be on the ground in the first few hours.

  • RickW

    2 years ago

    Name

    Quote:
    Despite the Premier's pre-election promise in 2005 to seismically upgrade all BC's schools in 15 years

    He is - in his own sort of way. He's closing them down, so the little tykes won;t be at school when the big one hits.......

  • driftwolf

    2 years ago

    bad advice

    The last advice from the government that I saw about disaster prep was to store water and food... in your basement. Which, of course, is the first thing that becomes inaccessible during floods, earthquakes, or other disasters.

    I haven't paid much attention to government pronouncements since that time. My "disaster" kit is NOT in my basement, of course. Still looking for my off-grid back-country survival property though.

  • Fii

    2 years ago

    Reefer Madness??

    Where did I say this:
    "I'm not sure the basis for you claim that help will arrive from the ROC "within hours". ???

    I said other parts of Canada. I'm far less complacent than the average Canadian, trust me. I believe our infrastructure is basically sound (though I'm not saying codes are all up to par- how would I know?) and the best we can hope for is that Canadians would pull together and do the best they can for their neighbours. Most Cdns would be mobilized to organized action. I mean let's face it, if there is one thing Cdns are good at it's organizing. Our society (in relation to others) is organized to the point of being almost ridiculous.

    Yes, a 9.0 would have a very bad effect- but you know what, we are all far, far more likely to die in car accidents in the next few days than in an earthquake at any point in time.

  • avebury

    2 years ago

    Emergency Response

    I'm a certified Emergency Social Service Director by the feds for disaster reponse...the cuts to the Provincial Emergency Program is a real problem in BC. We used to run training events annually with community organizations that will be critical to local survival. Thats all gone. Costa Rica has a higher standard of building code than Canada, and I contribute regularly to their civilian emergency training program. Thats gone in BC. I've been in and responded to several major earthquakes around the world and BC is not prepared. Our colleague referenced a good "get prepared" website so, and the Red Cross has similar.

  • ReeferMadness

    2 years ago

    Fii

    ROC = rest of Canada.

    The best we can hope for is that our political leaders will start being honest with us in terms of the true state of our infrastructure, in terms of whether our building codes are really adequate for where we live, in terms of an honest cost vs risk discussion regarding preparedness. I'd rather be in a position where my family and I came through the earthquake in one piece and have to hunker down for a week than have somebody there the next day to dig my body out of the rubble.

  • ReeferMadness

    2 years ago

    Emergency Response

    avebury, how are our building codes inferior to those in Costa Rica? I've tried researching how well our building will stand up to earthquakes and can't get anywhere.

    I live in a house built in the 40s. It seems pretty solid but I wonder how it would hold up. Any advice?

  • doggone

    2 years ago

    Depends

    Your house is very likely just fine.
    I've built numerous houses to code on Vancouver Island and I am seriously hoping they stand.
    Quite often I fit concrete to rock (which is a bit of a pain) and some juresdictions require us to pin the footings to the rock - whatever - we know damn well if the shake goes above about 7 and local and shallow we are -----------(enter your favourite expletive)

  • RickW

    2 years ago

    ReeferMadness....

    Quote:
    in terms of whether our building codes are really adequate for where we live

    They might well be -- but if the builders cut corners and the inspectors "turn a blind eye" (I refer to the ongoing -- and very low-key -- leaky condo farce going on under our noses) all the adequate building codes in the world won't help.

    Contractors that cheat and inspectors that don't catch their "shortcuts" ought to be jailed.

  • Fii

    2 years ago

    Reefer :)

    Ah, I see... I read it as "Republic of China", which is what Taiwan is referred to as- Taiwan, ROC. haha

  • ME2

    2 years ago

    Yes RickOshea, our Big Brother will be ready with help

    There have been lots of reports of US takeover of disaster relief in Haiti in the news recently, such as assuming total control of the airports, inefficiently distributing other nation’s relief supplies (Medicine Sans Frontiers being one such critic). I had put it down to typical Yankee arrogance until I read the article linked below, with the mention of 20,000 US troops, the embassy size, the well-known US ouster of the Socialistic Aristides, the heretofore unmentioned existence of minerals – other than oil – and so on

    THE FATEFUL GEOLOGICAL PRIZE CALLED HAITI

    http://www.rense.com/general89/fat.htm

    quote
    “A US military occupation of Haiti under the guise of earthquake disaster 'relief' would give Washington and private business interests tied to it a geopolitical prize of the first order. Prior to the January 12 quake, the US Embassy in Port-au-Prince was the fifth largest US embassy in the world, comparable to its embassies in such geopolitically strategic places as Berlin and Beijing. With huge new oil finds off Cuba being exploited by Russian companies, with clear indications that Haiti contains similar vast untapped oil as well as gold, copper, uranium and iridium, with Hugo Chavez' Venezuela as a neighbor to the south of Haiti, a return of Aristide or any popular leader committed to developing the resources for the people of Haiti, -- the poorest nation in the Americas -- would constitute a devastating blow to the world's sole Superpower”

    Will the so-called “Free World” stand up to the US just this once? I wonder.

  • ME2

    2 years ago

    Apology.....but

    My apologies to the other posters here for de-railing this thread.

    I waited, hoping Mr Beers would come up over the weekend with a columnist who might address the rapidly growing problem of the US intervention in Haiti, and since none appeared, I posted the above.

    The Americans are engaged in legitimising their installation of an overt puppet gov't for Haiti, and IMO, we shouldn't let them get away with it without a fight. Here's their rationale:

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/31/AR2010013102725.html?hpid%3Dtopnews&sub=AR >

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.